TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE Book Reviews 457 rational, efficient leadership. He clearly prefers citizen-led “townscape ” development but finds ours, since 1930, an “Age of Illusions,” where persistent social problems are obscured, common standards are few, and power brokers’ values dominate. Without fundamental change in the socioeconomic order, constructions of the past fifty years will not soon be undone. The value of this heavily illustrated book lies in the author’s inte grating visible forms with underlying causes to show their cumulative effect on urban landscapes. He borrows freely and perceptively from scholars who have examined individual topics in detail, adding his observations of cities in Great Britain and North America and a few elsewhere. Relph writes with grace and wit (“[Frederick] Taylor was not a relaxed individual” [p. 94]). No one since Lewis Mumford has done a better job of integrating secondary literature and firsthand observations to produce fresh insights about modern city appearances. There are a few shortcomings, but none are serious. Most notably, as the author acknowledges, restricting the study to mostly Englishspeaking cities compromises what can be claimed about urban land scapes worldwide. Nevertheless, Relph is an astute observer. He has written an excellent general book and a solid critique, just the thing for readers who want to know why cities look as they do and how our sometimes flashy yet generally narrow uses of architecture, planning, technology, and cultural circumstance create mean human habitats. John Hancock Dr. Hancock is professor of urban design and planning at the University of Wash ington. He writes on urban and planning history, most recently on New Deal planning in the 1930s. Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia. By Robert Fishman. New York: Basic Books, 1987. Pp. xii + 241; illustrations, notes, index. $19.95. Historians have followed America’s population from the colonial frontier to grimy industrial cities and on to suburbia’s winding streets and culs-de-sac. In Bourgeois Utopias, Robert Fishman traces this in tellectual progression to what he sees as its next stop, which is not the post—World War II suburbanization of America recently described by Kenneth Jackson (Crabgrass Frontier, 1985) but the end of suburbia and the rise of “technoburbs” clustered in “technocities” dominated by superhighway corridors and held together by an “invisible web of advanced technology and telecommunication.” Bourgeois Utopias’ focus is not on suburbia’s social and economic characteristics but on the concept of suburbia as something created by the yearnings of the Anglo-American middle class for a close-knit, stable, homogeneous community where the family is safe from urban corruption and restored to harmony with nature. The physical man 458 Book Reviews TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE ifestation of these utopian yearnings is a “distinctive low density en vironment defined by the primacy of the single family house set in the greenery of an open parklike setting.” It is Fishman’s conclusion that suburbia’s evolution reached its de nouement with the emergence of metropolitan Los Angeles. There the city was turned inside out and, instead of the downtown core, suburbs became the defining characteristic. The mass transit system was replaced by a reliance on private cars and freeways. The prevailing structural element became the single-family detached home, and the dominant land use feature was the residential lot. For a time there existed in Los Angeles a harmony among urban, rural, and suburban environments, but in the post—World War II period the disappearance of open space and increasingly congested highways upset the balance. Further, the democratization of suburban areas and the reintegration of middle-class women into the work force revealed a paradox between the suburban ideal and reality. With sin gle-family houses available to more and more people and new industry, offices, and shopping facilities springing up on the urban periphery, suburbs were no longer an exclusive zone of residence between city and country. As a result, Fishman argues, greater Los Angeles has become a new type of city. Nonhomogeneous technoburbs—each large enough to be a viable socioeconomic unit, with their boundaries defined by the limits of driving convenience—have beenjoined together by the high way grid into a multicentered technocity with weakened bonds to the...