Cisplatin In Patients Research Articles

Conversion chemoradiotherapy combined with nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with locally advanced borderline-resectable or unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phasei/ii prospective cohort study.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin as the regimen of conversional chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in locally advanced borderline resectable or unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients with locally advanced ESCC (cT3‑4, Nany, M0‑1, M1 was limited to lymph node metastasis in the supraclavicular area) were enrolled. All the patients received the cCRT of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin. After the cCRT, those resectable patients received esophagectomy; those unresectable patients continued to receive the definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). The locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), pathological complete response (pCR), R0resection rate, adverse events (AEs) and postoperative complications were calculated. 45patients with ESCC treated from October 2019 to May 2021 were finally included. The median follow-up time was 30.3 months. The LRC, OS, EFS, DMFS at 1and 2years were 81.5%, 86.6%, 64.3%, 73.2 and 72.4%, 68.8%, 44.8%, 52.7% respectively. 21patients (46.7%) received conversional chemoradiotherapy plus surgery (cCRT+S). The pCR rate and R0resection rate were 47.6 and 84.0%. The LRC rate at 1and 2years were 95.0%, 87.1% in cCRT+Spatitents and 69.3%, 58.7% in dCRT patients respectively (HR, 5.14; 95%CI, 1.10-23.94; P = 0.021). The toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were tolerated, and the most common grade3-4 toxicitiy was radiation esophagitis (15.6%). The most common postoperative complication was pleural effusion (38.1%) and no grade ≥ IIIb complications were observed. nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin are safe as the regimen of conversional chemoradiotherapy of ESCC.

Split-Dose Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BackgroundGemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is a highly active and commonly used regimen in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). With GC, cisplatin is dosed at 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle; however, for many patients, impaired renal or cardiac function, neuropathy, or poor performance status (PS) can preclude the use of cisplatin. A promising alternative is split-dose GC, in which the cisplatin dose is divided over 2 days. MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) to better understand treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness and safety of split-dose GC vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCa), GC, and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC). ResultsAmong 120 identified studies, 16 studies representing 1,767 patients included split-dose GC. Common reasons for choosing split-dose GC were impaired renal function, age > 70 years, comorbidities, and physician preference. Split-dose GC had objective response rates (ORRs) of 39%-80%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.5-9.9 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 8.5-18.1 months. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 5%-38%. In the NMA, ORR with split-dose GC was significantly higher than with GCa. PFS and OS for split-dose GC were similar to that observed with the other regimens (GCa, GC, and MVAC). ConclusionsThis is the first SLR and NMA of split-dose GC in la/mUC. Despite heterogeneity in the limited studies included, split-dose GC demonstrated comparable effectiveness and safety profile to those seen with other regimens. Split-dose GC thus has the potential to extend the la/mUC population eligible to receive cisplatin-based regimens and warrants further prospective study.

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: A large real-life worldwide population

BackgroundThe TOPAZ-1 phase III trial showed a survival benefit with durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). To understand this combination's real-world efficacy and tolerability, we conducted a global multicenter retrospective analysis of its first-line treatment outcomes. MethodsWe included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin at 39 sites in 11 countries (Europe, the United States, and Asia). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results666 patients were enrolled. Median OS was 15.1 months and median PFS was 8.2 months. The investigator-assessed overall response rate was 32.7 %, with stable disease in 45.2 % of patients. High baseline CEA levels, ECOG PS > 0, metastatic disease, and NLR > 3 were associated with poor survival. Any grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 92.9 % of patients (grade >2: 46.6 %). Immune-related AEs (irAEs) occurred in 20.0 % (grade >2: 2.5 %). Three deaths (0.5 %) were deemed treatment-related, none linked to immunotherapy. Common irAEs were rash (8.2 % all grades; 0.3 % grade >2), itching (10.3 % all grades; 0.2 % grade >2), and hypothyroidism (5.1 % all grades; 0.3 % grade >2). Durvalumab discontinuation rate due to AEs was 1.5 %.ESMO-recommended genes were analyzed and no outcome differences were found. A comparative analysis with a historical cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy alone confirmed the positive survival impact of durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine. ConclusionThis first global real-world analysis largely confirmed the TOPAZ-1 findings, supporting gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab as a first-line standard of care for patients with advanced BTC.

A hypoxia-derived gene signature to suggest cisplatin-based therapeutic responses in patients with cervical cancer

Cervical cancer remains a significant global public health concern, often exhibits cisplatin resistance in clinical settings. Hypoxia, a characteristic of cervical cancer, substantially contributes to cisplatin resistance. To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin in patients with cervical cancer and to identify potential effective drugs against cisplatin resistance, we established a hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1)-related risk score (HRRS) model using clinical data from patients treated with cisplatin. Cox and LASSO regression analyses were used to stratify patient risks and prognosis. Through qRT-PCR, we validated nine potential prognostic HIF-1 genes that successfully predict cisplatin responsiveness in patients and cell lines. Subsequently, we identified fostamatinib, an FDA-approved spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as a promising drug for targeting the HRRS-high group. We observed a positive correlation between the IC50 values of fostamatinib and HRRS in cervical cancer cell lines. Moreover, fostamatinib exhibited potent anticancer effects on high HRRS groups in vitro and in vivo. In summary, we developed a hypoxia-related gene signature that suggests cisplatin response prediction in cervical cancer and identified fostamatinib as a potential novel treatment approach for resistant cases.

Phase II study of neoadjuvant durvalumab and tremelimumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma that is borderline resectable or resectable with high risk for recurrence.

TPS4198 Background: Finding effective and tolerable neoadjuvant treatment to downstage borderline resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) could increase the rate of R0 resections and significantly improve patient outcomes. The combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab based on the TOPAZ-1 trial is now the preferred first-line regimen for advanced, unresectable biliary tract cancer (1). The objective response rate (ORR) was 26.7% for the 3-drug regimen. Gemcitabine, cisplatin, durvalumab, and tremelimumab (an anti-CTLA4 antibody) in advanced, unresectable biliary tract cancer had an objective response rate of 70% in a phase II study (2). Given this response to immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, the 4-drug combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin, durvalumab, plus tremelimumab in the neoadjuvant setting may be able to improve the conversion rate of borderline resectable ICC to resectable ICC and improve R0 resection rates. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase II safety and feasibility study of neoadjuvant gemcitabine + cisplatin + durvalumab + tremelimumab in patients with ICC that is borderline resectable or resectable with a high risk of recurrence. 24 patients will receive 3-week cycles of durvalumab 1500 mg on D1, tremelimumab 300 mg only on C1D1, gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 on D1 and D8, and cisplatin 25mg/m2 on D1 and D8. Treatment will be stopped after C4 if a patient is able to proceed with surgery, otherwise they will complete 8 cycles and be re-evaluated for surgery at that point. Key eligibility criteria include no prior systemic therapy, histologically proved ICC, ECOG 0-1, and disease that is not readily suitable for resection with curative intent based on discussion with multidisciplinary committee including a hepatobiliary surgeon. Primary endpoints are feasibility and safety with secondary endpoints of overall survival, progression free survival, ORR, R0 resection rate, and pathologic complete response. Molecular biomarkers from blood to predict outcomes and organoid development from circulating tumor cells are exploratory endpoints. The study will be carried out in 2 stages. In stage 1, 11 patients will be accrued and the study will be stopped if 2 or fewer patients undergo resection based on a null hypothesis of a resection rate after neoadjuvant treatment of about 24%. Otherwise, 17 more patients will be accrued in stage 2 (assuming 15% dropout rate to hit target of 24) and if 9 or more of the 24 patients undergo resection, we will claim the treatment is feasible. The design has a type 1 error rate of 0.1 and power 0.8. Patient follow-up will be up to 3 years. The study is currently enrolling participants. 1. Oh et al. NEJM Evid 2022. 2. Oh et al. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT06017297 .

Cadonilimab in combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (BicureX): A phase II, single-arm clinical trial.

e16158 Background: PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment has been proven to be effective in improving the prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. However, there is still considerable demand for further improvement of BTC patients’ prognosis. This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4, a bi-specific antibody) plus gemcitabine and cisplatin for patients with advanced BTC in first -line treatment. Methods: In this phase II, single-arm trial, we will enroll 65 patients with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic BTC, including intrahepatic or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC/ECC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Participants received Cadonilimab (10 mg/kg, days 1, every three weeks) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8, Q3W), and cisplatin (25 mg/m2, days 1, 8, Q3W) for up to eight cycles, followed by Cadonilimab (10 mg/kg, days 1, Q3W) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment response was evaluated with image-based assessment according to response evaluation criteria insolid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. by two experienced experts and further explored multiple methods, such as 3D visualisation and Spectral computed tomography Scan. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints are disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory endpoints included associations between response, molecular characteristics, and the immune microenvironment. Results: Between June 30, and January 31, 2024, a total of 30 patients have undergone at least one imaging evaluation. 66.7% of these patients were diagnosed with ICC, 23.3% with GBC, and 10% with ECC. The mean age was 58.4 years, and 60% of the patients were male. 24 (80%) patients had metastasis. Among them, 1 (3.3%) patient acheived complete response (CR), 15 (50%) patients had partial response (PR) and 8 (26.7%) patients presented with stable disease (SD). The ORR was 53.3% and the DCR was 80%. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade were rash (80%) and anaemia (76.7%). Grade 3 TRAEs were observed in 66.7% of the patients. The most frequent grade 3 TRAEs were anaemia (33.3%), and leukocytopenia (33.3%). No grade 4 or 5 events were observed. All patients were microsatellite stable (MSS), and the median TMB was 2.88 (0-109.44) Muts/Mb. Conclusions: Cadonilimab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin shown a promising efficacy and acceptable safety profile as first-line treatment for advanced BTC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05978609 .

Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Biliary Tract Cancer: a Real-World Retrospective, Multicenter Study.

The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit with the anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). The present study investigated for the first time the impact on survival of adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine compared with cisplatin/gemcitabine in a real-world setting. The analyzed population included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine or with cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. The impact of adding durvalumab to chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was investigated with univariate and multivariate analysis. Overall, 563 patients were included in the analysis: 213 received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, 350 received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. At the univariate analysis, the addition of durvalumab was found to have an impact on survival, with a median OS of 14.8 months versus 11.2 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.80, p = 0.0002] in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab compared to those who received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. At the univariate analysis for PFS, the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine demonstrated a survival impact, with a median PFS of 8.3 months and 6.0 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47-0.70, p < 0.0001) in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab and cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, respectively. The multivariate analysis confirmed that adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS, with patients > 70 years old and those affected by locally advanced disease experiencing the highest survival benefit. Finally, an exploratory analysis of prognostic factors was performed in the cohort of patients who received durvalumab: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and disease stage were to be independent prognostic factors in terms of OS. The interaction test highlighted NLR ≤ 3, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) = 0, and locally advanced disease as positive predictive factors for OS on cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. In line with the results of the TOPAZ-1 trial, adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine has been confirmed to confer a survival benefit in terms of OS and PFS in a real-world setting of patients with advanced BTC.

Tislelizumab in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for lymph node‐positive bladder cancer: Results of a prospective study.

619 Background: Although multiple single-arm clinical trials have shown promising pathologic complete response (pCR) rates with neoadjuvant ICIs combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in MIBC, lymph node‐positive bladder cancer is generally excluded. In this study, our specific aim was to compare the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with lymph node‐positive bladder cancer. Methods: In this investigator-initiated study, eligible patients had cT2-T4 N+ M0 MIBC, cisplatin-eligible, and to be planned radical cystectomy (RC). Patients received tislelizumab 200 mg in day 8 (D8), cisplatin 70 mg/m2 D2-4, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 D1 and D8 every 21 days for 3 or 4 cycles. RC was performed within 6 weeks after last dose treatment. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0). Secondary endpoints included pathologic downstaging (&lt;ypT2), EFS, OS and safety. Results: A total of 15 pts were enrolled,14 pts (2 cT2, 7 cT3, 5 cT4) have completed neoadjuvant therapy and underwent RC. One patient declined surgery for personal reasons and received further systemic therapy. In 14 pts evaluable for efficacy, the investigator-assessed confirmed clinical complete response was 21.4% (3/14). Final pathologic results showed that 5 pts (50%) achieved pCR (ypT0N0), 4 ypT1, and 5 ypT2/T3, and 9 patients (&lt;ypT2N0,64.2%) had staging downgrades, with no patients experiencing progression. A complete nodal response (pN0) occurred in 11 (78.5%) pts after tislelizumab +chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 8.9 months, with one death due to multiple metastases and the remaining patients showing no signs of recurrence or metastasis. Median EFS and OS was not reached. Most common neoadjuvant therapy-related AEs of any grade were hematologic toxicities (11/14,78.5%), nausea (9/14,64.2%), vomiting (8/14,57.1%). Grade ≥3 neoadjuvant therapy-related AEs were neutropenia (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), anemia (n = 2). One patient discontinued tislelizumab due to AEs. Conclusions: The combination of tislelizumab and gemcitabine/cisplatin is clinically active with a manageable safety profile as a neoadjuvant therapy for lymph node‐positive bladder cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04570410 .

Application of artificial intelligence (AI) features of nuclear morphology from BLASST-1 (Bladder Cancer Signal Seeking Trial) of nivolumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in patients with MIBC undergoing cystectomy.

674 Background: BLASST-1 is a multi-center phase II trial evaluating neoadjuvant nivolumab (N) with gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) for patients (pts) with MIBC undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) (NCT03294304). 41 pts with MIBC (cT2-T4a, N≤1, M0) were enrolled between Feb 2018 and June 2019; (cT2N0 90%, cT3N0 7%, cT4N1 3%). Pts received C (70mg/m2) IV on D1, G (1000mg/m2) on D1, D8, and N (360 mg) IV on D8 every 21 days for 4 cycles followed by RC within 8 wks. The primary endpoint was pathologic downstaging (PaR; ≤pT1N0). Safety, Relapse-free survival (RFS), Progression-free survival (PFS) and biomarker analyses were secondary endpoints. PaR rate was 65.8%, the pCR (≤pT is N0) rate was 49% and there were no safety concerns or delays to RC. Morphometric characteristics of the cell nucleus can be used to assess bladder cancer grading and gain insights into cellular functionalities. In this study, we sought to evaluate the ability of the AI model to identify non-responders to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. in the BLASST-1 cohort based on computerized image features of nuclear morphology and architecture on pre-treatment transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) tissues. Methods: Of the 41 pts, we had H&amp;E images available for 34 pts, of which 23 had PaR and 11 did not have PaR and these were classified as responder (R) and non-responder (NR) groups. A machine learning model (U-net) was developed and invoked for tumor segmentation on the H&amp;E images from the BLASST-1 cohort. A second machine learning model (HoVer-Net) was employed to segment and classify individual nuclei. A total of 408 features relating to the textural and spatial arrangement of individual cancer nuclei were extracted. The 17 most significant features, identified through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, were used to train a Cox regression model to predict the risk of death using 361 MIBC pts from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). This Cox model was then applied to assign a risk score to pts in BLASST-1, using a threshold learned from TCGA pts, the individual pts in BLASST-1 were assigned as either low-risk or high-risk. Results: The top identified prognostic features described the textural appearance of individual nuclei with more texture. This model accurately predicted PaR in BLASST-1, with an area under a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83. Overall, the pts with the same nuclear angle direction within the tumor tissue had a high chance of response to the neoadjuvant chemo-IO combination in the BLASST-1 trial. Conclusions: A computerized AI model relying on nuclear morphologic and architecture features demonstrated prognostic capability in MIBC within the TCGA dataset and predictive capability for the PaR in the BLASST-1 trial. These findings support further validation studies.

PROOF 301: Results of an early discontinued randomized phase 3 trial of the oral FGFR inhibitor infigratinib vs. gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with an FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement.

516 Background: Infigratinib (BGJ398), an oral inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-3 with demonstrated clinical activity and a manageable adverse event profile in a phase 2 study in patients with previously treated, unresectable or metastatic CCA with an FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement, represented one of the few targeted treatment options after progression on first-line therapy, as per FDA conditional approval. The confirmatory phase III trial PROOF 301 of infigratinib versus gem/cis as frontline treatment of FGFR2 Gene Fusions/Translocations CCA was early discontinued. Here we report the efficacy and safety in the patients accrued prior to termination. Methods: Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to infigratinib 125 mg on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle vs intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) + cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), confirmed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), investigator determined PFS, overall response rate (ORR), best overall response (BOR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), and safety and tolerability. Crossover to the investigational arm was permitted at progression. Results: Over 40 months, a total of 1127 patients were pre-screened at 120 sites and 48 enrolled. In a 2:1 randomization, 29 patients received infigratinib and 19 received gem/cis. Upon progression, 2 patients crossed over from gem/cis to infigratinib. Median PFS (95% CI) by BICR was 7.4 (5.4, not evaluable [NE]) and 8.0 (3.4, NE) months with infigratinib and chemotherapy, respectively. The ORRs by BICR were 37.9 % with infigratinib and 15.8 % with gem/cis. Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 79.3% and 58.8% patients treated with infigratinib and chemotherapy. Conclusions: Infigratinib showed a preliminary signal of efficacy in the first-line treatment of FGFR2-rearranged CCA, but due to early termination of the study, the power is insufficient to draw conclusions regarding its efficacy in comparison to gem/cis. This study highlights the challenge of performing confirmatory studies in biomarker-selected subpopulations of rare tumors and the importance of exploring alternative approaches to delivering confirmatory data for regulatory purposes. Clinical trial information: NCT03773302 .

The role of durvalumab in the treatment of biliary tract tumors

Malignant biliary tract tumors are highly aggressive, with a 5-year survival rate in advanced disease 2–7%. During last decade therapeutic options for treatment biliary cancer were extremely limited. The unchanged standard of first-line therapy since 2010, based on ABC-02 trial, has been GemCis combination. The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial for the first time for last 12 years reported a survival benefit with the antiprogrammed death cell ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer, achieving a median survival of 12.9 months (11.6–14.1) compared to 11.3 months (10.1–12.5) in the placebo group (RR 0.76 [0.64–0.91]). The objective response rate was 26.7% in the durvaulmab group compared with 18.7% in the placebo group. Median of overall survival is highly dependent on the best antitumor response achieved, with patients in the durvalumab group with a partial/complete response having a median survival of 19.5 months (95% CI: 15.7–28.3), with stable disease 13.6 months (95% CI: 12.2–14.7), and with progression disease 5.7 months (95% CI: 3.6–8.9). This article describes the features of the tumor microenvironment and immunogenicity of cholangiocarcinomas, provides studies of the early phases of immunotherapy with durvalumab and tremelimumabm, and provides a detailed analysis of the key study TOPAZ-1. In addition, we describe a clinical case that demonstrates long-term disease of advanced cholagiocarcinoma due to impact of significant advances in the modern treatment of cholangiocarcinoma with the introduction of immunotherapy with durvalumab, targeted therapy and the use of a new technique of local radioembolization.

Preliminary Open-Labeled Study to Examine the Effect of Cilastatin on the Pharmacokinetics of Cisplatin in Patients with Lung Cancer Undergoing Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy

Preliminary Open-Labeled Study to Examine the Effect of Cilastatin on the Pharmacokinetics of Cisplatin in Patients with Lung Cancer Undergoing Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy

A Randomized Controlled Phase Ⅱ Study of Nab-Paclitaxel vs. Paclitaxel plus Cisplatin in Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of concomitant chemoradiotherapy with nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study (NCT04284215) is a prospective, phase II, randomized controlled study, and the patients are enrolled in a ratio of 1:1 in the study with patients treat-naïve locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer.in comparison with paclitaxel plus cisplatin, the regimen of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin was use in the treatment of DT:69 Gy/46f.Nab-paclitaxel 40mg/m2/week (4-6 weeks in total) and cisplatin 75mg/m2 for 2 cycles. paclitaxel 175mg/m2 d1, cisplatin 75mg/m2 for 2 cycles. The primary endpoints are ORR and treatment-induced toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and the secondary endpoints are PFS and OS. A total of 68 patients (1:1) were randomized from March 3, 2019 to August 23, 2021.Sixty-five patients received concomitant chemoradiotherapy according to the study protocol, including 32 patients in the nab-paclitaxel group and 33 patients in the paclitaxel group. There was no significant difference in ORR between the two groups (84.4% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.411).There was no difference in median PFS between the two groups (14 months (95% CI 14.60-22.93) vs. 12 months (95% CI 13.15-22.74), P = 0.521).The incidence of grade III-IV leukopenia and neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting and other toxic and adverse reactions in the nab-paclitaxel group were significantly lower than those in the paclitaxel group (P<0.006, P<0.000, 0.016, 0.021, 0.019) CONCLUSION: Compared with paclitaxel plus cisplatin regimen, the combination of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin regimen has no significant difference in ORR and PFS, but significantly reduces the incidence of grade III-IV granulocytopenia and gastrointestinal reactions.

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term follow-up results of a phase II randomized controlled trial

BackgroundDefinitive radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy has been a standard treatment for esophagus patients who are unfit to undergo surgery. However, there are a variety of concurrent chemotherapy regimens with varying efficacy. In this phase II prospective study, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of DP (docetaxel and cisplatin) and PF (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) regimens with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and analyzed the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). We also summarized the salvage treatments and late toxicities.MethodsWe enrolled 86 patients with clinical stage II-IVA from the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The patients were divided into two groups: PF group (41) and DP group (45). Statistics were analyzed using SPSS version 19.0.ResultsThe 5-year OS rates were 62.9% ± 7.6% in PF group, and 52.7% ± 7.5% in DP group (P = 0.131), respectively. The 5-year PFS rates were 43.9% ± 7.8% for PF group, and 40.0% ± 7.3% for DP group (P = 0.398), respectively. Sixteen patients in the DP group and thirteen in the PF group received salvage treatment. For those patients with local residual or local recurrent disease, the median survival time after salvage treatment was 13.5 months and the 1, 2, and 3-year survival rates were 79.0%, 50.3%, and 43.1%, respectively. For all patients, thirteen (15.1%) had Grade 2 late cardiac toxicities. One patient had Grade 2 pleural effusion and required diuretic. Most patients with pneumonia are mild, and only one patient in PF group had Grade 2 pneumonia. One patient in the DP group developed tracheoesophageal fistula.ConclusionsThe 5-year follow-up confirmed that definitive CCRT with the DP regimen did not improve the treatment response, OS, or PFS in patients with ESCC compared to the PF regimen. The PF regimen remains the standard regimen for definitive CCRT for patients with locally advanced ESCC. Long-term follow-up also suggested that appropriate and active salvage treatment has a survival benefit for some patients, and late cardiopulmonary toxicities should be noticed during follow-up.Trial registrationThe trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT 02969473, October 2010).

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: An early exploratory analysis of real-world data.

The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit with the anti-programmed death cell ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of this new standard treatment in a real-world setting. The analysed population included patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the biliary tract treated with durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin at 17 Italian centres. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), whereas secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) by baseline characteristics were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. From February 2022 to November 2022, 145 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 8.5 months (95% CI: 7.9-13.6), the median PFS was 8.9 months (95% CI: 7.4-11.7). Median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI: 10.9-12.9). The investigator-assessed confirmed ORR was 34.5%, and the disease control rate was 87.6%. Any grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 137 patients (94.5%). Grades 3-4 AEs occurred in 51 patients (35.2%). The rate of immune-mediated AEs (imAEs) was 22.7%. Grades 3-4 imAEs occurred in 2.1% of the patients. In univariate analysis, non-viral aetiology, ECOG PS >0 and NLR ≥3 correlated with shorter PFS. The results reported in this first real-world analysis mostly confirmed the results achieved in the TOPAZ-1 trial in terms of PFS, ORR and safety.

Multicenter Phase II Trial of Lenvatinib plus Hepatic Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Cisplatin for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: LEOPARD

Introduction: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with cisplatin and lenvatinib exhibits strong antitumor effects against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Higher antitumor activity is expected for the combination treatment. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in combination with HAIC using cisplatin in patients with advanced HCC. Methods: In this multicenter, open-labeled, single-arm, phase II trial, patients with advanced HCC categorized as Child-Pugh class A with no prior history of systemic therapy were enrolled. Patients received lenvatinib plus HAIC with cisplatin (lenvatinib: 12 mg once daily for patients ≥60 kg, 8 mg once daily for patients <60 kg; HAIC with cisplatin: 65 mg/m2, day 1, every 4–6 weeks, maximum of six cycles). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed using modified RECIST by the Independent Review Committee. The secondary endpoints were the ORR assessed using RECIST v1.1, progression-free survival, overall survival, and frequency of adverse events associated with the treatment. Results: A total of 36 patients were enrolled between September 2018 and March 2020. In the 34 evaluable patients, the ORR assessed by the Independent Review Committee using modified RECIST and RECIST v1.1 were 64.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46.5–80.3%) and 45.7% (95% CI: 28.8–63.4%), respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.1–7.9 months) and 17.2 months (95% CI: 10.9 – not available, months), respectively. The main grade 3–4 adverse events were increased aspartate aminotransferase (34%), leukopenia (22%), increased alanine aminotransferase (19%), and hypertension (11%). Conclusion: Lenvatinib plus HAIC with cisplatin yielded a favorable ORR and overall survival and was well tolerated in patients with advanced HCC. Further evaluation of this regimen in a phase III trial is warranted.

A phase I study of the Wee1 kinase inhibitor adavosertib (AZD1775) in combination with chemoradiation in cervical, upper vaginal, and uterine cancers

ObjectiveWee1 kinase is a crucial regulator of the G2/M checkpoint which prevents entry of damaged DNA into mitosis. Adavosertib (AZD1775), a selective inhibitor of Wee1, induces G2 escape and increases...

A Phase Ib Study of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) in Combination with Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy and Weekly Cisplatin for Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (DECISION Study): The Early Safety and Efficacy Results.

We conducted a phase Ib study to examine the safety of a combination of carbon-ion RT (CIRT) with durvalumab (MEDI4736; AstraZeneca) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. This was an open-label, single-arm study with a modified 3 + 3 design. Patients with newly diagnosed histologically proven locally advanced cervical cancer were enrolled. All patients received 74.4 Gy of CIRT in 20 fractions and concurrent weekly cisplatin (chemo-CIRT) at a dose of 40 mg/m2. Durvalumab was administered (1500 mg/body) at weeks two and six. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs), including dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). All three enrolled patients completed the treatment without interruption. One patient developed hypothyroidism after treatment and was determined to be an SAE. No other SAEs were observed. The patient recovered after levothyroxine sodium hydrate treatment. None of the AEs, including hypothyroidism, were associated with DLT in the present study. All three patients achieved complete responses within the CIRT region concerning treatment efficacy. This phase 1b trial demonstrates the safety of combining chemo-CIRT and durvalumab for locally advanced cervical cancer in the early phase. Further research is required as only three patients were included in this study.

#4934 HYPERTHERMIC INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY WITH CISPLATIN INCREASES THE RISK OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL INTRAPERITONEAL CISPLATIN

Abstract Background and Aims Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin is increasingly used for the treatment of ovarian and peritoneal cancer. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication after cisplatin containing HIPEC therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and severity of AKI and renal survival after HIPEC compared to repeated cycles of conventional high-dose intraperitoneal cisplatin in patients with ovarian and malignant peritoneal cancer. Method We conducted a retrospective study that included patients with ovarian cancer that received repeated cycles of high-dose intraperitoneal cisplatin and patients with ovarian and primary malignant peritoneal cancer that received HIPEC with cisplatin in our center between August 2006 and September 2022. Demographic and perioperative data were compared between both groups. We compared the incidence of AKI defined as a rise in serum creatinine by ≥ 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours (KDIGO criteria), the severity of AKI defined as stages I, II and III using the KDIGO staging, the rate of kidney function recovery and need for renal replacement therapy in both groups. We performed logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for experiencing AKI and conducted survival analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses to detect independent risk factors for patient survival. Results The study included 39 patients; 20 received 76 cycles of conventional intraperitoneal cisplatin, and 19 patients (13 with ovarian cancer and 6 with primary peritoneal cancer) received HIPEC. Patients who received HIPEC were older (63.4±20 years vs 56±8 years, p = 0.002) and received a lower dose of cisplatin both in absolute values (109.2±41.1 mg vs 159.2±15.2 mg, p&amp;lt;0.001) and adjusted by body surface area (63.4±19.9 mg/m2 vs 96.8±9.2 mg/m2, p&amp;lt;0.001). AKI was significantly more frequent in patients receiving HIPEC (42.1% vs 15.8%, p = 0.012), and was more severe after HIPEC with AKIN-I, AKIN-II and AKIN-III in 50% vs 83%, 12.5% vs 16.7% and 37.5% vs 0% respectively, p = 0.042. Recovery from AKI was more frequent in patients receiving conventional intraperitoneal cisplatin (100% vs 50%, p = 0.014) and 1 patient in the HIPEC group progressed to end stage kidney disease. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for age, baseline serum creatinine and cisplatin dose, treatment with HIPEC compared to conventional high-dose intraperitoneal cisplatin remained a significant risk factor for developing AKI (OR 1550, CI 95% 19-128070). Conclusion Cisplatin-based HIPEC therapy is associated with an increased risk of severe AKI compared to conventional high-dose intraperitoneal cisplatin regimens, despite the use of prophylactic measures. Hyperthermic perfusion of the abdomen might be an important contributing factor in HIPEC-induced renal injury. To reduce the incidence of AKI and its associated morbidity after HIPEC, early implementation of preventive measures with adequate fluid management and closer monitoring of hemodynamic parameters and kidney function tests should be taken into consideration.

Tislelizumab in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for lymph node‐positive bladder cancer.

e16599 Background: Although multiple single-arm clinical trials have shown promising pathologic complete response (pCR) rates with neoadjuvant ICIs combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in MIBC, lymph node‐positive bladder cancer is generally excluded. Our specific aim was to compare the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with lymph node‐positive bladder cancer. Methods: In this single arm phase II study, eligible patients had cT2-T4a N+ M0 MIBC, cisplatin-eligible, and to be planned radical cystectomy (RC). Patients received tislelizumab 200 mg in day D8, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 D2, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 D1 and D8 every 21 days for 3 or 4 cycles. RC was performed within 6 weeks after last dose treatment. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0). Secondary endpoints included pathologic downstaging ( &lt; ypT2), EFS, OS and safety. Results: By Jan 2023, 17 eligible pts (2cT2, 10 cT3, 5 cT4) were enrolled. 14 pts have completed neoadjuvant therapy, with median age of 67 (60-81) years, among whom 10 pts underwent RC and two declined RC. According to RECIST 1.1, 6 pts achieved a clinical complete response (cCR)(6/14,42.8%). Pathological results revealed 5 pCR (ypT0N0, 50%), 3 ypT1N0, and 2 ypT2/T3N0. A complete nodal response (pN0) occurred in 10 (100%) pts post- tislelizumab +chemotherapy and 8 ( &lt; ypT2N0,80%) pts achieved pathologic downstaging. Most common neoadjuvant therapy related AEs of any grade were hematologic toxicities (11/14,78.5%), nausea (9/14,64.2%), vomiting (8/14,57.1%), decreased appetite (6/14,42.8%), fatigue (4/14,28.5%), pruritus (3/14,21.4%) and ALT/AST increased (4/14,28.5%). Grade ≥3 neoadjuvant therapy related AEs were neutropenia (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), anemia (n = 2). One patient discontinued GC plus tislelizumab due to AEs. Conclusions: Patients with clinically lymph node‐positive bladder cancer have significant pN0 after neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus gemcitabine/cisplatin was feasible and provided meaningful pathologic responses in lymph node‐positive bladder cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04570410 .