Nepotism, the preferential dispensing of benefits to relatives, is common among females of the same generation in the social Hymenoptera (Gamboa et al., 1986; Breed and Bennett, 1987). Although many have speculated that such behavior may have promoted the initial spread of the altruism characteristic of many social insect colonies (Hamilton, 1964; Wilson, 1971; WestEberhard, 1978; Brockmann, 1984), it is not known whether preferential treatment of relatives other than offspring evolved before or after the origin of sociality (Brockmann, 1984; Matthews, 1991). One way to begin to address this issue is to look for such nepotism in a solitary species whose life history and ecology resemble those of the probable precursors of modem eusocial forms. Finding nepotism in such a species would suggest that nepotism possibly preceded, and even promoted, the origin of cooperative insect societies. We investigated the possibility that nepotism toward non-descendant kin occurs in a solitary hymenopteran, the cicada killer wasp (Sphecius speciosus). Sphecius females provision underground nests with paralyzed cicadas upon which they lay their eggs (Dow, 1942; Dambach and Good, 1943; Evans, 1966; Pfennig and Reeve, 1989). We selected this species because, like the probable ancestors of modem eusocial forms (Evans, 1958; West-Eberhard, 1978; Carpenter, 1982; Brockmann, 1984), Sphecius females nest near others and sometimes share the same burrow. When a female enters another's nest, the nest owner exhibits variable tolerance toward the intruder (Dambach and Good, 1943; Pfennig and Reeve, 1989). Field observations and blind experiments have revealed that females nesting 1 m apart [non-neighbors (Pfennig and Reeve 1989)]. In particular, burrow owners were significantly less likely to bite and sting neighbors than non-neighbors when intruders were encountered in the burrow (Pfennig and Reeve, 1989). In addition, females were significantly less likely to seize a neighbor's burrow (Pfennig and Reeve, 1989). Finding evidence of nepotism does not necessarily