Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are ubiquitous in the field of gastroenterology. Recent publications suggest possible links between chronic PPI use and several adverse events. As a result, more patients are asking questions about risk of PPI use, and providers face challenges regarding their appropriate use and their safety. We aimed to examine providers' knowledge and attitudes toward reported adverse effects of PPI and compare consultants and trainees' prescription practices. Methods: A detailed non-incentivized online survey was sent to medical providers; trainees (residents and fellows) and consultants across seven specialties at a tertiary academic center. The survey included 21 questions exploring providers' actions in response to challenging clinical scenarios dealing with PPI use. Chi-square was used to compare responses from trainees and consultants. Results: We sent the survey to 199 providers at our center. 71 providers (27 trainees and 44 consultants) completed the survey (35.7 % response rate). Trainees were residents from internal medicine, fellows were from gastroenterology, cardiology, hematology/ oncology, pulmonary and nephrology. Consultants were providers from cardiology, pulmonary medicine, endocrinology, family medicine, general internal medicine, hematology/oncology, and nephrology. More consultants than trainees cited that these reports changed their practice (81.8% vs 59.2%, p=0.03). Table (1) shows consultants and trainees actions when facing challenging patients using PPI. When asked about using PPI in patients with coronary artery disease who require clopidogrel, more trainees than consultants (59.3% vs 41.8%) chose to continue omeprazole. Both groups (trainees and consultants) agreed to monitor renal function in patients taking PPI who are at higher risk to develop chronic kidney disease (83.7% vs 92.6%). Figure (1) shows concerning side effects of PPI reported by providers. All p-values are not statistically significant. Most providers (consultants and trainees) conformed that scholastic sessions (e.g. grand rounds), would be useful to help address these challenges (90.9% vs 88.9%). Conclusion: Provider education about the adverse events that might be linked to PPIs is critical. More trainees switched their patients from PPI to other medications. In a similar fashion, both consultants and trainees were concerned about clostridium difficile infection and kidney disease.Table 1: Providers' responses when facing challenges regarding PPI side effectsFigure 1
Read full abstract