Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Research Articles

The Updated Results of Asciminib Managed-Access Program (MAP) in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Russia

Background: Therapy choice in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts) with ≥2 lines of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) failure or in pts with T315I mutationis a relevant problem. Efficacy and good tolerability of a first-in-class BCR::ABL1 allosteric inhibitor Asciminib (ASC) in chronic phase (CP) CML pts were confirmed in clinical trials. The out-study world data of ASC use in Managed Access Program (MAP) is of particular interest. Aim: to report the updated results of the ASC use within MAP in 3 clinical centers of Russia. Methods : Adult (≥18 years) CML pts with the lack of efficacy or intolerance to ≥2 lines of TKIs or T315I-positive pts after ≥1 prior TKI were included into a MAP. Inclusion criteria for our analysis were: CML-CP, ASC therapy for >3 months (mo). Two dosing regimen were used: 40 mg BID in BCR::ABL1 T315I-negative pts (40BID group) and 200 mg BID in BCR::ABL1 T315I-positive pts (200BID group). Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR, equivalent of MR2 or BCR::ABL1≤1%), major molecular response (MMR) and deep molecular response (MR4) achievement was assessed by cumulative incidence function (CIF) with Gray's test for comparison. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method according to “intention-to-treat” principle. Results: A total 82 pts received ASC in the MAP, 68 of them met the criteria for analysis (baseline characteristics are in table 1), while 14 were excluded. The median follow-up was 26 mo (range 4-49). The 2-year overall survival was 93% and 83%, the progression free survival was 90% and 70% in 40BID and 200BID groups, respectively. In 40BID group 17/43 pts discontinued ASC: 2 progressed to AP/BP, 2 - for bone marrow transplantation (BMT), 13 - failure (3 pts died due to CML after ASC discontinuation). In 200BID group 12/25 pts discontinued ASC: 2 developed AP, 3 -BMT, 7 - failure (one pt died). CIF of CCyR/MMR/MR4 by 24 mo was 58%/68%/19% in 40BID group and 65%/56%/32% in 200BID group. The achieved CCyR was preserved in 93% (14/15) and 77% (10/13) pts in 40BID and 200BID group, respectively. CIF of MMR in ponatinib-naïve pts was higher in both groups than in ponatinib-pretreated pts (picture). Dose escalation to 80-100 mg BID in 8/43 pts of 40BID group (due to lack of efficacy) resulted in achieving MMR for 2/8 pts with no MMR before escalation. Dose reduction in two groups was done both for adverse events (AEs) grade 3-4 (n=8) and stable MR4,5. In 4 pts (200BID) with no AEs and having a stable MR4,5 for >1 year, no MR4,5 loss was observed after ASC dose reduction to 100 mg BID. Subclone with emerging a new mutation was detected in 3 pts of 40BID group (A337T, G250A, T315I) while no new mutations were found in 200 mg BID group. AEs associated with ASC have been identified in 27/43 pts and 13/25 pts in 40BID and 200BID group, respectively, with no significant difference in AE spectrum and frequency. Most common (≥5%) AEs in two groups were: thrombocytopenia (29%), neutropenia (18%), cholesterol high (13%), anemia (6%), skin rash (5%). AEs grade 3-4 were detected in 13 (30%) and 4 (16%) pts in 40BID and 200BID group, respectively, and mostly presented by hematologic/cytopenic AEs (24%). No pt discontinued ASC due to toxicity, no arterial occlusive AEs were observed. Conclusion: ASC shows effectiveness and good safety profile in pts after prior failure to TKIs and those with T315I mutation. The CIF of any response was higher in ponatinib-naive pts at any dose. Different mutational subclones evolution was observed, including emergence of myristoyl-site mutation in 1 pt. ASC half dose reduction was safe in pts with previous MR4,5 stable response.

Uncovering the Transcriptional Landscape of CML Development and Therapeutic Interventions Via State-Transition Modeling

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is driven by expression of the BCR-ABL fusion gene. Despite the success of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the disease-originating leukemic stem cells frequently persist through therapy, and disease cannot be eradicated. Thus, new biomarkers beyond BCR/ABL may be necessary to assess disease state and treatment response, and to identify novel targets and therapeutics that could lead to a cure. Herein, we used time-series RNA-seq to molecularly characterize the transcriptional states of CML and predict disease evolution and treatment response. Using weekly blood draws from a murine tetracycline (Tet)-inducible BCR/ABL expression model of chronic phase CML and non-BCR/ABL expressing controls ( Fig 1A), we applied state-transition theory to mathematically model CML development. We constructed a CML state-space using dimensionality reduction to the full transcriptomic data of the time-series CML and control mice. From the sample distribution in the state-space, we empirically derived healthy (no BCR/ABL) and perturbed (BCR/ABL-induced) potentials ( Fig 1B). Using these potentials, our model described the transcriptome evolution during CML development as a particle undergoing Brownian motion. We used the Fokker-Planck (FP) solution of the Langevin equation of motion to both accurately model the transcriptome and predict the future dynamics from a single sample used as an initial condition. While control mice remain in the region of the state-space corresponding to health, each of the BCR/ABL expressing mice moved toward CML state as early as one week after BCR/ABL induction and before detection of BCR/ABL mRNA expression. Of note, no significant difference was observed between the experimental and the FP predicted trajectories and survivals, supporting the accuracy of our approach in predicting disease evolution and outcome at the earliest time points. The CML potential was described as a three well potential with three stable (Early c1, Transition c3, Late c5) and two unstable (Early Transition c2 and Late Transition c4). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) corresponding to Early c1, Transition c3, Late c5 states were identified by comparing with control mice. Importantly, the state-space model also allowed assessment of whether each DEG had a pro- or anti-CML effect. At the Early state c1, we identified 78 DEGs; 55% of them were anti-CML, indicating an early attempt of the biological system to prevent disease development. By GSEA, we showed that the anti-CML Hallmark gene sets included EMT, angiogenesis, hypoxia and the only pro-CML gene set was IL2/Stat5. In contrast, at the Transition c3 and Late c5 states, we identify 366 and 1858 DEGs, respectively; nearly all these DEGs had a pro-CML effect and were enriched for Hallmark gene sets involving inflammation, angiogenesis and metabolism. Using CML state-space as a pseudotime ordering of the CML samples, we also studied modules of non-linear gene expression dynamics. This approach revealed changes in gene expression rates (inflection points) coinciding with the unstable critical points (c2 and c4) that separated the otherwise stable states. The genes in these transition modules included immune/inflammation processes and likely represented those genes that drove CML state-transition. To investigate the evolution of disease “in reverse” (i.e., after the CML phenotype developed), we treated two cohorts of CML mice, one with a TKI (nilotinib) for 4 weeks and one with Tet to turn off the expression of BCR/ABL (Tet-off, Tet-on [TOTO]). We adapted the state-transition model to a “treatment state-transition” model by introducing a specific parameter, g, which both accurately described and predicted individual treatment efficacy. We showed that although the circulating leukemic cells were suppressed by TKI, the disease state recovered only from c5 to c3, but never reached the health (control) state, and the treated mice rapidly relapsed once treatment was completed. Conversely, the TOTO cohort, which had the BCR/ABL expression completed turn off, returned stably to the healthy state. In conclusion, our state-transition model provides a theory-based analytic framework for investigating disease dynamics and predicting treatment response and outcome. Importantly, can be translated into the clinic for novel transcriptomic-based diagnostic approaches.

Multiomic Single-Cell Analysis Identifies Von Willebrand Factor and TIM3-Expressing BCR-ABL1+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells

Characterization of the leukemic stem cell (LSC) population in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) may identify therapeutic targets for sustained elimination of leukemic cells. High-throughput single-cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) has paved the way for detailed transcriptional assessment of CML LSC. Building on this technique, multiomic CITE-seq approaches carry additional benefit in that the paired protein expression information may enable identification of associated cell surface marker profiles, subsequent FACS-based isolation and functional characterization. However, detection of BCR-ABL1 transcripts, which is arguably the only unequivocal marker to distinguish CML LSC from healthy hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), remains challenging using current high-throughput 3' end capture-based scRNAseq methods. For the present study, we performed single-cell CITE-seq analysis of the expression of 597 genes and 51 proteins in >70,000 stem and progenitor cells from 16 chronic phase CML patients and five healthy donors. Furthermore, we developed and employed a strategy allowing parallel detection of BCR-ABL1 transcripts at the single-cell level. In bone marrow samples from CML patients, we observed pronounced expansion of erythroid and myeloid progenitors within the CD14 -CD34 + compartment, and substantial heterogeneity within the traditionally defined CD34 +CD38 -/low LSC compartment. In-depth analysis of the latter identified a group of immature BCR-ABL1 +cells displaying a CD45RA -cKIT -CD26 + TKI resistance phenotype sitting atop a hierarchy of myeloid progenitors. Within this group of potential LSC, expression of both previously reported ( e.g. CD25 and CD26) and unreported gene and protein markers was found to distinguish these cells from their healthy counterparts. Unlike HSC, the immature LSC showed high surface expression of TIM3 and high transcription of the von Willebrand factor gene ( VWF). While overexpression of VWF within the stem cell population may be linked to the aberrant myeloid-biased hematopoiesis characterizing the disease, the cell surface upregulation of TIM3 suggests that its targeting may have merit in CML. In conclusion, we here performed detailed multiomic characterization of CML stem and progenitor cells, paired with BCR-ABL1 detection at the single-cell level. Our findings revealed LSC-specific expression patterns that may have implications for the phenotypic definition of CML LSC. Additionally, the results identify TIM3 as a conceivable target for sustained elimination of immature LSC in CML.

Acquired microRNA-142 Deficit Drives Escape Mechanisms of Anti-Leukemic Surveillance during Blast Crisis Transformation of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

CML may evolve from a chronic phase (CP) into blast crisis (BC), but the underlying mechanisms of the transformation remain to be fully elucidated. We reported that microRNA (miR)-142 is downregulated in BC compared with CP patients; and in a murine model of CP CML (i.e., BCR-ABL mouse), miR-142 knock-out (KO) induced a BC-like phenotype, substantiating a mechanistic role of miR-142 deficit in BC transformation. Mechanistically, miR-142 KO induced mitochondrial fusion and increased oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) in leukemic stem cells (LSCs), causing a shift of leukemic phenotype from CP to BC ( Nat Commun, in press). Herein, we report that miR-142 deficit also occurs in T lymphocytes of BC patients due to inflammatory cytokines that are aberrantly produced by the proliferating leukemic cells. Using the Mir142 −/−BCR-ABL mouse, we observed that miR-142 deficit resulted in loss of T cell number and activity, suppressed the antileukemic immune surveillance, and contributed to BC transformation. In fact, miR-142 KO hampered thymic lymphoid-primed multipotent progenitor (LMPP) differentiation into T cells and rendered mature T cells dysfunctional and exhausted, with increase of PD-1 levels, and decrease of the apoptotic threshold, cell cycling and cytokine production, via blockade of OxPhos/glycolysis switch that regulates the metabolism of otherwise activated T cells. These changes translated into a decrease of T-cell antileukemic surveillance as demonstrated by increased numbers of BC murine Lin -Sca-1 +c-Kit + (LSKs) or human CD34+ blasts cocultured with Mir142 −/−T-cells vs those cocultured with Mir142 +/+ T-cells. Furthermore, congenic B6 (lethally irradiated to eradicate host T cells) or immunodeficient NSG (no T cells) recipient mice transplanted with Mir142 −/−BCR-ABL LSK and Mir142 −/− T cells had reduced T cells (both: p<0.0001), increased blasts (B6: p=0.01; NSG: p<0.0001) and a shorter survival (median survival for B6: 58 days vs unreached, p=0.008; for NSG: 28 days vs unreached, p<0.0001) compared with the respective controls transplanted with Mir142 −/−BCR-ABL LSK and Mir142 +/+ T cells. Transplantation of Mir142 −/−BCR-ABL LSKs into Mir142 −/− or Mir142 flox(f)/fLck-cre+ (i.e., miR-142 KO only in T cells; Mir142T Δ/Δ) recipients also resulted in a shorter survival than Mir142 +/+ recipients (median survival for Mir142 −/− vs Mir142 +/+ recipients: 44 vs 53 days, p=0.001; for Mir142T Δ/Δ vs Mir142 +/+ recipients: 42 vs 53 days, p=0.0002). To correct miR-142 deficit, we produced a synthetic miR-142 mimic oligonucleotide (CpG-M-miR-142). We treated a cohort of NSG mice transplanted with Mir142 −/−BCR-ABL LSKs and Mir142 −/− T cells, with CpG-M-miR-142 (30mg/kg/day, IV) or CpG-scramble RNA (SCR) for 3 weeks. We observed increased T cells (p=0.04), decreased blasts (p=0.0029) and longer survival (median survival: unreached vs 37 days, p=0.0005) in CpG-M-miR-142-treated recipients vs SCR-treated controls. Similar results were observed in CpG-M-miR-142-treated Mir142 −/−BCR-ABL mice vs SCR-treated controls. To test CpG-M-miR-142 activity in human T cells, a cohort of BC CML patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mice were given patient's autologous T cells and CpG-M-miR-142. Mice receiving T+CpG-M-miR-142 had increased T cell expansion (p=0.04), reduced leukemic cells (p=0.0078), and longer survival (median survival: 53 vs 38 days, p=0.01) than controls receiving T+SCR. In secondary transplants, the recipients of BM from T+CpG-M-miR-142-treated donors survived longer (median survival: 73 vs 53 days, p<0.0001) than the recipients of BM from T+SCR-treated donors, suggesting a decrease in LSC burden. Finally, we tested the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which represent the primary targeting approach for CML, in combination with CpG-M-miR-142 and/or PD-1 inhibitor in Mir142 −/−BCR-ABL mice. The mice treated with TKI+CpG-M-miR-142 (median survival: 107 days, p=0.001) or TKI+PD-1 inhibitor (104 days, p=0.002) survived longer than the controls treated with TKI alone (66 days); the triplet combination (TKI+CpG-M-miR-142+PD-1 inhibitor) is expected to improve survival further (ongoing experiment). In summary, CpG-M-miR-142 alone and in combination with TKI or PD-1 inhibitor rescued T-cell antileukemic activity and prolonged survival in BC CML murine and PDX models, thereby providing a potentially new therapeutic approach for BC CML.

Comparable b2a2/e13a2 and b3a2/e14a2 Reporting in BCR-ABL Assay When Calibrated By Who Is and By IVT-RNA Copy Number

Introduction: Xpert® BCR-ABL Ultra, automated cartridge-based assay for monitoring BCR-ABL transcript levels, is calibrated by WHO IS to standardize the %reporting for both b2a2/e13a2 BCR-ABL(e13a2) and b3a2/e14a2 BCR-ABL(e14a2) relative to control ABL gene in peripheral blood of patients as a standard management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) [1]. Studies have shown differences in patients carrying e13a2 or e14a2 in molecular response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) treatment [2-4]. Therefore, it is necessary to understand if there is %reporting differences between two transcripts calibrated by WHO IS[5] and explore the calibration method using breakpoint specific RNA input copy number (CN) for accurate TKI treatment monitoring. Objectives: To establish % reporting method calculated with known CN of e13a2, e14a2 and ABL IVT-RNA within a wide CN range and compare % e13a2 and % e14a2 to WHO IS quantification system. Methods: Three IVT-RNAs, containing e13a2-ABL-BCR, e14a2-ABL-BCR and ABL-BCR, were synthesized as shown in Figure 1. Serial diluted e13a2 RNA, e14a2 RNA and ABL RNA panels were tested on Xpert BCR-ABL Ultra assay to generate individual standard curve of e13a2 Ct, e14a2 Ct and ABL Ct as a function of CN for % reporting calculation. Four levels of IVT-RNA panels with same CN of e13a2 and e14a2 were tested for breakpoint specific % reporting comparison. K562(e14a2), BV173 (e13a2) cell lysates and CML clinical samples carrying e13a2 or e14a2 transcripts were tested to evaluate the %CN reporting compared to WHO IS. Result: Good linearity demonstrated in Ct vs CN input for e13a2, e14a2 and ABL IVT-RNA (Figure2) with comparable efficiency (E) between e13a2 (E=0.992) and e14a2 (E=0.986). %e13a2 reporting was ~1.50-fold (by WHO IS) and ~1.46-fold (by %CN) higher than %e14a2, by testing IVT-RNA panel (Table1). Minor differences in %reporting observed between % CN and WHO IS for e13a2 (84.5%~110.8%) vs e14a2 (82.5%~89.5%) from cell lysates (Table2) and e13a2 (92.6%~105.5%) vs e14a2 (88.1%~92.2%) from clinical samples (Table3). Conclusions: A %CN e13a2/ABL and e14a2/ABL reporting method with known CN of IVT-RNAs has been successfully established in Xpert BCR-ABL Ultra. Both WHO IS and %CN showed very minor differences between e13a2 and e14a2 for % reporting. %CN method demonstrated comparable %reporting to WHO IS in Xpert BCR-ABL Ultra. Recent Publications 1. Dominy KM, Simon IM, Khorashad JS (2021) Evaluation of Xpert® BCR-ABL Ultra for the confirmation of BCR-ABL1 international scale conversion factors for the molecular monitoring of chronic myeloid leukaemia, Int J Lab Hematol, Feb;43(1):e31-e34. 2. Hanfstein B, Lauseker M, Hehlmann R, Saussele S, Erben P, Dietz C (2014) Distinct characteristics of e13a2 versus e14a2 BCR-ABL1 driven chronic myeloid leukemia under first-line therapy with imatinib. Haematologica.99:1441-7. 3. Jain P, Kantarjian H, Patel KP, Gonzalez GN, Luthra R, Shamanna RK (2016) Impact of BCR-ABL transcript type on outcome in patients with chronic-phase CML treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Blood.127:1269-75. 4. Castagnetti F, Gugliotta G, Breccia M, Iurlo A, Levato L, Albano F (2017) The BCR-ABL1 transcript type influences response and outcome in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated frontline with imatinib. Am J Hematol. 92:797-805. 5. Matthew S, White HE, Hana Z, Nicholas C.P C (2022) Impact of BCR::ABL1 transcript type on RT-qPCR amplification performance and molecular response to therapy. Leukemia 36(7):1-8

Flumatinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Resistant or Intolerant Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results from Real-World Data

Introduction Over the past decades, BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as the initial treatment for chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) have dramatically turned CML-CP into a manageable and potentially curable chronic disease. Nonetheless, in spite of the massive improvement in CML treatment over the last years with the introduction of TKIs, some patients (20%-30%) display intrinsic or acquired resistance to treatment during the disease course. Flumatinib Mesylate is a newer and orally available TKI with higher selectivity and potency against BCR-ABL1 kinase versus imatinib. According to the previous data，flumatinib can be an effective first-line treatment for CML-CP. Patients and Methods This study was initiated mainly to observe the safety and efficacy of flumatinib in the treatment of adult patients with resistant or intolerant Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, especially in second-line or above treatment in the real world. Efficacy and safety assessments were collected for the intent-to-treat population. Major molecular response (MMR) was defined as BCR-ABL1 transcript level ≤ 0.1% on the International Scale (IS), molecular response (MR4) was defined as BCR-ABL1 transcript level (IS) ≤ 0.01%; MR4.5 was defined as a BCR-ABL1 (IS) transcript level ≤ 0.0032%. DMR was defined as MR 4.0 or MR 4.5. Results Among the 58 evaluable patients with CML-CP, 54% were male, 47% were female. The median age of these patients is 45Y. During the observation period, there were 28 second-line conversion patients (48%), 19 third-line conversion patients (33%), and 11 fourth-line and above patients (19%). Prior therapies included imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, olverembatinib, radotinib and ponatinib. All patients converted to treatment of 600mg flumatinib daily. Among the 58 evaluable patients, 20 patients who had been treated with imatinib alone were converted to flumatinib, including 9 cases of IM resistance, 8 cases of IM intolerance and 2 case of personal reasons. During the 1-year follow-up, 52% of patients (n=30) were evaluable for the achievement of MMR. The patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) > 10% at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months were 48%, 17%, 23% and 26%, respectively; for patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) < 0.1% were 26%, 40%, 49% and 52%, respectively; for patients with DMR were 26%, 40%, 49% and 52%, respectively. For imatinib-intolerant or -resistant patients, MMR was 44%. Subgroup analyses showed that the imatinib-intolerant or -resistant patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) >10% at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months were 65%, 0%, 10% and 0%, respectively; for patients with BCR-ABL1 (IS) < 0.1% were 10%, 33%, 80% and 44%, respectively; for patients with DMR were 5%, 11%, 30% and 11%, respectively. Meanwhile, 11% of patients could not be detected at molecular level (0.000%). Of the 58 patients, only Grade 1 AEs were reported, including diarrhea, rash and eye edema. Conclusion Flumatinib has good efficacy and safety in the treatment of adult patients with resistant or intolerant Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, it will be a good choice for second-line or above treatment for CML-CP In clinical practice.

18 months follow-up of deep molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) with nilotinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a prospective, multi-center study in China.

Early stable deep molecular response (DMR) to nilotinib is associated with goal of treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP). It is important to early distinguish between patients who can achieve a DMR and those who are fit for TFR. We performed a multicenter study to explore the early cumulative MR4.5 rate at 18 months with nilotinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP (ND-CML-CP) in China. Of the 29 institutes, 106 patients with ND-CML-CP received nilotinib (300 mg BID). The cumulative MR4.5 rate of nilotinib treatment at 18 months was 69.8% (74/106). The cumulative MMR and MR4.0 rates for nilotinib at 18 months were 94.3% (100/106) and 84.9% (90/106), respectively. Patients with an ultra-early molecular response (u-EMR) at 6 weeks were not significantly different in obtaining DMR or MMR by 24 months compared with those without u-EMR (p = 0.7584 and p = 0.9543, respectively). Our study demonstrated that nilotinib treatment in patients with ND-CML-CP contributed to obtain high early MR4.5.

Management and Risk Factors for Pleural Effusion in Japanese Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with First-line Dasatinib in Real-world Clinical Practice.

Objective Pleural effusion (PE) is a common adverse event that occurs during dasatinib therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, the pathomechanism of PE and appropriate management of Asian patients with CML have not been elucidated. This study investigated the incidence rate, risk, and appropriate management of PE in Asian patients with CML treated with dasatinib. Methods We retrospectively collected data on patients in the chronic phase of CML who received first-line dasatinib therapy and were registered in the CML-Cooperative Study Group database. Patients We identified 44 cases of PE in a series of 89 patients and analyzed previously reported risk factors and effective management of PE. Results A univariate analysis revealed that age, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, hypertension, the history of cardiovascular events, and dasatinib dose were significantly associated with PE. A multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥65 years old was the only independent risk factor for PE. Dasatinib dose reduction and switching to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor showed a statistically significant difference in effectively reducing PE volume compared to single diuretic use. Conclusion Although further studies are warranted, our observations showed that advanced age is a significant risk factor for PE, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor dose reduction or replacement of dasatinib may be an effective management strategy for PE in Asian CML patients who received first-line treatment with dasatinib in real-world clinical practice.

CO-RELATION OF P-GLYCOPROTEIN AND PLASMA IMATINIB IN IMATINIB RESPONDERS AND NON-RESPONDERS PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKAEMIA

Objective: To measure and compare P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expressions in imatinib responders and non-responders with chronic myeloid leukemia-chronic phase (CML-CP) and correlate with plasma imatinib levels. Methods: Patients were classified into two groups based on their haematological and cytogenetic responses to imatinib: responders and non-responders. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to measure plasma imatinib levels, while flow cytometry was used to evaluate leucocyte P-gp expression. Results: The median plasma imatinib trough levels in non-responders were 496 (217-3150) ng/ml compared to 2245 (454-4270) ng/ml in the responders, which was statistically significant (p=0.0003). The proportion of patients expressing P-gp in granulocytes was higher in the non-responder group than in the responder group (75% vs. 62.5%). The ratio of mean fluorescence intensity (RFI) revealed that non-responders had higher median P-gp expression than did respondents MFI (1.16(1.06-1.50) and 1.12(1.01-1.38), respectively; p = 0. 2307). In both groups, there was a negative correlation between P-gp expression and plasma imatinib trough levels (-0.4384 vs.-0.2848). Conclusion: Imatinib median plasma trough levels in non-responders were considerably lower. This was highly supported by P-gp expression in granulocytes, which is inversely related to imatinib plasma trough levels; however, the difference was not statistically significant, which could be attributed to the small number of patients. This could be the cause of imatinib resistance in non-responder CML-CP patients, and P-gp levels should be evaluated to optimize treatment in patients who do not achieve hematologic or cytogenetic response.

ASC2ESCALATE: A US Phase 2, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Dose-Escalation Study of Asciminib (ASC) Monotherapy in Patients (Pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) As Second-Line (2L) and First-Line (1L) Treatment

CONCLUSIONS Adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have increased survival in CML, although resistance and intolerance remain challenges, which often necessitate switch to another TKI. Many pts discontinue 1L treatment due to resistance/intolerance and switch to 2L therapy, to which resistance is typically higher. A need exists for effective, safe treatment options for pts in 1L and 2L. ASC is thefirst approved BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that Specifically Targets the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP), with activity against most BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutations conferring resistance to ATP-competitive TKIs, potentially providing a new early-line treatment option. ASC was first approved in the United States for pts with CML-CP after ≥2 TKIs at 80 mg once daily (QD) or 40 mg twice daily (BID) and for pts with CML-CP with the T315I mutation at 200 mg BID. A large, phase 1, dose-escalation trial (NCT02081378) demonstrated efficacy and tolerability of ASC across a broad range of dosages. Also, with >2 years of follow-up, ASC demonstrated superior efficacy and better safety and tolerability compared with bosutinib in pts with CML-CP without the T315I mutation after ≥2 prior TKIs in the phase 3 ASCEMBL study (NCT03106779). We describe the phase 2 ASC2ESCALATE trial investigating efficacy and safety of ASC with dose escalation in pts with CML-CP receiving ASC as their 2L or 1L therapy. This is a phase 2, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, dose-escalation study with sites in the United States (NCT05384587) (Figure). Pts receiving ASC as their 2L TKI must be adults with non-T315I CML-CP who discontinued their first ATP-competitive TKI for warning response ( BCR::ABL1IS >1%-10% after 6 months or >0.1%-1% after 12 months of 1L treatment), resistance ( BCR::ABL1IS >10% after 6-12 months or >1% or loss of major molecular response [MMR] after >12 months of 1L treatment), or intolerance (with BCR::ABL1IS >0.1% at screening). In addition to pts receiving ASC as their 2L TKI, a separate cohort of newly diagnosed pts will be included, and these pts may receive up to 4 weeks of prior treatment with imatinib or an approved second-generation TKI (Table). All pts will start treatment with ASC 80 mg QD. Pts achieving BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% at 6 months will continue at the same dose; pts not achieving BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% at 6 months will have their dose escalated to 200 mg QD. In pts not achieving MMR at 12 months, dose escalation from 80 to 200 mg QD or from 200 mg QD to 200 mg BID will occur or the pt will be taken off the study. If pts have grade ≥3 or persistent grade 2 toxicity refractory to optimal management, no dose escalation will occur, and pts will remain on ASC at their most current dose. This dose-escalation strategy applies to both the 2L and 1L cohorts. The primary endpoint is MMR rate at 12 months in pts using ASC as their 2L TKI. As all primary and secondary endpoints for the 2L cohort will be measured for the 1L cohort as secondary endpoints, the MMR rate at 12 months in pts receiving ASC as their 1L TKI is a secondary endpoint. Additional secondary endpoints are the same for both 2L and 1L cohorts and include MMR rates at 3, 6, 18, and 24 months; MMR rates by all scheduled time points; MR 2 ( BCR::ABL1IS ≤1%), MR 4 ( BCR::ABL1IS ≤0.01%), and MR 4.5 ( BCR::ABL1IS ≤0.0032%) at and by scheduled time points; time to and duration of MMR; time to treatment failure; progression-free survival; overall survival; and safety/tolerability. Exploratory endpoints include assessment of BCR::ABL1 mutations. ASC2ESCALATE is the first clinical trial designed to assess pts with CML-CP using ASC as their 2L TKI and will provide critical information on efficacy and safety of dose escalation in pts for whom certain response milestones are not met in 2L and 1L. Dose escalation of ASC in 2L and 1L is another treatment strategy and results from ASC2ESCALATE will add to the growing body of evidence for using ASC to treat pts with CML-CP. Recruitment for pts using ASC as their 2L TKI began November 2022, and as of July 10, 2023, 5 pts have been enrolled in this cohort; Up to 92 and 90 pts are estimated to enroll in the 2L and 1L cohorts, respectively, across 90 sites.

ASC4START and ASC4FIRST: Two Ongoing Phase 3 Trials Investigating Asciminib Monotherapy As First-Line Therapy Versus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase

Background: The current standard of care (SoC) for newly diagnosed patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) is treatment with 1 of the 4 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approved for this use (first generation [1G] imatinib [IMA] and second generation [2G] bosutinib [BOS], dasatinib [DAS], and nilotinib [NIL]). Although TKIs have vastly improved treatment outcomes, pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP experience lack of efficacy and intolerance to available treatments. A large number of pts treated with IMA do not achieve major molecular response (MMR) and even fewer pts achieve deep molecular response, a key requirement to attempt treatment-free remission. Treatment with 2G TKIs results in larger proportions of pts achieving deep responses albeit still with a sizeable minority not reaching this goal. Also, many pts are intolerant to 2G TKIs, resulting in therapy switching, frequently multiple times. For pts who remain on treatment, even low-grade adverse events (AEs) may significantly impact quality of life (QoL) given the long-term nature of treatment. Improved treatments with high efficacy and improved tolerability are needed to limit therapy switching, reduce treatment discontinuation, maintain, or improve pt QoL, and allow pts to remain on treatment at an optimal dose for longer duration to achieve deep responses. Asciminib is the first and only approved BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that works by specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP). This unique mechanism of action (MoA) has no confirmed overlapping mutation-driven resistance profile with ATP-competitive TKIs. Asciminib shows better selectivity compared to other TKIs, with no known off-target kinase-mediated effects due to its MoA; this translates into improved tolerability. In clinical trials (Hughes et al. N Engl J Med. 2019; Rea et al. Blood 2021), asciminib has demonstrated sustained efficacy and a favorable safety profile over time in pts with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs as well as in pts with T315I mutation. Asciminib as monotherapy and in combination with ATP-competitive TKIs is being studied as first-line (1L) treatment in CML. The ongoing ASC4FIRST (NCT04971226) study is investigating the efficacy and safety of asciminib 80 mg once daily (QD) monotherapy vs investigator-selected 1G or 2G TKI in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP ( Table 1). The primary endpoint of ASC4FIRST is MMR rate at 48 weeks. The ongoing ASC4START (NCT05456191) study is focused on pt-centric objectives, assessing the tolerability and efficacy of asciminib vs 2G TKI NIL in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP. The primary endpoint of ASC4START is time to treatment discontinuation due to an AE ( Table 1). Current Status: As of December 20, 2022, the ASC4FIRST study completed recruitment, with 405 pts enrolled worldwide. The end of study (EOS) will occur 5 years from the last pt first treatment in the study. Pts will continue to receive the assigned treatment until the EOS, or until premature discontinuation due to treatment failure, disease progression or intolerance, or due to investigator or participant decision. Between 21 November 2022 and 25 July 2023, 180 pts have been screened for the ASC4START study, with 147 pts randomized to treatment (n=52 France, n=40 Germany, n=9 Bulgaria, n=7 Czechia, n=7 Hungary, n=6 Korea, n=6 Singapore, n=2 Slovakia, n=5 Argentina, n=3 Greece, n=2 each from Slovakia, Malaysia, and Oman, and n=1 each from the USA, Italy, Romania, UK, Jordan, and Canada). Recruitment is ongoing. Patients will be treated until approximately 64 discontinuations of either study treatment due to an AE have been recorded. Conclusions: With demonstrated efficacy and improved tolerability compared to ATP-binding TKIs, asciminib has the potential to become the therapy of choice for CML in 1L, enabling newly diagnosed patients to remain on therapy with improved QoL and overall survival, and reducing the need for therapy switching, ultimately allowing patients to achieve optimal milestone responses and reach treatment goals. Findings from these two trials will provide comprehensive evidenceon the use of asciminib as 1L therapy for newly diagnosed pts with Ph+ CML-CP.

Asciminib (ASC) Once-Daily (QD) Dosing Demonstrates Comparable Tolerability and Efficacy to Twice-Daily (BID) Dosing: Results from the ASC in Monotherapy 4 CML (AIM4CML) Study in Patients (Pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

CONCLUSIONS ASC is the only approved BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that Specifically Targets the ABL1 Myristoyl Pocket, distinguishing it from other approved treatments that target the ATP binding site. In the phase III ASCEMBL trial (NCT03106779) ASC 40 mg BID was well tolerated and demonstrated superior efficacy vs bosutinib 500 mg QD in pts previously treated with ≥2 TKIs, with major molecular response (MMR; BCR::ABL1IS ≤0.1%) rates of 25.5% vs 13.2% at wk 24 and 37.6% vs 15.8% at wk 96. We present an interim analysis of the primary endpoint of the AIM4CML trial (NCT04666259), which was initiated to assess the safety, efficacy, and QD dosing of ASC in a similar population of pts with CML-CP. This is a multicenter, phase IIIb, open-label study of ASC in pts with CML-CP without the T315I mutation after ≥2 prior TKIs and pts with the T315I mutation after ≥1 prior TKI. Adults aged ≥18 years with CML-CP who had treatment failure with or intolerance of the most recent TKI were eligible. Pts without the T315I mutation were randomized to receive ASC 40 mg BID (cohort A) or 80 mg QD (cohort B). Results for pts with the T315I mutation who received ASC 200 mg BID (cohort C) will not be presented for this analysis. The primary endpoints include adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs by wk 24 in cohorts A and B, with additional safety and efficacy secondary endpoints. This study was not powered to detect statistical differences between cohorts. End of study is when the last pt completes 72 wks of treatment or discontinues prematurely. The numbers of enrolled pts in cohorts A, B, and C were 26, 27, and 3, respectively. This interim analysis included 42 pts randomized to cohort A (n=22) or cohort B (n=20), who reached 24 wks after cycle 1 day 1 of treatment by February 17, 2023. Most baseline characteristics in cohorts A and B were comparable, but median time since initial diagnosis and median baseline BCR::ABL1IS levels were longer and higher, respectively in cohort B (Table). Median duration of exposure was 23.1 (range, 2.7-72.3) wks in cohort A and 24.1 (range, 1.3-71.0) wks in cohort B. Prior to wk 24, treatment was discontinued in 7 and 4 pts in cohorts A and B, respectively. Reasons for discontinuation included physician decision (cohort A, n=4; cohort B, n=2), AEs (cohort A, n=2; cohort B, n=1), or pt decision (cohort A, n=1; cohort B, n=1). At the time of this interim analysis, discontinuation due to treatment failure was reported only in cohort B in 2 pts that discontinued due to physician decision. Cohorts A and B had comparable all-grade, grade 3, and grade 4 AEs. Treatment-emergent all-grade AEs occurring in ≥20% in cohorts A and B were fatigue (32% and 25%), headache (27% and 20%), abdominal pain (27% and 15%), rash (23% and 5%), dyspnea (23% and 10%), nausea (14% and 30%), hypertension (14% and 20%), cough (18% and 20%), and arthralgia (9% and 20%). While many pts had AEs requiring additional therapy, few had serious AEs, and similar numbers of pts in cohorts A and B had AEs leading to dose adjustments/interruptions and treatment discontinuation (Figure). One pt in cohort B had a fatal AE due to sepsis that was not attributed to study treatment. This trial is ongoing; data for the wk 24 primary endpoint for all enrolled pts will be available at the time of presentation. Pts with ≥1 molecular response assessment by wks 4, 12, and 24 were 18, 19, and 20 in cohort A, respectively, and 17, 17, and 18 in cohort B, respectively. The proportions of pts who maintained or achieved BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% by wks 4, 12, and 24 were higher in cohort B with 52.9%, 76.5%, and 88.9%, respectively than in cohort A with 50.0%, 63.2%, and 65.0%, respectively, likely due to higher baseline BCR::ABL1IS levels in cohort B (Table). MMR rates by wks 4, 12, and 24 were 33.3%, 42.1%, and 45.0% in cohort A and 23.5%, 47.1%, and 61.1% in cohort B, respectively. Deep molecular response (MR 4; BCR::ABL1IS ≤0.01%) rates by wks 4, 12, and 24 were 27.8%, 31.6%, and 30.0% in cohort A and 5.9%, 11.8%, and 27.8% in cohort B, respectively. This interim analysis of the AIM4CML trial further demonstrates the tolerability and efficacy of ASC and is among the first clinical reports on QD dosing of ASC in pts with CML-CP. Safety was comparable between the 80-mg QD and 40-mg BID doses, with both demonstrating safety profiles consistent with prior reports. Pts receiving ASC at both doses achieved and maintained molecular responses, which deepened over time. These results support the flexibility of QD dosing with ASC.

Sustained Efficacy and Safety with Asciminib (ASC) after Almost 4 Years of Median Follow-up from Ascembl, a Phase 3 Study of ASC Vs Bosutinib (BOS) in Patients (Pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) after ≥2 Prior Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs): An End of Study Treatment (EOS Tx) Update, Including Results from Switch Population

CONCLUSIONS CML requires chronic therapy, emphasizing the need for Txs that are characterized by high, durable efficacy and a low adverse event (AE) burden. ASC, the first BCR::ABL1 inhibitor Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP), demonstrated significantly superior efficacy and better safety/tolerability compared with BOS in pts with CML-CP who received ≥2 prior TKIs in the phase 3 ASCEMBL study. Major molecular response (MMR) rate was 25.5% with ASC vs 13.2% with BOS at wk 24, meeting the primary objective, and 37.6% vs 15.8% at wk 96, meeting the key secondary objective. Despite the longer duration of exposure to ASC, safety/tolerability remained consistently better with ASC vs BOS, with fewer all-grade and grade ≥3 AEs and AEs leading to Tx discontinuation observed. After a median follow-up of 3.7 y, we report EOS Tx results from ASCEMBL (cutoff: March 22, 2023). We also report the first available data from pts who experienced Tx failure on BOS and switched to ASC. Adults (aged ≥18 y) with CML-CP after ≥2 prior TKIs, with intolerance or lack of efficacy per 2013 ELN recommendations were randomized 2:1 to receive either ASC 40 mg twice daily or BOS 500 mg once daily. Pts who met Tx failure criteria per 2013 ELN while on BOS could switch to ASC and were analyzed separately. Pts who discontinued BOS due to intolerance could not switch. EOS will occur 5 y from when the last enrolled pt received first Tx dose. A total of 233 pts were randomized to ASC (n=157) or BOS (n=76). The most common reason for discontinuation was lack of efficacy in 40 (25.5%) pts on ASC and 28 (36.8%) on BOS. At the time of EOS Tx cutoff, Tx with ASC and BOS was ongoing in 77 (49.4%) and 8 (10.5%) pts, respectively; pts deriving benefit from study Tx at EOS TX, per investigator assessment, continued receiving posttrial access. MMR rate at wk 156 continued to be higher with ASC (33.8%) than with BOS (10.5%) (Figure 1). The difference after adjusting for baseline (BL) major cytogenetic response was 23.2%(95% CI, 13.1%-33.2%; 2-sided P<.001). The BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% rate at wk 156 in pts without this level of response at BL also continued to be higher with ASC (43.0%) than with BOS (11.1%). Despite the longer median duration (range) of exposure to ASC (156.0 [0.1-256.3] wk) vs BOS (30.5 [1.0-239.3] wk), safety/tolerability of ASC continued to be better compared with BOS and were consistent with previous analyses. Two new pts had AEs leading to Tx discontinuation since the wk 96 cutoff (1 pt on ASC reported pregnancy; 1 pt on BOS reported diarrhea), and rates remained lower with ASC vs BOS (8.3% vs 27.6%). The most frequent (≥10%) grade ≥3 AEs with ASC vs BOS were thrombocytopenia (22.4% vs 9.2%), neutropenia (18.6% vs 14.5%), diarrhea (0% vs 10.5%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (0.6% vs 14.5%). Most AEs occurred within the first 6 months (Figure 2). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of arterial occlusive events (AOEs) with ASC decreased since the wk 96 cutoff, from 3.0 to 2.2 per 100 pt-y, and no new AOEs occurred with ASC, indicating that the risk of AOEs did not increase over time. Among pts who discontinued Tx due to lack of efficacy or disease progression, no new mutations occurred since the wk 96 cutoff. Of 28 pts who discontinued BOS for lack of efficacy, 25 switched to ASC. Almost all switch pts (96%) had BL BCR::ABL1IS >10% prior to switch. No switch pts achieved MMR at or by wk 48 post switch. However, at wk 48, 24% achieved BCR::ABL1IS ≤10% and 8% achieved BCR::ABL1IS ≤1%. The safety profile of ASC in switch pts was consistent with that in pts receiving ASC in the randomized period. Most frequent (≥10%) grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (32.0%) and thrombocytopenia (24.0%). AEs leading to Tx discontinuation occurred in 8.0% of switch pts. With almost 4 y of follow-up in ASCEMBL, ASC continued to show greater efficacy and better safety/tolerability than BOS in pts with CML-CP after ≥2 prior TKIs. The robust safety profile of ASC was sustained through each analysis in ASCEMBL (wk 24, wk 96, and EOS Tx), confirming that pts receiving ASC can maintain a high level of response and continue Tx without experiencing late-emerging AEs. Results in the switch population support the use of ASC early in the Tx paradigm. ASCEMBL EOS Tx results continue to strongly support ASC as the therapy of choice for pts with suboptimal responses and/or intolerance to ≥2 prior TKIs, allowing more pts to remain on Tx and achieve their Tx goals without needing to switch.

Loss of Function of SETD2 Tumor Suppressor in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Progenitors Fosters Genomic Instability and Enhances Clonogenic Potential

BACKGROUND AND AIMS - Genomic instability is a hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells since the chronic phase (CP) of the disease, and results in BCR::ABL1 mutations and/or additional genetic and genomic aberrations that may drive resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and progression to blast crisis (BC). Genomic instability is also a feature of CML stem and progenitor cells and may contribute to their persistence. The SETD2 tumor suppressor codes for a protein that trimethylates histone H3 at lysine 36 (H3K36me3). In solid tumors, SETD2 loss of function has been shown to impair H3K36me3-mediated recruitment of DNA damage response components. We have recently reported that non genomic loss of function of SETD2 is a feature of BC CML and results from premature proteasome-mediated degradation of the SETD2 protein triggered by Aurora kinase A phosphorylation and MDM2 ubiquitination. In the present study, we aimed to assess SETD2/H3K36me3 status in CD34+ progenitors of CP CML patients (pts) and whether SETD2/H3K36me3 deficiency may play a role in genomic instability in CML models. METHODS - Western blotting (WB) was used to assess SETD2 protein expression and H3K36me3 as a surrogate marker of SETD2 function in the CD34+ cell fraction isolated from the bone marrow of 20 newly diagnosed CP CML pts and from a pool of healthy donors (HD). SETD2 forced expression in CD34+ progenitors from newly diagnosed CP CML pts and in the SETD2-deficient KCL22 cell line was performed by nucleofection. SETD2 knock-down in the SETD2-proficient LAMA84 cell line was performed by RNAi. Clonogenic capacity was evaluated by clonogenic assays. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) for H3K36me3 was performed on an Illumina HiSeq2000 with a min 50 million 150-bp single-end reads per replicate. High resolution karyotyping wias perfomed with Cytoscan HD arrays. DNA damage and DNA repair activation were assessed in primary samples and cell lines by WB and immunofluorescence (IF) using antibodies specific for phospho-H2AX, mismatch repair (MMR) and homologous recombination repair (HR) proteins. RESULTS - WB demonstrated a marked down-modulation of SETD2 expression, paralleled by H3K36me3 deficiency, in the CD34+ cells of all newly diagnosed CP CML pts as compared to the total mononuclear fraction and to CD34+ cells from HDs. To investigate whether SETD2 loss affects the activation and proficiency of HR and MMR, we used chronic exposure to UV rays or a single exposure to hydrogen peroxide (1mM for 30 and 60 min). Both induced DNA damage in SETD2 siRNA-depleted LAMA84 cells. Compared to parental cells, cells silenced for SETD2 failed to activate the ATM-dependent repair pathway. Moreover, we found that ATM inactivation prevents H2AX foci formation, associated with a loss of RAD51 and RAD54 (HR) and MSH6 (MMR) repair foci. To confirm the hypothesis that SETD2 is a tumor suppressor implicated in maintaining genomic stability in CML, we transfected SETD2-deficient KCL22 cells with an ectopic SETD2 plasmid. SETD2 forced expression was able to restore DNA damage response, as demonstrated by WB and IF detection of ATM, p95 and H2AX phosphorylation, BRCA1, BRCA2 and CtIP expression and finally RAD51 and RAD54 localization on HR repair foci observed after UV or hydrogen peroxide exposure. High-resolution karyotyping after DNA damage showed increased rate of DNA breakpoints in SETD2-deficient cells, preferentially occuring at loci where H3K36me3 marks were lost as assessed by ChiP-seq. In line with the effects observed in cell line models, forced expression of SETD2 in CD34+ cells from 5 CP CML pts was found to restore proliferation control, since a >50% reduction in clonogenic potential was observed after nucleofection. CONCLUSIONS - Our findings demonstrate that SETD2 is a bona fide tumor suppressor in CML progenitors and establish a functional link between SETD2 loss of function and genomic instability. SETD2 inactivation may thus play a pivotal role in the harmful cascade of events that may foster drug resistance and ultimately lead to disease progression. Since SETD2 loss of function in CML is mediated by post-translation mechanisms, hence is reversible, therapeutic strategies aimed at interfering with these mechanisms may restore proliferation control and interrupt this cascade. Supported by AIRC IG 2019 (23001) and by Italian Ministry of Health, “Bando Ricerca Finalizzata 2016”, project GR-2016-02364880.

Flumatinib Versus Imatinib As a Frontline Therapy for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: A Propensity Score Matching Study from Real-World Data

Background: Flumatinib mesylate, as a novel oral BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved as a frontline therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in China since 2019. Mechanistically, with its structure of trifluoromethyl and pyridine flumatinib blocked BCR-ABL1 kinase autophosphorylation with much more potent activity than did imatinib and even showed higher efficacy than nilotinib against wild-type BCR-ABL1 kinase. Currently, there is still lacking the real-world effectiveness and safety of flumatinib in patients with CML. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed efficacy and safety of CML-CP patients (≥16 years) used flumatinib (600mg daily) or imatinib (400mg daily) as first-line treatment from 2020 to 2023, presenting a real-world comparison study. A propensity score (PS) matching was performed to adjust for Sokal risk score to compare the treatment efficacy, survival outcomes and safety of flumatinib and imatinib in a clinically well matched cohort. Results: PS matching resulted in 20 patients from each cohort being matched for Sokal risk scores. The median follow-up of the flumatinib-treated and imatinib-treated cohorts was 441 days and 487 days, respectively. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population analysis, there is no differences between flumatinib and imatinib groups in 3-month early molecular response rate (85% vs. 80%, p = 0.677), 6-month major molecular response rate (MMR) (50% vs. 40%, p = 0.525) and 12-month MMR (55% vs. 50%, p = 0.752). In term of deep molecular response, more patients receiving flumatinib achieved molecular remission 4.5 (MR4.5) and molecular remission 4 (MR4.0) at 6 months (35% vs.0%, p = 0.004; and 45% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.003, respectively) and appeared to have higher 12-month MR4.5 and 12-month MR4.0 (45% vs.10%, p = 0.013; and 45% vs. 20%, p = 0.091, respectively; Table). During the follow-up period, treatment discontinuation occurred in 6 and 9 patients in flumatinib-treated and imatinib-treated cohorts respectively, including 2 and 3 patients due to drug resistance and 3 and 4 patients due to toxicity. The 2-year probability of event-free survival was 70% among the patients who received flumatinib and 47% among those who received imatinib ( p = 0.85), and the corresponding 2-year failure-free survival probabilities were 85% and 76%, respectively ( p = 0.77). Adverse events of edema, rash were more frequent in imatinib arm (any grade; 0% vs. 25%, p = 0.017; and 0% vs. 25%, p = 0.035, respectively), whereas alanine transaminase elevation appeared to be more frequent in flumatinib arm (any grade, 15% vs. 0%, p = 0.072). Of note, one patient receiving flumatinib had grade 3 QT prolongation and ventricular premature beat and was discontinued. Conclusions: The real-world data demonstrated that as a first-line treatment setting, flumatinib can bring patients with chronic phase CML higher rates of responses, and faster and deeper responses, indicating that flumatinib could be an alternative effective first-line treatment for CML-CP. The adverse events of flumatinib, such as cardiovascular events, abnormal liver function, and diarrhea, need to be given continuous concern in future studies.

Flumatinib for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Open-Label, Multi-Center Study

Background Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) ushered in the era of targeted therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia(CML), which greatly improved the prognosis of patients with CML. Flumatinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which is currently approved for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in China. And some current clinical trials revealed that flumatinib has been shown to be a more potent inhibitor of BCR::ABL than imatinib. Methods In this open label, single-arm, multicenter study, 127 patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) treated with flumatinib were enrolled. The primary endpoint of this study was early molecular response (EMR) rates at 3 months. The secondary were the rates of complete cytogenic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) at 3, 6, 12 months and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04591197. Results From October 2020 to December 2022, a total of 158 patients with CP-CML were assessed for eligibility, of whom 127 were followed up for more than 3 months. 79(62%) patients were men and 48 (38%) were women. The median age was 47 years (range, 19-82 years), The median time from diagnosis to treatment was 6 days (0-176 days) and the median follow-up was 9.7 months (range 3.1-26.6 months). Of evaluable 127 patients, EMR was achieved by 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.6%-90.7%) of patients at 3 months. After the initiation of flumatinib treatment, the incidence of MMR at 3, 6, and 12 months was 24%, 59%, and 73%, respectively. Patients receiving flumatinib had higher rates of CCyR at 6 months and MMR 12 months than the data from DASISION (dasatinib) and ENESTnd (nilotinib) therapy (85% vs 73% vs 67% and 73% vs 46% vs 44%). Progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1-year was 97.2%. Diarrhea (34%) were the most commonly reported adverse events. Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1/2. None of the patients discontinued or died due to AEs. Conclusion Flumatinib as first-line therapy in patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML was not inferior to nilotinib and dasatinib and well tolerated.

Characteristics, Outcomes, Tfr Rates in Young Adults with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Era: A French Observational Study

Introduction. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative disorder with a median age of approximately 60 years. Our study emphasizes the fact that CML can present at younger ages. These patients have significantly different life challenges compared with older patients. The 2020 update of the ELN recommendations mentioned that“ TFR may be the main goal for any patient, irrespective of age, but it is clear that the younger the patient the stronger the case for achieving TFR”. We report here the main characteristics and TFR data in CML young adults. Methods. The French CML group (FI-LMC) initiated an observational study (CCTIRS no. 14.745) to describe the characteristics of CML in young adult patients in terms of characteristics at diagnosis, treatment choices, tolerance, adherence, therapeutic response, evolution and survival. Patients ranging from 18 to < 30 years with newly diagnosed CML in chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in first line were eligible for enrolment. Results. The observatory included 253 unselected young adults from 22 centers with newly diagnosed CML in CP (n=246) or in AP (n=7) among which 51.6% were treated within a first line trial. At the time of CML diagnosis, the median patient age was 24 years (range, 18-29 years); 165 patients were males (63%). Median (range) values were: WBC 154.3 G/L (6.5; 841); platelets 374 G/L (51; 1799), hemoglobin 11.3 g/dL (4.1; 18.3), blast cells 1 % (0; 20), spleen below costal margin 4 cm (0; 30). In CP patients, Sokal score was low in 132 (53.6%) patients, intermediate in 46 (18.7%), high in 37 (15.1%) and unknown in 31 (12.6%) and ELTS score was low in 142 (57.7%) patients, intermediate in 48 (19.5%), high in 22 (9%) and unknown in 34 (13.8%). Initial TKI was imatinib alone (52.4%) or in combination with IFN (2.4%) or Ara-C (0.8%), nilotinib alone (24.6%) or in combination with IFN (4%), dasatinib alone (8.2%) or in combination with IFN (0.4%), bosutinib (1.2%), ponatinib (4.8%) or asciminib (1.2%). Median follow-up is 106.2 months (range: 0.03; 279.2). Ninety-nine (39.3%) patients remained under first-line TKI at latest follow-up and 21 pts (8.3%) underwent bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for resistance or transformation. Median overall survival at 9 years is 96.9% [95% CI: 94.5- 99.4]. Event free survival without death, transformation, or BMT at 9 years is 93.1% [95% CI: 89.7- 96.7]. Six patients died, 1 from sarcoma, 5 from CML including 1 before any therapy (brain hemorrhage). We investigated the TFR strategy. In 169 patients treated for at least 5 years, 56 (33.1%) attempted TKI discontinuation. TKI free survival at 24 months is 57.9% [95% CI: 45.8- 73.2] (Figure 1). Complete analysis comparing characteristics and outcome between the 2 groups of patients (TFR vs no TFR), will be available for ASH presentation. Conclusion. Despite aggressive features including prominent splenomegaly, high WBC counts and high blast cell percentage, TFR seems achievable in young adults with CML.

Full Treatment-Free Remission Outcome in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase Following One Year of Nilotinib De-Escalation: 96-Week Update of Dante Study

Introduction: Treatment-free remission (TFR) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is achievable and recommended for patients (pts) in sustained deep molecular response (DMR) who can discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment while maintaining responses. Studies investigating TKI de-escalation before TFR are mainly in imatinib-treated CML chronic phase (CP) pts and suggest that this stepwise approach is feasible. Although nilotinib (NIL) is the first and only TKI approved for stopping therapy, nilotinib-based TFR optimization strategy has not been formally studied. Our phase II, single-arm, prospective, multicenter DANTE study (NCT03874858) aims to shed light on frontline NIL de-escalation in terms of full treatment-free remission (FTFR) (primary endpoint) and TFR rate (secondary endpoint) 96 weeks after the start of consolidation in CML-CP Italian patients. Our previously analysis on 40 pts with sustained DMR who entered in the TFR phase showed that approximately 68% of pts remained disease-free 1 year after stopping NIL 1. Here we present the data of 89 patients who successfully completed NIL de-escalation and at least 1 year of TFR. Methods: Adults patients with CML-CP treated with NIL 300 mg twice daily (bid) in first line for ≥3 years who achieved sustained DMR for ≥1 year (≥MR 4.0; BCR-ABL level ≤0.01% IS) were enrolled in 27 centers. The study consisted of 4 phases: screening (week [wk] −4-0), consolidation (wk 0-48), TFR (wk 48-144), and follow-up (until wk 144). Ongoing treatment with ≥400 mg/day dose was allowed at study entry. During consolidation pts were treated with NIL 300 mg once daily (qd). At the end of consolidation phase, pts with sustained DMR entered TFR phase and NIL was discontinued. Patients with major molecular response (MMR [BCR-ABL ≤0.1% IS]) but without sustained DMR continued NIL 300 mg qd. At any time, pts with loss of MMR returned to NIL 300 mg bid. During TFR phase, BCR-ABL levels were monitored monthly from wk 52-96 and then every 3 months. Here we report updated results collected until the cut-off date of 8th February 2023, when all patients who entered the TFR phase had completed at least one year of TFR or switched to full-dose phase or entered in survival follow-up or discontinued the study. The primary endpoint of the study is FTFR, defined as the percentage of patients (in both TFR phase and NIL half-dose) in MMR or better at week 96. Results: Overall, 113 pts were screened and 107 entered in consolidation phase. The baseline characteristics and the clinical outcome of the 107 patients are shown in Tab 1. Specifically, 98/107 (92%) completed the consolidation phase, while 9 pts discontinued permanently (2 due to loss of MMR, 3 due to adverse events (AEs) and 4 due to patient decision). Noteworthy, 89/107 (83%) with sustained DMR entered in the TFR phase, while 9 pts maintained MMR but not sustained DMR (7 entered in NIL half dose follow-up period and were in FTFR at 96 weeks, while 2 discontinued the study before week 96). At 1 year cut-off data, 71/107 pts (66.4%) were in FTFR, meeting the primary endpoint of study. We observed 64/89 pts (72%) who entered in the TFR phase remained in MMR or better after a median duration of 20.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1.9-32.4), meeting the main secondary endpoint of the study. The median time to loss of MMR in TFR phase was not reached (Fig 1). The remaining 25/89 pts (28%) had discontinued the TFR phase (21 pts due to loss of MMR, 1 due to AEs and 3 pts for subject/guardian decision). The median time spent in TFR phase until loss of MMR was 3.6 months (IQR 2-19 months). At the cut-off data, 23/24 pts (96%) who restarted NIL after MMR loss regained MMR and MR4 after a median time of 2.7 months (IQR 1.0-5.6) and 4.1 months (IQR 1.2-10), respectively. Notably, 20/24 (83%) who restarted NIL after MMR loss achieved MR4.5 after a median time of 6.4 months (IQR 2.0-16.9). During the TFR phase, all-grade AEs were reported in 64/89 pts (72%). One pt (1.1%) had serious AE (pneumonia). No deaths and disease progressions were observed. Conclusions: Our findings show that 66.4% pts who entered in consolidation phase achieved FTFR 96 weeks after the start of the consolidation period, and approximately 72% of pts remained disease-free at 1 year after stopping NIL. Overall, our data suggest that de-escalation of NIL before TFR attempt in CML-CP pts with sustained DMR can be a successful dose-optimization strategy. 1Stagno F. et al., Blood (2022) 140 (Supplement 1): 9614-9616.

Treatment Patterns and Modifications of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) Therapy in Early Lines in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Real-World Analysis from a Large Commercial Claims Database in the United States (US)

Introduction: Although current TKI options are often successful in managing CML-CP in early lines of therapy, patients may experience issues related to tolerability or resistance to TKIs. Physicians often have to proceed with treatment modifications including discontinuation, switching, temporary interruptions, or dose modifications when the patient's current treatment is not working as expected. This retrospective cohort study assessed these TKI therapy management patterns in patients with CML in first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) treatment in the US. Methods: A large administrative claims database of commercially insured patients, the OptumInsight Clinformatics database (January 2007-June 2022), was used to select adult patients with CML who received 1L TKI therapy (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib; 1L cohort) and those who received 2L TKI therapy (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, or ponatinib; 2L cohort), with treatment initiation (index date) on or after 2012. Patients were required to have ≥6 months of continuous health plan enrollment pre-index, with no hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or CML-related chemotherapy treatments for accelerated phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC) pre-index. Treatment modifications assessed post-index included 1) treatment discontinuation, defined as the earliest of HSCT/treatment switch (defined below)/initiation of a CML-related chemotherapy for AP or BC, 2) treatment switch defined as initiation of another TKI/omacetaxine mepesuccinate, 3) temporary treatment interruption defined as gap of ≥ 14 days followed by resuming the index TKI, and 4) dose reduction (as compared to the initial dose) were assessed. Time to first event post-index were conducted using Kaplan Meier analyses for each of these treatment modifications, in 1L and 2L cohorts, separately. Results: A total of 2,043 patients were included in the 1L cohort with 47.8% of them receiving imatinib, 31.0% dasatinib, 19.2% nilotinib, and 2.0% bosutinib (median age: 64 years; 44.9% female; 69.7% White; 49.5% with Medicare advantage plan operated by commercial insurance [Part C]). Patients in the 1L cohort were observed for a mean (SD) period of 29.1 (27.3) months from index date to earliest of loss of follow-up/end of data. Overall, more than a quarter of patients (27.3%) experienced treatment discontinuation, with rates of discontinuation of 16.1% at 6 months, 25.0% at 12 months, and 33.5% at 24 months post-index ( Figure 1). Treatment switch was observed in 26.0% of the patients, with rates of 15.5% at 6 months and 24.4% at 12 months post-index. The proportion of patients with temporary treatment interruption was 18.6%, with rates of 20.6% at 6 months and 22.2% at 12 months post-index. Dose reduction (as compared to initial dose) occurred in 21.9% of patients, with rates of 18.8% at 6 months and 23.3% at 12 months post-index. A total of 586 patients were included in the 2L cohort with 23.0% of them receiving imatinib, 36.9% dasatinib, 26.6% nilotinib, 10.9% bosutinib and 2.6% ponatinib (median age: 65 years; 47.3% female; 72.5% White; 48.3% with Medicare advantage plan operated by commercial insurance [Part C]). Patients in the 2L cohort were observed for a mean (SD) period of 28.4 (25.4) months from index date to earliest of loss of follow-up/end of data. Almost a third of patients (32.8%) experienced treatment discontinuation, with rates of discontinuation of 22.1% at 6 months, 29.9% at 12 months, and 43.1% at 24 months post-index ( Figure 1). Treatment switch was observed in 30.5% of patients, with rates of 20.5% at 6 months and 28.3% at 12 months post-index. The proportion of patients with temporary treatment interruption was 21.3%, with rates of 24.8% at 6 months and 25.4% at 12 months post-index. Dose reduction as compared to initial dose occurred in 20.6% of patients, with rates of 17.5% at 6 months and 27.2% at 12 months post-index. Conclusions: Findings from this real-world study demonstrate that almost a quarter of patients with CML treated with current TKI treatment options in 1L or 2L experienced treatment discontinuation/switch in the first year from TKI initiation suggesting lack of optimal response/tolerability to currently available TKIs, with more pronounced rates in 2L. This suggests that unmet clinical needs still persist in this population, warranting optimal 1L and 2L treatment options with better tolerability profile for CML management.

Long-Term Follow-Up in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Ponatinib in a Real-World Cohort: Safety and Efficacy Analysis

BackgroundPonatinib is a third-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI), indicated in patients with chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP), or blast phase (BP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), who are resistant or intolerant to ≥2 prior TKIs, patients for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not appropriate, and patients who have a T315I mutation. Patients and MethodsWe aimed to evaluate outcomes of ponatinib treatment, including safety, with focus on cardiovascular toxicity, in real-world patients from Argentina. Data from patients with CP CML treated with ponatinib was retrospectively retrieved from 2013 to 2023 in 7 centers. ResultsSeventy-two patients were included (median age: 44 years; male: 55.5%; T315I mutation: 32%: median treatment duration: 36 months. At baseline, 57 patients (79%) had a breakpoint cluster region–Abelson (BCR::ABL1) transcript level >10% on the international reporting scale (BCR::ABL1 IS). A molecular response (MR, BCR::ABL1 (IS) <1%) was achieved at 12 months in 51.6% of evaluable patients; 57% maintained MR at last follow-up. Overall, 43% and 25% maintained major MR (MMR) or deep MR (DMR) (MR4.0-MR5.0), respectively at last follow-up. Twelve (16.6%) ponatinib-resistant patients were rescued with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 84%. Ponatinib dose was reduced during treatment in 22 patients; nevertheless, MMR was maintained in 50% of these patients. Severe arterial occlusive events (AOE) were reported in 10.9% of patients after a median treatment of 5 months. ConclusionCV toxicity was consistent with clinical trials and other real-world registries. Older age, hypercholesterolemia and a SCORE risk >2% were significantly associated with higher risk of AOEs. Controlling CV risk factors and reducing doses at optimal time points may help to optimize ponatinib use in daily practice.