Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Research Articles

Counting your chickens before they hatch: improvements in an untreated chronic pain population, beyond regression to the mean and the placebo effect.

Isolating the effect of an intervention from the natural course and fluctuations of a condition is a challenge in any clinical trial, particularly in the field of pain. Regression to the mean (RTM) may explain some of these observed fluctuations. In this paper, we describe and quantify the natural trajectory of questionnaire scores over time, based on initial scores. Twenty-seven untreated chronic low back pain patients and 25 healthy controls took part in this observational study, wherein they were asked to complete an array of questionnaires commonly used in pain studies during each of 3 visits (V1, V2, V3) at the 2-month interval. Scores at V1 were classified into 3 subgroups (extremely high, normal, and extremely low), based on z-scores. The average delta (∆ = V2 - V1) was calculated for each subgroup, for each questionnaire, to describe the evolution of scores over time based on initial scores. This analysis was repeated with the data for V2 and V3. Our results show that high initial scores were widely followed by more average scores, while low initial scores tended to be followed by similar (low) scores. These trajectories cannot be attributable to RTM alone because of their asymmetry, nor to the placebo effect as they occurred in the absence of any intervention. However, they could be the result of an Effect of Care, wherein participants had meaningful improvements simply from taking part in a study. The improvement observed in patients with high initial scores should be carefully taken into account when interpreting results from clinical trials.

Comparison of the Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise According to the Presence or Absence of Gluteus Medius Muscle Weakness in Chronic Lower Back Pain Patients with Lumbar Instability

Comparison of the Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise According to the Presence or Absence of Gluteus Medius Muscle Weakness in Chronic Lower Back Pain Patients with Lumbar Instability

Evaluation de la force musculaire chez le lombalgique chronique: Comparaison entre reeducation isocinetique et reeducation classique

Chronic low back pain is a public health problem in view of its functional repercussions and the functional rehabilitation is an integral part of its management. To compare the evolution of muscle strentgh of spinal extensors and flexors in chronic low back pain patients after an isokinetic rehabilitation protocol and a conventional rehabilitation one. This was a prospective and comparative study carried out in the Physical Medicine Department of the Tunis Military Hospital over a period of 7 months. Fifty patients were included, randomly divided into two groups of 25. The first group (G1) benefited from an isokinetic rehabilitation protocol and the second one (G2) from a classic active physiotherapy. We performed a clinical (Sorensen test and Shirado test) and isokinetic evaluation of the trunk muscles before and after rehabilitation. The mean age of the general population was 42±8.6 years old. Clinical evaluation showed a deficit in the extensor and flexor muscles of the spine, more important in the extensors in both groups. After rehabilitation, there was a significant improvement in clinical tests of muscular endurance in G1 and G2. Isokinetic assessment showed a greater muscle deficit in the extensors in both groups. After isokinetic rehabilitation, peak torque for flexors and extensors increased by 21% and 23% respectively, power was 34% and 37% higher, and total work increased by 26% and 47%. On the other hand, the (F/E) ratios were unchanged for all three speeds. In Group 2, peak torque values for flexors and extensors increased by 22 and 15% respectively, power was higher by 31 and 23% and total work was also up by 29 and 17%, while F/E ratios were also unchanged. Group 1 showed the greatest improvement in extensor strength at 60°/s, and in power at 90°/s for the various muscles. In our study, we concluded that endurance and muscular strength improved the most after isokinetic rehabilitation.

H-Wave® Device Stimulation for Chronic Neck Pain: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Study.

Chronic neck pain (cNP) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, often being refractory to conventional forms of treatment. Various forms of electrical stimulation have been proposed to decrease pain and improve function. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for treatment of cNP have rarely been published. An independent retrospective statistical analysis of PROMs data for users of H-Wave® device stimulation (HWDS), prospectively collected by the device manufacturer over a 4-year period, was conducted. Final surveys for 34,192 pain management patients were filtered for pain chronicity limited to 3-24months and device use of 22-365days, resulting in 11,503 patients with "all diagnoses"; this number was further reduced to 1482 patients with cNP, sprain, or strain. Neck pain was reduced by 3.13 points (0-10 pain scale), with significant (≥20%) relief in 86.6%. Function/activities of daily living (ADL) improved in 96.19%, while improved work performance was reported in 84.76%. Medication use decreased or stopped in 65.42% and sleep improved in 60.39%. Over 95% reported having expectations met or exceeded, service satisfaction, and confidence in device use, while no adverse events were reported. Subgroup analyses found positive benefit associations with longer duration of device use. Near-equivalent outcomes were self-reported by cNP HWDS patients as for (previously published) chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients. HWDS provided effective and safe cNP relief, improvements in function and ADL, along with additional benefits including decreased medication use, better sleep, and improved work performance.

Prevalence of Disability in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Patients

Background: Lower back pain (LBP) is the most frequent medical condition requiring rehabilitation in most countries, and it is also the most common medical issue among individuals with disabilities. Numerous illnesses, such as nephrolithiasis, endometriosis, tumors, fibromyalgia, and psychological disorders, can induce back pain that is not related to the spine. Objective: To determine the disability prevalence among patients with chronic non-specific low back pain Materials and Methods: The cross sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka. Total 103 cases diagnosed individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain after fulfilling enrollment criteria was enrolled in this study. Question about sex life (ODI-8) was asked at the end of the interview. Disability refers to impairment, activity limitation and participation restrictions that may occur with a health condition. Low back pain was defined as pain and discomfort, localized below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds with or without referred leg pain. Statistical analyses were carried out by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Results: Prevalence of the disability more than half (52.4%) of the patients had severe disability, 27(26.2%) had moderate, 14(13.6%) had crippled and 8(7.8%) had minimal disability. Conclusion: The prevalence of severe disability in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain was 52.4%. The duration and severity of pain are significantly correlated with impairment.

Can the Mismatch of Measured Pelvic Morphology vs. Lumbar Lordosis Predict Chronic Low Back Pain Patients?

Background: Measures of lumbar lordosis (LL) and elliptical modeling variables have been shown to discriminate between normal and chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Pelvic morphology influences an individual's sagittal lumbar alignment. Our purpose is to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of lumbar sagittal radiographic alignment and modeling variables to identify if these can discriminate between normal controls and CLBP patients. Methods: We conducted a computer analysis of digitized vertebral body corners on lateral lumbar radiographs of normal controls and CLBP patients. Fifty normal controls were attained from a required pre-employment physical examination (29 men; 21 women; mean age of 27.7 ± 8.5 years), with no history of low back pain, a normal spinal examination, no pathologies, anomalies, or instability. Additionally, 50 CLBP patients (29 men; 29.5 ± 8 years of age) were randomly chosen and matched to the characteristics of the controls. The inclusion criteria required no abnormalities on lumbar spine radiographs. The parameters included the following: ARA L1-L5 lordosis, ARA T12-S1 lordosis, Cobb T12-S1, b/a elliptical modelling ratio, sacral base angle (SBA), and S1 posterior tangent to vertical (PTS1). Two measures of pelvic morphology were determined for each person-the angle of pelvic incidence (API) and posterior tangent pelvic incidence angle (PTPIA)-and the relationships between API - ARA T12-S1, API - Cobb T12-S1, and API - ARA L1-5 was determined. Descriptive statistics and correlations among the primary variables were determined. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) for primary variables were analyzed. Results: The mean values of LL were statistically different between the normal and CLBP groups (p < 0.001), indicating a hypo-lordotic lumbar spine for the CLBP group. The mean b/a ratio was lower in the chronic pain group (p = 0.0066). The pelvic morphology variables were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). API had a stronger correlation to the SBA and Cobb T12-S1 than PTPIA did, while PTPIA had a stronger correlation to the S1 tangent and ARA T12-S1 than API did. While CLBP patients had a stronger correlation of ARA T12-S1 and Cobb T12-S1 relative to the pelvic morphology, they also had a reduced correlation of ARA L1-L5 lordosis relative to their SBA and pelvic morphology measures. API - T12-S1, API - L1-L5, and API - Cobb T12-S1 were statistically different between the groups, p < 0.001. Using ROC curve analyses, it was identified that ARA L1-L5 lordosis of 36° and ARA T12-S1 of 68° have a good sensitivity and specificity to discriminate between normal and CLBP patients. ROC curve analyses identified that lordosis ARAT12-S1 < 68° (AUC = 0.83), lordosis ARAL1-L5 < 36° (AUC = 0.78), API - ARA T12-S1 < -18° (AUC = 0.75), API - ARAL1-L5 > 35° (AUC = 0.71), and API - Cobb T12-S1 < -5° (AUC = 0.69) had moderate to good discrimination between groups (AUC = 0.83, 0.78, 0.75, and 0.72). Conclusions: Pelvic morphology is similar between normal and CLBP patients. CLBP patients have an abnormal 'fit' of their API - ARAT12-S1 and L1-L5 lumbar lordosis relative to their pelvic morphology and sacral tilt shown as a hypolordosis.

Impaired Carbohydrate Metabolism among Women with Chronic Low Back Pain and the Role of Dietary Carbohydrates: A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Experiment.

Background: Impaired glucose regulation is suggested to be related to chronic low back pain (CLBP), although it is not clear how they interact with each other. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to investigate differences in postprandial glycemic responses (PPGRs) (the first sign of impaired glucose metabolism) to high- (sucrose) and low-glycemic index (GI) (isomaltulose) beverages in normoglycemic women with CLBP and healthy controls (HCs) and explore whether any group that showed greater PPGRs to high-GI beverage intake would benefit when the high-GI beverage was replaced with a low-GI beverage. Secondly, this study aimed to explore the association between PPGR and pain in patients with CLBP. Methods: This study was registered at clinicaltrials.org (NCT04459104) before the start of the study. In this study, 53 CLBP patients and 53 HCs were recruited. After 11-12 h of fasting, each participant randomly received isomaltulose or sucrose. Blood glucose levels were measured during the fasting state and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after the beverage intake, and each participant underwent experimental pain measures. Results: Compared to the HCs, the CLBP group showed significantly higher PPGRs to sucrose (p < 0.021). Additionally, the CLBP group showed a significantly higher decrease in PPGR (p = 0.045) when comparing PPGR to sucrose with PPGR to isomaltulose. Correlation analysis revealed a positive association between self-reported pain sensitivity and PPGR to sucrose, while there was no association found between any experimental pain measures and glycemic responses. Conclusions: Overall, these findings suggest that normoglycemic CLBP patients might have a higher risk of developing impaired glucose tolerance than the HCs and might benefit more when high-GI foods are replaced with low-GI ones.

354 Feasibility and Clinical Imaging of Pain States Based on Multi-Delay Arterial Spin Labeling in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Implanted With Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation

INTRODUCTION: Multi-delay, pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling (PCASL) is a novel technique capable of perfusion imaging without contrast. It overcomes the limitation of a low signal-to-noise ratio of pulsed-ASL, and multiple post-label delays allow it to account for and measure arterial transit time (ATT). This makes it a suitable tool for the perfusion assessment. To date, there have been no studies to assess changes in ASL-measured perfusion in chronic low-back pain (cLBP) patients treated with thoracic spinal cord stimulation (tSCS). METHODS: PCASL data was acquired in five patients post-tSCS and five healthy subjects. ATT was estimated using weighted delays from multiple delay times, and it was used to calculate cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV). Maps were normalized into MNI space and smoothed. Averaged values of ATT, CBF and CBV from pain ROI atlas were extracted and compared between cLBP and healthy control groups. Statistics comparing perfusion changes between patients and healthy subjects were conducted after Box-Cox transformation of data using Wilcoxon rank sum. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated the feasibility of MRI scanning with ASL sequence in patients with SCS. Specific absorption rates ranged from 0.031–0.042W/kg. Wilcoxon test indicated that ATT was significantly greater in cLBP patients within the supplementary motor area, posterior short gyrus, and the orbitofrontal cortex. There were no significant differences in patients and controls in CBF or CBV. CONCLUSIONS: Rate of perfusion as indexed by PCASL-derived ATT is reduced in cLBP treated with SCS patients in regions associated with pain processing, cognition, and motor planning. Insignificant results in CBF and CBV measures are likely due to low sample size of patients.

348 Comparison of Brain Functional Imaging of Pain States Using Resting-State fMRI and Multi-Delay pCASL to Clinical Scores of Pain in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Implanted With Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is an interventional option for patients with refractory chronic low back pain (cLBP). The use of functional imaging of brain regions involved in pain as a quantitative method to evaluate treatment effectiveness has not yet been studied. METHODS: pCASL data using 5 post-label delays (0.5-2.5s) alongside rs-fMRI data was gathered from five patients (4 M, 1F) post-tSCS with cLBP post-implantation with the SCS device turned off at a 3.0T scanner. Arterial transit time (ATT), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and cerebral blood volume (CBV) were derived from pCASL data. Amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), fractional ALFF (fALFF), degree of centrality (DC) and regional homogeneity (ReHo) were derived from rs-fMRI data. These data were registered against a pain-ROI atlas. The following clinical pain scores were assessed in the same five patients: Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Predictive linear associations between pain ROIs and clinical scores were investigated using linear regression. RESULTS: Significant linear associations (p-value &lt; 0.001) were found between pCASL-derived ATT to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPC) and the NPRS; CBF to the ventral posterolateral thalamus (VPL) and the VAS, and of the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the VAS; CBV of the posterior short gyrus (PS) and the VAS; and rs-fMRI-derived fALFF of the amygdala and the CSI. CONCLUSIONS: A comparison of functional imaging results and clinical pain scores suggest predictive relationships between resting-state function/brain perfusion in regions involved in pain perception and processing and various clinical pain assessments.

Assessment of Motor Control in Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain Patients with Flexible Flat Foot

Assessment of Motor Control in Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain Patients with Flexible Flat Foot

349 Brain Functional Imaging of Pain States Using Resting-State fMRI and Multi-Delay PCASL in Chronic Low-Back Pain Patients Implanted With Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation

INTRODUCTION: A treatment of chronic low-back pain is implantation of a thoracic spinal cord stimulator (tSCS), which has been shown to reduce pain. The functional changes in pain processing regions of the brain as assessed by resting-state fMRI and multi-delay pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) have never been studied. METHODS: PCASL data based on 5 post-label delays (0.5–2.5s) as well as rsfMRI were acquired in five patients (1F) post-tSCS with cLBP and five healthy subjects (2F). Patient MRI scans were taken post-implantation with the SCS device turned off. Three PCASL measures and four rsfMRI measures were derived and normalized into MNI space and smoothed. Averaged values for each measure from the pain ROI atlas were extracted and compared between patients and controls. Statistics were conducted following Box-Cox transformation of data. RESULTS: Arterial transit time derived from PCASL showed a significant difference in the OFC, SMA, and PSG of patients, but other ASL measures showed no effect. Several regions across the rs-fMRI measures showed significant differences, including those involved in cognition (DLPFC, PCC), and pain processing (PSG) and sensation (S2). CONCLUSIONS: Functional imaging showed that cLBP patients treated with SCS display differences in resting-state function and brain perfusion across several pain regions of the brain. These areas are mainly part of the cognitive and behavioral components of the pain circuitry.

The analgesic and disability improvement effects of trigger points electroacupuncture on chronic low back pain patients: an uncontrolled before-and-after study

Low back pain (LBP) is the most common cause of disability in patients aged 45 to 65. Traditional medicine plays an important role in the treatment of this disease. Especially, electroacupuncture at 100 Hz is effective in the improvement of pain and symptoms. In addition, clinical and research evidence shows that trigger points acupuncture is effective in LBP treatment. However, these studies have small sample sizes, so their reliability is not high. Thus, our study aims to evaluate the effect of trigger points electroacupuncture (TrP-EA) at 100 Hz on chronic LBP patients with larger sample sizes. 37 patients diagnosed with chronic LBP received TrP-EA at 100 Hz for 4 weeks. Outcome measures were the visual analogue scale (VAS), roland morris questionnaire (RMQ), and Oswestry low back pain disability index (ODI). Compared with the pre-treatment baseline, VAS, RMQ, and ODI improved dramatically after 1 week of treatment (p&lt;0.01), 2 weeks of treatment (p&lt;0.01), 3 weeks of treatment (p&lt;0.01) and 4 weeks of treatment (p&lt;0.01). The results suggest that TrP-EA at 100 Hz had analgesic efficacy and may have the potential to improve disability in patients with chronic LBP.

The analgesic and disability improvement effects of trigger points electroacupuncture on chronic low back pain patients: an uncontrolled before-and-after study

Low back pain (LBP) is the most common cause of disability in patients aged 45 to 65. Traditional medicine plays an important role in the treatment of this disease. Especially, electroacupuncture at 100 Hz is effective in the improvement of pain and symptoms. In addition, clinical and research evidence shows that trigger points acupuncture is effective in LBP treatment. However, these studies have small sample sizes, so their reliability is not high. Thus, our study aims to evaluate the effect of trigger points electroacupuncture (TrP-EA) at 100 Hz on chronic LBP patients with larger sample sizes. 37 patients diagnosed with chronic LBP received TrP-EA at 100 Hz for 4 weeks. Outcome measures were the visual analogue scale (VAS), roland morris questionnaire (RMQ), and Oswestry low back pain disability index (ODI). Compared with the pre-treatment baseline, VAS, RMQ, and ODI improved dramatically after 1 week of treatment (p&lt;0.01), 2 weeks of treatment (p&lt;0.01), 3 weeks of treatment (p&lt;0.01) and 4 weeks of treatment (p&lt;0.01). The results suggest that TrP-EA at 100 Hz had analgesic efficacy and may have the potential to improve disability in patients with chronic LBP.

The short- and long-term effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on pain, and psychosocial factors in adults with chronic low back pain.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) has long plagued mankind, but little progress has been made in finding a rational and effective treatment, letalone a common cause. This study is an attempt to fill that void by measuring short- and long-term effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), including psychosocial and pain reduction in CLBP patients. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effectiveness of neuromusculoskeletal medicine/osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) in treating CLBP, with a focus on biopsychosocial (pain sensitivity questionnaire [PSQ]) and pain control in chronic conditions. The study involved a large, single cohort observational design of 101 patients. The inclusion criteria for selecting patients targeted those with "nonspecific" CLBP. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Minimum Dataset for Chronic Low Back Pain (NMD) was the measurement tool and was administered at consent (baseline), 2, 4, and 8weeks and at 6 and 12months. Time trends were analyzed as overall mean. Pairwise differences were compared between time points. Mixed-effects models were utilized to test the association of time with pain and biopsychosocial scores. Pain and PSQ scores decreased over the study timeline. The most significant change for both pain and biopsychosocial scores occurred at 6months compared to baseline, with a further reduction at 12months. OMT has been demonstrated to significantly reduce pain and psychosocial factors related to CLBP in both the short and long term.

Comparative efficacy of acupuncture, venesection, and physical therapy on chronic low back pain outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) imposes considerable financial and social burden with poor response to medical and surgical treatments. Alternatively, acupuncture and venesection(Fasd) are traditionally used to alleviate nociceptive and musculoskeletal pains. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of acupuncture and venesection on CLBP and patient functionality. The current study was a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial with balanced allocation, conducted in the Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Medicine, in 2022. One hundred five CLBP patients who had no back pain-attributable structural or major diseases were randomly allocated into three parallel arms and received either physical therapy (PTG), acupuncture (APG), or venesection (VSG). Pain severity and functional aspects were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) during the study. VAS and ODI scores were defined as the primary outcomes. Ninety-five patients were reviewed in the final analysis (PTG=33, APG=30, VSG=31). Demographic data showed equal group distribution. Statistical analysis showed all procedures had reduced VAS score immediately after the first session, after the last session, and after follow-up; however, APG and VSG values were significantly lower (P<0.05). Pain reduction results in follow-up period were more sustainable in APG and VSG as compared to PTG (P<0.01). ODI results revealed global improvement after the last session of the treatment in all groups, while APG had more significant results (P<0.05). During the follow-up period, ODI still tended to decrease in VSG, non-significantly increased in APG, and significantly increased in PTG. Only two patients reported fainting after receiving venesection. Considering the pain and functional scores, both acupuncture and venesection can reproduce reliable results. Acupuncture and venesection both have sustained effects on pain and daily function of the patients even after treatment termination, while physical therapy had more relapse in pain and functional limitations.

Research on the multidimensional brain remodeling mechanisms at the level of brain regions, circuits, and networks in patients with chronic lower back pain caused by lumbar disk herniation.

Chronic lower back pain (cLBP), frequently attributed to lumbar disk herniation (LDH), imposes substantial limitations on daily activities. Despite its prevalence, the neural mechanisms underlying lower back pain remain incompletely elucidated. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) emerges as a non-invasive modality extensively employed for investigating neuroplastic changes in neuroscience. In this study, task-based and resting-state fMRI methodologies are employed to probe the central mechanisms of lower back pain. The study included 71 chronic lower back pain patients (cLBP group) due to LDH and 80 age, gender, and education-matched healthy volunteers (HC group). The subjects are mainly middle-aged and elderly individuals. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopedic Association Scores (JOA) were recorded. Resting-state and task-based fMRI data were collected. No significant differences were observed in age, gender, and education level between the two groups. In the cLBP group during task execution, there was diffuse and reduced activation observed in the primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area. Additionally, during resting states, notable changes were detected in brain regions, particularly in the frontal lobe, primary sensory area, primary motor cortex, precuneus, and caudate nucleus, accompanied by alterations in Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuation, Regional Homogeneity, Degree Centrality, and functional connectivity. These findings suggest that chronic lower back pain may entail reduced excitability in sensory-motor areas during tasks and heightened activity in the sensory-motor network during resting states, along with modified functional connectivity in various brain regions.

Comparison of General Exercises, Motor Control Exercises and Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

Objective: To compare the effects of motor control exercises, general exercises and spinal manipulative therapy on pain, functional status and disability in chronic low back pain patients. Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial (IRCT:20200511047391N1) Place and Duration of Study: Riphah International University, Islamabad Pakistan, from Jun to Nov 2020. Methodology: Study was conducted on 36 chronic low back pain patients aged 18-50 years. All were randomly allocated to three groups: general exercises group, motor control group, and manipulative therapy; all were treated with eight sessions in four weeks. Numerical pain rating scale, Patient-specific functional scale and Oswestry disability index were used. Results: Findings revealed that differences between the three groups were statistically significant (p&lt;0.05) concerning pain score, patient-specific functional scale, and Disability index. Conclusion: It was concluded that motor control exercises are most effective in treating chronic low backache. The results of our study showed that there is a significant difference in pain, function and disability in all the groups.

Validity and Reliability of the Greek Version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Patients.

The purpose of this study was to investigate psychometric properties of the Greek translation of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (GR-PSQI) in a Greek chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) sample, thus, providing insight on its clarity and acceptability as a widely used sleep assessment tool in clinical practice. Asymptomatic volunteers (n = 73) and CNSLBP volunteers (n = 47), participated in the study. For the assessment of construct validity, the known-groups method was used. Thus, all the participants (asymptomatic and CNSLBP) completed the GR-PSQI. For the assessment of concurrent validity, the CNSLBP participants additionally completed the following validated questionnaires for depression, insomnia and sleep quality: Beck Depression Inventory Questionnaire (BDI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Sleep Quality Numeric Rating Scale (SQNRS). For the assessment of test-retest reliability, the CNSLBP participants completed the GR-PSQI a second time, one week after the first time. The results showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.969, SEM = 0.90, SDD = 2.49%) and internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.985), moderate to good concurrent validity (from r = 0.556 to r = 0.860) among PSQI, BDI, SQNRS, and ISI, as well as excellent construct validity (p = 0.000) between the two groups. The Greek translation of PSQI could be a valuable tool for Greek healthcare professionals in both clinical and research environments.

Superficial back line release versus trigger points release in chronic nonspecific low back pain patients

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Superficial back line (SBL) release on pain, Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), lumbar function, lumbar ROM, and balance in chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) patients. Additionally, it aims to compare the effect of SBL release versus myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) release on the same variables. This was a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) involving forty-eight male and female patients with CNSLBP. They were randomized via an online randomization web service into 3 groups: group A (n=16) received SBL release and exercises, group B (n=16) received MTrPs release and exercises, while group C (n=16) received exercises only. There were statistically significant improvements in all outcomes post-treatment in comparison to pre-treatment within the three groups (p&lt;0.05). After treatment, significant differences emerged between the groups in pain, PPT, lumbar extension ROM, and left anterior balance (p &lt; 0.05). Group A showed the most favorable results in pain reduction, lumbar extension ROM, and left anterior balance compared to groups B and C, while Group B demonstrated the most favorable results in PPT compared to groups A and C. In conclusion, SBL release and MTrPs release are effective in improving pain, lumbar function, MTrPs PPT, lumbar ROM, and balance in patients with CNSLBP. SBL release is particularly effective for pain, lumbar extension ROM, and left anterior balance, while MTrPs release is most effective for improving PPT.

Effects of Movement Retraining and Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study.

Objective To determine and compare the effects of movement retraining (MR), lumbar stabilization exercises (LSE), and a combination of both these exercises on pain, flexibility, strength, and functional disability in chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP) patients. Materials and methods Fifteen CMLBP participants, aged 20-40 years, were randomly allocated into three groups. Group A (n=5) received MR, group B (n=5), LSE, and group C (n=5), a combination of MR and CSE, along with hot packs for eight weeks, thrice a week on alternate days. Outcomes used were the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Modified Modified Schober's Test (MMST), Pressure Biofeedback (PBU), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Movement Control (MC) dissociation tests to identify MC impairments and were assessed at pre-intervention, post-four weeks, and post-eight weeks. The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. The level of significance was considered at p-value<0.05. Results Participants with CMLBP significantly improved in all variables in all three groups (p-value≤0.05). On inter-group comparison, group A showed better improvement in lumbar extension range of motion than the other two groups, with a mean difference of MMST in group A of 0.62±0.30, group B of 0.52±0.22, and group C of 0.36±0.02, with a p-value ≤0.002. Group C showed more improvement in core strength, with a mean difference of 5.0±0.25 in group A, 3.2±0.56 in group B, and 5.2±0.57 in group C, with a p-value ≤0.03. A significant improvement was observed in NPRS, MMST flexion, RMDQ, and uncontrolled movements (UCMs). Conclusion All three methods of treatment are effective in the management of CMLBP. Clinically, kinetic control showed better improvement in reducing pain and improving lumbar flexion and extension range of motion. Functional disability was better improved with lumbar stabilization exercises, and core strength was improved with a combination of KC and LSE. However, a combination of MR and LSE helps improve core strength, and movement retraining improves lumbar extension.