Chronic Illness Care Research Articles

Cushing's syndrome and COVID-19.

This review aims to present current data on the course of COVID-19 in patients with Cushing syndrome (CS) and discuss treatment for CS during to the pandemic. Literature review using PubMed (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The search included the following terms: "COVID19" in combination with "Cushing syndrome", "Hypercortisolism" and "Glucocorticoid". Chronic hypercortisolism has been reported to increase infectious risk and worsens prognostic of patients with COVID-19 potentially due to its direct impact on the immune system: lymphopenia, impairment of monocytes and neutrophils activity, diminution of complement activation. Main metabolic complications of CS - i.e. diabetes, hypertension and obesity - have been recognized as COVID-19 complications risk factors. Patients with CS treated with steroidogenesis inhibitors might experience adrenal insufficiency during COVID-19. Special attention should be paid to patients with CS and COVID-19. The pandemic has impacted - and delayed - care of chronic illnesses including CS. Specific recommendations had been provided during the pandemic: favor telemedicine consultations, limit in-hospital explorations and postpone surgery when feasible. There are enough evidence for an increased prevalence and severity of COVID-19 to recommend a specific attention and caution in patients with CS.

Psychometric Property of the Japanese Version of Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease Scale in Individuals with Chronic Diseases

BackgroundAlthough accurately assessing self-efficacy for self-management is crucial in chronic illness care, important, there is a scarcity of validated psychometric properties in Japan. This study aimed to validate a Japanese version of the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEMCD-J) scale. MethodsIndividuals with self-reported chronic diseases, symptoms, or conditions for over one year were recruited online. The SEMCD-J was translated through translation, back translation, and cognitive interviews with 15 participants. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Center for Disease Control and Prevention Healthy Days Core Module-4 (CDC-HRQOL-4) were used to evaluate the scale’s validity. Test-retest reliability was assessed two weeks after the initial measurement. ResultsOf 500 participants, 494 were analyzed and 149 were analyzed for test-retest reliability. The mean item score was 5.54 ± 2.12. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with a 1-factor model showed good fit (CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.23, SRMR = 0.04). CFA with a 2-factor model showed better fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.11, SRMR = 0.01). Cronbach’s α of the total, Factor 1, and Factor 2 were 0.97, 0.97, and 0.92. Their item-total correlations ranged from 0.88 to 0.95, 0.93 to 0.97, and 0.92 to 0.93, respectively. Their interclass correlation coefficients were 0.63, 0.58, and 0.66, respectively. The minimum detectable change was 3.56. Pearson’s correlation analyses indicated that SEMCD-J was significantly associated with PHQ-9 (r = -0.57, p < 0.001) and the dimensions of CDC-HRQOL-4, namely, the degree of general health (r = -0.55, p < 0.001), physically unhealthy days (r = -0.46, p < 0.001), mentally unhealthy days (r = -0.48, p < 0.001), and functionally unhealthy days (r = -0.50, p = < 0.001). ConclusionThe validity and reliability of the SEMCD-J were indicated to be acceptable.

Peer-Driven Intervention for Care Coordination and Adherence Promotion for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition that is usually treated by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, but poor adherence is common and is associated with worse patient outcomes and experiences. Patient satisfaction is increasingly adopted as a quality indicator by healthcare systems. We tested the hypothesis that peer-driven intervention effected through interactive voice-response(PDI-IVR) system leads to better patient satisfaction (primary outcome), care-coordination, and CPAP adherence when compared to active-control. We performed a 6-month randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial with CPAP naïve patients recruited from four centers and CPAP-adherent patients who were trained to be mentors delivering support through an IVR system. In 263 patients, intention-to-treat analysis global satisfaction for sleep-specific services was better in the intervention group (4.57+0.71 Likert scale score) than in the active-control group (4.10+1.13; P<0.001). CPAP adherence was greater in intervention group (4.5+0.2 hours/night; 62.0+3.0% of nights >4 hours usage) versus active-control group (3.7+0.2 hours/night; 51.4+3.0% of nights >4 hours usage; P=0.014 and P=0.023). When compared to active-control group, Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care ratings was moderately increased by an adjusted difference of 0.33+0.12 (P=0.009); Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems ratings was not different (adjusted difference of 0.46+0.26; P=0.076); and Client Perception of Coordination Questionnaire was mildly better in the intervention group (adjusted difference 0.15+0.07; P=0.035). Patient satisfaction with care delivery, CPAP adherence, and care-coordination was improved by peer-driven intervention through an IVR system. New payor policies compensating peer-support may enable implementation of this approach. Clinical trial registration available at www. gov, ID: NCT02056002.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lifestyle Behavior and Clinical Care Pathway Management in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Background and Objectives: In Italy, as in the rest of the world, government restrictions aimed at containing the spread of COVID-19 primarily imposed limitations on social relationships and personal behavior. This situation significantly affected the management of chronic illnesses, including type 2 diabetes (T2D). The objective was to evaluate the perceptions of patients with T2D regarding the quality of care received during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on dietary and physical activity behaviors. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional survey. Data were collected from June to July 2023 using the convenience sampling of patients with T2D, and the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Medi-Lite questionnaires were administered. Results: During the research period, out of the 130 subjects who met all enrollment criteria, 103 patients were included in this study (79.23%). The results of the administered questionnaires were heterogeneous. The average scores from the PACIC Questionnaire for each question displayed significant variability, indicating a range of experiences in the quality of care. In the Medi-Lite survey, fruit, cereals, and olive oil showed the highest adherence levels, with mean scores ranging from 2.58 (SD ± 1.18) for fruit to 1.89 (SD ± 0.34) for olive oil and 1.97 (SD ± 0.17) for cereals. Patients who reported increased food intake during the lockdown attributed it to having more time to prepare meals. Physical activity levels remained unchanged for 48 patients, decreased for 45 patients, and only 9 patients managed to exercise more during the COVID-19 restrictions. Conclusions: Healthcare systems must prioritize comprehensive care plans for T2D that address not only physical health, but also emotional and social well-being. Post-pandemic, promoting healthier lifestyles and empowering patients to manage their condition is crucial. A multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach could support the care of vulnerable individuals, such as patients with T2D, especially during crises like pandemics or other dramatic events.

Model of integrated mental health video consultations for people with depression or anxiety in primary care (PROVIDE-C): assessor masked, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether an integrated mental health video consultation approach (PROVIDE model) can improve symptoms compared with usual care in adults with depression and anxiety disorders attending primary care.DesignAssessor masked,...

Transcultural adaptation and validation of Persian Version of Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5As) Questionnaire in Iranian older patients with type 2 diabetes

BackgroundThe Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5As) questionnaire has been designed to evaluate the healthcare experiences of individuals with chronic diseases such as diabetes. Older adults are at higher risk for diabetes and its associated complications. The aim of this study was transcultural adaptation and evaluation of the validity and reliability of the PACIC-5As questionnaire in older patients with diabetes residing in Qazvin City, Iran.MethodIn this validation study, we recruited 306 older patients with diabetes from Comprehensive Health Centers in Qazvin, Iran. The multi-stage cluster sampling technique was used to choose a representative sample. The PACIC-5As questionnaire was translated into Persian using the World Health Organization (WHO) standardized method. The validity (face, content, and construct) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) of the PACIC-5As were assessed. Data analysis was conducted using R software and the Lavaan package.ResultsThe mean age of the older patients was 69.99 ± 6.94 years old. Most older participants were female (n = 180, 58.82%) and married (n = 216, 70.59%). Regarding face validity, all items of PACIC-5As had impact scores greater than 1.5. In terms of content validity, all items had a content validity ratio > 0.49 and a content validity index > 0.79. The results of confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the model exhibited satisfactory fit across the expected five factors, including assess, advise, agree, assist, and arrange, for the 25 items of the PACIC-5As questionnaire. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the PACIC-5As questionnaire was 0.805.ConclusionThis study indicates that the Persian version of the PACIC-5As questionnaire is valid and reliable for assessing healthcare experiences in older patients with diabetes. This means that the questionnaire can be effectively used in this population.

Navigating Chronic Illness Care Amidst a Global Pandemic: Insights from Missed Clinic Visits Before, During and After COVID-19 in Nigeria

Navigating Chronic Illness Care Amidst a Global Pandemic: Insights from Missed Clinic Visits Before, During and After COVID-19 in Nigeria

Self-care in patients affected by inflammatory bowel disease and caregiver contribution to self-care (IBD-SELF): a protocol for a longitudinal observational study

IntroductionSupporting patient self-care and the contribution of their caregivers is crucial in chronic illness care. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition whose prevalence is expected to double, especially...

The power of human-digital collaborations in chronic illness care.

The power of human-digital collaborations in chronic illness care.

Exploring Symptom Management Experiences Among College Students With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Using a Theoretical Framework: A Qualitative Study.

The purpose of this study was to explore symptom management experiences among college students with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Limited qualitative data using a theoretical framework exist that explore the self-care behavior processes for symptom management. A qualitative approach was used for this study. The middle-range theory of self care of chronic illness served as a framework for data collection and analysis procedures. Data collection included distributing a survey to collect participants' demographic and sociodemographic data and utilizing a semi-structured interview guide to conduct one-on-one interviews with 31 participants. Interviews occurred via Zoom (n = 28) and in person (n = 3). Interview transcripts were uploaded in NVivo for data management. The research team created a codebook using theoretical constructs to assist with thematic analysis. Data are representative of a sample whose characteristics include undergraduate students ages 18 to 23 living with T1DM for 2 years or more who attended large, public, 4-year universities located in the southeastern United States. Three main themes were created using theoretical constructs: symptom detection experiences, symptom interpretation experiences, and symptom response experiences. Two subthemes were identified for each theme. Participants engaged in symptom management for blood glucose regulation through detecting changes in their blood glucose physiologically and via technology. Additionally, symptom interpretation involved analyzing blood glucose trends and determining common causes of blood glucose changes. Symptom response included immediately addressing hypoglycemia but delayed responses addressing hyperglycemia. Challenges were present responding to hypoglycemia; therefore, additional research is warranted to improve symptom response skills.

"I Felt Like I Mattered": Caring is a key ingredient of collaborative care for chronic illness.

To identify perceptions and experiences related to caring science and collaborative care in intervention participants of the Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness (CASA) study, a randomized, multi-site clinical trial for patients with chronic heart failure and reduced health status. Forty-five participants completed semi-structured, telephone interviews with a focus on intervention components, impact of the intervention on participants' lives, and recommendations for intervention change. Data were analyzed using an inductive content analysis approach focusing on the presence and frequency of text to identify patterns, categories, and themes across participants without an a priori code book. The validity of the identified categories was enhanced through triangulation. Three themes were identified: (1) intervention providers' caring/helping attitude and caring/helping communication; (2) care team availability to respond to concerns or questions; and (3) help with understanding and navigating the healthcare system. Patients highly value caring attitudes and communication, availability, and empowerment to understand and navigate healthcare systems. These attitudes and behaviors may be important mediators of the success of collaborative care programs. These are consistent with the theory of caring science, a framework that is relevant more broadly to patient-centered and team-based care models.

Associations between perceived care quality, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes under the national essential public health services program

BackgroundThe rising prevalence of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in China poses a critical health challenge, necessitating effective management strategies. The National Essential Public Health Services Program (NEPHSP), initiated in 2009, focuses on equitable access to health services, including T2D management. This study investigates the associations between perceived care quality, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control in Chinese adults with T2D under NEPHSP, particularly examining the mediating role of self-care behaviors.MethodsConducted from April to November 2020 in Huai’an City, Jiangsu Province, this study involved 1,577 T2D patients enrolled in NEPHSP. We assessed perceived care quality using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) scale and developed a comprehensive self-care behavior score, covering nine essential health practices. Glycemic control was evaluated using HbA1c levels. Linear regression models were used to explore these associations, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, while causal mediation analyses examined the role of intermediate variables.ResultsHigher PACIC scores significantly correlated with improved self-care behaviors (β = 0.294, 95% CI: 0.233 to 0.354) and were negatively associated with HbA1c levels (β=-0.109, 95% CI: -0.192 to -0.026). The self-care behavior score inversely related to HbA1c levels (β=-0.197, 95% CI: -0.263 to -0.132). Notably, self-care behaviors mediated 50.41% (P < 0.05) of the effect of perceived care quality on HbA1c levels.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates a substantial association between perceived care quality and better glycemic control in Chinese adults with T2D under NEPHSP, with self-care behaviors playing a crucial mediating role. These findings suggest that patient-centered care and comprehensive self-care practices are essential for effective T2D management within NEPHSP.

The Effect of Oncology Nurse Navigation on Mental Health in Patients with Cancer in Taiwan: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

In this study, we investigated the prevalence of mental health problems among patients with cancer and whether oncology nurse navigation improved their mental health outcomes and medical experience. In this randomized controlled clinical trial, we recruited 128 outpatients with cancer via purposive sampling from a teaching hospital in northern Taiwan. Participants were randomly assigned to the navigation group (N = 61) or the usual care group (N = 67). Data were collected from January 2019 to July 2020 using questionnaires, including the self-reported Distress Thermometer, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Demoralization Scale, and Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care. Data were collected at baseline and after three and six months of the intervention. Descriptive and analytical statistical analyses were performed. The prevalence rates of anxiety, depression, distress, and demoralization were 17.9%, 15.7%, 29.7%, and 29.7%, respectively. After three months, the participants in the navigation group exhibited significantly reduced levels of anxiety, demoralization, and emotional distress (reduced by 92%, 75%, and 58%, respectively) and reported a better medical experience (odds ratio = 1.40) than those in the usual care group.

Knowledge of Patients' Activation Level Changes Expert US Physicians' Communication in GERD Management.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common. Treatment is to manage symptoms, but medication nonadherence is common. To date, little emphasis has been on understanding patient behaviors and reasons for medication nonadherence. We performed a cross-sectional survey study among expert gastroenterologists specializing in esophageal disease. Survey studies consisted of a 6-item questionnaire measuring physician knowledge of patient activation, the Clinician Support for Patient Activation Measure (CS-PAM), and an adapted 20-item Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). All question stems were specified to GERD management. Thirty-six experts participated. Most indicated hearing the term patient engagement before this survey (88.9%), but fewer were aware of the term patient activation (33.3%). Respondents were then made aware of the clinical significance of patient activation and asked, based on this knowledge, the likelihood that patients' activation level before the clinic would impact their communication. Responses varied between "to a great extent" and "not at all." Overall, CS-PAM activation scores were high, indicating a high level of support for patient activation. Lastly, respondents indicated their frequency of participating in partnership-building behaviors with patients. More than half (52.8%) of expert physicians "almost always" asked how GERD affected their lives, while less often asked patients about their health habits (22.2%), help set specific goals to improve their eating or exercise lifestyle (19.4%), or refer patients to a dietician, health educator, or counselor for their GERD (11.1%). Patient activation is an important strategy and may provide a behavioral approach to address medication adherence in GERD.

Equitable Care for Hypertension: Blood Pressure and Patient-Reported Outcomes of the RICH LIFE Cluster Randomized Trial.

Disparities in hypertension control are well documented but underaddressed. RICH LIFE (Reducing Inequities in Care of Hypertension: Lifestyle Improvement for Everyone) was a 2-arm, cluster randomized trial comparing the effect on blood pressure (BP) control (systolic BP ≤140 mm Hg, diastolic BP ≤90 mm Hg), patient activation, and disparities in BP control of 2 multilevel interventions, standard of care plus (SCP) and collaborative care/stepped care (CC/SC). SCP included BP measurement standardization, audit and feedback, and equity-leadership training. CC/SC added roles to address social or medical needs. Primary outcomes were BP control and patient activation at 12 months. Generalized estimating equations and mixed-effects regression models with fixed effects of time, intervention, and their interaction compared change in outcomes at 12 months from baseline. A total of 1820 adults with uncontrolled BP and ≥1 other risk factors enrolled in the study. Their mean age was 60.3 years, and baseline BP was 152.3/85.5 mm Hg; 59.4% were women; 57.4% were Black, 33.2% were White, and 9.4% were Hispanic; 74% had hyperlipidemia; and 45.1% had type 2 diabetes. CC/SC did not improve BP control rates more than SCP. Both groups achieved statistically and clinically significant BP control rates at 12 months (CC/SC: 57.3% [95% CI, 52.7%-62.0%]; SCP: 56.7% [95% CI, 51.9%-61.5%]). Pairwise comparisons between racial and ethnic groups showed overall no significant differences in BP control at 12 months. Patients with coronary heart disease showed greater achievement of BP control in CC/SC than in SCP (64.0% [95% CI, 54.1%-73.9%] versus 50.8% [95% CI, 42.6%-59.0%]; P=0.04), as did patients in rural areas (67.3% [95% CI, 49.8%-84.8%] versus 47.8% [95% CI, 32.4%-63.2%]; P=0.01). Individuals in both arms experienced statistically and clinically significant reductions in mean systolic BP (CC/SC: -13.8 mm Hg [95% CI, -15.2 to -12.5]; SCP: -14.6 mm Hg [95% CI, -15.9 to -13.2]) and diastolic BP (CC/SC: -6.9 mm Hg [95% CI, -7.8 to -6.1]; SCP: -5.5 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.4 to -4.6]) over time. The difference in diastolic BP reduction between CC/SC and SCP over time was statistically significant (-1.4 mm Hg [95% CI, -2.6 to -0.2). Patient activation did not differ between arms. CC/SC showed greater improvements in patient ratings of chronic illness care (Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care score) over 12 months (0.12 [95% CI, 0.02-0.22]). Adding a collaborative care team to enhanced standard of care did not improve BP control but did improve patient ratings of chronic illness care.

Identification and prioritization of patient-centred strategies to enhance IBD-related care for older adults: a modified Delphi approach

Abstract Background The older adult age group makes up one of the fastest-growing groups of individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is important to hear the perspectives of older adults living with IBD about care experiences and managing their illness. The purpose of this patient-oriented study was to identify and prioritize patient-centred strategies that have the potential to enhance IBD-related care for older adults in Saskatchewan. Methods The interprofessional research team, consisting of older adult individuals living with IBD, gastroenterology providers, and researchers specializing in IBD or older adult education used a modified Delphi approach to identify and prioritize strategies that may enhance IBD-related care for older adults. Thirty-one older adults with IBD participated in ranking, revising, and prioritizing statements related to their chronic illness care. Nine statements were developed that highlighted strategies for older adult IBD care. Results Through the consensus process, 6 statements were retained. Co-creating a treatment plan with the IBD provider was ranked as the top priority statement for older adults with IBD. Conclusion Facilitating collaborative relationships and understanding individual priorities for IBD-related care for older adults has the potential to enhance positive health outcomes and quality of life for these individuals.

Factors Influencing Adherence to Treatment in Adult Patients with Hypertension

Introduction Adherence to treatment including medication and lifestyle modification is crucial for improving health outcomes in patients with hypertension. However, there is limited research investigating the factors influencing adherence to medication and lifestyle modification, particularly among adult patients diagnosed with hypertension. Objective To investigate adherence to treatment and the predictive power of work status, comorbidity, complexity of medication regimens, perceived severity and risk of hypertension complications, and quality of care affecting adherence to treatment in adult patients with hypertension. Design Cross-sectional correlational predictive research using the multidimensional adherence model as the conceptual framework. Methodology The sample included 156 adult patients with essential hypertension aged 18 to 59 years old who had received antihypertensive medication and lifestyle modification treatment for at least six months at a super-tertiary hospital’s hypertension clinic. Data were collected between April and July 2023. The research instruments consisted of a general profile questionnaire, a treatment adherence questionnaire for patients with hypertension, a perceived severity and risk of hypertension complications questionnaire, a patient assessment of chronic illness care, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, a medication regimen complexity index, and an illness record form. These instruments were examined for content validity by experts and tested for reliability prior to use in data collection. The reliability ranged from .77-1.00. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression. Results The sample had an average age of 46.50 years (SD = 9.65); 63.46% were female. The average score for adherence to treatment was 87.97 (SD = 9.02), with the highest score for average medication adherence of 34.37 (SD = 2.52) and the lowest score for average exercise adherence of 4.33 (SD = 1.89). Additionally, 14.74% were overweight, and 71.80% were obese. The majority were employed (83.33%), without any comorbidities (62.82%), and had a low level of medication regimen complexity (68.59%). Furthermore, they demonstrated a high level of perceived severity and risk of hypertension complications (96.15%) and reported a high level of quality of care (61.54%). In the Multiple linear regression, 30.9% of the variance in adherence to treatment was explained (Adjusted R2 = .309 F(5,150) = 14.858, p &lt; .001). Work status (β = -.262, p &lt; .001), comorbidity (β = -.184, p = .020), perceived severity and risk of hypertension complications (β = .466, p &lt; .001), and quality of care (β = .165, p = .017) together were significant predictors of adherence to treatment in adult patients with hypertension. Recommendation To promote adherence to treatment in adult patients with hypertension, nurses should develop strategy to improve quality of care within hypertension clinics and enhance the perceived severity and risk of hypertension complications as well as enhance lifestyle modifications particularly regarding diet and exercise for overweight and obese adults with hypertension.

A longitudinal qualitative study on physician experience in managing multimorbidity across the COVID-19 pandemic in Odisha, India

While many studies have documented adverse impact of multiple chronic conditions or multimorbidity on COVID-19 outcomes in patients, there is scarcity of report on how physicians managed these patients. We investigated the experiences and challenges of clinicians in managing patients with multimorbidity throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in Odisha state, India. To understand the factors influencing illness management and the adaptive responses of physicians alongside the evolving pandemic, we followed a longitudinal qualitative study design. Twenty-three physicians comprising general practitioners, specialists, and intensivists, were telephonically interviewed in-depth. Saldana’s longitudinal qualitative data analysis method was employed for data analysis. COVID-19 pandemic initially diverted the attention of health systems, resulting in reduced care. With time, the physicians overcame fear, anxiety, and feelings of vulnerability to COVID-19 and started prioritising patients with multimorbidity for treatment and vaccination. All physicians recommended teleconsultation and digital health records to benefit chronic illness care during future public health crises. The findings underscore the transformative potential of physician resilience and adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing patients with multimorbidity, incorporating teleconsultation, and implementing digital health records in healthcare systems to enhance chronic illness care and preparedness for future public health crises.

Integrated patient-centred care for type 2 diabetes in Singapore Primary Care Networks: a mixed-methods study

ObjectivePatients with type 2 diabetes require patient-centred care as guided by the Chronic Care Model (CCM). Many diabetes patients in Singapore are managed by the Primary Care Networks (PCNs) which...

The Relationship between the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care and the Compliance with the Treatment of Individuals with Chronic Illness

Aim This study was performed to examine the relationship between the evaluation of chronic disease care of individuals with chronic disease and their compliance with treatment. Materials and Methods: This descriptive-relationship-seeking study was conducted with patients admitted to the internal medicine clinics of a training and research hospital between June and September 2022 and accepted to participate in the study. The patient Diagnosis Form, Chronic Illness Care Evaluation Scale, and Morisky-8 Item Compliance Form were used to collect data. Data were evaluated with descriptive statistics, independent groups t-test, Kruskal-Wallis, one-way variance, and Pearson correlation analysis. Results: The overall score for the evaluation of chronic disease care of the patients included in the study was 3.46±0.57, and the mean score of the drug compliance scale was 3.81±1.95. The findings showed a positive and significant relationship between patient activation, decision support, and problem-solving sub-dimensions and the mean scores of drug compliance. Conclusion: The identified patients' satisfaction level concerning chronic disease was moderate, and their compliance with the drug was low. The results indicated that as the patient activation, decision-making, and problem-solving sub-dimensions of the patient's satisfaction with the chronic disease increased, their treatment adherence raised.