Chromosome Reactivation Research Articles

The pluripotency factor Oct4 interacts with Ctcf and also controls X-chromosome pairing and counting

Pluripotency of embryonic stem (ES) cells is controlled by defined transcription factors1,2. During differentiation, mouse ES cells undergo global epigenetic reprogramming, as exemplified by X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) whereby one female X-chromosome is silenced to achieve gene dosage parity between the sexes3-5. Somatic XCI is regulated by homologous X-chromosome pairing6,7, counting8-10, and random choice of future active X (Xa) and inactive X’s. XCI and cell differentiation are tightly coupled11, as blocking one process compromises the other8,12 and dedifferentiation of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells is accompanied by X-reactivation2. Recent evidence suggests coupling of Xist expression to pluripotency factors13, but how the two are interconnected remains unknown. Here, we show that the Oct414 lies at the top of the XCI hierarchy and regulates XCI by triggering X-chromosome pairing and counting. Oct4 directly binds Tsix and Xite, two regulatory ncRNA genes of the X-inactivation center15,16, and also complexes with XCI trans-factors, Ctcf and Yy117, through protein-protein interactions. Depletion of Oct4 blocks homologous X-chromosome pairing and results in inactivation of both Xs in female cells. Thus, we have identified the first trans-factor that regulates counting and ascribed novel functions to Oct4 during X-chromosome reprogramming.

X Chromosome Reactivation Initiates in Nascent Primordial Germ Cells in Mice

During primordial germ cell (PGC) development, epigenetic reprogramming events represented by X chromosome reactivation and erasure of genomic imprinting are known to occur. Although precise timing is not given, X reactivation is thought to take place over a short period of time just before initiation of meiosis. Here, we show that the cessation of Xist expression commences in nascent PGCs, and re-expression of some X-linked genes begins in newly formed PGCs. The X reactivation process was not complete in E14.5 PGCs, indicating that X reactivation in developing PGCs occurs over a prolonged period. These results set the reactivation timing much earlier than previously thought and suggest that X reactivation may involve slow passive steps.

Pachytene Asynapsis Drives Meiotic Sex Chromosome Inactivation and Leads to Substantial Postmeiotic Repression in Spermatids

Transcriptional silencing of the sex chromosomes during male meiosis (MSCI) is conserved among organisms with limited sex chromosome synapsis, including mammals. Since the 1990s the prevailing view has been that MSCI in mammals is transient, with sex chromosome reactivation occurring as cells exit meiosis. Recently, we found that any chromosome region unsynapsed during pachytene of male and female mouse meiosis is subject to transcriptional silencing (MSUC), and we hypothesized that MSCI is an inevitable consequence of this more general meiotic silencing mechanism. Here, we provide direct evidence that asynapsis does indeed drive MSCI. We also show that a substantial degree of transcriptional repression of the sex chromosomes is retained postmeiotically, and we provide evidence that this postmeiotic repression is a downstream consequence of MSCI/MSUC. While this postmeiotic repression occurs after the loss of MSUC-related proteins at the end of prophase, other histone modifications associated with transcriptional repression have by then become established.

Expression Profiling of MAP Kinase–Mediated Meiotic Progression in Caenorhabditis elegans

The LET-60 (Ras)/LIN-45 (Raf)/MPK-1 (MAP kinase) signaling pathway plays a key role in the development of multiple tissues in Caenorhabditis elegans. For the most part, the identities of the downstream genes that act as the ultimate effectors of MPK-1 signaling have remained elusive. A unique allele of mpk-1, ga111, displays a reversible, temperature-sensitive, tissue-specific defect in progression through meiotic prophase I. We performed gene expression profiling on mpk-1(ga111) animals to identify candidate downstream effectors of MPK-1 signaling in the germ line. This analysis delineated a cohort of genes whose expression requires MPK-1 signaling in germ cells in the pachytene stage of meiosis I. RNA in situ hybridization analysis shows that these genes are expressed in the germ line in an MPK-1-dependent manner and have a spatial expression pattern consistent with the location of activated MPK-1. We found that one MPK-1 signaling-responsive gene encoding a C2H2 zinc finger protein plays a role in meiotic chromosome segregation downstream of MPK-1. Additionally, discovery of genes responsive to MPK-1 signaling permitted us to order MPK-1 signaling relative to several events occurring in pachytene, including EFL-1/DPL-1 gene regulation and X chromosome reactivation. This study highlights the utility of applying global gene expression methods to investigate genes downstream of commonly used signaling pathways in vivo.

X chromosome reactivation and regulation in cloned embryos

Somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos exhibit extensive epigenetic abnormalities, including aberrant methylation and abnormal imprinted gene expression. In this study, a thorough analysis of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) was performed in both preimplantation and postimplantation nuclear transfer embryos. Cloned blastocysts reactivated the inactive somatic X chromosome, possibly in a gradient fashion. Analysis of XCI by Xist RNA and Eed protein localization revealed heterogeneity within cloned embryos, with some cells successfully inactivating an X chromosome and others failing to do so. Additionally, a significant proportion of cells contained more than two X chromosomes, which correlated with an increased incidence of tetraploidy. Imprinted XCI, normally found in preimplantation embryos and extraembryonic tissues, was not observed in blastocysts or placentae from later stage clones, although fetuses recapitulated the Xce effect. We conclude that, although SCNT embryos can reactivate, count, and inactivate X chromosomes, they are not able to regulate XCI consistently. These results illustrate the heterogeneity of epigenetic changes found in cloned embryos.

Xist expression and macroH2A1.2 localisation in mouse primordial and pluripotent embryonic germ cells

The molecular mechanism underlying X chromosome inactivation in female mammals involves the non-coding RNAs Xist and its antisense partner Tsix. Prior to X inactivation, these RNAs are transcribed in an unstable form from all X chromosomes, both in the early embryo and in undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells. Upon differentiation, the expression of these unstable transcripts from all alleles is silenced, and Xist RNA becomes stabilised specifically on the inactivating X chromosome. This pattern of expression is then maintained throughout subsequent somatic cell divisions. Once established, the inactive state of the X chromosome is remarkably stable, the only natural case of reactivation occurring in XX primordial germ cells (PGCs) when they enter the genital ridge. To gain insight into the X reactivation process, we have analysed Xist gene expression using RNA FISH in PGCs and also in PGC-derived embryonic germ (EG) cells. XX EG cells were shown to express unstable Xist/Tsix from both X chromosomes. In contrast, no unstable Xist/Tsix transcripts were detected in XX PGCs at any stage. Instead, a proportion of XX PGCs isolated from the genital ridge between 11.5 and 13.5 dpc (the period during which X chromosome reactivation occurs) showed an accumulation of stable Xist RNA on one X. The number of these cells decreased progressively and was nearly extinguished by 13.5 dpc. As a late marker for the inactive state, we analysed localisation of the histone H2A variant macroH2A1.2. Although macroH2A1.2 expression was observed in PGCs, no significant localisation to the inactive X was detected at any stage. We discuss these results in the context of understanding X chromosome reactivation.

Germ Cell Development in the XXY Mouse: Evidence That X Chromosome Reactivation Is Independent of Sexual Differentiation

Prior to entry into meiosis, XX germ cells in the fetal ovary undergo X chromosome reactivation. The signal for reactivation is thought to emanate from the genital ridge, but it is unclear whether it is specific to the developing ovary. To determine whether the signals are present in the developing testis as well as the ovary, we examined the expression of X-linked genes in germ cells from XXY male mice. To facilitate this analysis, we generated XXY and XX fetuses carrying X chromosomes that were differentially marked and subject to nonrandom inactivation. This pattern of nonrandom inactivation was maintained in somatic cells but, in XX as well as XXY fetuses, both parental alleles were expressed in germ cell-enriched cell populations. Because testis differentiation is temporally and morphologically normal in the XXY testis and because all germ cells embark upon a male pathway of development, these results provide compelling evidence that X chromosome reactivation in fetal germ cells is independent of the somatic events of sexual differentiation. Proper X chromosome dosage is essential for the normal fertility of male mammals, and abnormalities in germ cell development are apparent in the XXY testis within several days of X reactivation. Studies of exceptional germ cells that survive in the postnatal XXY testis demonstrated that surviving germ cells are exclusively XY and result from rare nondisjunctional events that give rise to clones of XY cells.

X Chromosome Reactivation in Mouse Embryonal Carcinoma Cells

The embryonal carcinoma cell line, C86S1, carries two X chromosomes, one of which replicates late during S phase of the cell cycle and appears to be genetically inactive. C86S1A1 is a mutant which lacks activity of the X-encoded enzyme, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT). Treatment of C86S1A1 cells with DNA-demethylating agents, such as 5-azacytidine (5AC), resulted in (i) the transient expression in almost all cells of elevated levels of HPRT and three other enzymes encoded by X-linked genes and (ii) the stable expression of HPRT in up to 5 to 20% of surviving cells. Most cells which stably expressed HPRT had two X chromosomes which replicated in early S phase. C86S1A1 cells which had lost the inactive X chromosome did not respond to 5AC. These results suggest that DNA demethylation results in the reactivation of genes on the inactive X chromosome and perhaps in the reactivation of the entire X chromosome. No such reactivation occurred in C86S1A1 cells when the cells were differentiated before exposure to 5AC. Thus, the process of X chromosome inactivation may be a sequential one involving, as a first step, methylation of certain DNA sequences and, as a second step, some other mechanism(s) of transcriptional repression.

X chromosome reactivation in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells.

The embryonal carcinoma cell line, C86S1, carries two X chromosomes, one of which replicates late during S phase of the cell cycle and appears to be genetically inactive. C86S1A1 is a mutant which lacks activity of the X-encoded enzyme, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT). Treatment of C86S1A1 cells with DNA-demethylating agents, such as 5-azacytidine (5AC), resulted in (i) the transient expression in almost all cells of elevated levels of HPRT and three other enzymes encoded by X-linked genes and (ii) the stable expression of HPRT in up to 5 to 20% of surviving cells. Most cells which stably expressed HPRT had two X chromosomes which replicated in early S phase. C86S1A1 cells which had lost the inactive X chromosome did not respond to 5AC. These results suggest that DNA demethylation results in the reactivation of genes on the inactive X chromosome and perhaps in the reactivation of the entire X chromosome. No such reactivation occurred in C86S1A1 cells when the cells were differentiated before exposure to 5AC. Thus, the process of X chromosome inactivation may be a sequential one involving, as a first step, methylation of certain DNA sequences and, as a second step, some other mechanism(s) of transcriptional repression.

Developmental Patterns of Three X Chromosomal Enzyme Activities in the Brains of Female and Male Mice

The developmental profiles of the activities of the X chromosome-linked enzymes alpha-galactosidase, hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase were studied in the brains of mice. X chromosome inactivation, which takes place at an early stage of development, led to identical enzyme activities in females and males between the 15th day of gestation and the 64th day after birth. The enzyme activities were also studied after an X-ray dose of 3 times 1.05 Gy, delivered on gestational days 11, 12 and 13. Treatment with this dose, but not with 3 times 0.95 Gy or 1.15 Gy, respectively, was followed by the death of predominantly female offspring within 2 days after birth. The assumption that the reason for this might be a reactivation of inactive female X chromosomal genes in brain cells was tested in the present experiment. There were marked radiation-induced alterations of the activities of the above-mentioned enzymes. However, sex differences of these enzyme activities were not found after the irradiation treatment. A participation of X chromosome reactivation in the elevated mortality of female offspring is therefore unlikely.

X chromosome reactivation in oocytes of Mus caroli.

Mature mammalian oocytes have both of their X chromosomes active, while somatic cells from the same individual have one of their X chromosomes in an inactive state. We asked whether the X chromosomes of the germ cells never undergo inactivation in their ontogeny or whether inactivation of an X chromosome does occur but is followed by a subsequent reactivation event. Our approach has used an electrophoretic polymorphism for the X-linked enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) in the mouse species Mus caroli. G6PD is dimeric, and a heterodimer is produced in cells from heterozygous females if and only if both X chromosomes are active. Ovaries from heterozygous fetuses at different gestational ages were dissected and either studied cytologically or pressed between microscopy slides to obtain germ cell-rich and germ cell-poor preparations. No heterodimer band was detected on the 10th day of development in germ cell-rich preparations. On subsequent days, an increasingly intense heterodimer band was detected, which, by the 13th day, was approximately twice as intense as the corresponding homodimer bands. Consideration of (i) the G6PD activity per germ cell and per somatic cell and (ii) the percentage of germ cells in the germ cell-rich preparations indicated that a heterodimer band should have been visible on the 10th day had both X chromosomes been active. Cytological examinations showed that the earliest germ cells enter meiotic prophase on the eleventh day. These results demonstrate that oogonia have a single active X chromosome and that the inactive X chromosome is reactivated at or, more likely, shortly before entry into meiotic prophase.

Studies on the activity of the X chromosomes in female teratocarcinoma cells in culture

Embryonal carcinoma cells derived from murine teratocarcinomas are able to differentiate into the same variety of tissue types as early embryonic cells. Because embryonal carcinoma cells resemble those of the embryo at a stage before X chromosome inactivation has occurred in females embyronal carcinoma cells containing two X chromosomes were examined to determine whether both are genetically active. The specific activities of X-linked enzymes were measured in embryonal carcinoma cells containing either one or two X chromosomes. The activities in both cell types were similar, suggesting that only one X chromosome was active in the female cells. Further support for this conclusion came from experiments in which azaguanine-resistant mutants were recovered with similar frequencies from embryonal carcinoma cell lines containing one and two X chromosomes. Late replication of an X chromosome DNA was detected in one embryonal carcinoma cell line with two X chromosomes but not in another. This suggests that cells of these two lines were arrested at different developmental stages, and that late DNA replication may not be a necessary adjunct of X inactivation. Evidence is presented which suggests that X chromosome reactivation does not occur during differentiation of the cells in vitro.