Chromatin Barrier Research Articles

Conserved, developmentally regulated mechanism couples chromosomal looping and heterochromatin barrier activity at the homeobox gene A locus

Establishment and segregation of distinct chromatin domains are essential for proper genome function. The insulator protein CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is involved in creating boundaries that segregate chromatin and functional domains and in organizing higher-order chromatin structures by promoting chromosomal loops across the vertebrate genome. Here, we investigate the insulation properties of CTCF at the human and mouse homeobox gene A (HOXA) loci. Although cohesin loading at the CTCF binding site is required for looping, we found that cohesin is dispensable for chromatin barrier activity at that site. Using mouse embryonic stem cells in both a pluripotent and differentiated neuronal progenitor state, we determined that embryonic stem cell pluripotency factor OCT4 antagonizes cohesin loading at the CTCF binding site. Loss of OCT4 in the committed and differentiated neuronal progenitor cells results in loading of cohesin and chromosome looping, which contributes to heterochromatin partitioning and selective gene activation across the HOXA locus. Our analysis reveals that chromatin barrier activity of CTCF is evolutionarily conserved and is responsible for the coordinated establishment of chromatin structure, higher-order architecture, and developmental expression of the HOXA locus.

Dioxin receptor and SLUG transcription factors regulate the insulator activity of B1 SINE retrotransposons via an RNA polymerase switch.

Complex genomes utilize insulators and boundary elements to help define spatial and temporal gene expression patterns. We report that a genome-wide B1 SINE (Short Interspersed Nuclear Element) retrotransposon (B1-X35S) has potent intrinsic insulator activity in cultured cells and live animals. This insulation is mediated by binding of the transcription factors dioxin receptor (AHR) and SLUG (SNAI2) to consensus elements present in the SINE. Transcription of B1-X35S is required for insulation. While basal insulator activity is maintained by RNA polymerase (Pol) III transcription, AHR-induced insulation involves release of Pol III and engagement of Pol II transcription on the same strand. B1-X35S insulation is also associated with enrichment of heterochromatin marks H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 downstream of B1-X35S, an effect that varies with cell type. B1-X35S binds parylated CTCF and, consistent with a chromatin barrier activity, its positioning between two adjacent genes correlates with their differential expression in mouse tissues. Hence, B1 SINE retrotransposons represent genome-wide insulators activated by transcription factors that respond to developmental, oncogenic, or toxicological stimuli.

Chromatin Boundaries Require the Functional Cooperation Between hSET1 and NURF Complexes

AbstractAbstract 646Chromatin modification and remodeling activities play a central role in organizing nuclear functions in eukaryotic genome. Chromatin domains with characteristic epigenetic marks are organized by chromatin insulator. The chicken b-globin insulator, 5′HS4, is an excellent model system to study how insulator maintains gene function and prevents the encroachment of repressive heterochromatin. We showed previously that USF1/2 bound 5′HS4 insulator mediates chromatin barrier activity by recruiting and organizing active histone modifications in the chicken b-globin locus. However, it is not clear how insulator establishes such a barrier. To further understand the physical function of USF1, we purified the USF1-associated protein complexes. We found that USF1 forms a multiprotein complex with hSET1 and NURF exhibiting histone H3K4 methyltransferase and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activities, respectively. Both hSET1 and NURF complexes are specifically recruited to the 5′HS4 insulator by USF1 to retain the active chromatin structure. Knock-down of BPTF, a component of NURF complex, resulted in a rapid loss of barrier activity that protects a transgene from chromatin silencing. The loss of barrier by the BPTF knock-down is accompanied by an alternation of nucleosome positioning that expands the nucleosome to the nucleosome free linker region in the HS4 insulator site and increases repressive H3K9 dimethylation. Furthermore, the suppression of hSET1, a H3K4 methyltransferase, leads to not only a loss of barrier activity, but also a loss of H3K4 dimethylation and H3K9/K14 acetylation, as well as the recruitment of BPTF at chromatin insulator sites. Thus, our data reveal a molecular mechanism in which histone modifying enzyme hSET1 and chromatin remodeling complex NURF collaborate together to maintain the 5′HS4 chromatin barrier activity and to prevent the encroachment of adjacent heterochromatin. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Complete Biallelic Insulation at the H19/Igf2 Imprinting Control Region Position Results in Fetal Growth Retardation and Perinatal Lethality

BackgroundThe H19/Igf2 imprinting control region (ICR) functions as an insulator exclusively in the unmethylated maternal allele, where enhancer-blocking by CTCF protein prevents the interaction between the Igf2 promoter and the distant enhancers. DNA methylation inhibits CTCF binding in the paternal ICR allele. Two copies of the chicken β-globin insulator (ChβGI)2 are capable of substituting for the enhancer blocking function of the ICR. Insulation, however, now also occurs upon paternal inheritance, because unlike the H19 ICR, the (ChβGI)2 does not become methylated in fetal male germ cells. The (ChβGI)2 is a composite insulator, exhibiting enhancer blocking by CTCF and chromatin barrier functions by USF1 and VEZF1. We asked the question whether these barrier proteins protected the (ChβGI)2 sequences from methylation in the male germ line.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe genetically dissected the ChβGI in the mouse by deleting the binding sites USF1 and VEZF1. The methylation of the mutant versus normal (ChβGI)2 significantly increased from 11% to 32% in perinatal male germ cells, suggesting that the barrier proteins did have a role in protecting the (ChβGI)2 from methylation in the male germ line. Contrary to the H19 ICR, however, the mutant (mChβGI)2 lacked the potential to attain full de novo methylation in the germ line and to maintain methylation in the paternal allele in the soma, where it consequently functioned as a biallelic insulator. Unexpectedly, a stricter enhancer blocking was achieved by CTCF alone than by a combination of the CTCF, USF1 and VEZF1 sites, illustrated by undetectable Igf2 expression upon paternal transmission.Conclusions/SignificanceIn this in vivo model, hypomethylation at the ICR position together with fetal growth retardation mimicked the human Silver-Russell syndrome. Importantly, late fetal/perinatal death occurred arguing that strict biallelic insulation at the H19/Igf2 ICR position is not tolerated in development.

Mutational analysis of the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation sites of the transcription factor CTCF provides an insight into the mechanism of its regulation by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation.

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of the conserved multifunctional transcription factor CTCF was previously identified as important to maintain CTCF insulator and chromatin barrier functions. However, the molecular mechanism of this regulation and also the necessity of this modification for other CTCF functions remain unknown. In this study, we identified potential sites of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation within the N-terminal domain of CTCF and generated a mutant deficient in poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Using this CTCF mutant, we demonstrated the requirement of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation for optimal CTCF function in transcriptional activation of the p19ARF promoter and inhibition of cell proliferation. By using a newly generated isogenic insulator reporter cell line, the CTCF insulator function at the mouse Igf2-H19 imprinting control region (ICR) was found to be compromised by the CTCF mutation. The association and simultaneous presence of PARP-1 and CTCF at the ICR, confirmed by single and serial chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, were found to be independent of CTCF poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. These results suggest a model of CTCF regulation by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation whereby CTCF and PARP-1 form functional complexes at sites along the DNA, producing a dynamic reversible modification of CTCF. By using bioinformatics tools, numerous sites of CTCF and PARP-1 colocalization were demonstrated, suggesting that such regulation of CTCF may take place at the genome level.

VEZF1 Elements Mediate Protection from DNA Methylation

There is growing consensus that genome organization and long-range gene regulation involves partitioning of the genome into domains of distinct epigenetic chromatin states. Chromatin insulator or barrier elements are key components of these processes as they can establish boundaries between chromatin states. The ability of elements such as the paradigm β-globin HS4 insulator to block the range of enhancers or the spread of repressive histone modifications is well established. Here we have addressed the hypothesis that a barrier element in vertebrates should be capable of defending a gene from silencing by DNA methylation. Using an established stable reporter gene system, we find that HS4 acts specifically to protect a gene promoter from de novo DNA methylation. Notably, protection from methylation can occur in the absence of histone acetylation or transcription. There is a division of labor at HS4; the sequences that mediate protection from methylation are separable from those that mediate CTCF-dependent enhancer blocking and USF-dependent histone modification recruitment. The zinc finger protein VEZF1 was purified as the factor that specifically interacts with the methylation protection elements. VEZF1 is a candidate CpG island protection factor as the G-rich sequences bound by VEZF1 are frequently found at CpG island promoters. Indeed, we show that VEZF1 elements are sufficient to mediate demethylation and protection of the APRT CpG island promoter from DNA methylation. We propose that many barrier elements in vertebrates will prevent DNA methylation in addition to blocking the propagation of repressive histone modifications, as either process is sufficient to direct the establishment of an epigenetically stable silent chromatin state.

YFACT Induces Global Accessibility of Nucleosomal DNA without H2A-H2B Displacement

FACT has been proposed to function by displacing H2A-H2B dimers from nucleosomes to form hexasomes. Results described here with yeast FACT (yFACT) suggest instead that nucleosomes are reorganized to a form with the original composition but a looser, more dynamic structure. First, yFACT enhances hydroxyl radical accessibility and endonuclease digestion in vitro at sites throughout the nucleosome, not just in regions contacted by H2A-H2B. Accessibility increases dramatically, but the DNA remains partially protected. Second, increased nuclease sensitivity can occur without displacement of dimers from the nucleosome. Third, yFACT is required for eviction of nucleosomes from the GAL1-10 promoter during transcriptional activation in vivo, but the preferential reduction in dimer occupancy expected for hexasome formation is not observed. We propose that yFACT promotes a reversible transition between two nucleosomal forms, and that this activity contributes to the establishment and maintenance of the chromatin barrier as well as to overcoming it.

GPS2 Is Required for Cholesterol Efflux by Triggering Histone Demethylation, LXR Recruitment, and Coregulator Assembly at the ABCG1 Locus

Transcriptional coregulators, rather than ligand signals, are suspected to confer context and pathway specificity to nuclear receptor signaling, but the identity of such specifying coregulators and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely enigmatic. Here we address this issue in metabolic oxysterol receptor LXR pathways and describe the selective requirement of GPS2 for ABCG1 cholesterol transporter gene transcription and cholesterol efflux from macrophages. We implicate GPS2 in facilitating LXR recruitment to an ABCG1-specific promoter/enhancer unit upon ligand activation and identify functional links to histone H3K9 demethylation. We further describe fundamental differences between ABCG1 and ABCA1 with regard to GPS2 in relation to other coregulators, which are likely to apply to additional LXR-regulated genes. Our work identifies a coregulator-dependent epigenetic mechanism governing the access of a nuclear receptor to communicating regulatory regions in the genome. The pathway and coregulator selectivity of this mechanism implies pharmacological possibilities for the development of selective LXR agonists.

Global analysis of the insulator binding protein CTCF in chromatin barrier regions reveals demarcation of active and repressive domains

Insulators are DNA elements that prevent inappropriate interactions between the neighboring regions of the genome. They can be functionally classified as either enhancer blockers or domain barriers. CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) is the only known major insulator-binding protein in the vertebrates and has been shown to bind many enhancer-blocking elements. However, it is not clear whether it plays a role in chromatin domain barriers between active and repressive domains. Here, we used ChIP-seq to map the genome-wide binding sites of CTCF in three cell types and identified significant binding of CTCF to the boundaries of repressive chromatin domains marked by H3K27me3. Although we find an extensive overlapping of CTCF-binding sites across the three cell types, its association with the domain boundaries is cell-type-specific. We further show that the nucleosomes flanking CTCF-binding sites are well positioned. Interestingly, we found a complementary pattern between the repressive H3K27me3 and the active H2AK5ac regions, which are separated by CTCF. Our data indicate that CTCF may play important roles in the barrier activity of insulators, and this study provides a resource for further investigation of the CTCF function in organizing chromatin in the human genome.

Different Functional Modes of p300 in Activation of RNA Polymerase III Transcription from Chromatin Templates

Transcriptional coactivators that regulate the activity of human RNA polymerase III (Pol III) in the context of chromatin have not been reported. Here, we describe a completely defined in vitro system for transcription of a human tRNA gene assembled into a chromatin template. Transcriptional activation and histone acetylation in this system depend on recruitment of p300 by general initiation factor TFIIIC, thus providing a new paradigm for recruitment of histone-modifying coactivators. Beyond its role as a chromatin-modifying factor, p300 displays an acetyltransferase-independent function at the level of preinitiation complex assembly. Thus, direct interaction of p300 with TFIIIC stabilizes binding of TFIIIC to core promoter elements and results in enhanced transcriptional activity on histone-free templates. Additional studies show that p300 is recruited to the promoters of actively transcribed tRNA and U6 snRNA genes in vivo. These studies identify TFIIIC as a recruitment factor for p300 and thus may have important implications for the emerging concept that tRNA genes or TFIIIC binding sites act as chromatin barriers to prohibit spreading of silenced heterochromatin domains.

The chromatin remodelers ISWI and ACF1 directly repress Wingless transcriptional targets

The highly conserved Wingless/Wnt signaling pathway controls many developmental processes by regulating the expression of target genes, most often through members of the TCF family of DNA-binding proteins. In the absence of signaling, many of these targets are silenced, by mechanisms involving TCFs that are not fully understood. Here we report that the chromatin remodeling proteins ISWI and ACF1 are required for basal repression of WG target genes in Drosophila. This regulation is not due to global repression by ISWI and ACF1 and is distinct from their previously reported role in chromatin assembly. While ISWI is localized to the same regions of Wingless target gene chromatin as TCF, we find that ACF1 binds much more broadly to target loci. This broad distribution of ACF1 is dependent on ISWI. ISWI and ACF1 are required for TCF binding to chromatin, while a TCF-independent role of ISWI-ACF1 in repression of Wingless targets is also observed. Finally, we show that Wingless signaling reduces ACF1 binding to WG targets, and ISWI and ACF1 regulate repression by antagonizing histone H4 acetylation. Our results argue that WG signaling activates target gene expression partly by overcoming the chromatin barrier maintained by ISWI and ACF1.

Enhancer Blocking Activity of the Insulator at H19-ICR Is Independent of Chromatin Barrier Establishment

Transcriptional insulators are cis regulatory elements that organize chromatin into independently regulated domains. At the imprinted murine Igf2/H19 locus, the H19-ICR insulator prevents the activation of the Igf2 promoter on the maternal allele by enhancers that activate H19 on the same chromosome. Given the well-demonstrated role of H19-ICR as an enhancer blocker, we investigated its ability to define a chromatin barrier, as the two activities are coincident on several insulators and may act in concert to define a functional chromatin boundary between adjacent genes with distinct transcriptional profiles. Allele-specific association of posttranslationally modified histones, reflecting the presence of active or inactive chromatin, was analyzed in the region encompassing H19-ICR using chromatin immunoprecipitation. The existence of differential histone modifications upstream and downstream of H19-ICR specifically on the maternal chromosome was observed, which is suggestive of a chromatin barrier formation. However, H19-ICR deletion analysis indicated that distinct chromatin states exist despite the absence of an intervening "barrier." Also, the enhancers can activate the Igf2 promoter despite some parts of the intervening chromatin being in the silent state. Hence, H19-ICR insulator activity is not dependent on preventing the enhancer-mediated alteration of the histone modifications in the region between the Igf2 promoter and the cognate enhancers.

Elements of cHS4 insulator necessary for maximum chromatin barrier activity

Elements of cHS4 insulator necessary for maximum chromatin barrier activity

Bypassing the Requirements for Epigenetic Modifications in Gene Transcription by Increasing Enhancer Strength

Our current concept postulates that histone acetylation is required for the recruitment of bromodomain-containing transcription complexes, such as the chromatin-remodeling machine SWI/SNF and the basal transcription factor TFIID. We generated simple NF-kappaB-dependent enhancers of increasing transcriptional strengths and found that the histone acetylation requirements for activation of transcription depended on the strengths of these enhancers. All enhancers function by recruiting SWI/SNF and TFIID to induce nucleosome sliding, a prerequisite for transcriptional activation. However, histone acetylation, although it occurs, is dispensable for TFIID and SWI/SNF recruitment by the strong enhancers, indicating that strong activators can overcome the chromatin barrier by directly recruiting the necessary transcriptional complexes. Weak enhancers depend on histone acetylation for recruitment, and this requirement is independent of a histone acetylation code. Thus, the need for nucleosome modifications is imposed on genes and translated according to the quality and strengths of the activators.

Elements of a Chromatin Insulator Necessary for Consistent, High-Level Globin Gene Expression

Vectors flanked by the chicken b-globin locus hypersensitive site-4 (cHS4) insulator provide consistent, improved expression (chromatin barrier activity) and reduced genotoxicity (enhancer-blocking activity); features important for randomly integrating viral vectors. However, full-length 1.2Kb cHS4 reduces vector titers significantly. Initial studies mapped the enhancer blocking activity of cHS4 to the first 250bp ‘core' in a copy-number dependent manner (Felsenfeld and colleagues). However, elements required for the barrier effect are not well defined. We studied various regions of cHS4 for chromatin barrier effect. Beta-globin-LCR lentivirus vectors were constructed with the core (sBGC), 2 copies of the core (sBG2C), 400bp (sBG400) and 800bp (sBG800) fragments (both including the core) and compared to the un-insulated vector (sBG) and the vector with the full-length cHS4 (sBG-I). Barrier activity (improved probability and consistency of expression from individual integrants) in MEL cells and the clonal progeny of hematopoietic stem cells was analyzed. Single-copy MEL clones showed that sBG-I clones had a significantly higher proportion of hβ+ cells/clone. However, proportion of hβ+ cells from all other vectors carrying various fragments of cHS4 were not significantly different from the un-insulated vector (Table 1). Interestingly, all clones carrying a fragment containing the core showed reduced clonal variegation (coefficient of variation of hβ expression). We next analyzed hβ expression from the sBG, sBGC, sBG2C, sBG400 and sBG-I vectors in primary and secondary thalassemia (Hbb th3/+) mice. In the primary mice and secondary CFU-S analyzed thus far (Table 2), it appears that all vectors with cHS4 insulator fragments containing the core provide some barrier activity, but the full-length insulator is necessary for maximum barrier effect. To corroborate whether elements outside the core contribute to barrier activity, we also tested vectors with inert DNA spacers in addition to the core (sBG400−S, sBG-800−S and sBG1200−S). Single copy MEL clones confirmed that the sBG400−S, sBG800−S and 1200−S vectors had significantly lower proportion of hβ+ cells/clone [41±4.4%, 41±7% and 28±6% respectively, n=36]. These data suggest that regions of 950 bp region of cHS4 outside the core contains elements that cooperate with the core for optimal barrier activity. These studies have important implications for vector design for gene therapy for thalassemia, where variability in expression from uninsulated vectors compromizes efficacy.Table 1β globin expression in MEL cell clones from vectors carrying portions of the cHS4 insulatorsBGsBG csBG 2csBG 400sBG 800sBG-I% hβ+ cells59±549±651±351±349±684±3**CV53±437±3**40±2**42±1.5**42±3**36±2**Values are expressed as Mean±SEM, *P<0.05, **P<0.01 by ANOVA (Dunnet: comparisons of all vectors to the control vector, sBG)Table 2β globin expression in primary thalassemia mice and in the clonal progeny of hematopoietic stem cells of secondary micePrimary mice (16 weeks)MocksBGsBG csBG 2csBG 400sBG-IHCT (%)20±332±336±237±237±339±2Reticulocytes (%)28±216±511±1**13±6**7±2**7±2**%HbA (mαhβ by HPLC)/vector copyNA32±1924±529±331±343±4*% hβ+RBC/ vector copyNA36±1157±8*67±13*76±17*104±18** Secondary CFU-S (Single Copy)% hβ+ cells/cloneNA26±345±3*34±248±9*75±3**CVNA88±968±2*71±2*72±361±2**Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM, *P<0.05, **P<0.01 by ANOVA (Dunnett: comparison of all vectors to the control, sBG)

USF1 Recruits Histone Modification Complexes and Is Critical for Maintenance of a Chromatin Barrier

The insulator element at the 5' end of the chicken beta-globin locus acts as a barrier, protecting transgenes against silencing effects of adjacent heterochromatin. We showed earlier that the transcription factor USF1 binds within the insulator and that this site is important for generating in adjacent nucleosomes histone modifications associated with active chromatin and, by inference, with barrier function. To understand the mechanism of USF1 action, we have characterized USF1-containing complexes. USF1 interacts directly with the histone H4R3-specific methyltransferase PRMT1. USF1, PRMT1, and the histone acetyltransferases (HATs) PCAF and SRC-1 form a complex with both H4R3 histone methyltransferase and HAT activities. Small interfering RNA downregulation of USF1 results in localized loss of H4R3 methylation, and other histone modifications associated with euchromatin, at the insulator. A dominant negative peptide that interferes with USF1 binding to DNA causes silencing of an insulated reporter construct, indicating abolition of barrier function. These results show that USF1 plays a direct role in maintaining the barrier, supporting a model in which the insulator works as a barrier by maintaining a local environment of active chromatin.

An RNA Polymerase III-Dependent Heterochromatin Barrier at Fission Yeast Centromere 1

Heterochromatin formation involves the nucleation and spreading of structural and epigenetic features along the chromatin fiber. Chromatin barriers and associated proteins counteract the spreading of heterochromatin, thereby restricting it to specific regions of the genome. We have performed gene expression studies and chromatin immunoprecipitation on strains in which native centromere sequences have been mutated to study the mechanism by which a tRNAAlanine gene barrier (cen1 tDNAAla) blocks the spread of pericentromeric heterochromatin at the centromere of chromosome 1 (cen1) in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Within the centromere, barrier activity is a general property of tDNAs and, unlike previously characterized barriers, requires the association of both transcription factor IIIC and RNA Polymerase III. Although the cen1 tDNAAla gene is actively transcribed, barrier activity is independent of transcriptional orientation. These findings provide experimental evidence for the involvement of a fully assembled RNA polymerase III transcription complex in defining independent structural and functional domains at a eukaryotic centromere.

Improved Human β-globin Expression from Self-inactivating Lentiviral Vectors Carrying the Chicken Hypersensitive Site-4 (cHS4) Insulator Element

Effective gene therapy for beta-thalassemia major (beta-TM) requires consistent, high expression of human beta-globin (hbeta-globin) in red blood cells (RBCs). Several groups have now shown that lentiviral (LV) vectors stably transmit the hbeta/hgamma-globin genes and large elements of the locus control region, resulting in correction of the murine thalassemia intermedia (TI) phenotype and survival of mice with the TM phenotype. However, current LVs show variable hbeta/hgamma-globin expression and require a high number of vector copies/cell for a therapeutic effect. To address this, we designed LVs flanked by the chicken hypersensitive site-4 (cHS4) chromatin insulator element and compared them with their "un-insulated" counterparts. We observed a consistent twofold-higher hbeta expression from insulated vectors in single-copy mouse erythroleukemia cell clones, an increase that resulted from reduced position effect variegation (PEV) and increased probability of expression from individual integrants. This effect was confirmed in vivo: an approximately twofold increase in hbeta expression was seen in the RBC progeny of murine hematopoietic stem cells, with significantly higher numbers of hbeta-expressing cells in individual secondary spleen colony-forming units. In summary, cHS4-insulated hbeta-globin LVs showed distinct chromatin barrier activity, resulting in higher, consistent hbeta expression. These studies have important implications for vector design for clinical trials for gene therapy for hemoglobinopathies.

CTCF-Independent, but Not CTCF-Dependent, Elements Significantly Contribute to TCR-α Locus Control Region Activity

The mouse TCRalpha/TCRdelta/Dad1 gene locus bears a locus control region (LCR) that drives high-level, position-independent, thymic transgene expression in chromatin. It achieves this through DNA sequences that enhance transcription and protect transgene expression from integration site-dependent position effects. The former activity maps to a classical enhancer region (Ealpha). In contrast, the elements supporting the latter capacity that suppresses position effects are incompletely understood. Such elements likely play important roles in their native locus and may resemble insulator/boundary sequences. Insulators support enhancer blocking and/or chromatin barrier activity. Most vertebrate enhancer-blocking insulators are dependent on the CTCF transcription factor and its cognate DNA binding site. However, studies have also revealed CTCF-independent enhancer blocking and barrier insulator activity in the vertebrate genome. The TCRalpha LCR contains a CTCF-dependent and multiple CTCF-independent enhancer-blocking regions whose roles in LCR activity are unknown. Using randomly integrated reporter transgenes in mice, we find that the CTCF region plays a very minor role in LCR function. In contrast, we report the in vivo function of two additional downstream elements located in the region of the LCR that supports CTCF-independent enhancer-blocking activity in cell culture. Internal deletion of either of these elements significantly impairs LCR activity. These results reveal that the position-effect suppression region of the TCRalpha LCR harbors an array of CTCF-independent, positive-acting gene regulatory elements, some of which share characteristics with barrier-type insulators. These elements may help manage the separate regulatory programs of the TCRalpha and Dad1 genes.

Suppression of Clonal Dominance in Cultured Human Lymphoid Cells by Addition of the cHS4 Insulator to a Lentiviral Vector

Lentiviral vectors efficiently transduce quiescent stem cells and are being evaluated for gene therapy of blood dis-orders. The risk of genotoxicity as a result of insertional mutagenesis is an important safety consideration. The hy-persensitive site 4 insulator from the chicken beta-globin locus (cHS4) possesses chromatin bar-rier and enhancer-blocking functions. A control lentiviral vector encoding green fluorescent protein was compared with a vector in which the cHS4 insulator element flanked the green fluorescent protein expression cassette in single cell isolates of transduced human T cells (Jurkat) after 9 days in culture. The insulator had minimal effect on mean fluorescent intensity and only modestly reduced the variability of green fluorescent protein expression among indi-vidual single cell isolates. Most unique integration sites were within genes, but the insulator-containing vector had a moderate predilection to integrate near the transcriptional start site compared with the control vector. Clonal domi-nance developed in cultures of cells containing the integrated vector genomes, as reflected by the recovery of mul-tiple single cell isolates containing the same integration site. We infer that certain integrations conferred a prolifera-tive or survival advantage by affecting gene expression through insertional mutagenesis, leading to this clonal dominance. This effect was diminished by including the insulator element in the vector genome.