The pathologists play different roles in the care of cancer patients. The main part of this activity is to make the diagnosis of the tumor type, followed by the support to the clinicians in the staging of the patient. In the group of patients that receive Chemotherapy (CT) and / or Radiotherapy (RT) before surgery, the pathologist has to evaluate the results of these treatments by evaluating the tumor bed and the response of the lung. There is a lot of experience in the literature referred to the different types of pathological response to lung cancer treatment after the use of either CT or RT. There are guidelines for the pathologists in order to give an objective evaluation of the treatment results (1). All of them ask the pathologists to evaluate the percentage of viable tumor cells, necrosis and stromal reaction. We can also find different attempts to find molecular markers useful for predicting survival after these traditional treatments (2). In order to have an objective evaluation of the lung cancer patients after CT in 2014 emerged the concept of Major Pathological Response (MPR) as a possible predictor of overall survival (3). This term was applied to describe those patients with a viability of 10% of the tumor cells after neoadjuvant CT. In this report, they propose the MPR as a surrogate endpoint. Since that, the concept of MPR has been used in different reports and assays, becoming a usual parameter for patients with lung resections after receiving chemotherapy. The percentage of viable cells became an important data that has to be evaluated with accuracy in order to avoid subjective results. One of the best ways is to use any of the commercial systems to make measurements on the slides. In our department, we use digital slides to get objective and reproducible data for this type of evaluation. The recent implementation of immunotherapy (IT) for NSCLC that is being applied to an increasing number of patients all over the world makes it necessary to study deeply its morphological effects over de tumor in lung specimens. As most of the patients will never go to the operating room, it becomes important to be aware of the limited knowledge that we have so far. There are some reports comparing the effects of the traditional chemotherapy with immunotherapy. One of these studies shows that the pathologist should look for the same features that are routinely evaluated in the cases after CT (4). The pathologist might evaluate the classic features (viable cells, necrosis and stromal reaction) and other characteristics such as macrophages, cholesterol clefts, lymphoid aggregates, giant cells and neovascularization. In this review, they did not find important differences between the type of morphological changes in both types of treatment, so they propose to use the same parameters in CT and in IT A recent report proposes the concept of Immuno related Pathological Response Criteria (irPRC) (5). They pay attention to the Immune activation with dense lymphoid infiltrate, macrophages and tertiary lymphoid structures as the main characteristics. They also evaluate the massive tumor cell death with destructive features such as cholesterol clefts and those indicative of tissue repair with neovascularization and fibrosis. Last year a review collected different assays done with neoadjuvant IT in patients with resectable lung cancer (6). There is no enough experience in these special groups of patients, as today the IT is given only to advanced lung carcinoma patients. Conclusions: At the present time there are no guidelines for the evaluation of lung tissues after IT. The pathologists have to be aware of the effects of these new biological treatments for lung cancer patients, in order to give as much information as possible in the short number of cases that are seen in the real clinical situation. The previous experience in resected lungs after neoadjuvant therapy is not enough to evaluate the cases after IT. The data obtained from these lung specimens have to give more information in order to improve the knowledge of the effects of these new therapies.
Read full abstract