Objective: This review aimed to identify the optimum treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. Methods: A systematic review, up to July 2015, was conducted in accordance with MOOSE guidelines. The primary outcome was the hazard ratio for overall survival of different treatment modalities. Meta-analysis of differing treatment modalities was carried out using a random effects model with further assessment of additional prognostic factors for survival. Results: 18 cohort studies (2662 patients) were included in final data analysis. The median 5-year survival of repeat hepatectomy (RH; n = 481 pts), ablation (n = 389) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE; n = 878) were 43.0%, 52.7% and 9.0% respectively. Pooled analysis of 10 studies demonstrated no significant difference between overall survival after RH or ablation (HR = 1.03; p = 0.897). Median tumor size across these studies was 23.0 mm (RH) and 20.5 mm (ablation). Pooled analysis of 7 studies comparing TACE with RH showed a non-significant trend to improved survival from RH (HR = 1.61; p = 0.056). Review of prognostic factors identified those negatively associated with overall survival includes: recurrence of HCC within one year (HR 6.8; p < 0.05), presence of more than 3 recurrent tumors (HR 3.78; p < 0.05) and tumors greater than 3 cm in size (HR 4.01; p < 0.05). Conclusion: There was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of these studies preventing the implementation of formal meta-regression. Despite a paucity of available data, these results suggest a non-significant trend to improved survival following RH compared with TACE and identification of important negative prognostic factors, which may influence choice of treatment modality.
Read full abstract