* University of New South Wales; tStanford University. This paper benefited from comments of participants in workshops at Baruch College CUNY, Cornell University, Monash University, Stanford University, University of Chicago, University of New South Wales, University of Pennsylvania, University of Rochester, and Washington University. A special thanks is due to detailed criticisms from G. Biddle, S. Datar, L. DeAngelo, P. Dodd, N. Dopuch, J. Elliott, N. Gonedes, C. Horngren, M. Jensen, A. Kirby, R. Leftwich, J. Magliolo, R. Morris, C. Purvis, K. Schipper, D. Shores, R. Watts, G. Whittred, M. Wolfson, and J. Zimmerman. Foster's contribution was sponsored by the Stanford Program in Accounting, contributors to which are: Arthur Andersen & Co.; Arthur Young & Company; Coopers & Lybrand; Deloitte Haskins & Sells; Ernst & Whinney; Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.; and Price Waterhouse & Co. 1 Buchler [1961, p. 125] distinguishes and methodology in these terms:... in the broadest sense 'methodological' questions are those dealing with as their subject matter, questions pertaining to the origin, scope, nature and relative value of methods. Webster's Third New International Dictionary defines method as procedure or process for attaining an object ... a particular approach to problems of truth or knowledge. Methodology is defined as body of methods, procedures, working concepts, rules and postulates employed by a science, art or discipline ... a science on the study of method. We take research methods to include the selection of dependent and independent variables, sample selection, choice of functional forms, experimental controls, statistical inference, etc.