Reviewed by: From Underground to Independent: Alternative Film Culture in Contemporary China Andreas Steen (bio) Paul G. Pickowicz and Yingjin Zhang, eds. From Underground to Independent: Alternative Film Culture in Contemporary China. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006. 268 pp. Hardcover $82.50, ISBN 0-7425-5437-6. Paperback $29.95, ISBN 0-7425-5438-4. In 1990, Wu Wenguang's movie Bumming in Beijing: The Last Dreamers gave birth to a new film genre in the People's Republic of China (PRC). Wu, like many young directors of what was soon labeled "underground film," had studied at the prestigious Beijing Film Academy and developed his career along a path quite different from that of the successful filmmakers of the Fifth Generation (e.g., Zhang Yimou and Chen Kaige). The genre of underground film has undergone changes, as have its directors and official or governmental attitudes toward alternative film culture in the PRC. The trends have been documented in the Western press, but only recently have scholars in the West and in China attempted to examine this cultural field critically. From Underground to Independent, edited by two experts on Chinese film, intends to advance research on the PRC's underground film and to enhance scholarly knowledge of these films. In accordance with this purpose, the book contains a very useful appendix, consisting of a list of the holdings of the Chinese Underground Film Collection at the University of California, San Diego (with short summaries); a filmography; a bibliography; and a list of online resources. It should also be mentioned that the filmography lists about a hundred titles referred to in the book. Based on this film material and a broad set of sources such as personal observations and interviews and Chinese articles and ethnographic field work, the eight articles of the book employ different methodological approaches to explore China's underground film culture. One crucial problem is introduced in the preface, namely, the question of how to define this film genre: underground, independent, avant-garde, personal, newborn generation, urban generation, Sixth Generation? It is convincingly argued that "underground" is the best term; furthermore, the Chinese directors use it themselves. However, readers may find it confusing that several terms are used throughout the book. In the first article, Paul G. Pickowicz focuses on the political and social dimensions and thereby points at certain key issues that are also explored by other authors in the volume. He takes the recent shift of director Jia Zhangke from underground to aboveground as a starting point in analyzing the meaning and concepts associated with the term "underground." Underground filmmaking, it is said, has very little to do with artistic innovation, and in this respect the films "are quite disappointing" (p. 6). Underground filmmakers are most innovative in terms of content, because "they explore topics that are not treated [End Page 291] in mainstream productions." These topics evolve out of a "complex dance with the state" (p. 8), a dance that allows actors and directors to move between "under" and "above" grounds, but often denies them access to film distribution and exhibition networks within the PRC. Therefore, many directors "are busy chasing global fame" (p. 18) and concentrate on challenging topics (political, social, individual). Pickowicz criticizes this economically motivated new Occidentalism and the films' lack of historical depth. He is convinced that "the best underground work is far more interesting and vastly superior to anything that is being produced in the sterile state socialist sector" (p. 19). Since underground movies are made to attract foreign audiences, this evaluation is hardly surprising; it is, nevertheless, not entirely clear why official filmmaking should always be "sterile." Nowadays, a straightforward comparison of official and unofficial filmmaking seems to be inappropriate, especially if we consider the various networks between them. These surely encouraged the transformation from "underground to independent" and are frequently referred to in the other articles, which emphasize general aspects such as truthfulness, amateurism, independence, film content, criticism, and consumption. Zhang Yingjin looks into the filmmakers' claim that "my camera doesn't lie," which was the title of a book (2002) and of a documentary on independent filmmakers (2003). In his critical analysis, Zhang addresses complex issues of...
Read full abstract