The Greater China region --- by which I mean Taiwan, China and Hong Kong (and excluding Macao for now) --- has been one of the fastest growing areas in the world. Interestingly, corporate governance has not been much discussed in this region until the recent years. It is therefore opportune to try to examine whether there is any corporate governance model. From a legal perspective, this is a fascinating and daunting task. I will only attempt to examine a few topics covered in this vast subject to see whether this discourse can be enriched. One should start briefly with the similarities and differences of these three economies. In recent years, each of the economies in this region has received different challenges. They are at different stages of economic development, and they have vastly different development strategies and political economy. However, ethnic Chinese business culture is one common thread among them. In the area of corporate governance, these three economies all face some level of ownership concentration. In Taiwan and Hong Kong, family-owned but listed companies dominate the stock exchange. In China, the recent corporatization of state-owned enterprises still leaves the state with significant blocks of ownership. Therefore, the owner-manager (entrepreneurs) in China is only an emerging (albeit rapidly emerging) phenomenon. There is much closer integration between Hong Kong and southern China than the case between Taiwan and China. However, after both sides accede to the World Trade Organization, we can anticipate even closer cross-strait economic links. The three economies have different legal systems. Hong Kong has a modern Common Law system, although its Company Ordinances are increasingly becoming outdated. Taiwan follows the Civil Law system, and all practitioners and even some government officials admit that the corporate law is also very archaic. China now is reverting to the Civil Law system with, of course, a strong emphasis on socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics. In addition to the roots of the legal system, bureaucracy and public law administration also differ widely in the three economies. Generally, Hong Kong has been rated as having a far better (and far better paid) civil service system than in Taiwan and China. These differences in corporate and administrative law have profound ramifications on the state of corporate governance of respective economies.