Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy Research Articles

Evaluation of a flow cytometry-based method for determination of T-lymphocyte subtypes for quality assessment of cell therapy products

Chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapy is currently the best-known type of immune effector cells therapy. For CAR T-cell therapy, the determination of CD3+ T cells is necessary for the quality control of fresh leukapheresis product as starting material. The aim was to validate analytical method for quantification of percentage and absolute count of T lymphocyte subtypes (CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells) in fresh apheresis products using single-platform method on flow cytometer BD FACS Canto II. Validation study included determination of precision, trueness (bias), assessment of linearity, carryover, comparison of results obtained with two different protocols on flow cytometer for CD3+ cells determination and stability study. For between-run precision coefficients of variation (CVs) were <20%, as well as bias for all T-lymphocyte subtypes. For within-run precision, CVs were <10%, except for low CD8+ cell (percentage 10.51% and viable absolute count 12.37%). Comparison of results obtained with two different protocols for CD3+ cells determination shows no statistically significant difference. Statistically significant differences between results of the analysis of CD4+ cells in fresh samples and results obtained after storage at 4 °C (p = .004) and at room temperature (p = .018) were found. In conclusion, method for enumeration of T-lymphocyte subtypes can be used in routine work on BD FACS Canto II instrument for quality assessment of fresh cell products collected by leukapheresis procedure.

Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the FDA Reporting System

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, including axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), has demonstrated significant efficacy in treating refractory or relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Though adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are well characterized, the dermatologic adverse event (DAE) profile is less thoroughly described. This study aims to provide the first comprehensive analysis of DAEs associated with axi-cel and tisa-cel using real-world data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. FAERS database reports citing axi-cel or tisa-cel in patients aged 16 years or older were included, excluding duplicate reports and off-label indications. Disproportionality analysis by reporting odds ratio (ROR) was utilized to detect increased reporting of drug-adverse event combinations. Of the 11,256,845 reports in the FAERS database, 5559 identified CAR-T therapy as the primary suspected drug. After exclusions, 3,666 reports were analyzed (2,168 for axi-cel and 1,498 for tisa-cel). Among these, 2.7% of axi-cel and 5.1% of tisa-cel cases reported DAEs. There was a statistically significant increased reporting of 2 DAE groups associated with CAR-T therapy: severe cutaneous eruptions (ROR 5.18, 95% CI 1.29, 20.76) and vascular cutaneous (ROR 2.91, 95% CI 1.51, 5.60). The median time to DAE onset was 3 days after CAR T-cell infusion. Death was a reported outcome in 11.9% and 13.0% of axi-cel and tisa-cel DAE cases, respectively, and in 50% and 25% of severe cutaneous eruptions and vascular cutaneous cases, respectively. This study reveals a significantly increased reporting rate of severe cutaneous eruptions and vascular cutaneous DAEs associated with CAR-T therapy, with both event groups associated with high mortality. These results emphasize the importance of monitoring dermatologic toxicities in clinical practice to ensure timely identification and management of potentially severe adverse events.

Impact of COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies on outcomes of COVID-19 infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant and chimeric antigen receptor therapy recipients.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) recipients are at higher risk of serious complications of COVID-19 infection than the general population. Though there is evidence that monoclonal antibodies (MCA) against COVID-19 reduce the risk of death and hospitalization in the general population, data regarding their efficacy in HSCT and CAR-T recipients remains scarce. We conducted a retrospective review of HSCT and CAR-T recipients to compare 30-day outcomes between patients who did and did not receive MCA after their first episode of COVID-19 between May 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022. Outcomes were defined as the most severe complication experienced out of the following: 30-day emergency department visit, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and death after COVID-19 infection. We identified 166 patients comprised of 53.6% allogeneic HSCT, 35.5% autologous HSCT, and 10.8% CAR-T recipients; 107 had received a COVID-19 vaccine >2 weeks prior to testing positive, and 40 were treated with MCA. After adjusting for age, presence of symptoms at the initial positive test, and COVID-19 vaccination status, patients who did not receive MCA were five times more likely to develop complications after COVID-19 infection (adjusted odds ratio 5.0 [95% CI, 1.9-12.8], p =.001). HSCT and CAR-T recipients who received MCA following COVID-19 infection were far less likely to develop COVID-related complications than those who did not receive MCA, regardless of vaccination status. This underscores the potential benefit of developing novel MCA with efficacy against circulating COVID-19 strains.

Recent Advances in Nanoimmunotherapy by Modulating Tumor-Associated Macrophages for Cancer Therapy.

Cancer immunotherapy has yielded remarkable results across a variety of tumor types. Nevertheless, the complex and immunosuppressive microenvironment within solid tumors poses significant challenges to established therapies such as immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Within the milieu, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play a significant role by directly suppressing T-cell functionality and fostering an immunosuppressive environment. Effective regulation of TAMs is, therefore, crucial to enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapies. Various therapeutic strategies targeting TAM modulation have emerged, including blocking TAM recruitment, direct elimination, promoting repolarization toward the M1 phenotype, and enhancing phagocytic capacity against tumor cells. The recently introduced CAR macrophage (CAR-M) therapy opens new possibilities for macrophage-based immunotherapy. Compared with CAR-T, CAR-M may demonstrate superior targeting and infiltration capabilities toward solid tumors. This review predominantly delves into the origin and development process of TAMs, their role in promoting tumor growth, and provides a comprehensive overview of immunotherapies targeting TAMs. It underscores the significance of regulating TAMs in bolstering antitumor therapies while discussing the potential and challenges of developing TAMs as targets for immunotherapy.

The multifaceted roles of extracellular vesicles for therapeutic intervention with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) contribute to the development of cancer in various ways. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a cancer of mature lymphocytes and the most common hematological malignancy globally. The most common form of NHL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), is primarily treated with chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and/or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. With NHL disease progression and its treatment, extracellular vesicles play remarkable roles in influencing outcomes. This finding can be utilized for therapeutic intervention to improve patient outcomes for NHL. This review focuses on the multifaceted roles of EVs with NHL and its potential for guiding patient care.

Quadriparesis and paraparesis following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in children and adolescents

AbstractImmune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a common but potentially severe adverse event associated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy, characterized by the development of acute neurologic symptoms following CART infusion. ICANS encompasses a wide clinical spectrum typified by mild to severe encephalopathy, seizures, and/or cerebral edema. As more patients have been treated with CART, new ICANS phenomenology has emerged. We present the clinical course of 5 children who developed acute onset of quadriparesis or paraparesis associated with abnormal brain and/or spine neuroimaging after infusion of CD19- or CD22-directed CART, adverse events not previously reported in children. Orthogonal data from autopsy studies, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow cytometry, and CSF proteomics/cytokine profiling demonstrated chronic white matter destruction, but a notable lack of inflammatory pathologic changes and cell populations. Instead, children with quadriparesis or paraparesis post-CART therapy had lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interferon gamma, CCL17, CCL23, and CXCL10, than those who did not develop quadriparesis or paraparesis. Taken together, these findings imply a noninflammatory source of this newly described ICANS phenomenon in children. The pathophysiology of some neurologic symptoms following CART may therefore have a more complex etiology than exclusive T-cell activation and excessive cytokine production.

Salvage CD20-SD-CART therapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma after CD19 CART treatment failure.

Patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma(r/r aBCL)who progressed after CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CD19CART) had a poor prognosis. Application of CAR T-cells targeting a second different antigen (CD20) expressed on the surface of B-cell lymphoma as subsequent anti-cancer salvage therapy (CD20-SD-CART) is also an option. This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcome of CD20-SD-CART as a salvage therapy for CD19 CART treatment failure. This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with aBCL after the failure of CD19 CART treatment at Beijing Gobroad Boren Hospital from December 2019 to May 2022. Patients were subsequently treated with CD20CART therapy or non-CART therapy (polatuzumab or non-polatuzumab). A total of 93 patients were included in the study, with 54 patients receiving CD20-SD-CART therapy. After a median follow-up of 18.54 months, the CD20-SD-CART group demonstrated significantly longer median progression-free survival (4.04 months vs. 2.27 months, p=0.0032) and median overall survival (8.15 months vs. 3.02 months, p<0.0001) compared to the non-CART group. The complete response rate in the CD20-SD-CART group (15/54, 27.8%) was also significantly higher than the non-CART group (3/38, 7.9%, p=0.03). Multivariate analysis further confirmed that CD20CART treatment was independently associated with improved overall survival (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16-0.51; p<0.0001) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.8; p=0.005). CD20-SD-CART could serve as an effective therapeutic option for patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma after CD19CART treatment failure.

Medicare Utilization and Cost Trends for CAR T Cell Therapies Across Settings of Care in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies have transformed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treatment. It is important to better understand their use in Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) patients, who often differ from commercially insured populations in important ways. We analyzed Medicare FFS claims data, focusing on the utilization patterns across three CAR T products-lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and axicabtagene autoleucel (axi-cel)-which are indicated for the treatment of DLBCL. Our investigation covered the period from 2021 through 2022. This analysis spanned a 180-day period prior to CAR T procedure and extended to a 90-day post-CAR T. Utilization of healthcare services, healthcare spending, and comorbidities were assessed in the pre- and post-periods. Clinical trial and PPS-exempt center claims were removed from the analysis. Statistical comparisons between inpatient and outpatient cohorts were made using Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Among the total 391 CAR T claims assessed, most of the CAR T therapies were administered in the inpatient setting (79%) compared to outpatient (21%). CAR T therapy in the inpatient setting received an average Medicare cost of US$498,723 ($276,138-$1,066,524), while the average Medicare cost for outpatient CAR T claims was $414,393 ($276,980-$849,878). There was a higher 3-month average post-period cost for those hospitals utilizing CAR T in the outpatient setting than the inpatient setting ($15,794 vs. $10,244). Despite the higher post-period cost, when looking at the CAR T procedure and pre- and post-periods as a single episode, beneficiaries receiving outpatient CAR T had less cost for the total episode of care ($587,908 vs. $529,188). Follow-up inpatient claims were also assessed post-CAR T procedure for 30days. The rate of post-CAR T inpatient re-admission was significantly lower for beneficiaries receiving the index CAR T in the inpatient setting (21%) compared to outpatient CAR T (59%). Days between index CAR T discharge and IP admission were also significantly shorter for OP CAR T compared to IP CAR T (8.0 vs. 14.1 days, p<0.0001). Additionally, IP CAR T had a longer ALOS on the admission claim (6.9 vs. 6.2 days). CAR T therapy for the treatment of LBCL has become more common within the Medicare population, primarily in the inpatient setting. This study helps understand providers' cost and associated patient care around CAR T administration. The data show that the average cost received by hospitals encompasses the expenses related to both the CAR T drug and the medical services delivered to patients.

Optimization Strategies in CAR T-cell Therapy: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Cytopenia, HLH/MAS, and Other Adverse Events.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a transformative treatment for various hematological malignancies. Still, its remarkable efficacy is accompanied by unique adverse events that must be carefully managed. This comprehensive literature review evaluates the safety profile of CAR T-cell therapy, focusing on cytopenia, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)/macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), and other potential complications. Cytopenia, characterized by reduced blood cell counts, affects a significant proportion of patients, with rates of anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia reaching up to 60%, 70%, and 80%, respectively. Risk factors include high tumor burden, prior chemotherapy, and bone marrow involvement. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurs in 13% to 77% of patients and is linked to the cytokine storm induced by CAR T cells, target antigen expression, and preexisting immune dysregulation. Other notable adverse events discussed are cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and infections. Understanding the mechanisms, risk factors, and management strategies for these adverse events is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and unlocking the full potential of this revolutionary therapy. The review highlights the need for continued research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and evidence-based approaches to enhance the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy.

CAR T-cell Resistance to Oncogenic Transformation.

In this commentary, we discuss the investigation into reports of T-cell malignancies following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. We argue that although these cases should be thoroughly examined, current data suggest that such risks with autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cells are remarkably low compared with other cancer treatments. We also emphasize the importance of continued research, transparent reporting, and participation in postauthorization safety studies.

Outpatient administration of CAR T-cell therapies using a strategy of no remote monitoring and early CRS intervention

AbstractRecent studies demonstrating the feasibility of outpatient chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)–modified T-cell therapy administration are either restricted to CARs with 41BB costimulatory domains or use intensive at-home monitoring. We report outcomes of outpatient administration of all commercially available CD19- and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–directed CAR T-cell therapy using a strategy of no remote at-home monitoring and an early cytokine release syndrome (CRS) intervention strategy. Patients with hematologic malignancies who received CAR T-cell therapy in the outpatient setting during 2022 to 2023 were included. Patients were seen daily in the cancer center day hospital for the first 7 to 10 days and then twice weekly through day 30. The primary end point was to determine 3-, 7-, and 30-day post–CAR T-cell infusion hospitalizations. Early CRS intervention involved administering tocilizumab as an outpatient for grade ≥1 CRS. Fifty-eight patients received outpatient CAR T-cell infusion (33 myeloma, 24 lymphoma, and 1 acute lymphoblastic leukemia). Of these, 17 (41%), 16 (38%), and 9 patients (21%) were admitted between days 0 to 3, 4 to 7, and 8 to 30 after CAR T-cell infusion, respectively. The most common reason for admission was CAR T-cell–related toxicities (33/42). Hospitalization was prevented in 15 of 35 patients who received tocilizumab for CRS as an outpatient. The nonrelapse mortality rates were 1.7% at 1 month and 3.4% at 6 months. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the administration of commercial CAR T-cell therapies in an outpatient setting is safe and feasible without intensive remote monitoring using an early CRS intervention strategy.

Retrospective study on pomalidomide-PACE as a salvage regimen in aggressive relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Despite major advances in treatment options for multiple myeloma (MM), patients refractory to the main drug classes and those with aggressive, especially extramedullary disease, still face a dismal outcome. For these patients, effective therapeutic options are urgently warranted. In this retrospective study, we report on the safety and efficacy of the intensive combination regimen of pomalidomide plus cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (Pom-PACE) in patients with relapsed refractory MM (RRMM) or plasma cell leukemia (PCL). A study population of 20 consecutive patients treated with Pom-PACE at two academic centers was included for analysis. All patients had to have a confirmed relapse according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria and adequate organ function prior to the start of therapy. Data were collected by reviewing medical charts. Exploratory analyses were performed with regard to efficacy and safety. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median number of four prior therapies (range: 1-10). All patients were exposed to immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, and alkylating agents, 80% were double-class refractory, 40% were triple-class refractory. Extramedullary MM or PCL were present in 15 patients (75%). Overall response rate (ORR) was 68%, with 31% achieving at least a very good partial response. Responses were achieved rapidly with an ORR of 64% after one cycle. Median progression-free survival was 8.9 months (0.92-not reached [NR]) and median overall survival was 11.8 months (3-40.6). Pom-PACE was associated with significant toxicity. All evaluable patients experienced Grade 4 hematological toxicity. However, no treatment related mortality was observed. Pomalidomide-PACE was able to induce rapid responses in heavily pretreated, aggressive RRMM with a manageable toxicity profile and therefore offers an effective salvage regimen and a potential bridging strategy to further treatment options such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection management and outcomes in patients with hematologic disease and recipients of cell therapy.

Scarce real-life data exists for COVID-19 management in hematologic disease (HD) patients in the Omicron era. To assess the current clinical management and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed, identify the risk factors for severe outcomes according to the HD characteristics and cell therapy procedures in a real-world setting. A retrospective observational registry led by the Spanish Transplant Group (GETH-TC) with 692 consecutive patients with HD from December 2021 to May 2023 was analyzed. Nearly one-third of patients (31%) remained untreated and presented low COVID-19-related mortality (0.9%). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was used mainly in mild COVID-19 cases in the outpatient setting (32%) with a low mortality (1%), while treatment with remdesivir was preferentially administered in moderate-to-severe SARS-CoV-2 infection cases during hospitalization (35%) with a mortality rate of 8.6%. The hospital admission rate was 23%, while 18% developed pneumonia. COVID-19-related mortality in admitted patients was 14%. Older age, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, corticosteroids and incomplete vaccination were factors independently associated with COVID-19 severity and significantly related with higher rates of hospital admission and pneumonia. Incomplete vaccination status, treatment with prior anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, and comorbid cardiomyopathy were identified as independent risk factors for COVID-19 mortality. The results support that, albeit to a lower extent, COVID-19 in the Omicron era remains a significant problem in HD patients. Complete vaccination (3 doses) should be prioritized in these immunocompromised patients. The identified risk factors may help to improve COVID-19 management to decrease the rate of severe disease, ICU admissions and mortality.

Moving T-Cell Therapies into the Standard of Care for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: A Review.

Patients with follicular lymphoma, an indolent form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, typically experience multiple relapses over their disease course. Periods of remission become progressively shorter with worse clinical outcomes after each subsequent line of therapy. Currently, no clear standard of care/preferred treatment approach exists for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. As novel agents continue to emerge for treatment in the third-line setting, guidance is needed for selecting the most appropriate therapy for each patient. Several classes of targeted therapeutic agents, including monoclonal antibodies, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, and bispecific antibodies, have been approved by regulatory authorities based on clinical benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Additionally, antibody-drug conjugates and other immunocellular therapies are being evaluated in this setting. Effective integration of CAR-T cell therapy into the treatment paradigm after two or more prior therapies requires appropriate patient selection based on transformation status following a rebiopsy; a risk evaluation based on age, fitness, and remission length; and eligibility for CAR-T cell therapy. Consideration of important logistical factors (e.g., proximity to the treatment center and caregiver support during key periods of CAR-T cell therapy) is also critical. Overall, an individualized treatment plan that considers patient-related factors (e.g., age, disease status, tumor burden, comorbidities) and prior treatment types is recommended for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Future analyses of real-world data and a better understanding of mechanisms of relapse are needed to further refine patient selection and identify optimal sequencing of therapies in this setting.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel to Mosunetuzumab for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, while mosunetuzumab was the first bispecific monoclonal antibody approved in this population. In the absence of head-to-head evidence, this study sought to conduct a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to estimate the comparative efficacy and safety of these treatments in 3rd line or higher (3L+) FL. The evidence base consisted of individual patient data (IPD) of all enrolled patients, regardless of infusion status, from the single-arm axi-cel trial, ZUMA-5 (NCT03105336), and aggregate data from the mosunetuzumab FL trial (NCT02500407) from publications identified through a systematic review. Efficacy outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), objective response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR). Analyses used independent central review for both trials, where possible. Safety outcomes were cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurological events (NE), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Unanchored MAICs were conducted to align ZUMA-5 to the patient characteristics of the mosunetuzumab trial. For each outcome, prognostic factors were identified a priori through quantitative analysis and clinical experts. For time-to-event outcomes, hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox regression using IPD from ZUMA-5 and pseudo-IPD extracted from Kaplan-Meier plots for mosunetuzumab. Patient characteristics were well-aligned between trials leading to large effective-sample sizes after matching, ranging from 93.4 to 115.5, for ZUMA-5 (n = 127). In comparisons to mosunetuzumab (n = 90), axi-cel was associated with improved PFS (HR: 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.62) and DoR (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.27-0.76). Similarly, axi-cel led to higher ORR (OR: 3.87; 95% CI: 1.53-9.76) and CRR (OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.50-5.26). Although axi-cel was associated with a higher rate of all-grade CRS (OR: 5.54; 95% CI: 2.63-8.94) and NEs (OR: 3.54; 95% CI: 1.28-9.83), differences in grade ≥3 CRS and TRAEs were not statistically significant. Findings from this study show improved efficacy and more durable response for the treatment of 3L+ R/R FL with axi-cel relative to mosunetuzumab, with increased odds of all-grade CRS and NE, but not G3+ CRS and TRAEs.

Engineering strategies to safely drive CAR T-cells into the future.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has proven a breakthrough in cancer treatment in the last decade, giving unprecedented results against hematological malignancies. All approved CAR T-cell products, as well as many being assessed in clinical trials, are generated using viral vectors to deploy the exogenous genetic material into T-cells. Viral vectors have a long-standing clinical history in gene delivery, and thus underwent iterations of optimization to improve their efficiency and safety. Nonetheless, their capacity to integrate semi-randomly into the host genome makes them potentially oncogenic via insertional mutagenesis and dysregulation of key cellular genes. Secondary cancers following CAR T-cell administration appear to be a rare adverse event. However several cases documented in the last few years put the spotlight on this issue, which might have been underestimated so far, given the relatively recent deployment of CAR T-cell therapies. Furthermore, the initial successes obtained in hematological malignancies have not yet been replicated in solid tumors. It is now clear that further enhancements are needed to allow CAR T-cells to increase long-term persistence, overcome exhaustion and cope with the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. To this aim, a variety of genomic engineering strategies are under evaluation, most relying on CRISPR/Cas9 or other gene editing technologies. These approaches are liable to introduce unintended, irreversible genomic alterations in the product cells. In the first part of this review, we will discuss the viral and non-viral approaches used for the generation of CAR T-cells, whereas in the second part we will focus on gene editing and non-gene editing T-cell engineering, with particular regard to advantages, limitations, and safety. Finally, we will critically analyze the different gene deployment and genomic engineering combinations, delineating strategies with a superior safety profile for the production of next-generation CAR T-cell.

Epcoritamab (Epkinly)

We recommend that Epkinly be reimbursed by public drug plans for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, DLBCL transformed from indolent lymphoma, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or follicular lymphoma grade 3B after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy and who have previously received or are unable to receive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for a time-limited period while additional evidence is generated if certain conditions are met. Epkinly should only be covered to treat adults who have DLBCL, not otherwise specified, DLBCL transformed from indolent lymphoma, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or follicular lymphoma grade 3B that has come back or that did not respond to 2 or more previous treatments for their cancer, and who have also previously received CAR T-cell therapy, declined CAR T-cell therapy, or cannot receive CAR T-cell therapy. Epkinly should only be reimbursed if not given in combination with other anticancer drugs. Reimbursement of Epkinly should be discontinued if a patient’s cancer grows or spreads or if the treatment is unacceptably toxic to the patient. Epkinly should only be reimbursed when prescribed by specialists with experience managing large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), and if its cost is reduced.

Cholesterol efflux from C1QB-expressing macrophages is associated with resistance to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in primary refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has demonstrated promising efficacy in early trials for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, its efficacy in treating primary refractory DLBCL has not been comprehensively investigated, and the underlying resistance mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we report the outcomes of a phase I, open-label, single-arm clinical trial of relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel), a CD19-targeted CAR-T cell product, with safety and efficacy as primary endpoints. Among the 12 enrolled patients, 8 experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity of treatment-emergent adverse event. No grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity occurred. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed an increase proportion of C1QB-expressing macrophages in patients with progressive disease before CAR-T cell therapy. Cholesterol efflux from M2 macrophages was found to inhibit CAR-T cells cytotoxicity by inducing an immunosuppressive state in CD8+ T cells, leading to their exhaustion. Possible interactions between macrophages and CD8+ T cells, mediating lipid metabolism (AFR1-FAS), immune checkpoint activation, and T cell exhaustion (LGALS9-HAVCR2, CD86-CTLA4, and NECTIN2-TIGIT) were enhanced during disease progression. These findings suggest that cholesterol efflux from macrophages may trigger CD8+ T cell exhaustion, providing a rationale for metabolic reprogramming to counteract CAR-T treatment failure. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20200376.

Zevorcabtagene Autoleucel: First Approval.

Zevorcabtagene autoleucel () is a fully humanised B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy being developed by CARsgen for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Zevorcabtagene autoleucel is an autologous CAR T cell comprising a fully human BCMA-specific scFv (25C2), a CD8α hinge region and transmembrane domain, a 4-1BB costimulatory domain and a CD3-ζ T cell activation domain. Zevorcabtagene autoleucel recognizes and induces selective toxicity against BCMA-expressing tumour cells leading to their elimination. In February 2024, zevorcabtagene autoleucel received its first approval in China for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have progressed after ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy (including ≥ 1 proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent). Clinical studies of zevorcabtagene autoleucel are underway in Canada and the US. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of zevorcabtagene autoleucel leading to this first approval for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

IMMU-13. TUMOR INFLAMMATION-ASSOCIATED NEUROTOXICITY (TIAN): A TOXICITY SYNDROME IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TUMORS

Abstract BACKGROUND Immunotherapies are increasingly being explored as potential therapeutic modalities for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) tumors and have unique toxicity profiles. Toxicity syndromes such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) were identified through experiences with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for B cell malignancies; the creation of grading scales for these toxicities standardized the reporting and enabled management. METHODS From our collective experiences in treating patients with immunotherapies for CNS tumors, we have identified a localized neurotoxicity syndrome, distinct from the systemic toxicities of CRS and ICANS, termed tumor inflammation-associated neurotoxicity (TIAN). RESULTS TIAN develops secondary to localized inflammation at the tumor site. From a mechanistic perspective, we identified two types of TIAN: 1) type 1 TIAN arises in the setting of mechanical space constraints when peritumoral edema results in tissue shifts and increased intracranial pressure, which if untreated, can lead to a life-threatening herniation syndrome and 2) type 2 TIAN occurs when local neuronal dysfunction causes transient worsening/new neurological deficits. Whereas type 1 TIAN encompasses the concept of “pseudoprogression,” type 2 TIAN can occur in the absence of edema when neural-immune interactions disrupt local neural function. Patients can have both type 1 and type 2 TIAN simultaneously; understanding the type of TIAN can inform management. To facilitate the uniform reporting and management of TIAN, we created a TIAN grading scale that applies to both types of TIAN. Although, type 1 TIAN is generally associated with higher-grade toxicity, high-grade type 2 TIAN can occur when local inflammation compromises respiratory or autonomic functions. CONCLUSIONS Recognizing TIAN as a distinct, local neurotoxicity syndrome is critical to guiding clinical management and prognostication when treating patients with CNS tumors with immunotherapies.