2015 Children, Youth and Environments Children, Youth and Environments 25(3), 2015 Book Reviews Children of Katrina Alice Fothergill and Lori Peek (2015). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press, 321 pages. $24.95 (paperback); ISBN: 978-1-4773-0546-1. Children of Katrina, by sociologists Alice Fothergill and Lori Peek, is part of The Katrina Bookshelf collection available through the University of Texas Press. The series reflects a national commitment to enhance understanding about the human scope of Hurricane Katrina (the 2005 storm that struck the Gulf Coast of the United States) and the important lessons that may be learned from it. With their clear analysis of the trajectories of New Orleans-based children following the hurricane, Fothergill and Peek’s contribution to this series is nothing short of outstanding. I can identify many strengths in Children of Katrina. Fothergill and Peek bring attention to children, a group relatively neglected in disaster research. The authors highlight the range of outcomes for children after the hurricane, and explore how these outcomes connect to the social locations of their research participants. The authors take a holistic approach to understanding the spheres of children’s lives, including a consideration of family, housing, school, peers, health, and extracurricular activities. The research design reflects a commitment to gaining broad exposure to a large number of children and their experiences, while honing in on seven specific children’s stories, giving us a rich sense of actual lives. Fothergill and Peek capture the vantage points of not just children but the adults in their lives, including siblings, parents, child care workers, shelter staff, and teachers. Children of Katrina serves as both a model of good writing and an example of how research with a protected group can be conducted in a caring and compassionate manner. I’d like to discuss in more detail two additional strengths I see in the book that for me, are the most notable. First, the longitudinal design of the study enabled the authors to trace the trajectories of their focal children across seven years. Longitudinal research requires a major commitment of time and resources and is often neglected in the fast-track pace of academic research and publication. Writing up longitudinal results can require a complete reorientation in how to organize the analysis and findings, as Fothergill and Peek point out in their methodology appendix. Yet when done well, as I’m convinced this was, longitudinal research can shed invaluable light upon the factors shaping change over time, factors that lead to transitions and trajectories with long-term consequences. This longitudinal analysis adds great value and enables a deeper understanding of children’s lives across time. Book Reviews 205 Second, children whose lives were the most precarious were framed using the concept of cumulative vulnerability. This concept shaped the organization of the book and the conceptualization of key trajectories in children’s lives following the disaster. Three longitudinal trajectories emerged from analysis of the lives of the seven focal children: a declining trajectory, in which children’s lives following the disaster were characterized by “serious and ongoing instability” (37), a findingequilibrium trajectory, in which the disruption of the hurricane was followed by “a return to or a newfound type of stability” (97), and a fluctuating trajectory, in which a lack of comprehensive recovery or rapid fluctuations in well-being characterized the children’s experiences. Fothergill and Peek draw upon the cumulative vulnerability framework to characterize the children most at risk of a downward trajectory, and draw from the literature on disasters to identify groups most likely to be vulnerable following a natural disaster—racial minorities, low-income individuals, women, and children. As the footnotes indicate, the authors have previously written extensively about social vulnerability and disasters. I am not that familiar with the literature on disasters but would like to highlight how the concept of cumulative vulnerability contributes synergistically to another interdisciplinary sub-field of social research, that of social gerontology/aging and the life course. The life course perspective, a prominent conceptual framework in research on aging, draws attention to transitions and trajectories across the human life course. Key principles of time and place, timing, linked lives, life span development and...
Read full abstract