Children's Health Insurance Research Articles

Implications of Changing Public Charge Immigration Rules for Children Who Need Medical Care

In October 2018, the Trump administration published a proposed rule change that would increase the chance of an immigrant being deemed a "public charge" and thereby denied legal permanent residency or entry to the United States. The proposed changes are expected to cause many immigrant parents to disenroll their families from safety-net programs, in large part because of fear and confusion about the rule, even among families to whom the rule does not technically apply. To simulate the potential harms of the rule change by estimating the number, medical conditions, and care needs of children who are at risk of losing their current benefits, including Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). A cross-sectional study used nationally representative data from 4007 children 17 years of age or younger who participated in the 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to assess their potential risk of losing benefits because they live with a noncitizen adult. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 3 to April 8, 2019. The number of children at risk of losing benefits; the number of children with medical need, defined as having a potentially serious medical diagnosis; being disabled (or functionally limited); or having received any specific treatment in the past year. The numbers of children who would be disenrolled under likely disenrollment scenarios drawn from research on immigrants before and after the 1996 welfare reform were estimated. A total of 8.3 million children who are currently enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP or receiving SNAP benefits are potentially at risk of disenrollment, of whom 5.5 million have specific medical needs, including 615 842 children with asthma, 53 728 children with epilepsy, 3658 children with cancer, and 583 700 children with disabilities or functional limitations. Nonetheless, among the population potentially at risk of disenrollment, medical need was less common than among other children receiving Medicaid and CHIP or SNAP (64.5%; 95% CI, 61.5%-67.4%; vs 76.0%; 95% CI, 73.9%-78.4%; P < .001). The proposed rule is likely to cause parents to disenroll between 0.8 million and 1.9 million children with specific medical needs from health and nutrition benefits. The proposed public charge rule would likely cause millions of children to lose health and nutrition benefits, including many with specific medical needs that, if left untreated, may contribute to child deaths and future disability.

What do women in Medicaid say about enhanced prenatal care? Findings from the national Strong Start evaluation.

Medicaid pays for approximately half of United States births, yet little research has explored Medicaid beneficiaries' perspectives on their maternity care. Typical maternity care in the United States has been criticized as too medically focused while insufficiently addressing psychosocial risks and patient education. Enhanced care strives for a more holistic approach. The perspectives of participants in the Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns II initiative, which provided enhanced prenatal care to women covered by Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) during pregnancy through Birth Centers, Group Prenatal Care, and Maternity Care Homes, are evaluated. Strong Start intended to improve care quality and birth outcomes while lowering costs. We analyzed data from 133 focus groups with 951 pregnant or postpartum women who participated in Strong Start from 2013 to 2017. The majority of focus group participants said that Strong Start's enhanced care offered numerous important benefits over typical maternity care, including considerably more focus on women's psychosocial risk factors and need for education. They praised increased support; nutrition, breastfeeding, and family planning education; community referrals; longer time with practitioners; and involvement of partners in their care. Maternity Care Home participants, however, occasionally voiced concerns over lack of practitioner continuity and short clinical appointments, whereas Group Prenatal Care participants sometimes said they could not attend visits because of lack of childcare. Medicaid and CHIP beneficiaries reported positive experiences with Strong Start care. If more Medicaid practitioners could adopt aspects of the prenatal care approaches that women praised most, it is likely that women's risk factors could be more effectively addressed and their overall care experiences could be improved.

Association of Child Neurology-Indian Epilepsy Society Consensus Document on Social and Legal Aspects of Childhood Epilepsy (SOLACE).

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder which affects not only the health of the affected child, but also has an economic, psychological and emotional impact on the family as a whole. In the transition from Person with Disability (PWD) act (1995) to Rights of Persons with Disabilities act (RPWD act) (2016), which covers all aspects of life of a person with any disability, epilepsy has been excluded from the list of disorders, resulting in a loss of many of the benefits that were earlier available to persons with epilepsy, causing concern to all caregivers of persons with epilepsy. Additionally, physicians/ pediatricians/ neurologists are not really aware of the benefits that are available to persons with epilepsy, especially children. To address these issues, an expert group meeting of pediatric neurologists and epileptologists in India along with social workers/epilepsy educators legal experts, parents, and teachers was held. The implication of epilepsy being dropped as a disability, was discussed, and most of the experts concurred that epilepsy should be considered as a disability, depending of the type of seizures or the epilepsy syndrome. Also, the current status of income tax benefits, child care benefits, travel concession, schooling and health insurance for children with epilepsy in India were also discussed. The importance of creating awareness on these issues was stressed on. Here authors present the group consensus statement on these legal and social aspects about the care of children with epilepsy.

EHR quality indicator tracking: A process improvement pilot project to meet MACRA requirements.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services created the Quality Payment Program to award compensation to providers for offering evidence-based, high-value, and efficient care. This article outlines an information technology process improvement pilot project undertaken at a large primary care practice in western Florida to support readiness for Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Reauthorization Act of 2015 using new EHR quality indicator tracking features.

Disappearing Medicaid Enrollment Disparities for US Citizen Children in Immigrant Families: State-Level Trends from 2008 to 2015

ObjectiveMedicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) provide health insurance to 38% of all children in the United States. Uninsured rates continued to fall over the past decade, and citizen children in immigrant families experienced the most dramatic gains. Our objective is to test whether states have managed to close Medicaid enrollment gaps between US citizen children in native and immigrant families. MethodsWe use the 2008 to 2015 American Community Surveys to compare uninsured rates for 2.4million Medicaid-eligible citizen children in immigrant and native families. State fixed-effects probit models estimate the probability of children remaining uninsured when eligible for public coverage, excluding children covered by private insurance. We compare the states with the largest enrollment gains across differences in policies relevant to CHIP/Medicaid participation for all children, including CHIP Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) enrollment simplification, Immigrant Children's Health Improvement Act, and Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion. ResultsMost states reduced their enrollment disparities by one half or even completely eliminated their enrollment differentials. However, the states with the largest gains did not adopt ACA and CHIPRA policy options that would have improved CHIP/Medicaid participation for children in their states–or implemented the policies long before the observed gains. ConclusionsRather than policy anchoring the gains, the improvements may be rooted in operational changes and outreach efforts during CHIPRA and ACA implementation. Absent a policy anchor, the large enrollment differentials of a decade ago may reappear for children in immigrant families, affect the wellbeing of children and their communities.

Adult-Oriented Health Reform and Children's Insurance and Access to Care: Evidence from Massachusetts Health Reform.

Objective A national debate is underway about the value of key provisions within the adult-oriented Affordable Care Act (ACA)-the individual mandate, expansion of Medicaid eligibility, and essential benefits. How these provisions affect child health insurance and access to care may help us anticipate how children may be affected if the ACA is repealed. We study Massachusetts health reform because it enacted these key provisions statewide in 2006. Methods We used a difference-in-differences (DD) approach to assess the impact of Massachusetts health reform on uninsurance and access to care among children 0-17years in Massachusetts compared to children in other New England states. The National Survey of Children's Health provided the pre-reform year and two post-reform years (1 and 5years post-reform). We analyzed outcomes for children overall and children previously and newly-eligible for Medicaid under Massachusetts health reform, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, non-English language, and having special health care needs. Results Compared to other New England states, Massachusetts's enactment of the individual mandate, Medicaid expansion, and essential benefits was associated with trends at 5years post-reform toward lower uninsurance for children overall (DD = - 1.1, p-for-DD = 0.05), increased access to specialty care (DD = 7.7, p-for-DD = 0.06), but also with a decrease in access to preventive care (DD=-3.4, p-for-DD = 0.004). At 1year post-reform, access to specialty care improved for children newly-Medicaid-eligible (DD = 18.3, p-for-DD = 0.03). Conclusions for Practice Adult-oriented health reforms may have reduced uninsurance and improved access to some types of care for children in Massachusetts. Repealing the ACA may produce modest detriments for children.

Becoming a Hybrid Entity: A Policy Option for Public Health.

When Congress passed HIPAA, it did not intend to constrain public health's data sharing in the same way as clinical or payers. In fact, HIPAA recognizes data sharing with public health as a matter of national priority and shields this function from its reach. However, a health department may offer services that bring it within HIPAA's purview, such as running a Children's Health Insurance Program or a laboratory that bills electronically. When this is the case, HIPAA requires all information and departments be subject to HIPAA unless the public health authority chooses to hybridize. Health departments might re-assess their coverage and elect to become a hybrid entity, thereby restricting HIPAA to only where required and removing barriers to information sharing with communities.

Health Insurance Cards and Health Care Services Utilization: Evidence From Children in Mountainous Regions of Vietnam.

Health insurance reform for children younger than 6 years of age was implemented in 2005. The study aimed to describe the health insurance card status, health care services use, and associated factors. The cross-sectional study was conducted with 210 Hmong mothers of children younger than 6 years of age, and of those, 118 mothers having an ill child in the previous 4 weeks were selected in this study. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression were applied to predict the associated factors. In all, 42.9% of children had health insurance cards and 45.8% ill children accessed public health facilities. The factors included children’s age, mothers’ knowledge of the free health care policy, mothers’ knowledge about one sign of lung infection of their children associated with health insurance status, and health care services use. In conclusion, the 2005 reform of child health insurance policy has brought a modest impact on insurance coverage of children younger than 6 years of age and health care services use. Mothers’ knowledge of free health care policy should be improved.

Accessing your Quality Payment Program feedback reports

The Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (MACRA) established the Quality Payment Program (QPP), which shifts Medicare from a fee-for-service to a pay-for-performance program. The QPP requires that most Medicare providers participate in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) or an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM). As there are no approved vascular APMs, most vascular surgeons will participate in MIPS. Providers who do not meet 2018 minimum participation requirements will receive a 5% penalty in 2020 reimbursements. The first performance year was 2017, and feedback reports for participating providers are available through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) website: https://qpp.cms.gov. QPP participants are required to obtain Enterprise Identity Management (EIDM) credentials to obtain their feedback reports. The EIDM credentials are used to submit and to review data for MIPS reporting. Clinicians submitting data as an individual already have EIDM credentials, whereas someone within small group submissions will also have EIDM credentials or know who in their practice does. Partcipation in QPP as part of a large health care organization or academic institution may present challenges in finding the proper department to help you provide access to your data/feedback reports. Institutions participating as an MIPS APM1White P.W. Sales C.M. Johnson B. Rathbun J. Woo K. What is an MIPS APM?.J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67: 353Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar (distinct from an Advanced APM) are responsible for distributing feedback data to clinicians; CMS will not directly provide feedback data to individuals.2Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2017 Performance Feedback Guide.https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Payment-Program/Resource-Library/2017-Performance-feedback-user-guide.pdfDate accessed: August 23, 2018Google Scholar If you do not have EIDM credentials, the first step in obtaining your QPP performance report is to create an account within the CMS Enterprise portal (https://portal.cms.gov). Select “PV: Physician Quality and Value Programs” from the application drop-down menu. Enter your demographic information, select a user name, and answer three challenge questions that can later be used to verify your identity. Submit the form, and you should receive an e-mail acknowledging successful account creation with your EIDM user ID. If you are in a large group and need to find out if your practice or organization is already registered in the EIDM, contact the Quality Payment Program by phone (1-866-288-8292/TTY 877-715-6222) or by e-mail ([email protected]). You will need to provide the group's Tax Identifier Number and the name of the group. Again, if your practice has submitted data to QPP, then someone in your group has EIDM credentials and should be able to provide your feedback report to you. With your EIDM credentials, you will be able to log into the CMS Quality Payment Program website, https://qpp.cms.gov. Select the “View Performance Feedback” button to obtain your report and to review all of the practice sites to which data were submitted under your National Provider Identifier and Tax Identifier Number. Based on your EIDM credentials, you may be able to review performance feedback for your entire group or be restricted to individual data. Detailed instructions on accessing performance feedback reports are available in the MIPS 2017 Performance Feedback Guide2Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2017 Performance Feedback Guide.https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Payment-Program/Resource-Library/2017-Performance-feedback-user-guide.pdfDate accessed: August 23, 2018Google Scholar with examples of reports and interpretations. According to CMS, 91% of MIPS-eligible clinicians successfully submitted data in 2017. High performers will receive up to a 4% bonus in their 2019 reimbursements. A final score of 70 or greater qualifies a provider for an additional bonus adjustment for exceptional performance from a $500 million incentive pool.

Implementation of Oral Health Screening and Referral Guidelines in Primary Health Care.

To determine the oral health screening and referral practices of pediatric providers, their adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics oral health guidelines, and barriers to adherence. Providers in 10 pediatric practices participating in the North Carolina Quality Improvement Initiative, funded by the Child Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009, were asked to complete a 91-item questionnaire. Questions on risk assessment and referral practices were based on those recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Adherence to oral health guidelines was assessed by practitioners' evaluation of 4 vignettes presenting screening results for an 18-mo-old child with different levels of risk and caries status. Respondents chose referral recommendations assuming adequate and inadequate dentist workforces. Logit models determined the association between barriers specified in Cabana's framework and adherence (count of 6 to 8 adherent vignettes vs. 0 to 5). Of 72 eligible providers, 53 (74%) responded. Almost everyone (98.1%) screened for dental problems; 45.2% referred in at least half of well-child visits. Respondents were aware of oral health guidelines, expressed strong agreement with them, and reported confidence in providing preventive oral health services. Yet they underreferred by an average of 42% per vignette for the 7 clinical vignette-workforce scenarios requiring an immediate referral. Frequently cited barriers were providers' beliefs that 1) parents are poorly motivated to seek dental care, 2) oral health counseling has a small effect on parent behaviors, 3) there is a shortage of dentists in their community who will see infants and toddlers, and 4) information systems to support referrals are insufficient. Pediatric clinicians' beliefs lead to a conscious decision not to refer many patients, even when children should be referred. Evidence suggests that the primary care-dental referral process needs improvement. This study identifies barriers to delivering recommended preventive oral health services in pediatrics. The information can be used to improve the screening and referral process and, thus, the quality of preventive oral health services provided in primary care. Results also can guide researchers on the selection of interventions that need testing and might close gaps in the referral process and improve access to dental care.

Core Principles to Improve Primary Care Quality Management

Quality management in American health care is in crisis. Performance measurement in its current form is costly, redundant, and labyrinthine. Increasingly, its contribution to achieving the Quadruple Aim is under close examination, especially in the domain of primary care services, where the burden of measurement is heaviest. This article assesses the state of quality management in primary care in the United States, particularly the 2015 Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, in comparative perspective, drawing lessons from the Quality and Outcomes Framework in the United Kingdom. The health care delivery function specific to primary care is pivotal to crossing the quality chasm, yet prior efforts to improve the quality of this function have failed more often than succeeded. These failures are the result of quality programs unguided by core principles of primary care. Quality management in primary care requires a more disciplined approach, adherent to 4 foundational principles: optimizing holistic patient and population health; harnessing the Quadruple Aim as a dynamic whole; applying measurements as tools for quality, not outcomes of quality; and prioritizing therapeutic relationships. These principles serve as the foundation for a bridge to high-functioning primary care that will lead American health care closer to the Quadruple Aim.

Mothers’ Nonstandard Employment, Family Structure, and Children’s Health Insurance Coverage

Using data from two longitudinal studies on mothers and children (NLSY79 and NLSY79 Children), this study first examined the relationship between mothers’ nonstandard employment and children’s health insurance coverage while adjusting for various compositional characteristics of mothers, children, and families. This study also evaluated whether this relationship differed across family structures. Results from multinomial logistic regression models showed that mothers’ nonstandard work was associated with a higher likelihood of children being uninsured or relying on public programs. In addition, in single-mother families, children’s uninsurance rate was highest if the mother held a nonstandard job, even compared to children of non-employed mothers. These study findings contribute to the literature on access to health insurance for children in the United States.

Rural/urban residence and childhood and adolescent cancer survival in the United States.

To the authors' knowledge, no previous study has examined the relationship between rural/urban residence and childhood or adolescent cancer survival in the United States. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registries database, the authors examined childhood and adolescent cancer survival by rural/urban residence as defined by Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCCs). The authors obtained data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registries for individuals diagnosed at ages birth to 19 years with a first primary malignant cancer from 2000 through 2010. Rural/urban residence at the time of diagnosis was defined using both metropolitan/nonmetropolitan county classifications and individual RUCC categories. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compute adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association between rural/urban residence and cancer survival. The authors also examined effect modification by age group, sex, race/ethnicity, and cancer type. Among 41,879 cancer cases, approximately 54.7% were non-Hispanic white, 54.3% were male, and 90.4% lived in a metropolitan county. Individuals living in nonmetropolitan counties versus metropolitan counties had a similar risk of cancer death (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94-1.13) as did those living in nonmetropolitan rural counties with <2500 individuals nonadjacent to a metropolitan area versus those living in metropolitan counties of ≥1 million individuals (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.71-1.37). Evidence for effect modification largely was absent. The results of the current study suggest that childhood and adolescent cancer survival in the United States does not vary by rural/urban residence at the time of diagnosis as defined by RUCCs. The widespread availability of public health insurance for children and adolescents and a nationwide network of pediatric cancer providers may explain this finding.

Disparities in Self-reported Access to Patient-centered Medical Home Care for Children With Special Health Care Needs.

Efforts to transform primary care have been underway for over a decade. Yet, we lack understanding of the progress made in scaling up this care model nationwide and on whether patient-centered medical home (PCMH) has benefited every group of children with special health care needs (CSHCNs). The main objective of this study was to examine variation in caregiver service experience concordant with PCMH care over time and by child characteristics. This was a cross-sectional pooled data analysis using the 2003-2012 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey data for CSHCNs, aged 5-17 years. Logistic regressions were implemented, accounting for child and parent sociodemographic, child's health insurance, and contextual characteristics. PCMH concordant care and each component were constructed as binary variables and child functional impairment was measured with the Columbia Impairment Scale. Thirty-one percent of children reported medical home concordant care; comprehensive (83%) and compassionate (82%) care were most prevalent, and the least common were accessible care (59%) and patient-centered care (60%). PCMH concordant care significantly increased nationwide between 2003 and 2012, but disparities remained based on child needs and sociodemographic characteristics. Multivariate regressions showed variation across medical home components. Despite increased parent perception of care that is concordant with medical home care over time, disparities remain among high-need CSHCNs. Future research may focus on better understanding how clinical settings tailor this care model, particularly on providing increased access and patient-centered care, to better serve children at the highest need.

Lower socioeconomic status is associated with delayed access to care for infantile hemangioma: A cohort study

Early specialist evaluation during rapid proliferative growth of complicated infantile hemangiomas (IHs) is crucial. Health disparities and barriers of access to care for children with IHs have not been examined. To investigate whether socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with age at presentation to a subspecialist for IH evaluation. A retrospective cohort study of 804 children presenting to a large academic hospital. The primary outcome was age at initial presentation. Covariates included demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, and clinical characteristics. Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program were proxies for lower SES. Analysis of covariance, chi-square tests, and generalized ordered logistic regressions were performed. Children with lower SES had higher odds of presenting after 3months of age (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.38). In the subset that qualified for the institutional care management program (ICMP), no risk factors were associated with delayed presentation. Use of insurance and economic distress asproxies for SES; exclusion of uninsured children, which may have resulted in underestimation of racioethnic effects; and examination of a single academic center, which may limit generalizability. Children with IHs and lower SES were more likely to present later to specialists, but those enrolled in an ICMP were not, suggesting that integrated ICMPs may mitigate disparities and delayed access to care for IHs among lower-SES populations.

APA awarded CMS funding to develop quality measures

The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has been awarded funding to develop mental health and substance use quality measures as part of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS's) Quality Payment Program (QPP) established under the Medicare Access and CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program) Reauthorization Act of 2015, officials announced Sept. 21. The APA is working with experienced measurement developer NCQA. The three‐year funding was awarded by the CMS who awarded funding to a total of seven organizations. This grant will help develop and improve quality measures for mental health and substance use disorders, including patient‐reported outcomes, patient experience, care coordination and measures of appropriate use of services. The grant also aims to minimize the burden of measurement by eliminating redundancies and low‐value quality measures from the QPP. The APA will use the PsychPRO registry, a CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry, to test these quality measures as part of the grant.

The ASNR-ACR-RSNA Common Data Elements Project: What Will It Do for the House of Neuroradiology?

The American Society of Neuroradiology has teamed up with the American College of Radiology and the Radiological Society of North America to create a catalog of neuroradiology common data elements that addresses specific clinical use cases. Fundamentally, a common data element is a question, concept, measurement, or feature with a set of controlled responses. This could be a measurement, subjective assessment, or ordinal value. Common data elements can be both machine- and human-generated. Rather than redesigning neuroradiology reporting, the goal is to establish the minimum number of "essential" concepts that should be in a report to address a clinical question. As medicine shifts toward value-based service compensation methodologies, there will be an even greater need to benchmark quality care and allow peer-to-peer comparisons in all specialties. Many government programs are now focusing on these measures, the most recent being the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System and the Medicare Access Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015. Standardized or structured reporting is advocated as one method of assessing radiology report quality, and common data elements are a means for expressing these concepts. Incorporating common data elements into clinical practice fosters a number of very useful downstream processes including establishing benchmarks for quality-assurance programs, ensuring more accurate billing, improving communication to providers and patients, participating in public health initiatives, creating comparative effectiveness research, and providing classifiers for machine learning. Generalized adoption of the recommended common data elements in clinical practice will provide the means to collect and compare imaging report data from multiple institutions locally, regionally, and even nationally, to establish quality benchmarks.

Who loses public health insurance when states pass restrictive omnibus immigration-related laws? The moderating role of county Latino density

In the United States, there is widespread concern that state laws restricting rights for noncitizens may have spillover effects for Latino children in immigrant families. Studies into the laws’ effects on health care access have inconsistent findings, demonstrating gaps in our understanding of who is most affected, under what circumstances. Using comparative interrupted time series methods and a nationally-representative sample of US citizen, Latino children with noncitizen parents from the National Health Interview Survey (2005–2014, n = 18,118), this study finds that living in counties with higher co-ethnic density placed children at greater risk of losing Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program coverage when their states passed restrictive state omnibus immigrant laws. This study is the first to demonstrate the importance of examining how the health impacts of immigration-related policies vary across local communities.

Disparities in Pediatric Provider Availability by Insurance Type After the ACA in California

ObjectiveTo examine insurance-based disparities in provider-related barriers to care among children in California in the wake of changes to the insurance market resulting from the Affordable Care Act. MethodsOur sample included 6514 children (ages 0 to 11 years) from the 2014–2016 California Health Interview Survey. We examined parent reports in the past year of 1) having trouble finding a general provider for the child, 2) the child not being accepted by a provider as a new patient, 3) the child's health insurance not being accepted by a provider, or 4) any of the above. Multivariable models estimated the associations of insurance type—Medi-Cal (Medicaid), employer-sponsored insurance, or privately purchased coverage—and parent reports of these problems. ResultsApproximately 8% of parents had encountered at least one of these problems. Compared with parents of children with employer-sponsored insurance, parents of children with Medi-Cal or privately purchased coverage had over twice the odds of experiencing at least one of the barriers. Parents of children with Medi-Cal had over twice the odds of being told a provider would not accept their children's coverage or having trouble finding a general provider and 3times the odds of being told a provider would not accept their children as new patients. Parents of children with privately purchased coverage had over 3times the odds of being told a provider would not accept their children's coverage. ConclusionsOur study found significant disparities in provider-related barriers by insurance type among children in California.

25-hydroxyvitamin D and health service utilization for asthma in early childhood

IntroductionAsthma is the most common chronic illness of childhood and a common reason for hospital admission. Studies suggest that low vitamin D levels may be associated with health service utilization (HSU) for childhood asthma.&#x0D; Objectives and ApproachThe primary objective was to determine if vitamin D serum levels in early childhood were associated with HSU for asthma including: a) total HSU, b) hospital admissions, c) emergency department visits and d) outpatient sick visits. Secondary objectives were to determine whether vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy or childhood were associated with HSU for asthma. Prospective cohort study of children participating in the TARGet Kids! practice based research network. HSU was determined by linking each child's provincial health insurance number to health administrative databases. Multivariable quasi Poisson and logistic regression were used to evaluate the associations.&#x0D; Results2926 healthy children ages 0-6 years had 25-hydroxyvitamin D data available and were included in the primary analysis. Mean (IQR) 25-hydroxyvitmain D level was 84 nmol/L (65-98 nmol/L), 218 and 1267 children had 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels &lt;50 nmol/L and &lt;75 nmol/L, respectively. In the adjusted models, there were no associations between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (continuously or dichotomized at 50 and 75 nmol/L), vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy or childhood and HSU for asthma.&#x0D; Conclusion/ImplicationsHigher vitamin D blood values do not appear to be associated with HSU for asthma in this population of healthy urban children.