Dear Colleagues, This issue of Reading Research Quarterly includes compelling studies that highlight the impact of language in a variety of ways and across different cultures. Some of the language experiences examined and analyzed are how language can be used to discuss texts, how language can be used to shape a reader's identity, and how challenges in one language can be an indicator of challenges in a second language. Although much is known about how to engage children in rich language practices, there is still controversy over the role that images in books play in promoting it. Aukerman and Chambers Schuldt examine how young students explicitly reference images versus the words during text discussions. This study focuses on the opportunities to cultivate dialogue in whatever modal source they choose. The power of language, specifically labels, is evident in the next article. To provide an alternative lens on how a learning disability may be socially and culturally expressed across generations, Kabuto moves the research out of the school-based context of reading into the context of a single case study of a mother and her child. Kabuto shares how the mother, influenced by her own past reading experiences, described her son's activities differently than the test-based determinants of his teachers. By analyzing assessments and observations, Kabuto focuses on sociocultural-historical factors to form a transgenerational space. She poses critical questions around how we define reading ability and how parents use language and discourses to construct, support, and challenge their children's identities as readers. Kabuto challenges us to think about how school-based labels may communicate a wide range of meanings regarding one's ability and how labels can greatly influence a shared identity for family members. Nielsen adds to the extensive research on orthographic learning in her study of Danish-speaking third graders. She utilizes the self-teaching hypothesis to examine whether explicit instruction on conditional sound–spelling patterns facilitates orthographic learning during independent reading. In addition to the many standardized assessments used to assess students’ word knowledge, Nielsen developed additional assessments to measure print exposure, homophone choices, and nonword choices. She argues that her study provides newer and stronger evidence that “enhanced knowledge of sublexical sound–letter patterns boosts memory for new word spellings” by using distinct word-learning tasks. Shum, Ho, Siegel, and Au provide the results of their longitudinal study investigating whether reading development in two languages with dramatically different orthographies can predict common cognitive abilities. This study focused on Chinese and English biliteracy over a four-year period and sought to fill identified gaps in the research literature. Shum and colleagues argue that early cognitive abilities in Chinese predict higher order literacy skills, such as comprehension, text-level reading, and writing fluency in the second language, English. Basing their work on the central processing hypothesis and Cummins's linguistic interdependence hypothesis, Shum and colleagues present evidence that there are several cross-language markers that may contribute in predicting English reading and writing abilities over time. In the final article, Rodgers, D'Agostino, Harmey, Kelly, and Brownfield accept the challenge posed by van de Pol and colleagues to study instructional scaffolds in a way that analyzes student measures rather than simply the teacher's instructional moves. Rodgers and colleagues developed a five-level system for analyzing instructional contingency, attended to both student and teacher contributions in the interactions, and considered student outcomes. In an effort to gauge teacher effectiveness, the researchers created a National Teacher Effectiveness Index and measured this against a national set of 5,569 Reading Recovery teachers. Taking all of the analyses into account, the authors demonstrate and conclude that the nature of effective scaffolding is as complex as Wood and Middleton first indicated in 1975. Reading Research Quarterly's tradition of presenting rigorous research on timely issues continues with this volume of carefully crafted studies that illuminate the power of language. The articles in this issue provide opportunities for us to explore language from different perspectives and expand our knowledge of literacy, language, and culture. Susan B. Neuman Linda B. Gambrell
Read full abstract