Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index Research Articles

Patient and family burden in pediatric atopic dermatitis and its treatment pattern in Japan.

This study evaluated the level of burden in pediatric and adolescent atopic dermatitis (AD) patients in Japan, the associated burden on caregivers/families, and whether this burden varied with age. Data were drawn from the Adelphi Pediatric AD Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients conducted in Japan between July and December 2022. Physicians reported patient demographics, clinical characteristics, disease burden, and current/previous therapies. Patients and/or caregivers reported perceived disease severity and impact of AD, including the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and Dermatitis Family Impact questionnaire (DFI). Overall, 55 physicians provided data for 537 AD patients aged ≤17. Mean (SD) overall scores for CDLQI, POEM, and DFI were 9.3 (6.3), 8.3 (6.8), and 11.7 (7.2), respectively. Age was associated with higher patient and/or caregiver-reported CDLQI scores, which increased by 0.543 points per year of age (P = 0.01). Patients with severe disease reported a more significant impact on quality of life factors compared with mild patients (P < 0.001). Age was associated with higher caregiver-reported burden, with DFI scores increasing by 0.325 per year (P = 0.01). Physician-reported impact on caregivers showed that age was significantly associated with increased burden on sleep, daily activities, work, and mood (P < 0.05), with disease severity associated with impact across all factors (P < 0.01). Both increasing age and disease severity were associated with the increased impact of AD on patients and their caregivers. Disease control/modification through appropriate therapeutic intervention at a younger age may relieve the burden of pediatric AD on patients and their families.

Mental health among parents and their children with eczema in Hong Kong.

This cross-sectional survey research investigated mental health symptoms and quality of life among Chinese parents and their children with eczema at a paediatric dermatology clinic in Hong Kong from November 2018 to October 2020. Health-related quality of life, eczema severity, and mental health among children with eczema, as well as their parents' mental health, were studied using the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDQOL), Nottingham Eczema Severity Score (NESS), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and the Chinese version of the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21). In total, 432 children and 380 parents were recruited. Eczema severity (NESS and POEM) and health-related quality of life (CDLQI) were significantly positively associated with parental and child depression, anxiety, and stress levels according to the DASS-21, regardless of sex (children: r=0.28- 0.72, P<0.001 to 0.007; parents: r=0.20-0.52, P<0.001 to 0.034). Maternal depression was marginally positively associated with increased anxiety in boys with eczema (r=0.311; P=0.045). Younger parents had higher risk of developing more anxiety and stress compared with the older parents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=-0.342, P=0.014 and aOR=-0.395, P=0.019, respectively). Depression level of parents with primary to secondary education was 58% higher than their counterparts with post-secondary education or above (aOR=-1.579; P=0.007). Depression, anxiety, and stress among children with eczema and their parents were associated with eczema severity and impaired quality of life in those children. These findings regarding impaired mental health in children with eczema and their parents highlight the need to include mental well-being and psychosocial outcomes in future studies and clinical practice.

Effectiveness and Safety of Etanercept in Paediatric Patients with Plaque-Type Psoriasis: Real-World Evidence.

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic, multisystemic, inflammatory disease affecting approximately 1% of children and significantly reducing their health-related quality of life. Etanercept is a biologic fusion protein-blocking TNF-α and belongs to one of the biologics used among the children population. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety profile of etanercept in paediatric patients with plaque-type psoriasis. Material and methods: The outcome of the treatment was evaluated based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Body Surface Area (BSA), and Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI). Achievement of at least PASI75 at week 16 was assessed as an adequate response to therapy, which was the primary endpoint. Results: Forty-three paediatric patients were included in the study, 24 females and 19 males. The average age at inclusion into our study was 13 years. At baseline, the mean PASI score, BSA, and CDLQI were 16.3 ± 6.5, 22.3 ± 12.2%, and 17.4 ± 5.3, respectively. At week 16, 90.7% of patients achieved PASI 50, 79.1% achieved PASI 75, and 46.5% attained PASI 90. There was also a decrease in mean BSA and CDLQI values to 3.5 ± 3.8 and 5.4 ± 5.7, respectively. Conclusions: Etanercept proved to be effective, safe, and well-tolerated among the paediatric population with psoriasis.

645 - Effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in adolescent and adult patients with atopic dermatitis: an analysis of long-term (week 52) data from a real-world multicenter retrospective review

Abstract Introduction While clinical trial data demonstrates the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) for atopic dermatitis (AD), long-term real-world evidence remains limited. Objectives Our study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of UPA for AD at week 52±6. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of 3 practices in Canada. Effectiveness endpoints were evaluated at weeks 52±6 and including the following: Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of clear or almost clear (IGA 0/1) as well as improvements in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), body surface area (BSA), IGAxBSA, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)/Children’s DLQI (CDLQI). Safety was determined via incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results A total of 102 patients with AD were included in the analysis; mean age was 44.2 (range: 12-79) years and 52.9% (54/102) were female. Initial UPA doses were 15 mg (UPA15: 41.2%, 42/102) or 30 mg (UPA30: 58.8%, 60/102) once daily. Previous systemic therapies included conventional non-biologics (72.5%), biologics (30.4%), and JAKi (2.9%). At week 52±6: 78.4% (80/102) of patients achieved Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1; 87.5% (49/56), 78.6% (44/56), and 50.0% (28/56) achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvements of 75% (EASI75), 90% (EASI90), and 100% (EASI100), respectively; 75.0% (42/56) achieved EASI90 + IGA 0/1; mean EASI was reduced from 12.9 to 0.8 (mean EASI improvement = 91.4%); 91.9% (52/56), 92.9% (52/56), 82.1% (46/56), and 75.0% (42/56) achieved absolute EASI scores &amp;lt;7, &amp;lt;5, &amp;lt;3, and &amp;lt;1, respectively; mean body surface area (BSA) was reduced from 17.0% to 0.6% (mean BSA improvement=87.8%); mean IGAxBSA was reduced from 52.1 to 0.8 (mean IGAxBSA improvement=90.7%); and mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)/Children’s DLQI was reduced from 13 to 1.8 (mean DLQI/CDLQI improvement=86%), with 66.0% (33/50) of patients achieving DLQI/CDLQI 0/1. For patients not achieving IGA 0/1, EASI75, EASI90, and EASI100 at weeks 8-20, these responses were subsequently achieved in 60.0% (6/10), 88.9% (8/9), 84.6% (11/13), and 38.1% (8/21) of patients at week 52±6. Dose alterations occurred in 13 patients (12.7%) (escalation: 6.9%, 7/102; reduction: 5.9%, 6/102). Concomitant systemic therapies were used in 1.0% (1/102) of patients. We noted higher statistically significant achievement of endpoints for systemic biologic/JAKi-naïve vs -experienced patients (EASI75; EASI&amp;lt;7; EASI&amp;lt;5; DLQI/CDLQI &amp;gt;4-point improvement). No significant differences in outcomes were identified between dosing regimens. Frequent AEs included: acne (19.6%, 20/102), hypertriglyceridemia (17.6%, 18/102), elevated creatine phosphokinase (13.7%, 14/102), neutropenia (7.8%, 8/102), and transaminitis (7.8%, 8/102). Seven patients (6.8%) discontinued UPA owing to treatment-related AEs, including one case of venous thromboembolism; four patients (3.9%) discontinued UPA due to patient preference, and one patient (1%) discontinued UPA due to lack of efficacy. No serious infections, tuberculosis, major adverse cardiovascular events, gastrointestinal perforation, malignancy, or deaths were observed in 102.5 patient-years of follow-up. Conclusions In contrast to 52-week data from the Measure Up 1/2 and AD Up clinical trials, our results were superior for several outcome parameters (IGA 0/1, EASI90, EASI100, and DLQI 0/1), possibly owing to a patient population with less extensive baseline disease severity. Additionally, we noted similar achievement of these endpoints versus comparable long-term real-world studies. Safety was consistent with existing data, highlighting acne as a common AE (5.3%-20.3% versus 19.6%). Study limitations include its sample size and retrospective nature.

644 - Effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in adolescent and adult patients with atopic dermatitis: an interim analysis of week 20-32 data from a real-world multicenter retrospective review

Abstract Introduction While clinical trial data demonstrates the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib (UPA), a selective oral Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) for atopic dermatitis (AD), there is still a lack of real-world evidence. Objectives Our study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of UPA for AD at weeks 20-32. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective review at three practices in Canada. Effectiveness endpoints evaluated at weeks 20-32 included Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of clear or almost clear (IGA 0/1) as well as improvements in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), body surface area (BSA), IGAxBSA, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)/Children’s DLQI (CDLQI). Safety was ­determined via incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results A total of 131 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 44.3 ± 17.5 (range: 12-78) years; 53.4% (70/131) were female. UPA doses were 15 mg (43.5%, 57/131) or 30 mg (56.5%, 74/131) once daily. Previous treatments included: topical therapy (100%, 131/131), phototherapy (29%, 38/131), systemic non-biologic therapy (75.6%, 99/131), and systemic biologic/JAKi therapy (38.9%, 51/131). At weeks 20-32: 85.5% (112/131) of patients achieved IGA 0/1; 84.3% (59/70), 75.7% (53/70), and 62.9% (44/70) of patients achieved EASI improvements of 75% (EASI75), 90% (EASI90), and 100% (EASI100), respectively; mean EASI was reduced from 12.7 to 0.7 (p=0.0001; mean EASI improvement = 88.8%); 94.3% (66/70), 92.9% (65/70), 90% (63/70), and 77.1% (54/70) of patients achieved absolute EASI scores &amp;lt;7, 5, &amp;lt;3, and &amp;lt;1, respectively; mean BSA was reduced from 16.4% to 0.9% (p=0.0001; mean BSA improvement=92.5%); mean IGAxBSA was reduced from 53.5 to 1.6 (p=0.0001; mean IGAxBSA improvement=95.7%); and mean DLQI/CDLQI was reduced from 13 to 1.2 (p=0.0001; mean DLQI/CDLQI improvement=90.5%), with 84.6% (55/65) of patients achieving DLQI/CDLQI 0/1. UPA monotherapy was utilized in 38.9% (51/131) of cases. Common concomitant therapies included topical corticosteroids (56.5%, 74/131), systemic corticosteroids (5.3%, 7/131), and topical calcineurin inhibitors (3.8%, 5/131). Frequent AEs included: acne (18.3%, 24/131), hypertriglyceridemia (18.3%, 24/131), elevated creatine phosphokinase (12.2%, 16/131), herpes simplex (5.3%, 7/131), and transaminitis (5.3%, 7/131). Five patients (3.8%) discontinued UPA due to treatment-related AEs (myalgia/arthralgia [n=2]; gastrointestinal discomfort [n=1]; venous thromboembolism [n=1]; folliculitis [n=1]). No serious infections, tuberculosis, major adverse cardiovascular events, gastrointestinal perforation, or malignancy were observed in 67.4 patient-years of safety follow-up. Conclusions Our real-world study shows that UPA is an effective and safe therapy for AD, with high levels of skin clearance and a favorable safety profile between weeks 20-32. These results indicate that UPA may perform better in the real-world versus clinical trial setting, as compared to the Heads Up and Rising Up studies at week 24, specifically for IGA 0/1 and EASI75/EASI90/EASI100 achievement. This may be explained by less severe baseline disease severity in our study. Limitations of this study include its sample size and retrospective nature.

A prospective observational cohort study comparing the treatment effectiveness and safety of ciclosporin, dupilumab and methotrexate in adult and paediatric patients with atopic dermatitis: results from the UK-Irish A-STAR register.

The main conventional systemic atopic dermatitis (AD) treatments are methotrexate (MTX) and ciclosporin (CyA). Dupilumab was the first novel systemic agent to enter routine clinical practice. There are no head-to-head randomised controlled trials or real-world studies comparing these agents directly. Network meta-analyses provide indirect comparative efficacy and safety data and have shown strong evidence for dupilumab and CyA. The aim of this study was to compare the real-world clinical effectiveness and safety of CyA, dupilumab and MTX in AD. We compared the effectiveness and safety of these systemic agents in a prospective observational cohort study of adult and paediatric patients recruited into the UK-Irish Atopic eczema Systemic TherApy Register (A-STAR). Treatment effectiveness measures included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and children's DLQI (cDLQI). Minimum duration of treatment was 28 days and follow-up was 12 months. Adjusted Cox-regression was used to compare the hazards of achieving EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90 over time, and linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate changes in efficacy scores. Treatment safety was assessed by examining adverse events (AEs) at follow-up visits. 488 patients (n=311 adults and n=177 children/adolescents) on dupilumab (n=282), methotrexate (n=149), or CyA (n=57) were included. CyA and MTX were primarily used first line, while dupilumab was mainly a second line systemic as per UK National Institute of Clinical and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations. EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90 were achieved more rapidly in the dupilumab and CyA groups compared to MTX. After adjustment for previous severity, the reduction in EASI, POEM, PP-NRS and DLQI was greater for patients treated with dupilumab compared to MTX. In severe patients the reduction in EASI, POEM, and PP-NRS was even greater with CyA. The incidence of AEs was similar across groups (734, 654 and 594 per 10,000 person-month on CyA, dupilumab and MTX respectively). This real-world comparison of CyA, dupilumab and MTX in AD suggests that dupilumab is consistently more effective than MTX and that CyA is most effective in very severe disease within one follow-up year.

Evaluation of quality of life scores and family impact scales in pediatric patients with alopecia areata: a cross-sectional cohort study.

There are a limited number of studies evaluating the effects of alopecia areata (AA) on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of pediatric patients and their families. This study aimed to assess the HRQoL of pediatric patients with AA and their parents. This single-center cross-sectional cohort study included 72 pediatric patients diagnosed with AA. The study was conducted between December 2020 and December 2021 in the dermatology department of a single tertiary center in Turkey. The HRQoL index of the pediatric patients was assessed with the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI). At the same time, their parents, who were primarily involved in the disease process, were evaluated using the Dermatological Family Impact Scale (DeFIS). An ordinal logistic regression model was used to detect predictors for CDLQI severity. The mean ± SD CDLQI of the pediatric patients who participated in our study was 8.4 ± 5.3, corresponding to moderate impairment. The highest impairment in CDLQI was observed in the symptoms and feelings domain, while the slightest impairment was observed in the domain of personal relationships (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score and all CDLQI domains, and the most substantial relationship was with the leisure domain (r = 0.78, P < 0.001). DeFIS scores of female patients were substantially higher than males (25.3 ± 8.6 vs. 17.6 ± 9, P = 0.001). Our study supports that AA is a disease that significantly impacts the HRQoL of affected children and their families.

Impact of atopic dermatitis on quality of life in children and their families: A tertiary care hospital-based study from Northern India

Objectives: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is more frequent among children. Childhood is a critical time for physical and psychosocial development and AD develops more commonly in children in the first five years of life. The objective of the study was to determine the impact of AD on the quality of life (QoL) of Indian children and their families and correlate it with AD severity and the perception of severity as estimated by the family. Material and Methods: In the present study, 30 children clinically diagnosed with AD and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls presenting to our hospital were evaluated. Data on QOL were obtained through a questionnaire; Infants Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDQOL), Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DQLI) were used for patients,and the Dermatitis Family Impact (DFI) questionnaire for the family of the patients. The severity of the disease was determined using the Scoring for AD (SCORAD) index. Results: In our study, there were 16 male patients and 14 female patients. History of atopy was significantly higher in children with AD (p &lt;0.001); 13 patients had mild, 17 had moderate, and none of the patients had severe disease. The severity of the disease was found to correlate negatively with the age of the child. IDQOL positively correlated with the age of children with AD (r = 0.865, P &lt; 0.001). CDLQI negatively correlated with the age of children with AD (r = −0.616, P = 0.033). Impairment in IDQOL and CDLQI showed a significant positive correlation with DFI (r = 0.846, P &lt; 0.001; r = 0.910, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: AD is associated with lowered QOL of the patient,which increases with the severity of the disease. Itch and sleep disturbance were the most severely affected symptoms of AD. The disease significantly impacted the QOL of the family. The main issue with parents caring for AD children is continuous expenditure on treatment, emotional distress, and physical exhaustion. Therefore, efforts are needed to help parents by medical care personnel so that the outcomes in both the child and the significantly burdened parent caregiver can be improved.

Quality-of-Life Assessment in Singaporean Children with Alopecia Areata

Introduction: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune dermatological disorder characterized by nonscarring hair loss. Its chronic and visible nature can negatively impact the quality of life (QoL) of patients with the condition. There has been a lack of studies on the QoL of pediatric patients with AA, especially from Asian countries. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the impact of AA on the QoL of pediatric patients in Singapore. Methods: Between 2016 and 2017, 25 patients with AA were recruited to complete three questionnaires: Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI), and Pediatric Alopecia Areata Quality of Life Index. The results of these questionnaires were subsequently analyzed. Results: All three questionnaires had a broad range of responses, but scores were generally low, suggesting AA does not have a large impact on the QoL of our participants and their families. Two factors were identified to have resulted in better outcomes: the presence of comorbidity (atopic dermatitis, nail disease, food allergy, and allergic rhinitis) on the CDLQI and the presence of allergic rhinitis on the FDLQI. On the other hand, a later age of onset resulted in higher FDLQI scores. Conclusions: Similar to findings of other studies, the QoL of pediatric patients with AA is generally good, and clinical severity does not equate to worse QoL. Further studies are useful to provide more holistic care for the patient and their caregivers, involving both medical and psychosocial interventions.

Assessing the impact of childhood and adolescent chronic plaque psoriasis on parents/caregivers using the Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI): A cross-sectional study.

Background Chronic childhood diseases are a burden for paediatric patients and their caregivers. Limited data are available on the effect of paediatric psoriasis on the caregiver's well-being and quality of life. Objective To assess the impact of childhood and adolescent chronic plaque psoriasis on parents/caregivers quality of life. Methods A single-centre cross-sectional study was performed which included 102 children with psoriasis and their caregivers. Clinico-demographic data of children and socio-demographic details of primary caregivers were collected. Out of pocket expenditure for treatment was calculated for all the patients. The quality of life of children was assessed using the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and the caregiver's quality of life was assessed using the Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI). Results CDLQI was impaired in 85.29 % of children with a median score of 7. The item 'symptoms' was most commonly affected (87.2%), followed by 'self-conscious' (70.5%) and 'treatment' (65.6%). FDLQI was impaired in 96.1% of caregivers with a median value of 11. The most affected FDLQI items were 'emotional' in 95%, followed by 'time-spent' in 78.4%. Almost 40% of patients had catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and their FDLQI was significantly higher (p-0.014) compared to caregivers who did not experience catastrophic health expenditure. FDLQI had a positive relationship with the involvement of exposed body sites (p-0.003), CDLQI (p-0.000), treatment expense (p-0.031) and a negative correlation with duration of illness (p-0.04). Conclusion Childhood psoriasis has a negative impact on the quality of life of the children and caregivers highlighting the need for intervention strategies for both.

Impact of Atopic Dermatitis on Quality of Life of Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abstracts: Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic dermatological condition that affects both patients and their caregivers. Aims: To summarize evidence on the impact of AD on the quality of life (QoL) of caregiver. Methods: Observational studies were searched for in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases up till March 1, 2023. Results: Seventy studies with a total of 33,291 study participants were identified. The Dermatitis Family Index (DFI) questionnaire featured in 29 studies and was chosen for further meta-analysis. The pooled DFI for all studies was 9.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.94-11.76). For individual components, the highest component scores were for 1.24 for expenditure (95% CI 0.80-1.69), followed by 1.14 for emotions (95% CI 0.77-1.50), as well as sleep 1.12 (95% CI 0.71-1.54) and exhaustion 1.12 (95% CI 0.76-1.48). Meta-analysis on the effect of patient QoL on family QoL was conducted on 15 studies, with a pooled Spearman's rank coefficient using Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDQoL) was 0.632 (95% CI 0.558-0.707), whereas that using Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was 0.624 (95% CI 0.507-0.741). For the 17 studies correlating AD severity with family QoL, a pooled Spearman's rank coefficient of 0.425 (95% CI 0.330-0.521) was obtained. Conclusions: AD is associated with significant negative impacts on caregiver QoL, particularly in family finance, caregiver burnout, and sleep impairment. This was consistently affected by AD severity and patient QoL in all studies examining this association.

Comparing the Quality of Life of Patients and their Family Members with Dermatological and other Chronic Conditions, in The Bahamas

Background &amp; Objectives: Impact of dermatological and other chronic conditions not only affects the quality of life (QoL) of patients but also that of their family members. This pilot study aimed to compare the QoL impact of dermatological and other chronic conditions on patients with the QoL impact on their family members. Methods: A cross-sectional study using validated QoL questionnaires was conducted. In the dermatological group, patients (&gt;17 years) completed the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire, while children (4-16 years) completed the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) questionnaire. Family members (&gt;18 years) completed both Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16) and Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) questionnaires. In the other chronic conditions group, patients (&gt;17 years) completed the World Health Organization Quality of Life -BREF (WHOQoL-BREF) questionnaire and children (4-17 years) completed The Revised Children’s Quality of Life Questionnaire (KINDL-r: Kiddy KINDL, Kid KINDL and Kiddo KINDL). Family members completed the FROM-16 questionnaire. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS™ statistical software. Results: Forty-four participants completed the study. In the dermatological group (n=26), there was a weak negative correlation between DLQI and FDLQI scores (r= –0.23, p=0.55) not between DLQI and FROM-16 (r = –0.04, p=0.92). There was a very strong positive relationship between both CDLQI and FDLQI (r=0.83, p=0.17) and CDLQI and FROM-16 (r=0.82, p=0.18). Although not statistically significant, there may be a correlation between the FROM-16 and FDLQI scores for family members of dermatology patients. In the chronic conditions group (n=18) the mean score of WHOQoL-BREF was 90.5 (SD=13) with a significant negative inverse relationship to FROM-16 (r= –1.000, p=&lt;0.001). The KINDL-r scores (mean=66, SD =11) showed no significant correlation (r= –0.24, p=0.61) with FROM-16 scores (mean=9.6, SD=3.7). Conclusion: The impact of a patient’s dermatological or other chronic condition can not only negatively affect the patient’s QoL but also the QoL of their family members.

Impact of Crisaborole in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis.

Background: Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of crisaborole in patients with AD who had received prior treatment with (a) corticosteroids (systemic or topical) or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) or (b) topical corticosteroids (TCSs) or TCIs or (c) who were treatment-naive (TN). Methods: This post hoc analysis comprised patients aged ≥2 years with mild-to-moderate AD. Patients were assigned (2:1) to receive crisaborole or vehicle twice daily for 28 days. Patient response was assessed with the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), and Dermatitis Family Impact (DFI) tools. Safety was also assessed. Results: A significantly higher percentage of patients treated with crisaborole versus vehicle achieved ISGA success regardless of treatment history. Patients treated with crisaborole had significant reductions in DLQI, CDLQI, and DFI scores versus those who received vehicle regardless of treatment history, with the exception of DLQI and DFI scores in the TN group. Crisaborole was well tolerated in all subgroups. Conclusion: Crisaborole demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile in both treatment-experienced and TN patients. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02118766 and NCT02118792.

The Assessment of Quality of Life Among Pediatric Patients Having Dermatophytosis

Introduction: Dermatophytosis constitutes a group of superficial fungus infections of keratinized tissues. Presently, there is not much data on what impact dermatophytosis has on the quality of life among pediatric patients. With the growing prevalence of dermatophytosis, it has become the time to assess the impact of this infection on the quality of life of the children affected. There is a dearth of quality of life (QoL) studies assessing children in dermatophytosis. The aim and objective of this study is to assess the quality of life among pediatric patients suffering from dermatophytosis. Materials and Methods: Pediatric patients with clinically diagnosed dermatophytosis presenting in the Department of Dermatology at Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, from April 2021 to May 2022 were evaluated for inclusion in this study. The questionnaire applied is a validated Hindi version of the children dermatology life quality index (CDLQI). SPSS version 23 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Out of 100 patients, 75 were male and 25 were female. The mean ± SD CDLQI score in our study was13.88 ± 5.3. The majority 66.0% of the cases had very large to extremely large effect on the quality of life due to disease, followed by a moderate effect (33.0%). Most patients belonged to class 2 socio-economic classes (31%) with a mean duration of illness 4.75 ± 1.93 months. Conclusion: Dermatophytosis was found to have a very large effect on the QoL of affected children. The CDLQI score was largely influenced by the patient’s age, the disease duration, the number of lesions, size of the family and the total body surface area involved. It was affected more in females. This study also underscores the feasibility of CDLQI score-based QoL assessment in dermatophytosis.

Cross-sectional nationwide epidemiologic survey on quality of life and treatment efficacy in Japanese patients with congenital ichthyoses

BackgroundCongenital ichthyoses sometimes present with severe skin symptoms that significantly affect the patient’s quality of life (QOL). Symptomatic treatments are the mainstay therapies, and their efficacy is limited and inadequate. ObjectiveTo assess the disease severity and QOL in patients with congenital ichthyoses, and to investigate the effectiveness of current treatments. MethodsWe conducted a questionnaire-based Japan-wide epidemiological survey of patients with congenital ichthyosis who received medical care from 1 January 2016–31 December 2020. Effectiveness of past and current treatments was assessed. The outcomes were the physician’s assessment, disease severity assessed using the clinical ichthyosis score (CIS), and the disease burden estimated using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), and the Infants’ Dermatitis Quality of Life Index. ResultsOne hundred patients with 14 ichthyosis subtypes from 47 institutes were included in the final analysis. The CDLQI score showed a positive correlation with CIS (rs = 0.59, p = 0.004), while the DLQI score showed no significant correlation (rs = 0.13, p = 0.33). All existing medications were effective for many patients. Etretinate improved QOL and reduced CIS, but side effects including bone growth retardation were reported. Decreased treatment willingness was observed in patients with very low and very high CIS. ConclusionQOL scores were found to correlate with CIS in children, but not in adults. Considering the adverse events, it is speculated that etretinate is not indicated for children with mild cases. Petrolatum was the most commonly used medication, even in patients who were reluctant to receive treatment.

Clinically meaningful change threshold in health‐related quality of life among patients aged 6 months to 5 years with atopic dermatitis and their caregiver(s)/family

AbstractBackgroundAtopic dermatitis (AD) significantly impacts health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and their caregiver(s)/family. Measures to assess HRQoL include the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDQoL) and Dermatitis Family Impact (DFI) questionnaire. Currently, there are no established clinically meaningful within‐person change thresholds for these measures in young children (6 months to 5 years) and their caregiver(s)/family.ObjectivesTo determine the clinically meaningful within‐person change thresholds for CDLQI (4–5 years), IDQoL (&lt;4 years) and DFI scores in children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate‐to‐severe AD and their caregiver(s)/family.MethodsData from the 16‐week, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL part B study in children aged 6 months to 5 years were used. The anchor‐based method was used to assess meaningful change thresholds for the three instruments, using the Caregiver Global Impression of Disease (CGID; range: ‘no symptoms’ to ‘very severe’) as the primary anchor, and Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC; range: ‘much better’ to ‘much worse’) as a supportive anchor.ResultsThe mean CDLQI change scores were −6.3 and −9.5 based on CGID 1‐point improvement and CGIC improvement of ‘a little better’, respectively. The mean IDQoL change scores were −5.6 and −3.4 based on the CGID and CGIC anchors. The mean DFI change scores were −7.0 and −6.7 based on the CGID and CGIC anchors.ConclusionsBased on primary anchor findings, improvements of ≥6 points on the CDLQI total score for children aged 4–5 years and on the IDQoL total score for children aged &lt;4 years were recommended as the clinically meaningful within‐person change thresholds in children with moderate‐to‐severe AD. A 7‐point improvement on the DFI total score may be considered as the meaningful threshold for the caregiver(s)/family of children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate‐to‐severe AD.

Clinically relevant improvements in adults and adolescents with atopic dermatitis who did not achieve Investigator's Global Assessment treatment success following 8 weeks of ruxolitinib cream monotherapy.

Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation of ruxolitinib, a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK2. In two phase 3 studies in adults and adolescents (aged ≥12 years) with atopic dermatitis (AD; TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2), significantly more patients who applied ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle cream achieved Investigator's Global Assessment treatment success (IGA-TS; IGA score of 0/1 with ≥2-point improvement from baseline) at week 8 (primary endpoint). This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy, safety, and disease control of ruxolitinib cream in patients with AD who did not achieve IGA-TS at week 8. Patients in TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2 (N = 1249) were randomized 2:2:1 to apply twice-daily 0.75% ruxolitinib cream, 1.5% ruxolitinib cream, or vehicle cream for 8 weeks followed by a long-term safety period in which patients applied ruxolitinib cream as needed. In this pooled analysis, clinically meaningful response thresholds included ≥50% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, ≥2-point reduction in the Itch Numerical Rating Scale, ≥4-point improvement in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) or ≥6-point improvement in Children's DLQI, and ≥1-point reduction in IGA from baseline. Among patients who did not achieve IGA-TS at week 8 (n = 584), significantly more patients who applied either strength ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle achieved each response threshold at week 8. A response in ≥1 clinically meaningful endpoint was achieved in significantly more patients who applied ruxolitinib cream (93.4%/90.9% for 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream, respectively) versus vehicle (69.0%, both P < 0.0001). Progressive improvements in disease control were observed, with many patients achieving IGA-TS by week 52 (55.2%/56.3% for 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream, respectively). Ruxolitinib cream was well tolerated during the 52-week study in this patient population. Taken together, these results demonstrate that most patients with AD who did not achieve IGA-TS at week 8 have clinically meaningful responses to ruxolitinib cream, and continued therapy beyond 8 weeks could result in additional benefit.

A Study of Sleep Quality and Quality of Life in Children with Atopic Dermatitis between 6 and 12 Years of Age

Abstract Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic, relapsing dermatitis, affecting mainly children. It is associated with intense pruritus which can disrupt the sleep and quality of life (QOL), thereby impairing the neurocognitive development. An understanding of the link between severity of AD and sleep quality in children may help in better treatment of this condition. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted to correlate severity of AD with sleep quality and QOL. Sixty-six children with AD were enrolled for the study. In addition to basic demographic details, all patients were analyzed for disease severity using SCORing AD (SCORAD) score. The QOL and sleep quality were evaluated using Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) questionnaire and Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ), respectively. Results: The mean age of the study group was 8.94 ± 1.94 years and mean body mass index was 19.97 ± 2.69 kg/m2. The median SCORAD score was 32 ± 50. Mean CSHQ score was 43.17 ± 7.15, and it showed a positive correlation with SCORAD score (R 2 = 0.655; P = 0.000). Similarly, median score of CDLQI was 14 ± 18, which also showed a positive correlation with SCORAD score (R 2 = 0.822; P = 0.000). All the domains of CDLQI questionnaire were affected by the disease. In the CSHQ questionnaire, all parameters were affected except parasomnias and sleep-disordered breathing. Conclusion: The study demonstrated a significant association between severity of AD with sleep quality and QOL. It highlights the need for interventions to diminish sleep problems and to improve QOL in children with AD.

Investigation of Quality of Life of Patients with Atopic Dermatitis and Quality of Life, Psychiatric Symptomatology, and Caregiver Burden of Their Mothers.

The purpose of the present research was to evaluate the quality of life of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), and that of their mothers. We compared the anxiety and depression scores and caregiving burden of mothers of patients with AD with the same scores of mothers of healthy children. A total of 153 patients between the ages of 2 months and 16 years with AD in our clinic, and their mothers, were contained in the patient group. An additional 141 healthy cases between the ages of 2 months and 16 years, and their mothers, were included as the control group. The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was completed according to the children's opinions, and the Infant's Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDLQI), Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego Autoquestionnaire, and Zarit Caregiver Burden (ZCB) scale were completed based on the mothers' opinions. We detected a positive relationship between the SCORAD index and the IDLQI, CDLQI, and FDLQI scores of children with AD. We found that anxiety, depression, and caregiving burden in mothers of AD cases increased when mothers of AD cases were compared with mothers of healthy children (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.002, respectively). Also, based on the mothers' responses, we noted a positive correlation among the BDI, BAI, ZCB, and SCORAD index scores. Our study found that the quality of life of patients with AD, and that of their mothers, was negatively affected by the disease. We also found that anxiety, depression levels (not at the clinical diagnosis level, and the caregiving burden in mothers of AD cases increased when mothers of AD cases were compared with mothers of healthy children.

Quality of life in children with skin disease: A Spanish sample

IntroductionThe impact of skin diseases on quality of life varies widely, and some can have an impact similar to that of asthma or cystic fibrosis. Material and methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study with the aim of describing the degree to which quality of life was affected in paediatric patients managed in a dermatology clinic by means of the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI). ResultsIn our study, the skin disease with the greatest impact on quality of life was atopic dermatitis, chiefly on account of symptoms like pruritus and insomnia. It was followed by acne, mainly due to the associated negative feelings (shame, sadness, etc.). Quality of life in patients with viral warts and molluscum contagiosum was mostly affected by the treatment, chiefly based on cryotherapy. Most patients with nevi or café-au-lait spots did not have a decreased quality of life, although up to one third of them had negative feelings in relation to their skin disease. DiscussionAtopic dermatitis was the common skin disease that caused the greatest impairment in quality of life in our sample, although other diseases also had an impact on different dimensions of quality of life. We ought to underscore the recommendation to use less painful treatments than cryotherapy for viral warts and molluscum contagiosum, as the impairment in quality of life in paediatric patients with these conditions was mainly due to the treatment.