Letters to the EditorSpeciation and Biotyping of Brucella Kevin K. Smith and RT(CSLT) S.M. HussainQadri, PhD, Diplomate ABMM, FAAM, FRCPath Kevin K. Smith Section of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (MBC-10), King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, P.O. Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia Search for more papers by this author and S.M. Hussain Section of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (MBC-10), King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, P.O. Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia Search for more papers by this author Published Online:1 May 1992https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.1992.325SectionsPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail AboutIntroductionTo the Editor: With reference to a recent letter to the editor by Eltigani et al [1], we concur that speciation and biotyping of Brucella provides an excellent tool in understanding the epidemiology of brucellosis. However, their contention that “no significant work has been done to identify the species and biotypes responsible. The only published work was that of Corbel…” is not completely justified. Several investigators have reported their findings on the incidence of Brucella species and biotypes both in man and animals. Our cursory survey of literature, which we feel is far from complete, showed that of 527 cases of brucella cultured from humans in the last eight years, 517 (98%) were identified as B. melitensis and the rest as B. abortus[1–7]. Madkour [8] reported a moderate distribution of B. melitensis and B. abortus in animals and an understandable absence of B. suis.Although Corbel [9] has found all three biotypes of B. melitensis, Qadri et al [2] reported that 64% of their 153 B. melitensis isolates from a major tertiary care center in Riyadh were biotype 1 and the rest biotype 3. Recently, Bilal et al [3] found that all the 70 isolates from the Asir region were biotype 3. Distribution of biotypes of B. melitensis, including those reported by Eltigani et al [1], is shown in Table 1.Table 1. Biotypes of Brucella melitensis.Table 1. Biotypes of Brucella melitensis.Since biotype 1 is more common in African countries, its high prevalence in Saudi Arabia may be due to the import of animals from these countries for slaughter as well as breeding purposes. Biotype 3 is usually associated with nomadic herds and its second highest incidence reflects the nomadic heritage in the Kingdom.Although several reports from the Central region of the Kingdom have dealt with speciation and biotyping, there are gaps in their prevalence from other parts of the Kingdom. We agree with Eltigani et al [1] on the need for further studies that may aid in the discovery and clarification of epidemiological linkages. Unfortunately, in the countries most affected by brucellosis, including Saudi Arabia, biotyping has not been performed to such a level so as to provide worthwile epidemiological evaluation.ARTICLE REFERENCES:1. Eltigani MME, Al-Orainey IO, El-Nageed SS, Kambal AMM. "Biotyping of Brucella isolates" . Ann Saudi Med. 1991; 11(2):238–9. Google Scholar2. Qadri SMH, Akhtar M, Ueno Y, Al-Sibai MB. "Susceptibility of Brucella melitensis to fluoroquinones" . Drugs Exptl Clin Res. 1989; 10:483–5. Google Scholar3. Bilal NE, Jamjoom GA, Bobo RA, et al.. "Brucellosis in the Asir Region of Saudi Arabia" . Saudi Med J. 1991; 12:37–41. Google Scholar4. Al-Eissa YA, Kambal AM, Al-Nasser MN, et al.. "Childhood brucellosis: a study of 102 cases" . Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990; 9:74–9. Google Scholar5. Madkour MM, Rahman A, Mohamed E, et al.. "Brucellosis in Saudi Arabia" . Saudi Med J. 1985; 6:324–32. Google Scholar6. Kambal AM, Mahgoub ES, Jamjoom GA, Cowdhury MN. "Brucellosis in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a microbiological and clinical study" . Tran R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1983; 77:820–4. Google Scholar7. Kiel FW, Khan MY. "Analysis of 506 consecutive positive serologic tests for brucellosis in Saudi Arabia" . J Clin Microbiol. 1987; 25:1384–7. Google Scholar8. Madkour MM. Brucellosis. London: Butterworths, 1989;16–20. Google Scholar9. Corbel MJ. "Advances in the development of a reliable phage typing system for smooth and non-smooth brucella isolates" . Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol. 1987; 138:69–144. Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 12, Issue 3May 1992 Metrics History Published online1 May 1992 InformationCopyright © 1992, Annals of Saudi MedicinePDF download
Read full abstract