S i121 Jersey EDs, with participants consecutive patients seen by ED physicians January 1998 through July 2002. Based on ICD-9 codes, syndromic groups were developed for the following categories: any gastrointestinal, diarrhea, respiratory, asthma, chest pain, fever, skin, headache, and weakness. We then generated daily counts of patients by category and generated time series graphs to display the incidence of disease for these syndromic groups over the 4.5-year period. We also generated similar counts and graphs for the same syndromic groups based on the physician’s choice of charting template rather than ICD-9 code and compared the results. There were 3.2 million patient visits in the database. Visual inspection of the time series graphs showed definite seasonal peaks in the diarrhea, respiratory, asthma, fever, and skin syndromic groups. There was good agreement between ICD-9 codes and templates. The existing ED database identified seasonal peaks in the incidence of several disease syndromes. Tracking physician charting template usage could potentially identify these patterns in real time. This ED database may be able to provide early warning of disease outbreaks and some types of bioterrorist attacks. The Use of Hospital Emergency Department Chief Complaint Data as a “Near” Real-Time Marker for Assessing Public Health Risk of Infectious Disease Outbreak Ronald J. Shannon, Michael Davisson, Trang Nguyen, Carolyn Stetson, and Kevin Jones New York State Department of Health, Division of Epidemiology Since September 11, 2001, and the corresponding anthrax attacks, there has been considerable interest in developing pre-event surveillance methods that would be used for early detection of a bioterrorist event and prevention of widespread morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, active surveillance mechanisms to detect disease outbreaks consist of confirmatory laboratory testing after preliminary diagnosis from a physician. In many cases, the confirmation of infectious disease takes days of testing, many hours of epidemiological analysis, and significant public health resources at the local level before an outbreak is finally diagnosed. Our communities are at significant risk unless public health authorities can develop a preevent early warning system with a high degree of specificity and sensitivity for outbreak detection when patients present themselves to the emergency department or their primary health care provider. A pre-event early warning system depends on quality, “near” real-time data from the medical community. Potential sources of this information are (1) hospital emergency department encounters, (2) outpatient clinic visits, (3) pharmacy data (over the counter and prescription). All data sources have varying degrees of quality, but the hospital emergency department registration information (chief complaint at initial visit) is determined to provide the nearest real-time means for use in a pre-event surveillance system. But, is chief complaint information as reliable as International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9)–coded discharge diagnosis in predicting an early event? ICD-9 diagnosis is considered to be the best indicator of patient diagnosis, but is not readily available for epidemiological analysis until 3 to 5 days after initial visit. The New York State Department of Health and Emergency Medical Associates of New Jersey Research Foundation (EMARF) have completed a study comparing emergency department chief complaint data with ICD-9 discharge codes from 2.7 million patient encounters presenting to 15 emergency departments in New Jersey to determine the feasibility of using chief complaint for pre-event surveillance. Preliminary findings show a high specificity and sensitivity comparing chief complaint data to ICD9-coded discharge diagnosis. Connecticut Hospital Admissions Syndromic Surveillance Zygmunt Dembek, Myrth Myers, Kenneth Carley, and James Hadler Connecticut Department of Public Health