Chemotherapy In Elderly Patients Research Articles

Efficacy of targeted agents in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PurposeThe efficacy of targeted agents (TAs) in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy of TAs in the treatment of advanced NSCLC in this setting.Materials and methodsRelevant trials were identified by searching electronic databases and conference meetings. Prospective randomized controlled trials assessing chemotherapies with or without TAs in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.ResultsA total of 4,093 elderly patients from 17 randomized controlled trials were included for analysis. The addition of TAs to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75–0.96, P=0.01) when compared to chemotherapy alone. There was also a tendency to improve OS in the combination groups (HR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85–1.01, P=0.064). Subgroup analysis based on treatment line indicated that TAs plus chemotherapy as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC significantly improved PFS (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68–0.95, P=0.01) and OS (HR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83–0.99, P=0.037), while the use of TA-containing regimens as second-line therapy in these patients did not significantly improve PFS (HR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.75–1.10, P=0.33) and OS (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.81–1.33, P=0.77) in comparison with chemotherapy alone. No publication bias was detected by Begg’s and Egger’s tests for OS.ConclusionThe findings of this study suggest that the addition of TAs to first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC offers an improved PFS and OS. Further trials are recommended to clearly investigate the efficacy of adding specific TAs to first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in this setting.

Clinical impact of post-progression survival on overall survival in elderly patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer.

BackgroundThe effects of first‐line chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) might be confounded by subsequent therapies in patients with small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC). Therefore, the objective of our study was to determine the relationships between progression‐free survival (PFS) or post‐progression survival (PPS) and OS after first‐line chemotherapy in elderly patients with extensive disease‐SCLC (ED‐SCLC), using individual level data.MethodsBetween July 1998 and December 2014, we analyzed 57 cases of elderly patients with ED‐SCLC who were treated with carboplatin and etoposide as first‐line chemotherapy. The relationships between PFS and PPS with OS were analyzed at an individual level.ResultsSpearman rank correlation and linear regression analyses showed that PPS was strongly correlated with OS (r = 0.92, P < 0.05, R 2 = 0.83) and PFS was moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.76, P < 0.05, R 2 = 0.25). The best response at second‐line treatment and the number of regimens after progression beyond first‐line chemotherapy were both significantly associated with PPS (P < 0.05).Conclusions PPS has a stronger impact on OS than PFS in elderly ED‐SCLC patients after first‐line chemotherapy. In addition, the response at second‐line treatment and the number of additional regimens after first‐line treatment are significant independent prognostic factors for PPS. These results suggest that OS in elderly ED‐SCLC patients may be influenced by treatments subsequent to first‐line chemotherapy; however, this remains to be verified with prospective studies.

Chemotherapy in elderly patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Using chemotherapy in elderly nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is often challenging given concerns of treatment-related toxicity. However, data have demonstrated that chemotherapy can lead to improved survival in this age group. In this review, we summarize existing data and discuss the role of chemotherapy in elderly patients with localized, locally advanced, and metastatic NSCLC. Clear evidence-based guidelines for chemotherapy management in elderly patients is lacking given the limited prospective data available. However, there are more clinical trials investigating optimal chemotherapy agents and dosing schedules specific to the elderly. Comprehensive geriatric assessment-directed interventions are also being prospectively investigated to improve treatment selection for elderly patients. Chronological age should not be a limiting factor for chemotherapy use in elderly NSCLC patients. Several studies have demonstrated similar survival benefits than in younger patients when chemotherapy is given as adjuvant treatment for localized disease; part of definitive treatment with radiation in locally advanced disease; and palliative treatment for advanced NSCLC, however, at the cost of greater toxicity. Tolerability of chemotherapy in this heterogeneous group can be difficult to predict. Therefore, therapeutic decisions should be individualized based on performance status. Comprehensive geriatric assessment should be used to supplement performance status measures to minimize both under and overtreatment.

Combined-Modality Therapy With Radiation and Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients With Glioblastoma in the Temozolomide Era: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

The optimal management for elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is controversial. Following maximal safe resection or biopsy, accepted treatment paradigms for elderly patients with GBM include combined-modality therapy (CMT) with both radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT), RT alone, and CT alone. To evaluate the overall survival (OS) outcomes associated with RT, CT, and CMT for elderly patients with GBM in the modern temozolomide era. In this retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained, multi-institutional national cancer registry, the National Cancer Database was queried for elderly patients (≥65 years) with newly diagnosed GBM from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2011, with complete data sets for RT, CT, tumor resection, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores, age, sex, and year of diagnosis. Data analysis was performed from October 2015 through December 2015. Combined-modality therapy, RT, CT. Survival by treatment cohort was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using the log rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox models, and propensity score-matched analyses. A total of 16 717 patients (median [range] age, 73 [65-≥90 y]; 8870 [53%] male) were identified. The median OS by treatment was 9.0 (95% CI, 8.8-9.3) months with CMT (8435 patients), 4.7 (95% CI, 4.5-5.0) months with RT alone (1693 patients), 4.3 (95% CI, 4.0-4.7) months with CT alone (1018 patients), and 2.8 (95% CI, 2.8-2.9) months with no therapy (5571 patients) (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, CMT was superior to both CT alone (hazard ratio, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.40-1.60]; P < .001) and RT alone (hazard ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.39-1.55]; P < .001), whereas no differences were observed between CT alone vs RT alone (P = .60). Propensity score-matched analyses redemonstrated improved OS with CMT over CT alone (P = .002) and RT alone (P < .001); no differences were observed between CT alone vs RT alone (P = .44). On subgroup analyses, a consistent OS advantage was observed with CMT over both CT alone and RT alone across each age stratification (65-69, 70-74, 75-79, and ≥80 years) and among patients treated with or without tumor resection (all P < .001). In this analysis of multimodality therapy for elderly patients with GBM, OS was superior with CMT compared with CT alone and RT alone. Survival was similar between CT alone and RT alone, and both CT alone and RT alone were superior to no therapy. This analysis supports the use of CMT for suitable elderly candidates.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with primary breast cancer: are women ≥65 undertreated?

To establish whether women over 65years of age with newly diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) receive adjuvant chemotherapy less frequently than younger postmenopausal women and whether comorbidity influences this potential undertreatment. In a single-site, retrospective, comparative study, postmenopausal early stage BC patients treated between 01/2001 and 12/2005 at a major German university hospital were analyzed in two age Groups A and B (≥65 vs. <65years) for initiation and completion of guideline-recommended adjuvant chemotherapy. Risk stratification was based on the 2005 St. Gallen Consensus Conference criteria. Comorbidity was parametrized using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Analysis included 634 patients, 380 in Group A and 254 in Group B. Mean age (range) was 73 (65-94) and 61 (55-64) years, respectively. The proportion of patients from Group A given ≥3 cycles of chemotherapy was significantly decreased as compared to Group B. 52% of patients with CCI <3 but only 20% with CCI ≥3 were recommended to undergo chemotherapy (p<0.001). Median follow-up [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 85 (82-88) months. DFS was significantly shorter in patients aged ≥65years as compared to younger postmenopausal patients (HR, 0.598; 95% CI, 0.358-0.963; p=0.048). Despite being high-risk patients, older women with early stage BC were often not given guideline-recommended chemotherapy. Higher recurrence rates compared with younger postmenopausal women suggest that older patients are undertreated. Treatment needs to be adapted to general health and tumor biology rather than age. More trials in elderly BC patients are needed.

Chemotherapy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: experience of a brazilian center

Chemotherapy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: experience of a brazilian center

Is there room for chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the era of targeted hormone therapy?

The incidence of prostate cancer is strongly correlated with age, with 35 % of patients aged 65–74 years and 25 % aged 75 years or older being affected [1]. Prostate cancer is third leading cause of cancer death among men aged 80 years and older. Of patients dying of prostate cancer, 41 % are aged 75–84 years, and 30 % above 85 years [2]. Fortunately treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has evolved dramatically in the last few years.

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: single center experience.

BackgroundMetastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is mainly a disease of elderly, however, geriatric population is underrepresented in clinical trials. Patient registries represent a tool to assess and follow treatment outcomes in this patient population. The aim of the study was with the help of the patients’ register to determine the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in elderly patients who had previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.Patients and methodsThe registry of patients with mCRC was designed to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy as well as selection of patients in routine clinical practice. Patient baseline clinical characteristics, pre-specified bevacizumab-related adverse events, and efficacy data were collected, evaluated and compared according to the age categories.ResultsBetween January 2008 and December 2010, 210 patients with mCRC (median age 63, male 61.4%) started bevacizumab-containing therapy in the 1st line setting. Majority of the 210 patients received irinotecan-based chemotherapy (68%) as 1st line treatment and 105 patients (50%) received bevacizumab maintenance therapy. Elderly (≥ 70 years) patients presented 22.9% of all patients and they had worse performance status (PS 1/2, 62.4%) than patients in < 70 years group (PS 1/2, 35.8%). Difference in disease control rate was mainly due to inability to assess response in elderly group (64.6% in elderly and 77.8% in < 70 years group, p = 0.066). The median progression free survival was 10.2 (95% CI, 6.7–16.2) and 11.3 (95% CI, 10.2–12.6) months in elderly and < 70 years group, respectively (p = 0.58). The median overall survival was 18.5 (95% CI, 12.4–28.9) and 27.4 (95% CI, 22.7–31.9) months for elderly and < 70 years group, respectively (p = 0.03). Three-year survival rate was 26% and 37.6% in elderly vs. < 70 years group (p = 0.03). Overall rates of bevacizumab-related adverse events were similar in both groups: proteinuria 21/22 %, hypertension 25/19 %, haemorrhage 2/4 % and thromboembolic events 10/6 %, for elderly and < 70 years group, respectively.ConclusionsIn routine clinical practice, the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy is effective and well-tolerated regimen in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Detección y evaluación del papel de la sarcopenia en ancianos con cáncer tratados con quimioterapia. Proyecto ONCOSARCO

ObjectivesTo develop a predictive model of toxicity to chemotherapy in elderly patients with cancer, using the variables associated with sarcopenia, and to identify which of these parameters, sarcopenia or frailty, is the best predictor of toxicity to chemotherapy in the elderly. Material and methodsA prospective observational study with patients ≥70 years treated with chemotherapy in the Cancer Unit for the Elderly, in the Medical Oncology Section of the Hospital Virgen de la Luz de Cuenca.The following tests will be performed by each patient before chemotherapy: muscle strength (handgrip, cylindrical handgrip, pinch gauge, hip flexion, knee extension), muscle mass (skeletal muscle mass index), and physical function (gait speed and 5STS test). The occurrence of severe toxicity will be recorded over a period of 4 months of chemotherapy treatment.It will be evaluated, using logistic regression analysis, whether sarcopenia (defined by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People) or frailty (defined by the phenotype of frailty) is the best predictor of chemotherapy toxicity. Using a multinomial logistic regression analysis, we will try to create the first model to predict toxicity to chemotherapy in elderly patients with diagnosis of cancer, based on the definition of sarcopenia. ConclusionsIt is expected that the final analysis of this project will be useful to detect predictive factors of toxicity to chemotherapy in elderly patients with cancer.

A retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy of weekly nab-paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced squamous non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

PurposeThe aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the anticancer effect and toxicity of weekly administered nab-paclitaxel as a second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with relapsed squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the treatment of 42 elderly patients with relapsed squamous NSCLC, who received nab-paclitaxel monotherapy as a second-line treatment from January 2010 to March 2014. A dose of 100 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel was administered weekly on days 1, 8, and 15, followed by 1 week of rest. The protocol was maintained for at least two cycles.ResultsThe overall response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 21.43% (9/42) and 47.62% (20/42), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.6 and 10.9 months, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS, accounting for the first-line therapy factors (taxane agent, radiotherapy, or surgery). There was a statistically significant difference in DCR for stages III and IV (62.96% vs 20%, P=0.008), but there was no such difference in either PFS or OS. The ORR of 29 patients receiving more than three cycles of treatment was higher than that of those receiving less than three cycles of treatment (31.03% vs 0%, P=0.038), and there was a significant difference in PFS (7.6 vs 4.9 months, P=0.004) and OS (11.7 vs 8.9 months, P=0.002). No hypersensitivity reactions or treatment-related grade 4 adverse events were reported.ConclusionNab-paclitaxel monotherapy administered weekly at a dose of 100 mg/m2 is shown to be an effective and safe regimen for elderly patients with relapsed squamous NSCLC, especially for patients with stage III disease or good performance status.

Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most frequent malignant diseases in the elderly. Systemic chemotherapy showed an improvement of quality of life and survival benefit compared to supportive care alone in patients with advanced GC. Because comorbidities or age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may lead to higher toxicity, however, many oncologists hesitate to recommend elderly patients to receive chemotherapy.Available data suggest that elderly patients with GC are able to tolerate and benefit from systemic chemotherapy to the same extent as younger patients. The age alone should not be the only criteria to preclude effective chemotherapy. However, proper patient selection is extremely important to deliver effective treatment safely. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a useful method to assess life expectancy and risk of morbidity in older patients and to guide providing optimal treatment. Treatment should be personalized based on the nature of the disease, the life expectancy, the risk of complication, and the patient's preference. Combination chemotherapy can be considered for older patients with metastatic GC who are classified as non-frail patients by CGA. For frail or vulnerable patients, however, monotherapy or only symptomatic treatment may be desirable. Targeted agents seem to be promising treatment options for elderly patients with GC considering their better efficacy and less toxicity.

F35 - Weekly paclitaxel (wptx) as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients (pts) with advanced urothelial cancer: data from a single-centre experience

F35 - Weekly paclitaxel (wptx) as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients (pts) with advanced urothelial cancer: data from a single-centre experience

Metronomic Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Potentially Feasible Alternative to Therapeutic Nihilism

Metronomic Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Potentially Feasible Alternative to Therapeutic Nihilism

Risk Factors and Efficacy of Adjuvant Therapy After Surgery of Elderly Colon Cancer Patients 70 Years of Age or Older

Background: Colon cancer affects largely elderly populations. Elderly patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy is lower than younger patients in colon cancer. We aim to evaluate the survival and prognostic factors in accordance with adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly colon cancer patients undergoing curative resection. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 86 patients 70 years of age or older with stage II, III colon cancer who were underwent surgical resection between 2005 and 2013 at single-center. We examined demographic factors, comorbidities at the time of diagnosis, factors associated with colon cancer, and factors associated with treatment, and analyzed associations survival and these factors divided into adjuvant chemotherapy group (chemotherapy group) and the conservative treatment group (observation group). Results: Among 86 patients 70 years of age or older, 58 patients (67.4%) administered adjuvant chemotherapy and 28 patients (32%) underwent conservative treatment. There are significant differences in respect to the age of 75 in order to select conservative treatment or adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with surgery (p=0.008). There was no significant difference of median overall survival between both groups (chemotherapy group versus observation group: 20 months vs. 24 months, p=0.000). Poor ECOG PS score was independent prognostic factor for overall survival (95% confidential interval 0.016-0.205; hazard ratio, 0.58; p<0.001). Conclusion: Adjuvant chemotherapy did not affect the overall survival in stage II, III elderly colon cancer after surgical resection. There was the tendency to determine whether undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy according to chronologic age. It is thought to be necessary to perform a comprehensive geriatric assessment for decision of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients.

Reasons for Underuse of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer

BackgroundUndertreatment has been frequently reported in the elderly cancer patient population. For this reason, we aimed to characterize adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) use among elderly patients (EPs) with stage III colon cancer (CC) and to identify potential reasons for undertreatment. Patients and MethodsPatients diagnosed with stage III CC between 2008 and 2010 were included in this review. Multivariate Cox regression models were constructed to evaluate the associations between AC and cancer-specific, disease-free, and overall survival and to determine whether these were modified by age. ResultsWe identified 810 patients: 423 (52%) men, 423 (52%) young patients (YPs), and 603 (74%) received AC. Compared with YPs, EPs were less likely to receive AC (57% vs. 91%; P < .01), particularly 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) (32% vs. 74%, P < .01). Frequent reasons for nontreatment included age, comorbidities, and perceived minimal benefit from AC. When AC was given, EPs had similar rates of treatment discontinuations (34% vs. 26%; P > .05) and dose reductions (63% vs. 61%; P > .05) as YPs. Reasons for treatment interruptions included side effects, progressive disease, and patient choice. Receipt of either FOLFOX or capecitabine was correlated with improved cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival compared with surgery alone; this effect was not modified by age. ConclusionElderly patients with stage III CC frequently received either no AC or capecitabine monotherapy because of advanced age and comorbidities. The effect of AC on survival was similar across age groups, with comparable side effects and rates of treatment modifications. AC should not be withheld because of advanced age alone.

Risk of Vascular Toxicity with Platinum Based Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Bladder Cancer

Platinum based chemotherapy is widely used for bladder cancer but is associated with vascular toxicity, especially thromboembolism. We evaluated the short-term (less than 1 year) and intermediate-term (2 to 5 years) vascular toxicity of platinum agents in older patients with bladder cancer. We identified Medicare beneficiaries 66 to 94 years old diagnosed with stage II-III bladder cancer from 1998 to 2007 in the SEER-Medicare database. We measured the association between platinum based chemotherapy and vascular events (thromboembolic and nonthromboembolic) using Cox proportional hazard regression models. The sample included 5,057 patients, of whom 21.3% received platinum based chemotherapy. Patients receiving platinum based chemotherapy were more likely to be younger and male with less comorbidity than those not receiving any chemotherapy. During the first year after diagnosis the patients who received platinum based chemotherapy had a higher risk of a thromboembolic event (19.8% vs 11.6%, AHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.17-1.75) compared to those who did not receive chemotherapy. The likelihood of having a thromboembolic outcome was similar whether platinum chemotherapy was cisplatin based (21.1%, AHR 1.56, 95% CI 1.22-2.00) or carboplatin based (18.9%, AHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.71). During years 2 to 5 after diagnosis there was no significant association between platinum chemotherapy and the risk of thromboembolic events. The risk of nonthromboembolic vascular events was not increased with platinum chemotherapy in either period. Patients receiving platinum based chemotherapy were at higher risk for thromboembolism but not other vascular events, particularly in the first year after diagnosis. This risk of thromboembolism is similar for cisplatin and carboplatin.

1325 A phase II study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin followed by maintenance pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients (75-years-old) with advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer

1325 A phase II study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin followed by maintenance pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients (75-years-old) with advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer

Functional decline during first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients can be predicted by abnormal G8 score and performance status.

9538 Background: Predicting major adverse events such as functional decline during chemotherapy is an important issue in geriatric oncology. Recent studies have shown that different parts of compre...

Validation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage II/III gastric cancer.

e15036 Background: In recent years, the proportion of elderly patients has increased in Japan. Our previous report showed that the elderly patients with non-resectable gastric cancer tolerated inte...

Analysis of influencing factors for giving up chemotherapy during initial treatment in elderly multiple myeloma

Objective To study influencing factors for giving up chemotherapy during initial treatment in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Methods A total of 156 elderly patients diagnosed as multiple myeloma from 2000-2010 were retrospectively analyzed. And 123 young patients with multiple myeloma were selected as control group. The causes for giving up the chemotherapy and its related factors were recorded and analyzed. Results The rate of giving up the initial chemotherapy was higher in the elderly than in young patients 〔58.3% (91/156) vs. 35.0% (43/123), P<0.05〕. 51.7% of the elderly patients did not accept chemotherapy after diagnosis. The main factors for giving up the initial chemotherapy in elderly patients were critically ill, economic difficult and the low tolerance. However, the economic difficulty was the first cause in the young group. Conclusions The rate of giving up the chemotherapy in the elderly patients is high. Old age, severe conditions, economic difficulty, and low tolerance are the independent factors. Key words: Multiple myeloma; Medication compliance