Chemotherapy In Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

EP05.02-008 Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Icotinib Plus Chemotherapy for Stage II-IIIB EGFR-mutant Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer

Icotinib is a novel and selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for oral usage. Adjuvant therapy with icotinib has been confirmed to be associated with the improvement of DFS among patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in several studies. However, the clinical benefit of neoadjuvant icotinib combined with chemotherapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC remains unknown. This is the first trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of icotinib plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with stage II-IIIB EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

EP05.02-014 Neoadjuvant Toripalimab Combination in Patients with Stage IIB-IIIB NSCLC: A Single-Arm, Phase 2 Trial (Renaissance Study)

PD-1 inhibitors have displayed potential anti-tumor activities in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we conducted a single center, prospective study to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant toripalimab (the first PD-1 inhibitor from china) plus double platinum-based chemotherapy for stage IIB-IIIB NSCLC.

Current treatments for non-small cell lung cancer.

Despite improved methods of diagnosis and the development of different treatments, mortality from lung cancer remains surprisingly high. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the large majority of lung cancer cases. Therefore, it is important to review current methods of diagnosis and treatments of NSCLC in the clinic and preclinic. In this review, we describe, as a guide for clinicians, current diagnostic methods and therapies (such as chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, antiangiogenic therapy, immunotherapy, and combination therapy) for NSCLC.

Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in ALK Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

The management of advanced lung cancer has been transformed with the identification of targetable oncogenic driver alterations. This includes anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements. ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are established first-line treatment options in advanced ALK rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with several next-generation ALK TKIs (alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib and lorlatinib) demonstrating survival benefit compared with the first-generation ALK TKI crizotinib. Still, despite high objective response rates and durable progression-free survival, drug resistance inevitably ensues, and treatment options beyond ALK TKI are predominantly limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Anti-angiogenic therapy targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway has shown efficacy in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC without a driver alteration, and with EGFR TKI in advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC. The role for anti-angiogenic therapy in ALK rearranged NSCLC, however, remains to be elucidated. This review will discuss the pre-clinical rationale, clinical trial evidence to date, and future directions to evaluate anti-angiogenic therapy in ALK rearranged NSCLC.

Variants of ERCC5 and the outcome of platinum-based regimens in non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective cohort study

Excision repair complementary complex 5 (ERCC5) is an important component in the repair pathway of platinum-induced damage. The current study evaluated the effect of ERCC5 variants (rs751402 and rs1047768) on the clinical outcome of platinum-based regimens in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A prospective, cohort study was conducted on 57 newly diagnosed NSCLC Egyptian patients. Patients received either cisplatin or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. DNA was extracted and the variants were analyzed using real time PCR. This study found no significant difference between the studied variants and patients’ response to chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). However, a statistically significant association was found between the histologic subtypes and the studied variants (p = 0.028 and 0.018 for rs751402 and rs1047768, respectively). A statistically significant association was evident between the type of the allele present in the studied polymorphisms, p value = 0.000040. Moreover, the minor allele frequency (MAF) of the studied variants rs751402 and rs1047768 were similar to those of African and European populations, respectively. Results of this study have concluded that ERCC5 variants did not affect the clinical outcome of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC. A significant coinheritance was found between the two variants of ERCC5. Moreover, the similarity between the MAF of the studied variants and the African or European population can guide future research when extrapolating data from African European populations to their Egyptian counterparts.

RhG-CSF is associated with an increased risk of metastasis in NSCLC patients following postoperative chemotherapy

BackgroundRecombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) reduces neutropenia events and is widely used in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. However, the effects of rhG-CSF on distant organ metastasis (DOM) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients following postoperative chemotherapy are not clear.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on NSCLC patients who underwent complete surgical resection and postoperative systemic chemotherapy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017. The effect of rhG-CSF on DOM was assessed with other confounding factors using Cox regression analyses.ResultsWe identified 307 NSCLC patients who received postoperative systemic chemotherapy (n = 246 in the rhG-CSF group, n = 61 in the No rhG-CSF group). The incidence of DOM in postoperative NSCLC patients with rhG-CSF treatment was observably higher than in patients without rhG-CSF treatment (48.3% vs. 27.9%, p < 0.05). Univariate regression analysis revealed that rhG-CSF and pathological stage were independent risk factors for metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p < 0.05). RhG-CSF users had a higher risk of DOM (adjusted HR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.31–4.15) than nonusers of rhG-CSF. The association between rhG-CSF and the risk of DOM was significant only in patients presenting with myelosuppression (HR: 3.34, 95% CI: 1.86–6.02) and not in patients without myelosuppression (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.17–2.94, Interaction p-value< 0.01). The risk increased with higher dose density of rhG-CSF compared to rhG-CSF versus no users (p for trend< 0.001).ConclusionThese analyses indicate that rhG-CSF use is related to DOM following postoperative chemotherapy in NSCLC.

Identifying Biomarkers of Cisplatin Sensitivity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer via Comprehensive Integrative Analysis

Background: Only 30-40% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are clinically sensitive to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Thus, it is necessary to identify biomarkers for personalized cisplatin chemotherapy in NSCLC. However, data heterogeneity and low-value density make it challenging to detect reliable cisplatin efficacy biomarkers using traditional analysis methods. Objective: This paper aims to find reliable cisplatin efficacy biomarkers for NSCLC patients using comprehensive integrative analysis. Method: We searched online resources and collected six NSCLC transcriptomics data sets with responses to cisplatin. The six data sets are divided into two groups: the learning group for biomarker identification and the test group for independent validation. We performed comprehensive integrative analysis under two kinds of frameworks, i.e., one-level and two-level, with three integrative models. Pathway analysis was performed to estimate the biological significance of the resulting biomarkers. For independent validation, logrank statistic was employed to test how significant the difference of Kaplan- Meier (KM) curves between two patient groups is, and the Cox proportional-hazards model was used to test how the expression of a gene is associated with patients’ survival time. Especially, a permutation test was performed to verify the predictive power of a biomarker panel on cisplatin efficacy. For comparison, we also analyzed each learning data set individually, in which three popular differential expression models, Limma, SAM, and RankSum, were used. Results: A total of 318 genes were identified as a core panel of cisplatin efficacy markers for NSCLC patients, exhibiting consistent differential expression between cisplatin-sensitive and –resistant groups across studies. A total of 129 of 344 KEGG pathways were found to be enriched in the core panel, reflecting a picture of the molecular mechanism of cisplatin resistance in NSCLC. By mapping onto the KEGG pathway tree, we found that a KEGG pathway-level I module, genetic information processing, is most active in the core panel with the highest activity ratio in response to cisplatin in NSCLC as expected. Related pathways include mismatch repair, nucleotide excision repair, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, and basal transcription factors, most of which respond to DNA double-strand damage in patients. Evaluation on two independent data sets demonstrated the predictive power of the core marker panel for cisplatin sensitivity in NSCLC. Also, some single markers, e.g., MST1R, were observed to be remarkably predictive of cisplatin resistance in NSCLC. Conclusion: Integrative analysis is more powerful in detecting biomarkers for cisplatin efficacy by overcoming data heterogeneity and low-value density in data sets, and the identified core panel (318 genes) can help develop personalized medicine of cisplatin chemotherapy for NSCLC patients.

Clinical outcomes in immunotherapy and chemotherapy in minority populations with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

e20508 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths for Hispanics (HIS). Similarly, non-Hispanic blacks (NHB) are often disproportionately represented among cancer deaths compared to other racial/ethnic groups with lung cancer being the second most common cancer in black men and women, as well as the leading cause of cancer death. Despite these statistics, HIS and NHB remain underrepresented in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) research. The aim of this study was to determine if there was a difference in outcomes between HIS, NHB and NH Whites (NHW) who had NSCLC and were treated with surgery, immunotherapy or chemotherapy. Methods: We studied 645,221 observations from the 2004-2018 National Cancer Database (NCDB), categorized as HIS, NHB or NHW, who received surgery, immunotherapy or chemotherapy for NSCLC. Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were analyzed using ANOVA. Survival outcomes were assessed using a Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. Results: Regardless of treatment types, HIS had the highest median overall survival (OS) compared to other groups (NHW: 14.7 months; NHB: 15.0 months; HIS: 16.4 months) (P &lt; 0.001). Regardless of the type of systematic therapy received (immunotherapy or chemotherapy), HIS had the highest median OS (P &lt; 0.001) with HIS in the immunotherapy cohort having the highest survival advantage of all other race/ethnicity and chemotherapy groups. Multivariate Cox regression model further support the survival advantage of HIS compared to NHW (HR = 0.86; P = 0.009). OS was also assessed between patients who received surgery and/or chemotherapy. Patients who received a combination of surgery and chemotherapy had the highest OS compared to patients who underwent surgery only or received chemotherapy only. Among the cohort who received both, HIS had the highest median OS (NHW: 55.2 months; NHB: 55.5 months; HIS: 61.5 months). The surgery only cohort had the next highest median OS of all treatment groups; however, the HIS ethnicity group was non-estimable due to the small sample size. Of all three treatment groups, the chemotherapy only cohort had the lowest median OS while HIS had the highest median OS (NHW: 11.8 months; NHB: 12.9 months; H: 13.5 months) (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Results of our study suggest immunotherapy may offer an increased survival advantage for HIS and NHB compared to chemotherapy. For patients receiving chemotherapy, a combination of surgery and chemotherapy may offer a greater survival advantage for NSCLC patients. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with better survival regardless of the type of treatment received.

Tiragolumab and atezolizumab in patients with PD-L1 positive non-small-cell lung cancer

Anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies, alone or in combination with chemotherapy or anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, are standard therapeutic options for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression (ie, with more than 50% of cancer cells staining positive for PD-L1 on immunohistochemistry), pembrolizumab or atezolizumab monotherapy can substantially improve objective response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with chemotherapy, sparing selected patients from chemotherapy. 1 Jassem J de Marinis F Giaccone G et al. Updated overall survival analysis from IMpower110: atezolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy in treatment-naive programmed death-ligand 1-selected NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2021; 16: 1872-1882 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar , 2 Reck M Rodríguez-Abreu D Robinson AG et al. Five-year outcomes with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 50. J Clin Oncol. 2021; 39: 2339-2349 Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar Combining anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies with chemotherapy for patients with non-squamous NSCLC with a high PD-L1 expression can push the median overall survival to 27·7–30·0 months (up from 20·2–26·3 months with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab monotherapy), although the combination can have higher adverse events. 3 Gray J Rodríguez-Abreu D Powell SF et al. FP13.02 Pembrolizumab + pemetrexed-platinum vs pemetrexed-platinum for metastatic NSCLC: 4-year follow-up from KEYNOTE-189. J Thorac Oncol. 2021; 16: S224 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Google Scholar , 4 Socinski MA Nishio M Jotte RM et al. IMpower150 final overall survival analyses for atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in first-line metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2021; 16: 1909-1924 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (49) Google Scholar Immunotherapy combinations such as nivolumab plus ipilimumab (with or without chemotherapy) are also standard regimens, but do not appear to add benefit versus single agents, as shown by a median overall survival of 21·2 months reported in a high-PD-L1 population. 5 Paz-Ares LG Ramalingam SS Ciuleanu T-E et al. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced NSCLC: 4-year outcomes from the randomized, open-label, phase 3 CheckMate 227 part 1 trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2022; 17: 289-308 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar Therefore, there is an unmet need to improve outcomes for patients with NSCLC with a high expression of PD-L1, by use of immunotherapy combinations that dispense with the need for upfront chemotherapy. Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab versus placebo plus atezolizumab as a first-line treatment for PD-L1-selected non-small-cell lung cancer (CITYSCAPE): primary and follow-up analyses of a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 studyTiragolumab plus atezolizumab showed a clinically meaningful improvement in objective response rate and progression-free survival compared with placebo plus atezolizumab in patients with chemotherapy-naive, PD-L1-positive, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC. Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab was well tolerated, with a safety profile generally similar to that of atezolizumab alone. These findings demonstrate that tiragolumab plus atezolizumab is a promising immunotherapy combination for the treatment of previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic NSCLC. Full-Text PDF

Two cycles versus three cycles of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (neoSCORE): A randomized, single center, two-arm phase II trial.

8500 Background: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy have a promising efficacy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet the period of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is undetermined. This phase II study compared the efficacy and safety of two cycles with three cycles of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy in resectable stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Methods: This randomized, open-label phase II trial recruited patients aged 18 or older with histologically confirmed, treatment-naïve, American Joint Committee on Cancer-defined stage IB-IIIA, resectable NSCLC. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to two or three cycles of neoadjuvant treatment with intravenous sintilimab (200 mg) plus carboplatin (area under curve 5) and nab-paclitaxel (260mg/m2, for squamous) or pemetrexed (500mg/m2, for non-squamous) on day 1 of three-week cycle. After surgical resection, patients received totally four doses of perioperative immunochemotherapy, followed by one-year sintilimab maintenance under patient decision. Randomisation was stratified by tumor PD-L1 expression (≥1% vs &lt; 1%). The primary endpoint was MPR rate. Secondary endpoints included complete pathology response (pCR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT04459611. Results: From 6/2020 to 9/2021, 60 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant treatment. The patient characteristics of both arms were well balanced. Among 55 patients with successful R0 resection, we observed a higher MPR rate (41.4%, 12/29) in three-cycle group compared with two-cycle group (26.9%, 7/26) (p = 0.260), meanwhile, pCR rate achieved 24.1% (7/29) and 19.2% (5/26) respectively (p = 0.660). Patients of squamous subtype generally achieved a statistically higher MPR rate (51.6%, 16/31) compared with the non-squamous subtype (12.5%, 3/24) (p = 0.002). In squamous subgroup, three cycles neoadjuvant treatment induced a MPR rate of 60% compared with 43.8% after two cycles treatment (p = 0.366).In the meantime, the MPR rate was 21.4% versus 0% in non-squamous subgroup, respectively (p = 0.239). The ORR showed no statistical difference between three-cycle group (55.2%, 16/29) and two-cycle (50%, 13/26) (p = 0.701). Patients were well-tolerated in both groups and 5% (3/60) experienced grade 3 immune related adverse events. Conclusions: It is the first randomized study comparing different treatment periods of immuno-chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Three cycles neoadjuvant treatment achieved a numerically higher MPR rate compared with two cycles. Patients with squamous lung cancer obtained a better MPR rate compared with non-squamous subtype. Clinical trial information: NCT04459611.

Choline Kinase α Inhibitors MN58b and RSM932A Enhances the Antitumor Response to Cisplatin in Lung Tumor Cells

Lung cancer is one of the main causes of death in developed countries, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most frequent type (80% of patients). In advanced NSCLC, platinum-based chemotherapy is the frontline palliative treatment, but less than 5% of patients achieve prolonged survival. Immunotherapy has recently been proposed as the standard of care (SoC) as either monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. The levels of expression of PD-L1 are the only predictive biomarkers for patient assessment. Although around 30% of patients receiving immunotherapy achieve 5-year survival, a significant number does not benefit from this novel therapeutic approach. Therefore, there is a need for novel strategies to improve clinical outcomes. The expression level of choline kinase α (ChoKα) is increased in a large number of human tumors, including NSCLC tumors, and constitutes an independent prognostic factor for early-stage NSCLC patients. Thus, ChoKα has been postulated as a new target drug in cancer therapy. The combination of cisplatin with novel targeted drugs such as choline kinase inhibitors may improve both the survival rates and the quality of life of NSCLC patients and may serve as the basis for the development of new therapeutic approaches. To that aim, we developed several in vitro and in vivo approaches to assess the antitumor activity of a novel combination regimen using cisplatin and ChoKα inhibitors. Our results suggest that a proper combination of specific inhibitors of the NSCLC prognostic factor ChoKα and platinum-based conventional chemotherapy might constitute a new, efficient treatment approach for NSCLC patients. This novel approach may help reduce the toxicity profile associated with cisplatin since, despite the advances in NSCLC management in recent years, the overall 5-year survival rate is still poor.

First-line immunotherapy or angiogenesis inhibitor combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertions: Real-world evidence from China.

Currently, survival benefit of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) is controversial, though it generally indicates poor response and activity. Compared with standard chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab, first-line chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins remains elusive and lacks real-world evidence. A retrospective real-world study was conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes of chemotherapy alone (C), chemotherapy plus ICI (C + I), or chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors (C + A) as first-line strategies for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins. Investigator-assessed response and survival outcomes were compared between subgroups. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis was conducted to reveal concomitant alterations and explore the molecular landscape of ex20ins. A total of 164 patients were screened, identifying 35 kinds of ex20ins, and 122 cases treated with C, C + I, and C + A were finally included in the first-line analysis. C + A achieved much better objective response rate (ORR, 38.1% vs. 18.2%) and significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit compared with C (median, 7.73 vs.5.93 months, HR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.90, p=0.014), and it showed similar ORR (38.1% vs. 40.0%), but higher disease control rate (DCR, 96.8% vs. 80.0%) and numerically longer median PFS (7.73 vs. 6.53 months, HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.44-1.56, p=0.30) than C + I. There was no PFS difference between C + I and C, despite of PD-L1 expression or tumor mutational burden. KEGG analysis revealed concomitant upregulation of PI3K/AKT signaling might mediate intrinsic resistance to ICI in ex20ins. First-line chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors might yield more survival benefits than chemotherapy alone for NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins, whereas, it suggests that chemotherapy in combination with ICI might not obtain a better survival benefit for this subset of patients. Activation of PI3K/AKT signaling might mediate intrinsic immunosuppression in NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins.

Neoadjuvant treatment in non-small cell lung cancer: New perspectives with the incorporation of immunotherapy.

The aim of neoadjuvant treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is to eliminate micrometastatic disease to facilitate surgical resection. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) in localised NSCLC has numerous advantages over other therapeutic modalities and is considered standard treatment in resectable disease. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improves long-term survival in advanced disease and has a better toxicity profile than conventional therapies. These immunotherapy agents (anti-PD1/PD-L1), administered with or without ChT, are currently being evaluated in the preoperative setting, with initial results showing better pathological response rates and more long-term benefits. Importantly, these drugs do not appear to increase the rate of severe adverse effects and/or postoperative complications. However, several questions still need to be resolved, including the identification of predictive biomarkers; comparative studies of immunotherapy alone vs combined treatment with ChT and/or radiotherapy; the optimal duration of treatment; the timing of surgery; the need for adjuvant treatment; appropriate radiologic evaluation and mediastinal staging; and the correlation between pathological response and survival outcomes. Here we review the current evidence for immunotherapy from a multidisciplinary perspective and discuss current and future controversies.

Osimertinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Series

Background: Evidence of osimertinib as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are currently lacking. This case series study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant osimertinib therapy followed by surgery for resectable NSCLC. Materials and methods: Patients with resectable NSCLC with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation who received osimertinib as neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery at our center were included. Demographic features, radiologic and pathological assessment of response, surgery-related details and complications, toxicity profiles, and prognostic outcomes were extracted. Results: A total of 13 patients were included in this study. The median age at the time of surgical resection was 57 years (interquartile range: 52–64 years), and eight (61.5%) patients were female. The objective response rate (ORR) was 69.2% (9/13), and the complete resection rate was 100%. The rates of pathologic downstaging and lymph node downstaging were 100% (13/13) and 66.7% (6/9), respectively. There were no perioperative deaths and only three (23.1%) patients had postoperative complications. Seven (53.8%) and 13 (100%) patients experienced grade 1 treatment-related adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities, respectively. No patients experienced drug withdrawal or surgical delays due to the adverse events. No patients showed grade 2 or worse toxicity profiles. One patient was lost to follow-up. The other 12 patients were alive and free of disease recurrence with a median follow-up time of 9.5 months. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant osimertinib therapy seemed to be safe and feasible for resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Future large prospective studies are warranted to confirm whether osimertinib as neoadjuvant therapy outperforms standard tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or chemotherapy for resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Final progression-free survival, interim overall survival, and biomarker analyses of CHOICE-01: A phase III study of toripalimab versus placebo in combination with first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK mutations

362936 Background: Toripalimab (anti–PD-1) in combination with chemotherapy showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the first-line treatment of advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed to identify correlative biomarkers for survival. Methods: Patients (465 patients) with treatment-naïve, advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK mutations were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive toripalimab 240 mg (309 patients) or placebo (156 patients) in combination with chemotherapy for 4-6 cycles, followed by maintenance of toripalimab or placebo plus standard care until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or completion of 2 years of treatment. Stratification factors included PD-L1 expression status, histology, and smoking status. The primary endpoint was PFS by investigator per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included PFS by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC), OS, and safety. Results: At the prespecified final PFS analysis (cutoff date Oct 31, 2021), a significant improvement in PFS as assessed by investigator was observed for the toripalimab arm over the placebo arm: HR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.39-0.61); two-sided p &lt; .0001; and median PFS 8.4 vs. 5.6 months. The 1-year PFS rates were 36.7% vs. 17.2%. PFS as assessed by BIRC was also significantly longer in the toripalimab arm. The improvements of PFS were observed across key subgroups, including histology and PD-L1 expression. At the interim OS analysis, the toripalimab arm had a significantly longer OS than the placebo arm: HR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.52-0.92); two-sided p = .0099; median OS not reached vs. 17.1 months. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs; 78.6% vs. 82.1%) was similar between the two arms. AEs leading to discontinuation of toripalimab/placebo (14.3% vs. 3.2%) and fatal AEs (5.5% vs. 2.6%) were more frequent in the toripalimab arm. WES results from 394 available patients revealed that patients with high tumor mutational burden (TMB; ≥ 10 mutations per million base pairs) were associated with significantly better PFS in the toripalimab arm over the placebo arm (median PFS 13.1 vs. 5.5 months; interaction p = .026). In addition, patients with mutations in the FAK-PI3K-Akt pathway or IL-7 signaling pathways achieved significantly better PFS and OS from the toripalimab chemotherapy combination (interaction p values ≤ .01). Conclusions: The addition of toripalimab to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC provided superior PFS and OS when compared to chemotherapy alone with a manageable safety profile. These results support the use of toripalimab with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT03856411.

Gender Differences and Their Effects on Survival Outcomes in Lung Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AimsProgrammed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have had a major impact on the approach to care of patients with lung cancer. An important issue that is not known is whether they benefit men and women the same. We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine if clinical response and survival are influenced by gender. Materials and methodsA PubMed search was carried out to identify all randomised controlled trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared with conventional chemotherapy in NSCLC. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed to assess overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) and whether there were differences in these outcomes between men and women. ResultsIn total, 12 studies with data for overall survival and 11 studies with data for PFS were included. Immunotherapy showed a statistically significant benefit over chemotherapy for overall survival (pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.65–0.81, P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (pooled hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval = 0.54–0.72, P < 0.001). We did not find a statistically significant difference between men and women in terms of overall survival (males versus females: pooled hazard ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval = 0.66–0.83 versus pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.63–0.82, P = 0.709) or progression-free survival (males versus females: pooled hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval = 0.53–0.75 versus pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.58–0.88, P = 0.372). ConclusionThis is the first systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effect of gender and response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in patients solely with NSCLC. We examined 9270 and 6193 patients in terms of overall survival and PFS, respectively. Although there are significant biological differences between men's and women's immune responses, we have shown that these drugs offer the same survival benefit in patients with NSCLC regardless of gender.

Osmundacetone modulates mitochondrial metabolism in non-small cell lung cancer cells by hijacking the glutamine/glutamate/α-KG metabolic axis

BackgroundOsmundacetone (OSC) is a bioactive phenolic compound isolated from Phellinus igniarius and that was shown to exert cytotoxic effects on cancer cells in our previous work. The antiproliferative impact of OSC on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the underlying mechanisms, however, have not been studied. PurposeThis study aimed to explore the antiproliferative effect of OSC on NSCLC cells and the mechanisms involved. MethodsCell viability, colony formation and cell cycle distribution were measured following exposure to OSC in vitro. The anticancer activity of OSC was also examined using a xenograft growth assay in vivo. Furthermore, serum metabolomics analysis by GC–MS was done to detect alterations in the metabolic profile. Next, expression of GLS1 and GLUD1, the key enzymes in glutamine metabolism, was evaluated using RT-PCR and western blot. α-KG and NADH metabolites were assessed by ELISA. Mitochondrial functions and morphology were evaluated using the JC-1 probe and transmission electron microscopy, respectively. The ATP production rate in mitochondria of cells with OSC treatment was determined using a Seahorse XFe24 Analyzer. ResultsOSC selectively reduced the proliferation of A549 and H460 cells. OSC triggered G2/M cell cycle arrest and decreased the cell clone formation. A mouse xenograft model revealed that OSC inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Findings of serum metabolomics analyses indicated that the anticancer function of OSC was related to disorders of glutamine metabolism. Such a speculation was further verified by the expression level of GLUD1, which was downregulated by OSC treatment. Concentrations of the related metabolites α-KG and NADH were reduced in response to OSC treatment. Moreover, OSC led to disorganization of the mitochondrial ultrastructure and a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential. OSC also decreased ATP production via oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) but did not affect glycolysis in NSCLC cells. ConclusionThe key role of OSC in mitochondrial energy metabolism in NSCLC cells is to suppress tumor development and cell proliferation downregulating GLUD1 to inhibit the glutamine/glutamate/α-KG metabolic axis and OXPHOS. It indicats that OSC might be a potential natural agent for personalized medicine and an anticancer metabolic modulator in NSCLC chemotherapy.

Distinct Immune Gene Programs Associated with Host Tumor Immunity, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, and Chemoimmunotherapy in Resectable NSCLC.

Our understanding of the immunopathology of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still limited. Here, we explore immune programs that inform of tumor immunity and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in localized NSCLC. Targeted immune gene sequencing using the HTG Precision Immuno-Oncology panel was performed in localized NSCLCs from three cohorts based on treatment: naïve (n = 190), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 38), and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (n = 21). Tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) phenotypes were based on the location of CD8+ T cells (inflamed, cold, excluded), tumoral PD-L1 expression (<1% and ≥1%), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL). Immune programs and signatures were statistically analyzed on the basis of tumoral PD-L1 expression, immune phenotypes, and pathologic response and were cross-compared across the three cohorts. PD-L1-positive tumors exhibited increased signature scores for various lymphoid and myeloid cell subsets (P < 0.05). TIME phenotypes exhibited disparate frequencies by stage, PD-L1 expression, and mutational burden. Inflamed and PD-L1+/TILs+ NSCLCs displayed overall significantly heightened levels of immune signatures, with the excluded group representing an intermediate state. A cytotoxic T-cell signature was associated with favorable survival in neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated NSCLCs (P < 0.05). Pathologic response to chemoimmunotherapy was positively associated with higher expression of genes involved in immune activation, chemotaxis, as well as T and natural killer cells (P < 0.05 for all). Among the three cohorts, chemoimmunotherapy-treated NSCLCs exhibited the highest scores for various immune cell subsets including T effector and B cells (P < 0.05). Our findings highlight immune gene programs that may underlie host tumor immunity and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in resectable NSCLC.

Efficacy of platinum agents for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study

BackgroundPlatinum-based chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy for relapsed NSCLC following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of platinum-doublet chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy who were registered in a nationwide registry NSCLC database. Patients were divided into the platinum-doublet chemotherapy (platinum) group and single-agent chemotherapy (non-platinum) group based on the type of second-line chemotherapy.ResultsThe platinum group (n = 119) showed significantly better overall survival (OS) than the non-platinum group (n = 201) (median OS: 21.5 vs. 10.5 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–0.73, p < 0.001). OS from the beginning of chemoradiotherapy was also significantly better in the platinum group than in the non-platinum group (median OS: 34.9 vs. 21.8 months, HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43–0.79, p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, platinum-doublet chemotherapy as second-line therapy, female sex, clinical stage IIIA, and duration of ≥ 8.6 months from the beginning of first-line therapy to the beginning of second-line therapy were associated with significantly better OS.ConclusionPlatinum-doublet chemotherapy as a second-line therapy may prolong survival in unresectable stage III NSCLC patients following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. Thus, re-administration of platinum agents may be a promising treatment for unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with platinum-based chemoradiotherapy.

Metformin Combining PD-1 Inhibitor Enhanced Anti-Tumor Efficacy in STK11 Mutant Lung Cancer Through AXIN-1-Dependent Inhibition of STING Ubiquitination.

Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with STK11 mutation showed primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The glucose-lowering drug metformin exerted anti-cancer effect and enhanced efficacy of chemotherapy in NSCLC with KRAS/STK11 co-mutation, yet it is unknown whether metformin may enhance ICI efficacy in STK11 mutant NSCLC. Methods: We studied the impact of metformin on ICI efficacy in STK11 mutant NSCLC in vitro and in vivo using colony formation assay, cell viability assay, Ki67 staining, ELISA, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout, and animal experiments. Results: Through colony formation assay, Ki67 incorporation assay, and CCK-8 assay, we found that metformin significantly enhanced the killing of H460 cells and A549 cells by T cells. In NOD-SCID xenografts, metformin in combination with PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab effectively decreased tumor growth and increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells. Metformin enhanced stabilization of STING and activation of its downstream signaling pathway. siRNA-mediated knockdown of STING abolished the effect of metformin on T cell-mediated killing of tumor cells. Next, we found that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of the scaffold protein AXIN-1 abolished the effect of metformin on T cell-mediated killing and STING stabilization. Immunoprecipitation and confocal macroscopy revealed that metformin enhanced the interaction and colocalization between AXIN-1 and STING. Protein-protein interaction modeling indicated that AXIN-1 may directly bind to STING at its K150 site. Next, we found that metformin decreased K48-linked ubiquitination of STING and inhibited the interaction of E3-ligand RNF5 and STING. Moreover, in AXIN-1 −/− H460 cells, metformin failed to alter the interaction of RNF5 and STING. Conclusion: Metformin combining PD-1 inhibitor enhanced anti-tumor efficacy in STK11 mutant lung cancer through inhibition of RNF5-mediated K48-linked ubiquitination of STING, which was dependent on AXIN-1.