Chemoradiotherapy Group Research Articles

More May Not Be Better: Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes Following Induction Chemotherapy Plus Chemoradiation and Chemoradiation Alone for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

The oncologic benefit of induction chemotherapy (IC) before chemoradiation (CRT) compared to CRT alone for locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is not well defined. We hypothesized that IC with CRT would improve survival and pathologic complete response rate compared to CRT alone. A retrospective review of patients with biopsy proven esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative CRT and IC + CRT and surgical resection from 2007 to 2023 at a single institution was performed. First order outcomes were overall survival and pathologic complete response rate; secondary outcomes included disease-free survival and distant metastasis failure. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on baseline characteristics and tumor-specific features. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis. Of 205 patients that met inclusion criteria, 76 (38%) patients underwent IC + CRT. There were no significant differences in demographic or tumor-specific characteristics between the two cohorts. There were no differences in the median overall survival between CRT and IC + CRT groups (47 months vs. not reached, p = 0.194). The rate of pathologic complete response in the overall cohort was 22%; IC + CRT was not associated with higher complete tumor response than CRT alone (20% vs. 23%, p = 0.557). There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes between the two treatment paradigms. We could not detect added oncologic benefit in survival or pathologic complete response with IC over CRT alone for resectable esophageal and GEJ cancer. Biomarker driven prospective studies exploring the optimal perioperative treatment regimens are warranted.

Clinical efficacy of Endostar continuous infusion combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using Endostar continuous infusion for treating oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A total of 62 patients with oesophageal carcinoma were divided into three groups: the Endostar continuous infusion group (n = 27), the Endostar intravenous drip group (n = 21) and the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group (n = 14). All patients underwent oesophageal radiotherapy (56-60 Gy) alongside concurrent chemotherapy (4 mg of raltitrexed +100 mg of oxaliplatin, two cycles). In the Endostar continuous infusion group, 210 mg of Endostar was administered via infusion once every 3 weeks for 72 h, repeated for two cycles. The Endostar intravenous drip group received a dosage of 15 mg/day of Endostar, administered once daily for 14 days, repeated for two cycles. The objective response rate (ORR) (complete remission + partial remission), progression-free survival (PFS), 2-year overall survival (2y-OS) and adverse reactions were observed. In the Endostar continuous infusion, intravenous drip and concurrent chemoradiotherapy groups, the ORR was 100, 95.2 and 78.6%, respectively (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the continuous infusion and concurrent chemoradiotherapy groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the continuous infusion and intravenous drip groups or the intravenous drip and concurrent chemoradiotherapy groups (p > 0.05). The continuous infusion and intravenous drip groups had higher PFS rates than the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group (p < 0.05). Regarding the 2y-OS rate, no statistically significant difference was observed among the three groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in adverse reactions among the groups (p > 0.05). Concurrent chemotherapy based on endostatin is effective and safe in the treatment of OSCC. Continuous 3-day Endostar infusion treatment can significantly enhance both short-and long-term therapy efficacy in patients while maintaining a high level of safety.

Vulvar Skin Metastasis From Cervical Adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Cervical cancer stands as one of the most common gynecologic malignancies in developing countries; however, cutaneous metastasis from cervical cancer is a rare occurrence. In this study, we present a case involving a 44-year-old woman diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIA gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma. Two years later, after undergoing radical hysterectomy and chemoradiation therapy, she exhibited cutaneous metastasis in the vulvar region.

Abrasive challenge effects on enamel and dentin from irradiated human teeth: an in vitro study.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on the wear and surface roughness of in vitro irradiated human enamel and dentin subjected to abrasive challenge. Enamel and dentin specimens (n = 42) were prepared from teeth donated by healthy patients and those with head and neck cancer who had received radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The specimens were categorized into three groups: control, RT, and CRT (n = 14 per group for both enamel and dentin). These samples were subjected to an in vitro abrasive experiment using a brushing machine, followed by wear and surface roughness assessments with a confocal laser scanning microscope conducted before and after the abrasive challenge, considering both exposed and non-exposed areas. Statistical analysis used Shapiro-Wilk tests for normality, Wilcoxon tests for comparing two means, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. A significance level of 5% was adopted. In enamel specimens, wear profile values ​​of CRT and RT groups were not different from the control (p > 0.05). The RT group presents lower step values than the CRT and control groups (p < 0.001). No significant difference in final surface roughness was observed in all groups (p > 0.05). In dentin specimens, no significant difference in wear profile and step was observed in all groups (p > 0.05). However, CRT and RT groups present higher values in final surface roughness (p < 0.001). The exposure to ionizing radiation (associated or not to chemotherapy) influenced the surface roughness of dentin and the wear (step) of enamel after the in vitro abrasive challenge.Trial registration: Ethical procedures were approved by the FORP/USP Research Ethics Committee (CAAE: 61308416.4.0000.5419), and Hospital do Câncer de Barretos/Fundação Pio XII (CAAE: 61308416.4.3001.5437).

Induction chemotherapy followed by standard chemoradiotherapy versus standard chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (GCIG INTERLACE): an international, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial

Locally advanced cervical cancer is treated with chemoradiotherapy (standard of care), but many patients still relapse and die from metastatic disease. We investigated chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy to determine whether induction chemotherapy improves both progression-free survival and overall survival. The INTERLACE trial was a multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial done at 32 medical centres in Brazil, India, Italy, Mexico, and the UK. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO 2008 stage IB1 disease with nodal involvement, or stage IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIB, or IVA disease) were randomly assigned (1:1), by minimisation, using a central electronic system, to standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (once-a-week intravenous cisplatin 40 mg/m2 for 5 weeks with 45·0-50·4 Gy external beam radiotherapy delivered in 20-28 fractions plus brachytherapy to achieve a minimum total 2 Gy equivalent dose of 78-86 Gy) alone or induction chemotherapy (once-a-week intravenous carboplatin area under the receiver operator curve 2 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for 6 weeks) followed by standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. Stratification factors were recruiting site, stage, nodal status, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy, age, tumour size, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival within the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01566240, and EUDRACT, 2011-001300-35. Between Nov 8, 2012, and Nov 17, 2022, 500 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the chemoradiotherapy alone group (n=250) or the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group. Of 500 patients, 354 (70%) had stage IIB disease and 56 (11%) stage IIIB disease. Pelvic lymph nodes were positive in 215 (43%) patients. 230 (92%) patients who received induction chemotherapy had at least five cycles. Median interval between induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy was 7 days. Four or more cycles of cisplatin were given to 212 (85%) participants in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group and to 224 (90%) of participants in the chemoradiotherapy alone group. 462 (92%) participants received external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy with a median overall treatment time of 45 days. After a median follow-up of 67 months, 5-year progression-free survival rates were 72% in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group and 64% in the chemoradiotherapy alone group with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·65 (95% CI 0·46-0·91, p=0·013). 5-year overall survival rates were 80% in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group and 72% in the chemoradiotherapy alone group, with an HR of 0·60 (95% CI 0·40-0·91, p=0·015). Grade 3 or greater adverse events were reported in 147 (59%) of 250 individuals in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group versus 120 (48%) of 250 individuals in the chemoradiotherapy alone group. Short-course induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy significantly improves survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Cancer Research UK and University College London-University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following R1 Resection After Either Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy Alone

IntroductionTotal neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved long-term outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, long-term outcomes have not been investigated for patients with incomplete (R1) resection separately. This study investigates overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local and distant recurrence rates in patients with R1 resection after preoperative treatment with ICT and CRT or CRT. Patients and methodsFrom the NORD database 689 patients with LARC who received treatment between 2006 and 2017 were screened for inclusion. All patients with R1 resection were included. ICT consisted of at least 1 cycle of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and was followed by radiotherapy concomitant with capecitabine. ResultsAmong 46 patients with R1 resection, 27 (59%) received both ICT and CRT, and 19 (41%) patients received CRT. The 5-year OS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 37% (95% CI, 15%-59%) (CRT) (P = .25) and 5-year DFS was 44% (95% CI, 26%-63%) (ICT + CRT) versus 32% (95% CI, 11%-53%) (CRT) (P = .22). The local recurrence rates showed a small nonstatistical significant difference in local control in the ICT group: 15% compared to 26% in the CRT group (P = .22). Distant recurrence rates were similar: 41% (ICT + CRT) versus 47% (CRT) (P = .48). ConclusionThere was no significant difference in OS, DFS or local and distant recurrence rates between patients who received ICT + CRT versus patients who received CRT only.

Inclusion of Surgery in Multimodality Treatment is Predictive of Better Survival in Stage IIIA Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: An Inverse Probability Treatment-Weighting Analysis

IntroductionStage IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are treated with surgical based multimodality approach or definitive chemoradiation therapy plus durvalumab consolidation. It is not clear whether surgery-based multimodality therapy has any survival advantage over definitive chemoradiation plus immunotherapy consolidation. MethodNational Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify NSCLC patients at stage IIIA (AJCC8, T3N1/T4N0-1 or T1N2/T2N2) who are treated with surgery-based multimodality approach or definitive chemoradiation plus durvalumab. Survival between groups were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results were independently confirmed by Landmark Inverse and Clone Censor Weight analyses to address immortal time bias. ResultsFrom 2017 to 2019, 24,170 patients are identified as potentially resectable stage IIIA (T3N1, T4N0-1, T1N2/T2N2). Among them, 2,615 (10.8%) received surgery-based multimodality therapy and 2,985 (12.4%) received definitive chemoradiation plus durvalumab. Surgery based multimodality approach had significant survival advantage over definitive chemoradiation plus durvalumab (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.69-0.79, P < .001). The median overall survival (mOS) for the definitive chemoradiation plus durvalumab group was 48.59 m whereas mOS was not reached for surgery-based multimodality group. This trend persisted in both N2 negative and positive tumors. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was just as effective as adjuvant chemotherapy and delay of immunotherapy consolidation to 12 weeks after initiation of chemoradiation did not negatively affect survival outcome. ConclusionFor stage IIIA NSCLC patients, surgery-based multimodality treatment outperformed chemoradiation plus durvalumab in survival. DisclosureZH reports grant from Bayer Inc, BMS, Merck, AMG, Legend biotech, BeiGene, Novartis and OncC4. No disclosure from all other authors.

Clinical outcomes and synergistic effect between radiotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world study

BackgroundPatients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) experience significant therapeutic challenges and limited survival rates. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of combining immunotherapy (IT) with chemotherapy (CT) for treating ES-SCLC and to explore the synergistic effect between radiotherapy (RT) and IT.MethodsThis retrospective analysis examined patients with ES-SCLC who received treatment at three centers. Furthermore, propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was conducted. The Kaplan‒Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare the survival outcomes.ResultsA total of 257 eligible patients with ES-SCLC were included in the analysis. Among all patients, the median overall survival (mOS) was 18.0 m in the chemoimmunotherapy (CT + IT) group and 15.7 m in the CT group (p = 0.208). The median real-world progression-free survival (mrwPFS) was 7.7 m and 6.8 m (p = 0.043) in the CT + IT and CT group, respectively. Moreover, the mOS was 22.0 m in the chemoradiotherapy (CT + RT) group and 13.6 m in the CT group (p < 0.001). The mrwPFS was 7.4 m and 6.0 m (p = 0.175) in the CT + RT group and CT group, respectively. The multivariate analyses revealed that sex, liver metastasis and RT were independent prognostic factors for OS (p < 0.05), while liver metastasis and IT were found to be independent predictive factors of real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) (p < 0.05). After PSM, the mOS was 23.2 m in the CT + IT group and 13.0 m in the CT group (p = 0.008). The mrwPFS was 7.3 m and 6.2 m (p = 0.096) in the CT + IT group and the CT group, respectively. Moreover, the mOS was 21.4 m in the CT + RT group and 12.5 m in the CT group (p < 0.001). The mrwPFS was 7.3 m and 5.2 m (p = 0.220) in the CT + RT group and the CT group, respectively. Additionally, our study revealed that in the PD-1 group, RT significantly improved patient survival (36.0 m vs. 15.8 m, p = 0.041).ConclusionAn increasing number of treatment options are being explored for ES-SCLC, and CT is the cornerstone of treatment for this disease. Combining CT with IT and RT has demonstrated remarkable efficacy and excellent safety profiles, and such treatments are worthy of further exploration.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Real-World Study.

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a promising approach for managing locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), aiming to enhance resectability, increase pathological complete response (pCR), improve treatment compliance, survival, and sphincter preservation. This study compares the clinical outcomes of TNT, with either induction or consolidation chemotherapy, to those of the standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In this retrospective multi-institutional study, patients with stage II-III LARC who underwent CRT or TNT from seven oncology centers between 2021 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The TNT group was categorized into induction or consolidation groups based on the sequence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Clinical and pathological data and treatment outcomes, including pCR, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS), were analyzed. Among the 276 patients, 105 received CRT and 171 underwent TNT. The TNT group showed significantly higher pCR (21.8% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001) and lower lymphatic (26.3% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.009), vascular (15.8% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.002), and perineural invasion rates (20.3% vs. 37.6%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, 16.9% of TNT patients opted for non-operative management (NOM), compared to 0.9% in the CRT group (p < 0.001). The median interval between the end of radiotherapy and surgery was longer in the TNT group (17.6 weeks vs. 8.8 weeks, p < 0.001). The 3-year EFS was 58.3% for CRT and 71.1% for TNT (p = 0.06). TNT is associated with higher pCR, lower lymphatic and vascular invasion rates, and higher rates of NOM compared to CRT. This supports the use of TNT as a viable treatment strategy for LARC, offering potential benefits in quality of life.

Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy for locoregional recurrence of completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ056).

Locoregional recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after complete resection lacks standard treatment. Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or CRT alone is often selected in daily clinical practice for patients with locoregional recurrence; however, the therapeutic efficacy of these treatments remains unclear, and we aimed to assess this. This retrospective observational study used data from patients with NSCLC diagnosed with locoregional recurrence after complete resection who subsequently underwent concurrent CRT followed by durvalumab (CRT-D group) or CRT alone (CRT group). We employed propensity score analysis with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for various confounders and evaluate efficacy in the CRT-D group. After IPTW adjustment, the CRT-D group contained 119 patients (64.7% male; 69.7% adenocarcinoma), and the CRT group contained 111 patients (60.5% male; 73.4% adenocarcinoma). Their mean ages were 66 and 65 years, respectively. The IPTW-adjusted median progression-free survival was 25.4 and 11.5 months for the CRT-D and CRT groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.64); the median overall survival was not reached in either group favoring CRT-D (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.99). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in 48.8% of patients during CRT, 10.7% after initiating durvalumab maintenance therapy in the CRT-D group, and 57.3% in the CRT group. Overall, the sequential approach of CRT followed by durvalumab is a promising treatment strategy for locoregional recurrence of NSCLC after complete resection.

Efficacy and safety of MR-guided adaptive simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy to primary lesions and positive lymph nodes in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomized controlled phase III trial

BackgroundIn locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), optimizing neoadjuvant strategies, including the addition of concurrent chemotherapy and dose escalation of radiotherapy, is essential to improve tumor regression and subsequent implementation of anal preservation strategies. Currently, dose escalation studies in rectal cancer have focused on the primary lesions. However, a common source of recurrence in LARC is the metastasis of cancer cells to the proximal lymph nodes. In our trial, we implement simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to both primary lesions and positive lymph nodes in the experimental group based on magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART), which allows for more precise (and consequently intense) targeting while sparing neighboring healthy tissue. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRgART dose escalation to both primary lesions and positive lymph nodes, in comparison with the conventional radiotherapy of long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT) group, in the neoadjuvant treatment of LARC.MethodsThis is a multi-center, randomized, controlled phase III trial (NCT06246344). 128 patients with LARC (cT3-4/N+) will be enrolled. During LCCRT, patients will be randomized to receive either MRgART with SIB (60–65 Gy in 25–28 fractions to primary lesions and positive lymph nodes; 50–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions to the pelvis) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (50–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions). Both groups will receive concurrent chemotherapy with capecitabine and consolidation chemotherapy of either two cycles of CAPEOX or three cycles of FOLFOX between radiotherapy and surgery. The primary endpoints are pathological complete response (pCR) rate and surgical difficulty, while the secondary endpoints are clinical complete response (cCR) rate, 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates, acute and late toxicity and quality of life.DiscussionSince dose escalation of both primary lesions and positive nodes in LARC is rare, we propose conducting a phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SIB for both primary lesions and positive nodes in LARC based on MRgART.Trial registrationThe study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the Identifier: NCT06246344 (Registered 7th Feb 2024).

Surgical Outcomes Following Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

To assess overall survival (OS), compare the effects of neoadjuvant treatment, and describe surgical outcomes for patients undergoing pancreatic resection following chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We approach BR/LA PDAC using chemotherapy followed by selective CRT to the primary site of disease where either the surgical margin remains radiologically threatened following chemotherapy or as a further downstaging treatment. Retrospective study of patients between December 2005 and June 2023 at the Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom. A total of 54 patients were included. The OS between R1 and R0 patients was significantly different: 7.5 versus 23 versus 42 versus 51 months for R1 chemo, R1 chemo and CRT, R0 chemo and R0 chemo, and CRT groups, respectively, P < 0.001. Similarly, 9 versus 18 versus 42 versus 41 months for N1 chemo, N1 chemo and CRT, N0 chemo and N0 chemo, and CRT groups, respectively, P = 0.0026. Multivariable Cox regression model demonstrated that perineural invasion (hazard ratio: 2.88, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-7.81; P = 0.038) and perivascular invasion (PVI) (HR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.24-6.13; P = 0.013) were associated with significantly worse OS. Chemo and CRT conferred OS benefit compared to chemo only (7 vs 23 months, P = 0.004) in PVI-positive patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CRT compared to chemotherapy alone for resected BD and LA PDAC was demonstrated to significantly improve median OS, in particular, in patients with R1 resection margins, ypN1 nodal status, and perivascular invasion.

Real-World Analysis of Survival and Treatment Efficacy in Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) poses a significant clinical challenge, with low survival rates despite advances in therapy. The lack of a standardised treatment approach complicates patient management. This study utilises real-world data from Guy's Thoracic Cancer Database to analyse patient outcomes, identify key predictors of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and address the limitations of randomised controlled trials. This observational, single-centre, non-randomised study analysed 142 patients diagnosed with clinical and pathological T1/2 N2 NSCLC who received curative treatment from 2015 to 2021. Patients were categorised into three groups: Group A (30 patients) underwent surgery for clinical N2 disease, Group B (54 patients) had unsuspected N2 disease discovered during surgery, and Group C (58 patients) received radical chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone (CRT/RT) for clinical N2 disease. Data on demographics, treatment types, recurrence, and survival rates were analysed. The median OS for the cohort was 31 months, with 2-year and 5-year OS rates of 60% and 30%, respectively. Group A had a median OS of 32 months, Group B 36 months, and Group C 25 months. The median DFS was 18 months overall, with Group A at 16 months, Group B at 22 months, and Group C at 17 months. Significant predictors of OS included ECOG performance status, lymphovascular invasion, and histology. No significant differences in OS were found between treatment groups (p = 0.99). This study highlights the complexity and diversity of Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC, with no single superior treatment strategy identified. The findings underscore the necessity for personalised treatment approaches and multidisciplinary decision-making. Future research should focus on integrating newer therapeutic modalities and conducting multi-centre trials to refine treatment strategies. Collaboration and ongoing data collection are crucial for improving personalised treatment plans and survival outcomes for Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients.

Low to intermediate grade lung neuroendocrine tumours. A single centre real world experience

IntroductionLung neuroendocrine tumours (LNETs) are a rare heterogenous group of tumours whose incidence has been increasing. We investigated the diagnosis, treatment, and survival patterns of patients with low to intermediate grade LNETs. MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients with low to intermediate grade LNETs, treated at a Canadian tertiary-level cancer centre was performed. ResultsWe identified 59 patients. Most were G1or G2 and well or moderately differentiated. Forty-seven patients presented with local or locally advanced disease, of which 57.4 % received curative intent surgery. The rest were treated with definitive radiation, radical chemoradiation with platinum and etoposide, palliative chemotherapy with doxorubicin, or supportive care. The five-year overall survival (OS) for those treated surgically was 83 % versus 44 % in the non-surgical group. Metastatic disease was seen in 24/59 patients, with a five-year OS in patients with stage IV disease of 39 %. Of those with advanced or unresectable disease (n = 32), 21 received palliative systemic treatment with up to three lines of therapy. First-line treatment was most commonly chemotherapy with platinum/etoposide combination or somatostatin analogue therapy. Second-line treatment involved chemotherapy or targeted everolimus. PRRT was used once as a first-line and once as second-line therapy. Third-line included lanreotide or chemotherapy with capecitabine/temozolomide combination. ConclusionOverall, patients with surgically resectable disease had a good five-year OS. However, inoperable or more advanced disease was associated with a poorer OS. Despite many treatment options, the sequence of treatments is poorly established. This highlights the need for further development and dissemination of evidence-based guidelines for LNET patients.

A retrospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy in older patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with limited-disease small cell lung cancer: insights from two institutions and review of the literature.

The standard treatment for patients in good general condition with limited-disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) is concurrent platinum/etoposide chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). However, the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in older patients with LD-SCLC has not been fully explored; moreover, the optimal treatment for this patient group remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of CRT in older patients with LD-SCLC. From April 2007 to June 2021, consecutive older patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with stage I to III SCLC who received concurrent or sequential CRT at two institutions were retrospectively evaluated for efficacy and toxicity of CRT. A total of 32 older patients underwent concurrent (n = 19) or sequential (n = 13) CRT for LD-SCLC. The median ages of the patients in the concurrent and sequential CRT groups were 77 (range: 75-81) years and 79 (range: 76-92) years, respectively. The median number of chemotherapeutic treatment cycles was four (range, 1-5), and the response rate was 96.9% in all patients (94.7% in concurrent and 100% in sequential CRT groups). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) for all patients were 11.9 and 21.1 months, respectively. The median PFS was 13.0 and 9.0 months in the concurrent CRT and sequential CRT groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.67). The median OS from the initiation of CRT was 19.2 and 23.5 months in the concurrent and sequential CRT groups, respectively (p = 0.46). The frequencies of Grade ≥ 3 hematological adverse events were as follows: decreased white blood cell count, 20/32 (62.5%); decreased neutrophil count, 23/32 (71.9%); anemia, 6/32 (18.8%); decreased platelet count, 7/32 (21.9%); and febrile neutropenia, 3/32 (9.4%). Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient from each group. Although hematological toxicities, particularly reduced neutrophil count, were severe, CRT showed favorable efficacy in both concurrent and sequential CRT groups. However, concurrent CRT may not be feasible for all older patients with LD-SCLC; accordingly, sequential CRT may be considered as a treatment of choice for these patients. Further prospective trials are warranted to identify optimal treatment strategies for this patient group.

Effectiveness of multi-disciplinary team management on 5-year overall survival for patients with stage III lung cancer.

Stage III lung cancer (LC) represents a heterogeneous group of diseases, and the optimal management is still a matter of debate. To date, only a few studies have assessed the role of multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion in impacting survival of stage III LC. Hence, we aimed to reported the impact of the implementation of MDT discussion on long-term survival of stage III LC patients. This is a retrospective, observational, single-centre cohort study evaluating data of consecutive patients with a clinical and pathological diagnosis of stage III LC treated before [2005-2011] and after [2012-2020] the implementation of MDT. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). A total of 983 patients were enrolled with stage III LC, 411 (41.8%) pre-MDT and 572 (58.2%) post-MDT. The 5-year OS rates were 25.3% for the pre-MDT cohort and 33.9% for the post-MDT cohort (P=0.0008). Resected patients (n=670), who underwent trimodality therapy achieved a higher 5-year OS in both pre-MDT and post-MDT groups. An increased 5-year OS was observed in patients who underwent systemic therapy, from 28.2% in pre-MDT to 40.2% in post-MDT cohorts. In non-resected patients, there was an increased in 5-year OS in both systemic and chemoradiotherapy groups. The implementation of an MDT increased the 5-year OS in both resected and non-resected stage III LC patients. Implementing MDT might be useful in improving the management of therapy with less invasive local and surgical strategies personalized for each LC patient.

2182: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer.

2182: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Evaluating coronary arteries and predicting MACEs using CCTA in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy

BackgroundWhether coronary computed-tomography angiography (CCTA) can detect cancer treatment-related impairments of coronary artery and predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (CHT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is unclear. ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate coronary arteries using CCTA parameters and explore the association of these parameters with MACEs in patients with lung cancer receiving CHT or CRT. Materials and methodsThis study retrospectively collected data from 697 lung cancer patients who received CHT or CRT and underwent CCTA examination within 2 weeks before or after treatment from June 2013 to May 2019. The patients were divided into CHT and CRT group, and for the control group, the propensity score matching (PSM) was used and 125 participants without carcinoma with a single CCTA examination were included. CCTA parameters, assessed using artificial intelligence software, were compared across different groups (control vs. CHT & CRT; CHT vs. CRT). We analyzed associations between CCTA parameters and MACEs using a Cox-regression model and Kaplan–Meier curves to compare MACE-free survival rates. ResultsBefore CHT or CRT, compared with the control group, in CHT&CRT group we observed higher fat attenuation index (FAI), coronary-artery calcium (CAC) score, CAD-RADS classification, stenosis severity and lower computed-tomography fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR; all P<0.05). After treatment, the CT-FFR decreased and the FAI increased; simultaneously, we observed a lower CT-FFR and higher FAI (all P<0.05) in the CRT than in the CHT group. Among the 146 cases developed MACEs, lower CT-FFR and higher FAI values were found compared with the non-MACE group (all P<0.05), and CT-FFR and FAI before treatment were associated with MACEs. ConclusionCancer treatment-related impairments of coronary arteries could be identified using CT-FFR and FAI. Before treatment, these parameters were associated with MACEs in lung cancer patients receiving CHT or CRT.

Effect of Chemoradiotherapy on Locoregional Recurrence After Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for isolated locoregional recurrence after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Twenty-eight patients who had isolated locoregional recurrence after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer between 2007 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. We investigated the effect of the treatment method [radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy)] on progression-free survival (PFS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS). The median disease-free survival was 16.1 months (range=4.7-47.1 months). Five patients received radiotherapy and 21 patients received chemoradiotherapy [radiotherapy concurrent with gemcitabine (GEM) or S-1] for locoregional recurrence. All patients except one patient with interstitial pneumonia were treated with salvage chemotherapy after irradiation. The median PFS rates of the radiotherapy group and the chemoradiotherapy group were 2.8 months (range=1.5-5.4 months) and 16.8 months (range=2.7-42.8 months), respectively. The median PRS rates were 23.7 months (range=8.1-26.4 months) for the radiotherapy group and 26.2 months (range=6.0-64.7 months) for the chemoradiotherapy group. Multivariate analysis identified radiotherapy [hazard ratio (HR)=12.2, 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.29-45.6, p<0.001] and serum DUPAN-2 >150 U/ml (HR=2.90, 95%CI=1.22-6.93, p=0.02) as independent predictors of PFS, and UICC TNM Stage ≥III (HR=3.23, 95%CI=1.17-8.96, p=0.02) and modified Glasgow prognostic score before the treatment for the recurrence 1 or 2 (HR=3.05, 95%CI=1.15-8.08, p=0.03) as independent predictors of PRS. Chemoradiotherapy for isolated locoregional recurrence after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer could suppress re-recurrence more effectively than radiotherapy.

Carcinoma esophagus with small bowel metastasis: a case report with review of literature.

Small intestinal metastasis is extremely rare and only 13 cases have been reported till date and almost all such patients have presented with intestinal obstruction. The 5-year overall survival for metastatic esophageal cancer is as low as 5% while the patients with small intestinal metastasis have a median survival of only 3months (range 1-12months) despite undergoing radical resection of the small bowel. We present a case of a male in his 50's who presented with difficulty in swallowing for 4months. On evaluation, he was found to have squamous cell carcinoma in the mid thoracic esophagus. He underwent radical chemo-radiation up to 60Gy in 25 fractions over 5weeks. One week after completion of treatment he presented with ileal obstruction and omental nodules and surgical resection and evaluation of the respective ileal segment and omental biopsy revealed a metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. The patient expired 3months post-surgery. Carcinoma esophagus with small bowel metastasis has a very grave prognosis that patients rarely survive beyond 1year despite undergoing resection. Hence it is imperative to consider a small bowel metastasis when such patients present with clinical features of intestinal obstruction for early diagnosis and aggressive management.