This work evaluates the use of transfer of classification models for identifying adulteration of extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) samples involving, separately, two analytical techniques: fluorescence spectroscopy and digital imaging. The chemometric procedures, including development of classification models and application of classification transfer methods, were performed individually for each analytical technique. Methods of direct standardization (DS) and piecewise direct standardization (PDS) were applied to transfer samples sets in order to estimate an adjustment function and apply it to a samples set measured by the secondary instrument. For purposes of comparison, classification models were built based on linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with previous selection of variables by the successive projections algorithm (SPA), and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). The performance of the classification models was evaluated according to the number of errors and correct classification rate (CCR) for the prediction set measured by the secondary instrument. Before standardization, SPA-LDA and PLS-DA models achieved the same CCR using two analytical techniques: 54% for fluorescence emission spectra and 47% for histograms of digital images. After the standardization, a substantial increase of the CCR was observed. For the SPA-LDA models, a CCR of 88% was obtained for the fluorescence emission spectra and 82% for the histograms of the digital images. The PLS-DA classification models reached 85% and 76% of CCR for the fluorescence and imaging data, respectively, after standardization. These results demonstrate the efficiency of standardization procedures applied to multivariate classification models developed from fluorescence spectroscopy and digital images.