The Myth of the Chemical Cure: A Critique of Psychiatric Drug Treatment . Joanna Moncrieff. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, 278 pp., $95.00. In the gloomiest of days during the American Revolution when George Washington's soldiers were enduring a cold, poorly clothed, and hungry winter at Valley Forge in December 1776, Tom Paine wrote, "These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country." There is something of a gloom hanging over the revolution against involuntary, biological psychiatry. Like the British Empire at the time of American's War of Independence, organized psychiatry and the drug companies have all the money, all the power, and most of the big victories. What does the opposition to modern psychiatry have on its side? What armaments are in the hands of those few who stand up for independence from oppressive and irrational biological psychiatry? We have the scientific truth and right principles, at this point spoken by a few undaunted, courageous truth speakers. Joanna Moncrieff is one of these few truth speakers. I should begin with a disclosure of conflict of interest. Joanna Moncrieff and I get together on occasion at professional meetings, we've shared a couple of speech platforms in London, and I like her and respect her very much. We correspond occasionally. She is a board member of the International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology, the organization I founded decades ago. If she didn't live on that island (England) so far away, I'm sure we'd know each other better. So I was prepared to like her book and maybe, unconsciously, to be generous toward her. Why generous? Because long ago I learned to mute my disappointment with my colleagues in psychiatry-even the ones I like. No disappointment here! Dr. Moncrieff's book impressed me with its scientific precision, its incisiveness, its honesty, and its courage. She masterfully weaves together science and philosophy. Although written from a scientific perspective, the prose is incisive. She writes with a rare determination to make herself clear and accomplishes her aim with easily readable prose. She does not waffle about her conclusions as one might expect by a psychiatrist with academic credentials and appointments. The Myth of the Chemical Cure: A Critique of Psychiatric Drug Treatments delivers what is says it will. Dr. Moncrieff sets her observations within two alternative models of explanations. One is biological model, which she calls the disease-centered model. Its first two premises are "Drugs help an abnormal brain state" and "Therapeutic effects of the drugs derived from their effects on presumed disease pathology." The paradigm, of course, is insulin for diabetes. Dr. Moncrieff proposes and ultimately defends a second paradigm, the drug-centered model. This drug-centered model begins by understanding how drugs really work. Its first two premises are "Drugs create an abnormal brain state" and "Therapeutic effects derived from the impact of the drug-induced state on behavioral and emotional problems." The model is alcohol for anxiety. She debunks the notion that psychiatric drugs are specific for diseases and cites scientific literature calling into question claims for effectiveness. …