Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy For Cancer Research Articles

Challenges and advances of immune checkpoint therapy

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesImmuno‐checkpoint therapy (ICT) significantly alters the clinical course of cancer patients, providing long‐lasting clinical benefits and offering the potential for cure to some patients. However, response rates for different tumour types vary, and predictive biomarkers are needed to enhance patient selection for the purpose of optimising effectiveness and reducing toxicity. This has driven efforts to decipher the immune and non‐immune factors that regulate ICT response.Main ContentThis review offers a thorough examination of the advantages and future challenges of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy. Additionally, we explore ongoing efforts to address current challenges, such as guiding subsequent clinical trials, developing ICT combination therapy strategies and utilising epigenetics to enhance clinical efficacy.Conclusion and PerspectivesDespite significant progress, ICT faces challenges including immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) and resistance mechanisms. Ongoing research focuses on developing novel biomarkers, combination therapies, and epigenetic strategies to improve the efficacy and safety of ICT for cancer patients worldwide. Future studies are required to validate these findings across different tumor types and treatment settings.

Paraneoplastic Calmodulin Kinase-Like Vesicle-Associated Protein (CAMKV) Autoimmune Encephalitis.

To report an autoimmune paraneoplastic encephalitis characterized by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody targeting synaptic protein calmodulin kinase-like vesicle-associated (CAMKV). Serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples harboring unclassified antibodies on murine brain-based indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) were screened by human protein microarray. In 5 patients with identical cerebral IFA staining, CAMKV was identified as top-ranking candidate antigen. Western blots, confocal microscopy, immune-absorption, and mass spectrometry were performed to substantiate CAMKV specificity. Recombinant CAMKV-specific assays (cell-based [fixed and live] and Western blot) provided additional confirmation. Of 5 CAMKV-IgG positive patients, 3 were women (median symptom-onset age was 59 years; range, 53-74). Encephalitis-onset was subacute (4) or acute (1) and manifested with: altered mental status (all), seizures (4), hyperkinetic movements (4), psychiatric features (3), memory loss (2), and insomnia (2). Paraclinical testing revealed CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis (all 4 tested), electrographic seizures (3 of 4 tested), and striking MRI abnormalities in all (mesial temporal lobe T2 hyperintensities [all patients], caudate head T2 hyperintensities [3], and cortical diffusion weighted hyperintensities [2]). None had post-gadolinium enhancement. Cancers were uterine adenocarcinoma (3 patients: poorly differentiated or neuroendocrine-differentiated in 2, both demonstrated CAMKV immunoreactivity), bladder urothelial carcinoma (1), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1). Two patients developed encephalitis following immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapy (atezolizumab [1], pembrolizumab [1]). All treated patients (4) demonstrated an initial response to immunotherapy (corticosteroids [4], IVIG [2]), though 3 died from cancer. CAMKV-IgG is a biomarker of immunotherapy-responsive paraneoplastic encephalitis with temporal and extratemporal features and uterine cancer as a prominent oncologic association. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:21-33.

Murine MHC-Deficient Nonobese Diabetic Mice Carrying Human HLA-DQ8 Develop Severe Myocarditis and Myositis in Response to Anti-PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Cancer Therapy.

Myocarditis has emerged as an immune-related adverse event of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cancer therapy associated with significant mortality. To ensure patients continue to safely benefit from life-saving cancer therapy, an understanding of fundamental immunological phenomena underlying ICI myocarditis is essential. We recently developed the NOD-cMHCI/II-/-.DQ8 mouse model that spontaneously develops myocarditis with lower mortality than observed in previous HLA-DQ8 NOD mouse strains. Our strain was rendered murine MHC class I and II deficient using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, making it a genetically clean platform for dissecting CD4+ T cell-mediated myocarditis in the absence of classically selected CD8+ T cells. These mice are highly susceptible to myocarditis and acute heart failure following anti-PD-1 ICI-induced treatment. Additionally, anti-PD-1 administration accelerates skeletal muscle myositis. Using histology, flow cytometry, adoptive transfers, and RNA sequencing analyses, we performed a thorough characterization of cardiac and skeletal muscle T cells, identifying shared and unique characteristics of both populations. Taken together, this report details a mouse model with features of a rare, but highly lethal clinical presentation of overlapping myocarditis and myositis following ICI therapy. This study sheds light on underlying immunological mechanisms in ICI myocarditis and provides the basis for further detailed analyses of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Sargramostim for Prophylactic Management of Gastrointestinal Immune-Related Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy improves outcomes in several cancers. Unfortunately, many patients experience grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events, including gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities which are common. These GI immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by ICIs present significant clinical challenges, require prompt intervention, and result in treatment delays or discontinuations. The treatment for these potentially severe and even fatal GI irAEs which include enterocolitis, severe diarrhea, and hepatitis may interfere with the anti-cancer approach. Sargramostim (glycosylated, yeast-derived, recombinant human GM-CSF) is an agent that has been used in clinical practice for more than 30 years with a well-recognized safety profile and has been studied in many therapeutic areas. The mechanism of action of sargramostim may treat moderate-to-severe GI irAEs without impairing the anti-cancer therapy. Some early data also suggest a potential survival benefit. Through the differentiation/maturation of monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils and induction of anti-inflammatory T cell responses, GM-CSF aids in GI homeostasis, mucosal healing, and mucosal immunity. GM-CSF knockout mice are susceptible to severe colitis which was prevented with murine GM-CSF administration. For some patients with GI mucosa and immune cell function impairment, e.g., Crohn’s disease, sargramostim reduces disease severity. In a prospective, randomized study (ECOG 1608), advanced melanoma patients had a reduction in grade 3–5 GI irAEs and less frequent colonic perforation in the sargramostim plus ipilimumab arm compared to ipilimumab alone. Sargramostim continues to be studied with ICIs for the prophylactic management of irAEs while also potentially providing a survival benefit.

The Heart of the Matter: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Immune-Related Adverse Events on the Cardiovascular System.

Cancer remains a prominent global cause of mortality, second only to cardiovascular disease. The past decades have witnessed substantial advancements in anti-cancer therapies, resulting in improved outcomes. Among these advancements, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising breakthrough, leveraging the immune system to target and eliminate cancer cells. Despite the remarkable potential of immunotherapy, concerns have arisen regarding associations with adverse cardiovascular events. This review examines the complex interplay between immunotherapy and cardiovascular toxicity and provides an overview of immunotherapy mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and potential biomarkers for adverse events, while delving into the intricate immune responses and evasion mechanisms displayed by cancer cells. The focus extends to the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy, including CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 targeting antibodies. This review underscores the multifaceted challenges of managing immunotherapy-related cardiovascular toxicity. Risk factors for immune-related adverse events and major adverse cardiac events are explored, encompassing pharmacological, treatment-related, autoimmune, cardiovascular, tumor-related, social, genetic, and immune-related factors. The review also advocates for enhanced medical education and risk assessment tools to identify high-risk patients for preventive measures. Baseline cardiovascular evaluations, potential prophylactic strategies, and monitoring of emerging toxicity symptoms are discussed, along with the potential of adjunct anti-inflammatory therapies.

Oncolytic adenoviruses expressing checkpoint inhibitors for cancer therapy

Despite the remarkable success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), primary resistance to ICIs causes only subsets of patients to achieve durable responses due to the complex tumor microenvironment (TME). Oncolytic viruses (OVs) can overcome the immunosuppressive TME and promote systemic antitumor immunity in hosts. Engineered OVs armed with ICIs would likely have improved effectiveness as a cancer therapy. According to the diverse immune cell landscapes among different types of tumors, we rationally and precisely generated three recombinant oncolytic adenoviruses (OAds): OAd-SIRPα-Fc, OAd-Siglec10-Fc and OAd-TIGIT-Fc. These viruses were designed to locally deliver SIRPα-Fc, Siglec10-Fc or TIGIT-Fc fusion proteins recognizing CD47, CD24 or CD155, respectively, in the TME to achieve enhanced antitumor effects. Our results suggested that OAd-SIRPα-Fc and OAd-Siglec10-Fc both showed outstanding efficacy in tumor suppression of macrophage-dominated tumors, while OAd-TIGIT-Fc showed the best antitumor immunity in CD8+ T-cell-dominated tumors. Importantly, the recombinant OAds activated an inflammatory immune response and generated long-term antitumor memory. In addition, the combination of OAd-Siglec10-Fc with anti-PD-1 significantly enhanced the antitumor effect in a 4T1 tumor model by remodeling the TME. In summary, rationally designed OAds expressing ICIs tailored to the immune cell landscape in the TME can precisely achieve tumor-specific immunotherapy of cancer.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapy in patients with preexisting type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) produce dramatic tumor shrinkage and durable responses in many advanced malignancies, but their use is limited by the development of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) that occur in up to 60% of patients and often affect endocrine organs. Concern for more severe IRAEs in patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases, including type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), has led to the exclusion of such individuals from clinical trials of ICI therapy. As a result, little is known about the safety and efficacy of ICI in this population. Here, we report safety and treatments outcomes in ICI-treated patients with preexisting T1DM. This retrospective case-controlled study evaluated adult patients with T1DM who received ICI therapy for solid malignancies from 2015 to 2021 at four academic medical centers. Patients with prior ICI therapy, bone marrow transplantation, or pregnancy were excluded. We collected data on demographics, cancer diagnosis and treatment, IRAE incidence and severity, and diabetes management. Controls were matched 2:1 by age, sex, cancer diagnosis, and ICI therapy class. Of 12,142 cancer patients treated with ICI therapy, we identified 11 with a preexisting confirmed diagnosis of T1DM prior to starting ICI therapy. Mean age was 50.6 years, 63.6% were women, and most received anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy (10/11) compared with combination therapy (1/11). Grade 3/4 IRAEs were seen in 3/11 subjects with preexisting T1DM and were hepatitis, myositis, and myasthenia gravis. All three cases had interruption of ICI therapy and administration of adjunct therapies, including steroids, IVIG, or mycophenolate mofetil with resolution of the IRAE. The odds of all-grade IRAEs and of severe IRAEs were comparable between cases and controls matched for age, sex, cancer type, and ICI therapy [OR 0.83 (95% CI 0.2-3.56), p = 0.81, and OR 1.69 (0.31-9.36), p = 0.55, respectively]. Overall survival was not different between patients with T1DM and controls (p = 0.54). No patients had hospitalizations for diabetes-related complications during therapy. These data suggest that ICI monotherapy can successfully be used in patients with preexisting T1DM, with IRAE rates comparable with individuals without preexisting T1DM. Larger, prospective studies of these potentially life-saving ICI therapies that include patients with preexisting autoimmunity are warranted.

Oral Lesions Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: An Emerging Entity Oral Healthcare Professionals Should Comprehend

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new group of drugs that have been recently used as part of antineoplastic therapy targeting the immune system to activate the anti-tumor effect. However, as a result of this immune activity adverse events usually occur that can affect different body parts known as immune related adverse events (irAEs). In the oral and maxillofacial area, irAEs mimic many immune-mediated conditions, including oral lichen planus, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and Sjögren syndrome, among others. The aim of this review is to summarize the irAEs in oral and maxillofacial areas and to enlighten oral healthcare professionals on how to recognize these events and to be a part of the care team for patients treated with ICIs.

SAT443 Prevalence Of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-related Endocrinopathies In Patients With Cancers

Abstract Disclosure: S. Pittampalli: None. S.R. Lubin: None. R. Acharya: None. Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), emerged as the primary treatment modality for a wide range of cancers improving overall survival. Nevertheless, improved overall survival is complicated by endocrine dysfunctions including thyroid dysfunction, adrenalitis, diabetes mellitus, and hypophysitis. Such adverse events offset the benefits of ICI therapy and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Limited data exists concerning the burden of the ICI-related endocrinopathies in cancer treatment.Objective: To identify the prevalence and timing of onset of various endocrinopathies in patients with cancers receiving ICIs. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at SUNY Upstate Medical University, NY comprising of adult patients. The study population consisted of all patients age 18 and above seen at Upstate Medical University between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2021. Anonymized aggregate-level data was collected using an EPIC Slicer Dicer to identify all adult patients with cancer who underwent ICI therapy and a total of 199 patients were included. Demographic, clinical, histopathological, laboratory data were examined. The study was reviewed by IRB and deemed exempt. The following ICI-related endocrinopathies were considered: Hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, diabetes mellitus, adrenal insuffiency, and hypophysitis. ICI treatments included: anti-PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab), anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab), and combination therapy (ipilimumab and nivolumab, or any other ICI combinations). Statistical analysis including descriptive statistics, ANOVA was conducted using IBM SPSS software.Results: A total of fifty patients (25%) developed ICI-related endocrinopathy (n=28 M, 22 F) with a mean age of onset 63.69 years. Majority of the patients were being treated for lung cancers (51%) and had hypothyroidism (88%) followed by adrenal insufficiency (9%) and diabetes (2%). There were no cases of hyperthyroidism or hypophysitis observed. The average time of onset of endocrinopathies after initiation of ICI therapy was 22 weeks (anti-PD-1=122 days, anti-PD-L1=180 days and combination therapy= 252 days) with a significantly later onset with combined therapy when compared to anti-PD-1 inhibitors (252 vs 122 days, p= 0.004). Conclusion: With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy, there is increased prevalence of endocrinopathies. Periodic hormonal assessment along with close monitoring of new symptoms results in early detection of endocrinopathies as the time of onset varies significantly with the type of ICI agent and the use of single vs combination therapy. Presentation: Saturday, June 17, 2023

Autoimmune Autonomic Ganglionopathy: Solving the 10 Assignments

Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG) is a rare acquired immune-mediated neurological disease that causes various autonomic symptoms. AAG is induced by autoantibodies for the α3 and β4 subunits of the ganglionic acetylcholine receptor (gAChR). gAChR antibodies mediate synaptic transmission in all autonomic ganglia, resulting in dysautonomia. Recent clinical and basic research topics in AAG include the following: 1)analysis of clinical features; 2)novel methods for gAChR antibody detection; 3)efficacy of combined immunotherapy; 4)novel experimental AAG; 5)COVID-19 and mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and its association with autonomic dysfunction; and 6)dysautonomia as an immune-related adverse event of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy. The author and his collaborators have previously established "10 assignments" to understand the basic research and clinical issues of AAG. In this review, the author describes the current status of research on each of the "10 assignments," incorporating research trends over the last five years.

New developments in the mechanism and application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy (Review).

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been demonstrated in the treatment of numerous types of cancer and ICIs have remained a key focus of cancer research. However, improvements in survival rates only occur in a subset of patients, due to the complexity of drug resistance. Therefore, further investigations are required to identify predictive biomarkers that distinguish responders and non‑responders. Combined therapeutics involving ICIs and other modalities demonstrate potential in overcoming resistance to ICIs; however, further preclinical and clinical trials are required. Concurrently, prompt recognition and intervention of immune‑related adverse events are crucial to optimize the use of ICIs in clinical treatment. The present study aimed to review the current literature surrounding the mechanisms and application of ICIs, with the aim of providing a theoretical basis for clinicians.

Diagnostic criteria and management recommendations for immune related endocrinopathies following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer.

Checkpoint inhibitors are now widely used in the management of many cancers. Endocrine toxicity are amongst the most common side effects. These endocrinopathies differ form from most offer other immune related toxicities, in frequently being irreversible, but and rarely requiring cessation of checkpoint inhibitor therapy. This review covers considers an approach to the presentation and diagnosis and presentation of these endocrinopathies, comparing to classical endocrine diagnosis, making recommendations for classification and treatment based on fundamental endocrine principles suggesting improvements to classification and treatment based on fundamental endocrine principles. These will help to align management with other similar endocrine conditions and standardise the diagnosis and reporting of endocrine toxicity of checkpoint inhibitors to improve both endocrine and oncological care. In particular the importance of considering any inflammatory phase (such as painful thyroiditis or hypophysitis resulting in pituitary enlargement), form the endocrine consequences (transient hyperthyroidism followed by hypothyroidism, pan-hypopituitarism or isolated ACTH deficiency), is highlighted. It is also important to consider the potential confounder of exogenous corticosteroids in adrenal suppression.

Immune suppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment of multiple myeloma

With the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy, tumor microenvironments have attracted the attention of many researchers as a critical compartment of immune therapies. Immune suppressive cells such as regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and tumor-associated macrophages play important roles in regulating anti-tumor immunity in the bone marrow microenvironment in multiple myeloma, in addition to decreased immunogenicity of tumor cells and increased expression of immune checkpoint molecules. These cells are activated by numerous chemicals released by tumor cells or their surroundings, and they suppress dendritic, tumor-specific cytotoxic T, NK, and NKT cells. Multiple myeloma cells use immunological suppressive effects to escape the patients' immune surveillance system. In the future, we hope a better understanding of these immune suppressive cells leads to further improvements in immune therapies.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Cancer: Success versus Limitations

The immune system possesses the capability to identify tumor cells and eradicate early malignant tumor cells. Thus, activating the immune system of cancer patients provides great therapeutic benefits. Inhibitory T-cell immune checkpoints play a vital role in tumor immune escape. Thus, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have attracted attention in cancer immunotherapy. In ICI therapy, the therapeutic targets are the expressed immune checkpoints of T cells. Immune checkpoints induce T-cell dysfunction in cancer. However, ICIs or immunomodulators restore the antitumor actions of cytotoxic T cells by blocking immune checkpoints. ICIs have become desirable treatment options because of their broad range of activities and response rates ranging from 15% to 90% in several cancer types. Generally, ICIs also have favorable toxicity profiles. This paper will first delve deeper into the best-known immune checkpoints and then review ICIs that are attractive treatment options in immunotherapy.

The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy.

Over the years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have become a powerful treatment strategy in the field of cancer immunotherapy. In the last decade, the number of FDA-approved CPIs has been increasing prominently, opening new horizons for the treatment of a wide range of tumor types. Pointedly, three immune checkpoint molecules have been under extensive research, which include cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand-1 (PD-L1). Despite remarkable success, not all patients respond positively to therapy, which highlights the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and immune system. This has led to the identification of molecular biomarkers to predict response and toxicity. In addition, there has been an emerging focus on developing new delivery and targeting approaches for better drug efficacy and potency. In this review, we highlight the mechanism of action of major CPIs, their clinical impact, variation in effectiveness, response prediction, updated clinical indications, current challenges and limitations, promising novel approaches, and future directions.

Biologic treatment of psoriasis in oncologic patients

ABSTRACT Introduction There is a complex interplay between psoriasis and cancer, with therapeutic implications. Patients with psoriasis have an increased risk of developing several types of cancer, and safety concerns have arisen regarding biologic therapies and cancer. On the other hand, biologics can provide adequate control of psoriasis that appears or worsens as an immune-related adverse event following immune enhancing checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer, thus allowing prosecution of oncologic treatment without impairing its efficacy. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective observational study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis under biological treatment and cancer who were treated at our Department between January 2009 and June 2022. Results We included 31 adult patients with psoriasis and cancer; in 16 the diagnosis of cancer preceded the inception of biological treatment, and 9 of those patients were in remission. Most malignancies arose in the genitourinary system, followed by breast, hematologic, colorectal, thyroid, and others. Anti-IL23p19 biologics were most frequently used (36%), followed by anti-TNF (32%), anti-IL-17 (16%) and anti-IL-12/23 (16%) agents. All patients showed improvement of psoriasis after biologic initiation. Conclusions Biologic treatment for moderate-severe psoriasis should be considered in oncologic patients since it is not formally contraindicated and is safe. Moreover, the efficacy and safety profile of IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors may be advantageous for those patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy: The leading role of the endocrinologist

The endocrine, immune, and nervous systems have a close functional relation from the embryonic development until the end of life, nevertheless this important homeostasis can be altered by any stressors such as infections, autoimmune diseases, neoplasms or medications.
 Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) have relatively recently emerged as a promising treatment option for several cancers, including advanced melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and colorectal cancer. ICPi target immune checkpoints, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1). ICPi modulates the immune system with the aim of eradicating cancer cells, but despite their acknowledged anti-cancer efficacy, they can increase the risk of developing autoimmune disorders. In this fashion, the same mechanisms that support tumor regression may favor autoantigen-mediated cytotoxicity and the production of T-cell-dependent autoantibodies. Importantly, patients on ICPi may develop endocrine adverse events, even after months or years from the final dose of ICPi, affecting a wide variety of glands. These endocrine adverse events include hypophysitis, diabetes mellitus, hypo and hyperthyroidism, and, adrenal insufficiency. Such toxicities may complicate the clinical course and prognosis of patients, increasing morbidity and mortality if not promptly identified and treated, as they can be life threatening and irreversible.

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: Clinical Benefits for Head and Neck Cancers.

Simple SummaryIn recent years, checkpoint inhibitor treatment of tumors has caused a stir. The response of patients with metastases showed outstanding success for some cancer types. However, many tumor types develop resistance strategies to evade this therapeutic application. This review provides an overview of the potential and broader treatment options that have emerged in recent years with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) treatment. Here, a major focus is placed on treatment with ICIs and combination therapies for head and neck tumors. This review offers a comprehensive overview of clinical trials for ICI (combination) therapies in advanced stages, as well as clinical trials in their early stages for head and neck tumors.Recently, considerable progress has been achieved in cancer immunotherapy. Targeted immune checkpoint therapies have been established for several forms of cancers, which resulted in a tremendous positive impact on patient survival, even in more advanced tumor stages. With a better understanding of cellular responses to immune checkpoint therapies, it will soon be feasible to find targeted compounds which will make personalized medicine practicable. This is a great opportunity, but it also sets tremendous challenges on both the scientific and clinical aspects. Head and neck tumors evade immune surveillance through various mechanisms. They contain fewer lymphocytes (natural killer cells) than normal tissue with an accumulation of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells. Standard therapies for HNSCC, such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, are becoming more advantageous by targeting immune checkpoints and employing combination therapies. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the expanded therapeutic options, particularly the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition with various conventional and novel therapeutics for head and neck tumor patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy: Review of orofacial adverse events and role of the oral healthcare provider.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a revolutionary class of antineoplastic therapy that restore anti-tumor immunity. Consequences of this enhanced immune response include a multitude of immune related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any body system, including the mouth. Orofacial irAEs reproduce features of numerous immune-mediated conditions, including oral lichen planus, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and Sjögren syndrome, among others. The aim of this review is to summarize known orofacial irAEs and to familiarize oral healthcare providers with how to identify and manage these toxicities as part of the care team for patients treated with ICIs.

The Blocking vs Depletion Model of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Cancer

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) therapy is the most exciting development in cancer treatments in recent years. As of the end of 2021, more than a hundred of clinical trials have been carried out by several major drug makers and research hospitals all over the world just to explore the use of ICI antibodies in almost every type of cancer and under various clinical settings. These clinical trials have resulted waves of good news in every year’s major academic conferences and FDA approvals, and now ICI therapy is in the move to take over traditional therapy to become the major player in clinical management of cancer. On the other hand, most of these clinical trials have failed to show clear benefits in most cancer patients, and only few have been reported in public. In real-world clinical setting, ICI antibodies are being massively and sometimes abusively prescribed for almost every desperate situation with clear clinical benefit in only a few (<10%). Yet, the enthusiasm behind ICI therapy is not dampened by the massive clinical failure but has been growing. The reason for the consistent enthusiasm among clinicians and patients is the miracle-like clinical responses seen in some of the responders that even including late-stage hopeless cases. Every clinician wants to repeat this miracle in the next seemingly identical patient, and every patient and their family members want to believe that they are in line for that miracle. But the reality is disheartening in that clinicians do not see the predictable repeat of miracle-like responses in seemingly identical patients and most patients selecting ICI therapy as the last straw in life did not benefit from it, if not hurt by it. What then are the reasons that ICI therapy is so impressive when working and so unpredictable in responses? This review attempts to draw some mechanistic aspects based on our own experiences in ICI therapy and to come up with a different explanation for the unexplained clinical observations. The goal of this review is to alert the clinical field about the danger and irreversible damages that wrongly used ICI antibodies may cause, and at the same time to introduce some preliminary criteria to select proper patient for the benefits and to avoid the harms of ICI therapy.