Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment Research Articles

Phenotyping Hepatic Immune-Related Adverse Events in the Setting of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

We present and validate a rule-based algorithm for the detection of moderate to severe liver-related immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a real-world patient cohort. The algorithm can be applied to studies of irAEs in large data sets. We developed a set of criteria to define hepatic irAEs. The criteria include: the temporality of elevated laboratory measurements in the first 2-14 weeks of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, steroid intervention within 2 weeks of the onset of elevated laboratory measurements, and intervention with a duration of at least 2 weeks. These criteria are based on the kinetics of patients who experienced moderate to severe hepatotoxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grades 2-4). We applied these criteria to a retrospective cohort of 682 patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma and treated with ICI. All patients were required to have baseline laboratory measurements before and after the initiation of ICI. A set of 63 equally sampled patients were reviewed by two blinded, clinical adjudicators. Disagreements were reviewed and consensus was taken to be the ground truth. Of these, 25 patients with irAEs were identified, 16 were determined to be hepatic irAEs, 36 patients were nonadverse events, and two patients were of indeterminant status. Reviewers agreed in 44 of 63 patients, including 19 patients with irAEs (0.70 concordance, Fleiss' kappa: 0.43). By comparison, the algorithm achieved a sensitivity and specificity of identifying hepatic irAEs of 0.63 and 0.81, respectively, with a test efficiency (percent correctly classified) of 0.78 and outcome-weighted F1 score of 0.74. The algorithm achieves greater concordance with the ground truth than either individual clinical adjudicator for the detection of irAEs.

Integrative multimodality spatial biomarker analysis for tailoring checkpoint inhibitor therapies in non-small cell lung cancer.

e14664 Background: Checkpoint inhibitor therapy has become a cornerstone in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the response to checkpoint inhibitors varies widely among patients, with some experiencing significant benefits and others facing adverse reactions without therapeutic gain. The ability to accurately predict which patients will benefit from checkpoint inhibitor therapies is essential for enhancing treatment efficacy and minimizing side effects. In this context, the identification and analysis of predictive biomarkers, including the expression of immune checkpoint proteins such as PD-L1 and TIGIT, and the comprehensive profiling of cytokines in the tumor microenvironment, are of paramount importance. Methods: A multimodal strategy was employed to identify predictive biomarkers for checkpoint inhibitor therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This approach integrated metabolic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data to achieve a thorough insight into the biomarkers likely to influence patient responses. The diverse data sets were fused through advanced machine learning techniques, creating a holistic dataset. Analysis of this integrated dataset facilitated the discovery of multimodal biomarker signatures, offering the potential to predict which NSCLC patients would positively respond to checkpoint inhibitor treatments. Results: Initial observations revealed considerable variability in the expression of PD-L1 and TIGIT alongside other immune checkpoint molecules, across different regions of the tumor microenvironment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Multimodal biomarker signatures, encompassing distinct expressions of immune checkpoint inhibitors, cytokine levels, and the presence of immune cells, showed a strong correlation with patient outcomes following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusions: Our research highlights the significant promise of using a multimodal stratification method to unravel the complexities of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to predict patient responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Through the integration of metabolomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data, we discovered distinctive biomarker signatures that were highly predictive of responses to these immunotherapies.

Phase I dose escalation trial of the first-in-class TNFR2 agonist monoclonal antibody, HFB200301, in monotherapy and in combination with tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.

2526 Background: Tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 (TNFR2) is expressed on effector CD8+, CD4+, and regulatory T (Treg) cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and myeloid cells. Activation of TNFR2 is anticipated to yield effective anti-tumor immunity by stimulating T-cell and NK-cell activation and proliferation in the tumor microenvironment. HFB200301 is a first-in-class anti-TNFR2 agonistic monoclonal antibody that triggers both innate and adaptive immune stimulation by binding to a specific epitope on TNFR2. We report initial results of an ongoing Phase I dose escalation, multicenter study (NCT05238883) of HFB200301 in monotherapy and in combination with tislelizumab (TIS) in patients (pts) with advanced refractory solid tumors. Methods: A Phase I trial designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and initial efficacy of HFB200301 in monotherapy and in combination with TIS. Eligible pts, ≥18 years with an ECOG PS 0-1 and advanced solid tumors, will be enrolled in dose escalation at 5 different dose cohorts in monotherapy (Q4W), 3 different dose cohorts in combination with TIS (Q4W), or in dose expansion following determination of safety. Radiographic response is assessed every 8 weeks. Results: A total of 39 pts have been enrolled, 27 pts in monotherapy and 12 pts in combination. All pts received prior systemic therapy (median 2, range 1-4); 23 pts (59%) had prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment. No dose limiting toxicities were observed in either the monotherapy or combination arms. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 44% of monotherapy and in 50% of combination pts, with pruritis (11%), tremor (7%), fatigue (7%), asthenia (7%) and nausea (7%) being the most common TRAEs. No ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs were reported, and there were no drug discontinuations due to TRAEs. Preliminary HFB200301 PK analysis demonstrated non-linear clearance of HFB200301, with dose-proportional maximum concentration [Cmax], achieving sufficient exposures for peripheral target engagement in all tested doses. Emerging PD data demonstrates evidence of immune activation and expansion of CD8+ T cells, but not Tregs, in the tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood. Single cell RNAseq analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells demonstrated PD modulation in TNFR2 positive immune cell types post-HFB200301 treatment. Early response evaluation reveals ongoing durable clinical responses (> 6 months) in a PD-L1+ pleural mesothelioma pt and an EBV+ gastric cancer pt from combination cohorts. Conclusions: HFB200301 demonstrates a favorable safety profile, dose-dependent PK, with PD and preliminary clinical activity in monotherapy and in combination with TIS in pts with heavily pre-treated refractory solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT05238883 .

Stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: Preliminary result of a single-arm study.

e16205 Background: IMbrave150 study confirmed the clinical benefit of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, patients with extrahepatic metastasis (EHS) had a poorer prognosis. Studies suggested “abscopal effect” of synchronous radiotherapy and immunotherapy may improve antitumor activity. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in HCC patients with EHS. Methods: This single-arm study included HCC patients with EHS from January 2022 to November 2023 in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor and/or immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment were eligible. After first dose atezolizumab and bevacizumab, SBRT was performed with a total dose of 25-50 Gy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and duration of response (DOR). Results: Thirty-nine patients were included. Fourteen patients were treated as first-line therapy and 25 patients were treated as later-line therapy. The mean age was 56.69±11.21 years and 89.7% were male. Of these patients, 66.7% had hepatitis viral infection and 25.6% had vascular invasion. 53.8% of patients had ≥2 extrahepatic spread lesions. In addition, 33.3% of patients had received prior immunotherapy and 23.1% of patients had received tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. The median follow-up was 6.50 (range: 1.43-22.17) months. The ORR and DCR were 43.6% and 92.3%, respectively. The ORR was 57.1% and 36.0% in first-line subgroup and later-line subgroup, respectively. The 12-month OS rates was 54.7%. The median PFS, median TTP and median DOR were 6.73 months, 8.67 months, and 7.17 months, respectively. The incidence of all grade TRAE and grade ≥3 TRAE were 38.5% and 12.8%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were decreased platelet count (7.7%), decreased white blood cell count (2.6%), pruritus (2.6%) and rectal bleeding (2.6%). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: SBRT combined with systemic atezolizumab and bevacizumab showed encouraging efficacy with manageable safety profile for HCC patients with EHS regardless of prior treatment. Further studies are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT05396937 . [Table: see text]

A phase 1/2 study of EG-70 (detalimogene voraplasmid) intravesical monotherapy for patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with carcinoma in situ.

TPS4626 Background: High-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is treated with adjuvant intravesical Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG). However, approximately 50% of patients experience recurrence and/or progression after BCG treatment and are considered unresponsive. EG-70 (detalimogene voraplasmid) is an investigational drug product that was specifically engineered for intravesical administration to elicit local stimulation of anti-tumor immune responses in the bladder and drive durable efficacy in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, while mitigating the risk of systemic toxicities from immune stimulation. The phase 1 (dose-escalation) part of the first-in-human LEGEND (NCT04752722) phase 1/2, open-label, multicenter study of EG-70 in patients with high-risk BCG-unresponsive NMIBC with carcinoma in situ (CIS) is complete: intravesical instillation of EG-70 was well tolerated with an overall complete response (CR) rate of 73%; and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was identified. Here we describe the ongoing phase 2 part of the study, which opened to enrollment in May 2023. Methods: Patient eligibility criteria: age ≥18 years; ECOG PS 0−2; BCG-unresponsive NMIBC with CIS, with or without resected coexisting papillary tumors, ineligible for, or have elected not to undergo, cystectomy; satisfactory bladder function with ability to retain study drug for ≥60 minutes. Prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment is allowed if completed within 30 days before study entry. Patients are treated with EG-70 at the RP2D (800 µg in 50 mL) by intravesical administration on weeks 1, 2, 5, and 6 of a 12-week cycle, for 4 cycles in one of two cohorts: BCG-unresponsive (Cohort 1); BCG-naïve or BCG-incompletely treated (Cohort 2). Patients in either cohort who exhibit stable disease (SD) or CR at week 12 will continue treatment until week 24; patients with progressive disease (PD) will discontinue treatment. Patients who experience or maintain CR at week 24 will receive additional cycles every 12 weeks until week 48; patients with SD or PD at week 24 will discontinue treatment. Patients with PD at any time after week 24 will discontinue treatment. Phase 2 primary objective: evaluate efficacy (CR rate at week 48) and safety of EG-70. Secondary objectives: evaluate progression-free survival, CR rate at 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks, and duration of response. The study is being conducted in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines and with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provide written informed consent. The ongoing, registration-enabling phase 2 portion of the LEGEND study is anticipated to recruit approximately 100 patients from sites in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Clinical trial information: NCT04752722 .

Breaking the Mold: Trailblazing Melanoma Therapy Beyond Checkpoint Through Innovative Approaches.

Melanoma has long been a difficult malignancy to treat with low response rates to standard chemotherapies. In recent years, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated promising results, paving the way for the use of the rapidly developing novel immune targeting therapies. In this review, we look beyond immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments and summarize several emerging treatment strategies for melanoma, including neoantigen vaccines, conventional antibody drug-conjugates, and bispecific T-cell engager therapies.

Clinical features and prognostic analysis of 247 patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and an exploration of the treatment of recurrent OCCC: A single-center study in China.

e17548 Background: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is relatively resistant to chemotherapy and has a worse prognosis than other ovary cancer. In this study, we reviewed the case files of OCCC in a single center to find its clinical characteristics and explore the treatment of recurrent cases, and the efficacy of immunotherapy. Methods: From August 2007 to August 2023 247 patients with OCCC were retrospectively involved. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent clinicopathological factors. The relapse OCCC were divided into four groups based on the different treatment who underwent chemotherapy or chemotherapy combined with surgery, bevacizumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment. Kaplan–Meier curves were utilized to compare OS and DFS/PFS between the groups. Results: (1) 247 patients with OCCC were included, CA125 abnormality (> 35 U/ml) 65.2%, ascites cytology positive 10.1%, and the overall satisfactory reduction of tumor was 92.7%, CR and PR were 93.1 and 6.9%, respectively. 16.2% patients received more than 6 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy.(2)Univariate Cox regression analysis identified ascites (HR=4.012, 95% CI: 1.846 - 8.720, P<0.001), initial treatment effect (HR=2.714, 95% CI: 1.132 - 6.506, P=0.025), and chemotherapy cycles (HR=2.564, 95% CI: 1.402 - 4.689, P=0.002) were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS.(3)The patients who received chemotherapy cycles exceeding 6 cycles had worse prognosis(HR=3.01, 95%CI: 1.70-5.33, P<0.001), the result is the first proposal in our study.(4) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the OS of the chemotherapy combined with surgery relapse OCCC group was significantly better than the other three groups (HR=0.2732, 95%CI: 10.133-0.559, P=0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that relapse patients with satisfactory tumor reduction had more significant survival benefits(HR=3.86, 95%CI: 0.79-18.93, P=0.096).(5)The PFS of the chemotherapy combined with surgery group was also better than the other three groups (median PFS 25 months vs 8.5 months in chemotherapy vs12 months in chemotherapy combined immunotherapy vs 12 months in chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab). (6)4 patients who tested positive for PD-L1 received immune maintenance therapy after chemotherapy for 6-24months. There has been no recurrence since follow-up. Conclusions: Ascites, initial treatment effect and chemotherapy cycles were identified as independent prognostic factors for OCCC OS, chemotherapy combined with surgery for recurrent OCCC was significantly improving patient prognosis. For patients who achieve CR after initial treatment, if PD-L1 expression is positive, maintenance immunotherapy can be considered, but further studies with large samples are needed.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in PD-L1-negative gastroesophageal cancer tumors.

e16062 Background: We aimed to investigate whether there is a subgroup of patients with gastroesophageal cancers who, despite having IHC-PD-L1 negative tumors, might still benefit from ICI treatment. Furthermore, the impact of ICI treatment on patients with tumors that are PD-L1 negative by IHC but exhibit high CD274 (PD-L1) expression remains undefined. Methods: 1,416 esophageal adenocarcinomas (EA), 486 esophageal squamous carcinomas (ES), 859 esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas (EJA), and 1,613 gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) samples were analyzed using NGS of DNA (NextSeq, 592 genes and NovaSeq, WES) and RNA (NovaSeq, WTS) (Caris Life Sciences, Phx, AZ). PD-L1 IHC positivity was defined as > 1% CPS (Agilent's 22c3). Correlation between PD-L1 CPS and CD274 expression (transcripts per million – TPM) were assessed by Spearman’s coefficient. Tumors were divided into CD274-H (high expression) and CD274-L (low expression) cohorts, representing the top 25% and bottom 25% of expression levels, respectively. Real-world overall survival (OS) data were obtained from insurance claims records and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards with hazard ratios (HR) and log-rank tests. Results: Weak correlations were observed between PD-L1 CPS and CD274 expression in adenocarcinoma histology tumors (EA: 0.374, EJA: 0.358, GA: 0.387), while a stronger correlation was found in squamous tumors (ES: 0.537). Median CD274 expression was significantly higher in PD-L1+ compared to PD-L1- ES tumors (2.65-fold) and in EA (1.68-fold), EJA (1.92-fold), and GA (1.96-fold) tumors (p < 0.001). In PD-L1 IHC-negative ES, there was no association between CD274-H expression and OS (H 12.4 vs L 10.6 mo; HR 0.90, p = 0.48). However, in adenocarcinomas, CD274-H showed a slightly improved OS (12.8 vs 11.3 mo; HR 0.79, p < 0.05). CD274-H trended towards worse post-Carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) OS (ES: 13.8 vs 18.2 mo; HR 1.60; p = 0.22; Adenocarcinoma: 18.2 vs 27.4 mo; HR 1.50, p = 0.19). Interestingly, CD274-H was associated with improved post-CP/nivolumab survival in ES (96.5 vs 28 mo; HR 0.32; p = 0.047), with a similar but not statistically significant pattern in Adenocarcinoma EGC (Not Reached vs 30.2 mo; HR 0.39, p = 0.23). Furthermore, in CD274-L GEC, there was no difference in post-treatment survival with the addition of Nivolumab to CP (Squamous: 30 vs 18.2 mo; HR 0.91, p = 0.83; Adenocarcinoma: 30.2 vs 27.4 mo; HR 1.14; p = 0.76). In contrast, CD274-H showed improved survival with the addition of Nivolumab (Squamous: 96.5 mo vs 13.8 mo; HR 0.15; p = 0.01; Adenocarcinoma: NR vs 18.2 mo; HR 0.30; p = 0.08). Conclusions: High CD274 expression was associated with improved survival when Nivolumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. Further investigation is needed to confirm the potential benefits of Nivolumab treatment in gastroesophageal cancer patients with tumors that are PD-L1-negative by IHC but exhibit high mRNA expression.

Clinical outcomes from a phase I clinical trial of a novel oncolytic virus VG161 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory after 2 prior lines of therapy including checkpoint inhibitors (CPI).

4105 Background: This study aims to investigate the safety and anti-tumor activity of VG161 expressing IL12, IL15/IL15 receptor α unit, and PD-L1 blocking peptide in patients with HCC refractory to standard therapies. Methods: The study was conducted as a multicenter phase I trial with fast titration and 3+3 dose escalation part (A) and expansion part (B), which enrolled patients with primary liver cancer refractory to standard therapies. Patients in part A were dosed in 5 cohorts on days 1, 2 and 3 by image-guided intratumoral injections with dosing ranges from 1.0×10^8 to 5×10^8 PFU per 28 days treatment cycles. Part B used a single arm Simon's two-stage design at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The study endpoints were safety, and efficacy assessed by objective response rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) by RECIST1.1 and mRECIST (HCC), PFS and OS. Pretreatment HCC tumor samples were collected and analyzed by RNAseq. Results: 44 patients including 40 HCC (Male/Female: 37/3; median age: 58years) were dosed and no DLTs were reported. The most common Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs) was fever, which was resolved with symptomatic treatment. RP2D was determined as 1ⅹ10^8 PFU daily on day 1, 2 and 3 of each cycle. Of 40 HCC patients, 35 failed after 2 prior lines of therapy and were eligible for tumor assessment. ORR was 17.14% (6/35), DCR was 60.00% (21/35). The median PFS and OS were 2.90 (95%CI: 1.85-3.95) and 9.40 (95%CI: 0.47-18.33) months respectively. Statistically significant OS prolongation was observed in a subgroup of 22 HCC patients who progressed after receiving at least 3 months of CPI (PreCPI>3 m) as compared to those who received CPI for ≤3 months (PreCPI ≤ 3 m). The median OS was 17.30 months (95%CI: 5.35-29.25) vs. 7.40 months (95%CI: 5.11-9.69), HR: 0.32 (95%CI: 0.10 to 0.98) (p<0.05). Patients who received targeted or CPI therapies after VG161 survived longer than those who did not receive any anticancer treatment although they all previously failed such therapies [20.10 months (95%CI: 13.19-27.01) vs. 8.80 months (95%CI: 6.34-11.26), HR: 0.30 (95%CI: 0.10-0.88), P<0.05]. PreCPI>3 m and anti-cancer treatment after VG161 were the 2 independent factors with significant impact on OS (P<0.05). A gene signature was identified based on RNAseq data which predicted the prolonged OS in the study patients (P<0.01) but not in patients retrieved from TCGA database. Conclusions: VG161 was well tolerated and demonstrated comparable ORR and DCR with other CPIs data in 2L HCC. VG161 also prolonged survival in a subgroup of patients identified by prior treatment or gene signature, supporting further studies with enrichment of patients who may benefit from the treatment. The implications of pre/post VG161 CPI treatment on OS underscore a combination strategy for improving outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT04806464 .

Pan-cancer analysis of CDKN2A alterations identifies a subset of gastric cancer with a cold tumor immune microenvironment

BackgroundAlthough CDKN2A alteration has been explored as a favorable factor for tumorigenesis in pan-cancers, the association between CDKN2A point mutation (MUT) and intragenic deletion (DEL) and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still disputed. This study aims to determine the associations of CDKN2A MUT and DEL with overall survival (OS) and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment (ICIs) among pan-cancers and the clinical features of CDKN2A-altered gastric cancer.MethodsThis study included 45,000 tumor patients that underwent tumor sequencing across 33 cancer types from four cohorts, the MSK-MetTropism, MSK-IMPACT, OrigiMed2020 and TCGA cohorts. Clinical outcomes and genomic factors associated with response to ICIs, including tumor mutational burden, copy number alteration, neoantigen load, microsatellite instability, tumor immune microenvironment and immune-related gene signatures, were collected in pan-cancer. Clinicopathologic features and outcomes were assessed in gastric cancer. Patients were grouped based on the presence of CDKN2A wild type (WT), CDKN2A MUT, CDKN2A DEL and CDKN2A other alteration (ALT).ResultsOur research showed that CDKN2A-MUT patients had shorter survival times than CDKN2A-WT patients in the MSK MetTropism and TCGA cohorts, but longer OS in the MSK-IMPACT cohort with ICIs treatment, particularly in patients having metastatic disease. Similar results were observed among pan-cancer patients with CDKN2A DEL and other ALT. Notably, CDKN2A ALT frequency was positively related to tumor-specific objective response rates to ICIs in MSK MetTropism and OrigiMed 2020. Additionally, individuals with esophageal carcinoma or stomach adenocarcinoma who had CDKN2A MUT had poorer OS than patients from the MSK-IMPACT group, but not those with adenocarcinoma. We also found reduced levels of activated NK cells, T cells CD8 and M2 macrophages in tumor tissue from CDKN2A-MUT or DEL pan-cancer patients compared to CDKN2A-WT patients in TCGA cohort. Gastric cancer scRNA-seq data also showed that CDKN2A-ALT cancer contained less CD8 T cells but more exhausted T cells than CDKN2A-WT cancer. A crucial finding of the pathway analysis was the inhibition of three immune-related pathways in the CDKN2A ALT gastric cancer patients, including the interferon alpha response, inflammatory response, and interferon gamma response.ConclusionsThis study illustrates the CDKN2A MUT and DEL were associated with a poor outcome across cancers. CDKN2A ALT, on the other hand, have the potential to be used as a biomarker for choosing patients for ICI treatment, notably in esophageal carcinoma and stomach adenocarcinoma.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Evolving Role of Systemic Therapies as a Bridging Treatment to Liver Transplantation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Classically, liver transplantation (LT) can be curative for HCC tumors within the Milan criteria. Bridging strategies to reduce the dropouts from LT waiting lists and/or to downstage patients who are beyond the Milan criteria are widely utilized. We conducted a literature-based review to evaluate the role of systemic therapies as a bridging treatment to liver transplantation (LT) in HCC patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be used as a systemic bridging therapy to LT in patients with contraindications for locoregional liver-directed therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment can be utilized either as a monotherapy or as a combination therapy with bevacizumab or TKIs prior to LT. Acute rejection after liver transplantation is a concern in the context of ICI treatment. Thus, a safe ICI washout period before LT and cautious post-LT immunosuppression strategies are required to reduce post-LT rejections and to optimize clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials are needed to establish definitive conclusions about the utility of systemic therapy as a bridging modality prior to LT in HCC patients.

The nutrition-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy used for lung cancer has significantly changed response and survival rates, however, the impact on patients' nutritional status remains largely unexplored. This review aims to identify common adverse events that increase nutrition risk induced in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and assess impact on nutritional status. PubMed, Medline and CINAHL were systematically searched in September 2023 for randomised controlled trials comparing immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment of non-small cell lung cancer to a control group. Treatment-related adverse events that increased nutrition impact symptoms identified in the patient-generated subjective global assessment and clinical guidelines were extracted and qualitatively analysed. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2. Eleven eligible randomised controlled trial studies were identified and analysed. The data demonstrated immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was associated with a lower percentage of reported nutrition impact symptoms, for example, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, compared to chemotherapy treatment. Conversely, immune checkpoint inhibitor treated patients recorded a greater percentage of immune-related adverse events that alter metabolism or nutrient absorption. Non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors still experience nutrition impact symptoms but less frequently than patients treated with chemotherapy. This combined with unique nutrition-related consequences from colitis and thyroid disorders induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy indicates patients should be screened, assessed and interventions implemented to improve nutrition.

Janus kinase inhibitor overcomes resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer in C57BL/6 J mice

BackgroundCancer immunotherapy aims to unleash the immune system’s potential against cancer cells, providing sustained relief for tumors responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). While promising in gastric cancer (GC) trials, the efficacy of ICIs diminishes in the context of peritoneal dissemination. Our objective is to identify strategies to enhance the impact of ICI treatment specifically for cases involving peritoneal dissemination in GC.MethodsThe therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD1, CTLA4 treatment alone, or in combination was assessed using the YTN16 peritoneal dissemination tumor model. Peritoneum and peritoneal exudate cells were collected for subsequent analysis. Immunohistochemical staining, flow cytometry, and bulk RNA-sequence analyses were conducted to evaluate the tumor microenvironment (TME). A Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) was introduced based on the pathway analysis results.ResultsAnti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 combination treatment (dual ICI treatment) demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in certain mice, primarily mediated by CD8 + T cells. However, in mice resistant to dual ICI treatment, even with CD8 + T cell infiltration, most of the T cells exhibited an exhaustion phenotype. Notably, resistant tumors displayed abnormal activation of the Janus Kinase-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway compared to the untreated group, with observed infiltration of macrophages, neutrophils, and Tregs in the TME. The concurrent administration of JAKi rescued CD8 + T cells function and reshaped the immunosuppressive TME, resulting in enhanced efficacy of the dual ICI treatment.ConclusionDual ICI treatment exerts its anti-tumor effects by increasing tumor-specific CD8 + T cell infiltration, and the addition of JAKi further improves ICI resistance by reshaping the immunosuppressive TME.

Mitotic MTH1 inhibitor TH1579 induces PD-L1 expression and inflammatory response through the cGAS-STING pathway

The mitotic MTH1 inhibitor TH1579 is a dual inhibitor that inhibits mitosis and incorporation of oxidative DNA damage and leads to cancer-specific cell death. The response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment is often augmented by DNA damaging agents through the cGAS-STING pathway. This study investigates whether TH1579 can improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockades through its immunomodulatory properties. Various human and murine cancer cell lines were treated with mitotic MTH1i TH1579, and the expression of PD-L1 and T-cell infiltration-related chemokines was analysed by flow cytometry and real-time qPCR. Syngeneic mouse models were established to examine the combined effect of TH1579 and PD-L1 blockade. In our investigation, we found that TH1579 upregulates PD-L1 expression at both the protein and mRNA levels in human cancer cell lines. However, in murine cell lines, the increase was less pronounced. An in vivo experiment in a syngeneic mouse melanoma model showed that TH1579 treatment significantly increased the efficacy of atezolizumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, compared to vehicle or atezolizumab monotherapy. Furthermore, TH1579 exhibited immune-modulatory properties, elevating cytokines such as IFN-β and chemokines including CCL5 and CXCL10, in a cGAS-STING pathway-dependent manner. In conclusion, TH1579 has the potential to improve ICI treatment by modulating immune checkpoint-related proteins and pathways.

#1795 Diverse histological findings of kidney injury in cancer patients on immunotherapy- impact on clinical management

Abstract Background and Aims Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are becoming rapidly more used to treat various types of cancer. Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is considered the most common pattern of kidney injury in these patients, however other distinct histological lesions are increasingly reported. The aim of this study is to assess the histological findings and the value of kidney biopsy in the management of patients with CPI-associated nephrotoxicity. Method All records from patients treated with CPIs and kidney injury that underwent a kidney biopsy during the last 4 years were retrospectively assessed. Results We included 16 biopsied patients treated with CPIs and kidney injury, 8 males and 8 females. The mean age at the time of renal biopsy was 68 (± 8.2) years and the median follow up time was 11.5 (8-29) months. The most common primary malignancy was non-small cell lung cancer (n = 8), followed by melanoma (n = 3), endometrial cancer (n = 2), renal cell carcinoma (n = 1), breast cancer (n = 1) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1). At the time of kidney biopsy eleven patients were treated with pembrolizumab, three patients with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination, one patient with ipilimumab and one patient with atezolizumab. Eleven patients were on immune-chemo combined therapy. Twelve patients presented with acute kidney injury (AKI), two with nephrotic syndrome, one with nephrotic range proteinuria and one with acute onset of hypertension and subnephrotic proteinuria [Urine Protein (UPr): 3 g/24 h]. The median time to developing kidney injury from CPI initiation was 9 (4.25-21.5) months. The prevalent histologic lesion was AIN (n = 5), followed by three cases of mixed AIN with acute tubular injury (ATI), and two cases of pure ATI. We recorded three cases of CPI-associated glomerulonephritis including membranous nephropathy (MN) with a lupus-like pattern on immunofluorescence, AA amyloidosis and Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) cellular variant. Two patients had diabetic nephropathy (DN) with ATI and one patient had thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) with ATI. Immunotherapy was temporarily withheld in all patients at the time of kidney biopsy. After the establishment of the histological diagnosis: we continued treatment with corticosteroids in nine patients (five cases with AIN, one case with mixed AIN/ATI, one case with MN, one case with FSGS and one case with TMA/ATI). Withdrawal of corticosteroids was decided in five cases (two patients with diabetic nephropathy, two patients with mixed ATI/AIN and one with ATI). The patient with AA amyloidosis was treated with colchicine and cortisone with partial remission of nephrotic syndrome (UPr: 1.2 g/24 h). In one case with pure ATI, corticosteroids, and the concomitant chemotherapeutic agent (pemetrexed) were withdrawn with complete response of AKI. Partial remission of proteinuria occurred in the patient with FSGS (UPr: 1.3 g/24 h). At the end of follow up, kidney recovery occurred in all 12 patients with AKI (among them one patient who required renal replacement therapy at the time of biopsy). Rechallenge with a CPI was attempted in 8 patients. After rechallenging, one patient experienced relapse of nephrotic syndrome (MN) and immunotherapy was withdrawn. The other seven patients continued CPI treatment without recurrence of kidney injury. The overall patient survival was 62.5%. Conclusion AIN is only one of the possible causes of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving CPIs. Kidney biopsy establishes the accurate diagnosis of CPI-associated AKI. In selected cases it allows the continuation of immunotherapy and can prevent the unnecessary use of corticosteroids.

Factors Associated with Adoption of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Advanced Melanoma: A SEER-Medicare Cohort Study

We aimed to explore differences in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy utilization for advanced melanoma by examining patient and neighborhood characteristics.We performed a retrospective cohort study using a de-identified, random sample of SEER-Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with stage III or stage IV melanoma (2011-2017). Our primary outcome was initiation of ICI immunotherapy (ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or atezolizumab) following stage III or stage IV melanoma diagnosis. We analyzed ICI usage with multivariable logistic regression. After analyzing the entire 2011-2017 cohort, we conducted a secondary analysis in which we separately analyzed the 2011-2014 and 2015-2017 cohorts to assess possible differences over time.We included 3,531 beneficiaries with mean follow-up 2.1 (SD 2.0) years. Higher likelihood of ICI usage was associated with male sex (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.42) and higher density of medical oncologists (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04). Lower likelihood of ICI usage was associated with older age group and Charlson comorbidity score (score ≥2 OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86). These associations were diminished in more recent years (no association with sex, medical oncologist density, Charlson comorbidity score, and association with only the oldest age group in years 2015-2017).We found significant sex and age-related differences in initiation among SEER-Medicare beneficiaries with stage III or stage IV melanoma, which appear to be improving over time.

Optimization of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment planning for relapsed or refractory extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma.

Pembrolizumab (anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitor) is a promising salvage therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (R/R ENKTL). However, the appropriate duration of pembrolizumab use in R/R ENKTL patients and the optimal timing for administering pembrolizumab remain undetermined. We collected and analyzed clinical information on R/R ENKTL 58 patients who received pembrolizumab to evaluate the optimal treatment durations and clinical information for considering treatment interruption. Treatment outcomes were assessed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and Epstein Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA) every 3months. Nineteen (32.8%) patients had been treated with more than three chemotherapies before pembrolizumab administration. The best response rate towards the first try of pembrolizumab was 38.9% (31.5% complete response rate (CR), 7.4% partial response (PR)). During the 41.8-month median follow-up duration, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.1months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.1months. The failure group, which was characterized by Deaville score (DS) 3-4 and circulating EBV detection, or DS 5 with/without EBV detection, had the worst PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001), followed by the high (DS 1-2 and EBV detection, or DS 3-4 and EBV not detected) and low-risk groups (DS 1-2 and EBV not detected). Among the 21 patients who achieved the best response at the first pembolizumab try, the patients who received planned 24 cycles presented better PFS than those who received incomplete cycles (57.6 months vs 20.9 months, P-value = 0.012). Among 13 patients who received avelumab or pembrolizumab in advance, a few who responded to the second trial of pembrolizumab administration had over one year of chemotherapy vacation. Determining the discontinuation or continuation of pembrolizumab would be considered in selected cases assessed by PET-CT and EBV monitoring. Disruption of pembrolizumab treatment may be advisable for the low-risk group(DS 1-2 and EBV not detected), whereas continuation could be warranted for the high-risk group (DS 1-2 and EBV detection, or DS 3-4 and EBV not detected). Moreover, it might be critical to maintain over 24 cycles to improve the survival outcome of R/R ENKTL.

Clinical biomarkers for thyroid immune-related adverse events in patients with stage III and IV gastrointestinal tumors.

Thyroid immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment appear to correlate with a better prognosis. We aimed to investigate clinical biomarkers associated with thyroid irAEs. We retrospectively analyzed data from 129 patients receiving programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors for stage III and IV gastrointestinal tumors. Patients were divided into two groups: "thyroid irAEs" group and "no thyroid irAEs" group. We compared continuous variables using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests and categorical variables using Pearson's chi-square test. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and associations between clinical features and thyroid irAEs were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Associations for thyroid irAEs and outcomes [progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)] of the patients were performed with a Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 129 patients, including 66 gastric cancer, 30 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and 33 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), were involved in this analysis with 47 cases of thyroid irAEs occurrence. The Cox proportional hazard model analysis confirmed the extended PFS [hazard rate (HR) = 0.447, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.215 to 0.931, p = 0.031] and OS (HR = 0.424, 95% CI: 0.201 to 0.893, p = 0.024) for thyroid irAEs group when compared with those of the no thyroid irAEs group. Association between thyroid irAEs and clinical characteristics at baseline was analyzed subsequently by univariate analysis. Higher body mass index (p = 0.005), increased eosinophil count (p = 0.014), increased lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.008), higher baseline thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (p = 0.001), HCC (p = 0.001) and increased adenosine deaminase (ADA) (p = 0.001) were linked with thyroid irAEs occurrence. The multivariable logistic regression model indicated that ADA [odds rate (OR) = 4.756, 95% CI: 1.147 to 19.729, p = 0.032] was independently associated with thyroid irAEs occurrence. Increased baseline level of ADA was associated with thyroid irAEs occurrence in patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumors who received ICI treatment. In the case of abnormal ADA, attention should be paid to the risk of thyroid irAEs.

Immunomodulation of salivary gland function due to cancer therapy.

Functional salivary glands (SG) are essential for maintaining oral health, and salivary dysfunction is a persistent major clinical challenge. Several cancer therapies also have off-target effects leading to SG dysfunction. Recent advances highlight the role of SG immune populations in homeostasis, dysfunction and gland regeneration. Here, we review what is known about SG immune populations during development and postnatal homeostasis. We summarize recent findings of immune cell involvement in SG dysfunction following cancer treatments such as irradiation (IR) for head and neck cancers, immune transplant leading to graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. The role of immune cells in SG in both homeostasis and disease, is an emerging field of research that may provide important clues to organ dysfunction and lead to novel therapeutic targets.

Abstract PO2-15-10: Identifying new immune-related biomarkers in TNBC with a look at PD-L1 cell-autonomous role

Abstract Background The programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has recently emerged as a target immunotherapy in Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the tumor-intrinsic role of PD-L1 and its pathway still needs to be fully clarified. Recently, a close association between CD73, PD-L1, cancer cell steaminess and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition phenotypes is emerging. In addition, we have previously demonstrated that miR-320a and miR-145 target PD-L1, whereas miR-30 family is known to target CD73. In this study, we aimed at investigating the role of these miRNAs as prognostic and predictive dynamic biomarkers for immunotherapy in TNBC. Additionally, we investigated whether PD-L1 exerts cellular autonomic functions in TNBC beyond its role in the immune checkpoint. Results CD73 and PD-L1 expression was assessed in a panel of breast cancer lines and the non-malignant breast cells MCF-10. We showed a significantly higher CD73 and PD-L1 expression in MDA-MB-231 (TNBC, Basal B) than in MCF-10. Conversely, in MCF-7 cells (HR +, Luminal A), CD73 and PD-L1 expression is lower than in MCF-10. Furthermore, we showed that low PDL1 expression is correlated with high levels of miR-320a and miR-145, and CD73 expression is inversely related to miR-30 expression. These putative biomarkers were also validated in two patients with different PD-L1 status. From the analysis of the data obtained by real-time qRT-PCR, we found high plasma level of CD73 and low plasma level of miR-320a, miR-145 and miR-30 in the patient with PD-L1 positive BC. On contrary, in the patient with PD-L1-negative BC, we found low plasma level of CD73 and high plasma level of miR-320a, miR-145 and miR-30. Furthermore, to explore whether PD-L1 could also have an intrinsic role in tumor development and invasiveness, we used stably MDA–MB-231 PD-L1-silenced cells. We found that cell growth, colony formation, migration rate and the ability to form spheres are consistently reduced upon shRNA-mediated PDL1 silencing. In particular, we observed a reduction in the number, diameter and volume of the 3D spheres compared to the control cells. To further demonstrate the role of PD-L1, we treated the PDL1-high expression cells MDA-MB-231, PD-L1 silenced MDA-MB-231 clones, and PD-L1 low expression cells MCF-7 with Durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1. Interestingly, we observed that in PD-L1 silenced clones and MCF-7 cells, the sphere-forming ability was increased in presence of Durvalumab treatment. On the contrary, in MDA-MB-231, Durvalumab inhibited the sphere-forming ability. Conclusion Our data confirm that PD-L1 and CD73 are targets of miR-320a/miR-145 and miR-30 respectively. These could be potential predictive dynamic biomarkers for chemotherapy, ICIs and anti-CD73 therapeutic approach. Future validations of these biomarkers in an extensive series of TNBC patients are needed to support their use in clinical practice. Here, we further characterized the cellular autonomic role of PD-L1 in breast cancer and showed a differential role of basal PD-L1 expression in PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors treatment efficacy. This suggests a potential role in monitoring PD-L1 expression indirect biomarkers (i.e. miR-320a, miR-145 and CD73) during ICIs treatment.