Book Reviews 123© Max Weber Studies 2017. explicitly grounded on a rejection of the very possibility of legal sociology . Halpérin, finally, offers an interesting and convincing defense of the view that Weber’s and Kelsen’s conceptions of the structure of legality, if read together in such a way as to make up for their respective shortfalls, may be more relevant to the practice of legal history than legal historians have commonly recognized. These two volumes contain a wealth of very valuable contributions on the intellectual background and the historical context of Weber’s and Kelsen’s work on the juridico-political. The second volume also offers some very good analysis of the relationship between Kelsen’s pure theory of law and Weber’s legal sociology. As pointed out above, the two volumes are not of equal interest to those who—as political theorists, legal philosophers, theorists of public law, or philosophers of social science—might turn to Weber’s and Kelsen’s texts because they are interested in their continuing systematic relevance. In particular , there is little explicit engagement with the question of the value of the rule of law, and of the role legality can or cannot play in the constitution of legitimate political order. Weber’s and Kelsen’s reflections on that issue, as I am sure the editors of the two volumes would agree, have the potential to invigorate contemporary critical legal thought. In light of this interest, the contributions to the collections under review here could have done more to establish productive connections between Weber’s and Kelsen’s work and contemporary problem-oriented debates on the juridico-political. Lars Vinx Bilkent University Esther Bertschinger-Joos, Frieda Gross und ihre Briefe an Else Jaffé. Ein bewegtes Leben im Umfeld von Anarchismus, Psychoanalyse und Bohème (Marburg: Verlag LiteraturWissenschaft.de, 2014), 335pp. (pbk). ISBN 978-3-936134-43-8. €19.95. Gottfried M. Heuer, Freud’s ‘Outstanding’ Colleague / Jung’s ‘Twin Brother’: The suppressed psychoanalytic and political significance of Otto Gross (Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2017), xvii + 252pp. (pbk). ISBN 978-1-138-89969-8. £31.99. If we were to choose one life that in its multiple relationships touched on all aspects of Wilhelmine society, that person could probably be Frieda Gross. Born in 1876 and brought up in a bourgeois household 124 Max Weber Studies© Max Weber Studies 2017. in the Austrian city of Graz she was denied by her parents, through gender convention, entry into professional or vocational education. Intelligent, with striking looks, and an outgoing personality she moped around Graz, having finished her boarding school education in Freiburg i. B., looking for love, a man, and a vocation to do good in the world. That man, eventually, was Otto Gross, who she describes as ‘different from the others’, ‘impractical’, ‘shy’, ‘otherworldly ’ and ‘crazy’. They married, a Catholic wedding, in Graz in 1903. Gross was a charismatic personality - this was Weber’s first use of the term, which he used to describe Gross when they met in Heidelberg in 1907. Gross was recognised as being superlatively intellectually gifted by his father Hans, a professor in criminal law and criminology, and by Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung. Otto Gross’s great ambition was to combine Nietzsche’s philosophy with the new psychoanalytic theory of Freud. Trained as a doctor of medicine and lecturing in Graz in psychiatry, in 1907 he moved to Munich as an assistant in Emil Kraepelin’s new psychiatric clinic. As two strongly affective personalities Otto and Frieda were enraptured with each other, role playing: ‘you be the mother’, ‘you be the queen’, ‘you be the beloved’, ‘you be the comrade’. Frieda was his constant interlocutor as Otto worked out a highly original variant of Freud’s theory of repression. Otto Gross’s brilliance came with a cost. In a letter (1902) to Else Jaffé Frieda wrote, ‘you have to realize that he has two ideals, two passions, the love of concepts and the love of Frieda’. He required a constant stream of patients for face to face psychoanalytic encounters, and he did not discriminate between hospital patients or acquaintances, friends and lovers he met in the cafés...
Read full abstract