Harassment Charges Research Articles

Outcomes of Sexual Harassment Charges

The article presents information on a study which examined a reported case of sexual harassment charges against an employer. Details are presented regarding the nature of the reported sexual harass...

OUTCOME OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT CHARGES.

The article presents information on a study which examined a reported case of sexual harassment charges against an employer. Details are presented regarding the nature of the reported sexual harass...

Learning from higher education

revailing myths the contrary, inP stitutions of higher education are not always sedate enclaves of scholarly interaction. Ivory Tower, like all hierarchical organizations, is fraught with the day-to-day tug and pull of its members' needs, beliefs, feelings and misunderstandings. In short, there is often conflict on campus. Although colleges and universities have for some time been concerned over faculty/staff/administration disputes (t~pically involving contract or tenure issues), it is only within the last decade that attention has been given conflicts involving students. A survey of 741 colleges and universities (Folger and Shubert, 1981) found that over half of the institutions studied had implemented some type of procedure that used a third party in disputes invoMng students. These procedures, both formal and ad hoc, covered a wide range of student-related issues, including charges of discrimination, capricious or arbitrary enactment of rules or regulations, grade grievances, charges of sexual harassment, grievances about the quality of instruction, the adequacy of financial assistance awards, and issues centering around dormitory living. The results of that study provide descriptive information about what colleges and universities are doing in their use of third parties resolve conflicts affecting students. But the study does not provide insights about why the dispute resolution procedures were developed or how the}, have been implemented. Nor does the study make a W attempt assess the relative effectiveness of the various methods of third party intervention either in terms of individual disputes or larger institutional changes in policy or practice. The study reported here was undertaken in an effort provide answers the '~.L how~ and to v~taat effect questions of using third parties resolve disputes involving students.

Relationship of Nature of Sexual Harassment, Evidence, and Pre-Filing Actions to Sexual Harassment Charge Outcomes.

Formal sexual harassment charges filed under Title VII were examined to assess the relative frequency of occurrence of various types of outcomes, and investigate the influence of selected case vari...

COMPLAINANT CHARACTERISTICS AND REPORTED BEHAVIORS AND CONSEQUENCES ASSOCIATED WITH FORMAL SEXUAL HARASSMENT CHARGES

Eighty‐one formal sexual harassment charges were examined in an attempt to identify the characteristics of individuals who file formal sexual harassment charges and describe the behaviors and employment‐related consequences associated with such charges. The sex, age, marital status, educational level, occupation, and salary distributions of complainants differed significantly from the expected distributions based upon labor force statistics. As regards reported behaviors and consequences, the most compelling finding was that over 65% of the charges involved job discharge.

When women cry ‘Wolf’: Liability for false charges of sexual harassment

Employment Relations TodayVolume 10, Issue 1 p. 73-81 Employment Relation Forum When women cry ‘Wolf’: Liability for false charges of sexual harassment Naida B. Axford, Naida B. Axford Naida B. Axford is with the law firm of Hocker & Axford, P.C., in Tempe, Arizona. Ms. Axford's practice primarily involves labor relations law, including employment discrimination, education labor issues, wrongful discharge, Fair Labor Standards Act litigation, unemployment compensation defense, and public employee litigation.Search for more papers by this author Naida B. Axford, Naida B. Axford Naida B. Axford is with the law firm of Hocker & Axford, P.C., in Tempe, Arizona. Ms. Axford's practice primarily involves labor relations law, including employment discrimination, education labor issues, wrongful discharge, Fair Labor Standards Act litigation, unemployment compensation defense, and public employee litigation.Search for more papers by this author First published: Spring 1983 https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.3910100109 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Volume10, Issue1Spring 1983Pages 73-81 RelatedInformation

FDA denies employee harassment charges

RETURN TO ISSUEPREVNewsNEXTFDA denies employee harassment chargesCite this: Chem. Eng. News 1974, 52, 39, 5Publication Date (Print):September 30, 1974Publication History Published online7 November 2010Published inissue 30 September 1974https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-v052n039.p005bCopyright © 1974 American Chemical SocietyArticle Views3Altmetric-Citations-LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit PDF (133 KB) SUBJECTS:Pharmaceuticals Get e-Alerts

Gofman and tamplin: harassment charges against AEC, Livermore.

Gofman and tamplin: harassment charges against AEC, Livermore.