A more general approach to distinguishing between so-called homogeneous vs heterogeneous catalysts has been developed and intrinsically tested in answering the question {open_quotes}what is the true catalyst in the active hydrogenation system which evolves from cyclohexene, hydrogen, and the discrete, polyoxoanion-supported Ir(I) catalyst precursor (Bu{sub 4}N){sub 5}Na{sub 3}[(1,5-COD)Ir{sm_bullet}P{sub 2}W{sub 15}Nb{sub 3}O{sub 62}]?{close_quotes}. The approach developed and utilized consists of four categories of experiments: (I) catalyst isolation and characterization studies, with an emphasis on TEM; (II) initial kinetic studies, emphasizing whether or not the isolated catalyst can account for the observed kinetics, especially any induction period seen, and whether or not the reaction exhibits a {plus_minus}10% reproducible rate; (III) quantitative phenomenological catalyst poisoning and recovery experiments; (IV) additional kinetic and mechanistic studies and chemical tests, all interpreted with strict adherence to the principle that the correct description of the catalyst (i.e., the correct mechanism) will explain all of the data. The present approach has identified a previously unknown type of hybrid homogeneous-heterogeneous, Ir{sub {approximately}190-450}{sm_bullet}polyoxoanion/Bu{sub 4}N{sup +} catalyst of average composition [Ir(0){sub {approximately}300}(P{sub 4}W{sub 30}Nb{sub 6}O{sub 123}{sup 16{minus}}){sub {approximately}33}](Bu{sub 4}N){sub {approximately}300}Na{sub {approximately}233}.