In March 2024 Construction and Building Materials published “Water distribution characteristics of capillary absorption in internally cured concrete with superabsorbent polymers”, which claims to present a water distribution model characterising the spatiotemporal moisture content evolution in internally cured concrete with superabsorbent polymers during capillary absorption. This discussion, considered a post-publication critique, establishes that the paper’s water distribution model conflicts with the paper’s capillary absorption tests. While the model is based on the premise of the square-root-of-time behaviour of capillary absorption, the tests do not demonstrate that square-root-of-time behaviour. This critique in addition questions the paper’s forthright application of the power-law diffusivity expression with exponent 4, given that its validity for the paper’s materials has not been verified. It is shown that different but equivalent diffusivity expressions lead to different moisture diffusivities at lower moisture contents.