Catholic Social Teaching and the Gig Economy: Engaging Labour Law and the Desert Fathers Cathleen Kaveny Catholic Social Teaching has not only consistently emphasised the dignity of work, it has also tirelessly defended the intrinsic value of the worker. In Rerum novarum (1891), Pope Leo XIII admonished wealthy owners and employers ‘not to look upon their work people as their bondsmen, but to respect in every man his dignity as a person ennobled by Christian character’.1 Ninety years later, magisterial teaching has deepened and even radicalised these moral commitments. In Laborem exercens (1981), Pope John Paul II make the case that the true meaning and value of work lies not in the objective value of the work product, but rather in the flourishing of workers themselves as human subjects. He maintains that this insight ‘leads immediately to a very important conclusion of an ethical nature: however true it may be that man is destined for work and called to it, in the first place work is “for man” and not man “for work”’.2 What does respecting the dignity of work and honouring the intrinsic value of the worker entail? First, it requires careful balancing of two views of work found in the common Christian tradition. On the one hand, work is recognised to be onerous; both Leo XIII and John Paul II take pains to grapple with the biblical teaching that work is meant in part to be a punishment for Adam’s original sin.3 On the other hand, work is also perceived as having positive aspects for those who engage in it. Even punishment, after all, is meant to operate for the good of the individuals who are punished. Ideally, therefore, one’s work can be a calling, an aspect of one’s vocation. Consequently, work ought to contribute to the worker’s material and spiritual flourishing. Second, respecting work and honouring workers requires concerted attention to the needs of all those who are stakeholders in human work. Productive work does not merely contribute to the bottom line of the employer. It also facilitates the well-being of the workers themselves, and Studies • volume 108 • number 432 399 Catholic Social Teaching and the Gig Economy: Engaging Labour Law and the Desert Fathers beyond that to the common good, by nurturing a stable, productive, selfactualised workforce whose members also have time and energy to make contributions to families, churches, private associations and the political life of the community. These insights are in some respects timeless, because they are rooted in bedrock values of the Catholic moral tradition. At the same time, their concretisation and implementation inevitably changes with the times, for both normative and factual reasons. For example, magisterial teaching has evolved along with developments of both the Church’s and the broader society’s understanding of the relationship between human beings and creation. Whereas Leo XIII spoke unselfconsciously of ‘dominion’, Francis emphasises the need to care for the earth as our mother and sister.4 Moreover, different eras pose different threats to the dignity and wellbeing of workers. Rerum novarum is preoccupied with the conflict between labour and capital in the mechanical age of automation, while Laborem exercens explores that conflict in the era of technology and globalised capital.5 More difficult but equally important to identify are changes to the nature of work itself. In grappling with how to apply Catholic Social Teaching to current problems, it is essential to interrogate the governing imaginary of ‘work’ that tacitly animates the encyclicals we treat as normative. Despite occasional protestations to the contrary, Laborem exercens largely operates with a tacit view of work that is modelled on the lives of people who work in a mill town. John Paul II seems to contemplate a social context in which most workers are employed many years at the same plant. Labouring with their hands and bodies, they produce tangible goods that can be brought to market or incorporated in other products. Finally, he treats the workplace as an actual social context, in which workers develop steady and face-to-face relationships with co-workers and management. In short, he tacitly assumes a paradigm of work that is (1) stable...