A number of books and articles describing and illustrating projective technics appeared during the three-year interval, indicating the increasing interest and use of these procedures. The rationale of these methods was especially emphasized in Frank's monograph (37). He discussed the dynamic theory of personality underlying the use of these tests, the current trends in scientific thought which made their development possible, and different theoretical approaches to the diagnosis of personality. He briefly described the main technics used, classifying them as constitutive, constructive, interpretive, cathartic, and refractive. Another useful work for the student in this field was written by Bell (8). He made a comprehensive summary of the literature of many projective methods and further attempted to provide an introductory manual for many of them. The publication of Buros' yearbook (15) provided another valuable source of references. Rosenzweig and Kogan (67) gave many illustrations of the scoring and interpretation of some of the more important tests in their book on psychological testing. The multiple use of projective technics continued. The Rorschach, the Thematic Apperception Test, and play technics were used by Merrill (54) in her study of juvenile delinquents. Havighurst and Taba (44) used the Rorschach and a TAT type test in one phase of their study of adolescent character and personality. Carp (16), rating in the Rorschachs, play productions, and crayon drawings of ninety-six thirdgrade students, found only a chance relationship between constriction ratings for an individual child in these three factors. Bell (7), however, found that the personality picture evoked in a play situation and a picturestory situation could be matched successfully. Goodenough (38) emphasized the need for caution in the interpretation of children's fantasy products and the need for more thoro investigation of the individual child. Schafer and Leitch (71) devised a tentative list of signs for the TAT, the Rorschach, and the Stanford-Binet Scale, Form L, for detecting mal-