What seems to be a ‘mere’ cofactor of a core factor to some, might be the main component to others; it is all a question of perspective and, probably quite often, pure semantics. SGT1 (SUPPRESSOR OF G2 ALLELE OF SKP1) was discovered genetically before it was recognized as being a cofactor of the molecular chaperone HSP90 (HEAT‐SHOCK PROTEIN 90). The molecular details of this interaction and its physiological relevance are the subject of a paper from the Shirasu and Guerois groups, in which they combine structural biology, biochemistry and genetics (Kadota et al , 2008, this issue). The interaction surfaces were analysed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and by testing point mutants with pull‐down experiments for interaction in vitro and by testing them for function in the resistance of plants against pathogens in vivo . If these approaches left any doubt that the protein–protein interactions are real, then the in vivo complementation by mutants with compensatory swaps of amino acids in the interface between the two partner proteins leaves no room for appeal. The purpose of this protein complex is to support crucial pathogen‐sensor proteins of the plant immune system—the NB‐LRR (NUCLEOTIDE BINDING AND LEUCINE‐RICH REPEAT) proteins—of which Arabidopsis encodes approximately 125 (Jones & Dangl, 2006). Remarkably, both the SGT1–HSP90 molecular chaperone machine and its targets, the NB‐LRR proteins, also have a function in the innate immune responses of animals (da Silva Correia et al , 2007; Mayor et al , 2007). HSP90 is usually considered to be the central subunit of a molecular machine. It owes this prominent role to the fact that it is an abundant cytosolic protein, perhaps even the most abundant protein in unstressed cells (Lai et al , 1984), and that it has ATPase activity, suggesting that it might ‘burn’ ATP to function as a …
Read full abstract