Numerically, the traditional family, with the man as breadwinner and the woman as homemaker, has decreased in importance. The dominant force behind this process is individualization and growth of real income (Lesthaeghe and Meekers, 1986). It went hand in hand with lower fertility, higher divorce rates, people staying single for a longer time, and growing female labour force participation. A major consequence of this process is the change in residential location needs. For instance, one of the triggers of gentrification is the rise of single households and childless dual-career households (Lipton, 1977; Hamnett, 1984; Dengschat, 1991). In gender studies it is often argued that suburban 2 environments are relatively unfriendly to working women. Most suburban areas were built in a period in which the dominant view prescribed a sharp division of labour in the household: the husband doing paid work elsewhere, the woman doing unpaid work at home. In short, this view led to the creation of suburbs, characterized by long commuting distances from the city center (where most employment was located), poor public transportation, and limited child-care facilities. A contradiction has grown between the changing gender relations and women's changing roles on the one hand and, on the other, the present form of the suburbs (England, 1991). Therefore, central cities are regarded as better environments for women compared with single-familydwelling suburbs (Rose, 1984). In cities, women have more access to facilities and a greater diversity of housing and services. According to Stapleton (1980), it is the changing allocation of time between domestic labour, paid labour, and leisure which leads to alterations in location needs. The fact that working women have better opportunities in central cities, and for that reason can be found more frequently in these environments, is not empirically corroborated in the Netherlands. There, many dual-career households are living in suburban areas (Kruythoff, 1993; Camstra, 1994). Factors which seem to influence residential environment choice are the equality of hours worked, level of education, having children, income, and stage in the life