With the acceleration of urbanization, it is essential to carry out change detection (CD) and obtain surface change information in urban areas. In the early stages, the spectral information of remote sensing images was used as a change index to capture the spectral and texture changes of ground objects in a two-dimensional plane. However, due to the dense buildings in urban areas, shadows and occlusions can be easily formed, and spectral information is sensitive to the imaging environment, such as the illumination, atmospheric conditions, and imaging angles, so that the detection results based on remote sensing images can often be incomplete. Most changes include not only 2-D plane changes but also 3-D elevation changes. Compared with spectral information, the elevation is more stable and more resistant to interference. Therefore, the fusion of remote sensing image and digital surface model (DSM) data has the potential to be used to detect the changes in urban areas. In this article, we propose a complementary evidence fusion 3-D CD framework based on the Dempster–Shafer theory (CDST). In this framework, DSM and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data are combined using a complementary evidence combination rule. The DSM data can effectively overcome the impact of shadows, and the NDVI data can capture the relevant changes of height-insensitive ground objects, such as vegetation and water. When mapping the basic probability assignment (BPA) of the difference image (DI), prior knowledge is used to ensure that the BPA is not affected by the data distribution. Since DSM and remote sensing image data are heterogeneous data, there is a high degree of conflict when representing the change information characteristics of specific areas. For example, the change between grassland and road is small in elevation but significant in the spectral details, and the traditional Dempster’s combination rule no longer applies. The proposed CDST framework uses a complementary evidence combination rule, which can effectively alleviate the conflicts between the evidence sources and improve the integrity of the detected changes. The experimental results obtained on real datasets confirm that the proposed method does indeed perform well.
Read full abstract