Land use land cover (LUCC) scenarios are often co-produced by researchers and a reduced group of local actors. While most scenarios’ evaluations analyse feedback from actors involved in the scenarios making, restricting the diffusion of scientific results to the co-construction group can limit their potential to support land management. In this study, we investigate if disseminating LUCC scenarios to a broad and heterogeneous audience is effective in overcoming socio-cultural and knowledge-related barriers to blue and green infrastructure (BGINs). We presented LUCC scenarios that study the impact of different blue and green infrastructure strategies on water resources and biodiversity. In 12 workshops, we collected feedback from 147 local actors, including representatives, water management technicians, farmers and students. Findings indicate that despite the original aim of the scenarios being to support the integration of BGINs in land management, the primary benefits were a deeper understanding of future land management challenges and cause-effect relationships between different landscape elements and socioeconomic drivers of change. In addition, we observed that respondents’ professional activity significantly influences the evaluation. We conclude that, while scenarios can be an effective tool in overcoming some of the barriers of BGINs, the outcomes of scenarios can be maximised by making the expected outcomes (including conceptual ones) explicit and by acknowledging local actors’ roles in land management during the dissemination.