Cervical Spine Range Of Motion Research Articles

Change of cervical flexion range of motion influences postoperative sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty

ObjectiveThe relationships between preoperative cervical spine range of motion (ROM) and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment (CSA), and clinical outcomes after laminoplasty (LMP) have been widely studied. However, the impact of ROM changes on postoperative CSA and clinical outcomes after LMP remains unclear. Herein, patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) were retrospectively analyzed to explore the association between postoperative cervical ROM changes and CSA and surgical outcomes.MethodsPatients who underwent cervical LMP at our hospital between January 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. CSA parameters were measured before the surgery and at the final follow-up. Loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) was defined as preoperative cervical lordosis (CL) - postoperative CL. An increase in the cervical sagittal vertical axis (I-cSVA) was defined as postoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) - preoperative cSVA. We defined the changes in cervical flexion range of motion (△Flex ROM, preoperative Flex ROM minus postoperative Flex ROM) > 10° as L- Flex ROM group, and △Flex ROM ≤ 10° as S- Flex ROM group. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog score (VAS) were used to assess the surgical outcomes.ResultsThe study comprised 74 patients and the average follow-up period was 31.83 months. CL, total ROM, and Flex ROM decreased and cSVA increased after cervical LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were positively correlated with △Flex. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that a decrease in the Flex ROM was a risk factor for LCL and I-cSVA after LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were higher in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group. Postoperative JOA and the JOA recovery rate were worse in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group.ConclusionsCervical total and Flex ROM decreased after cervical LMP. The reduction of Flex ROM was associated with LCL and I-cSVA after surgery. The preservation of cervical Flex ROM helps maintain CSA after LMP. Therefore, more attention should be paid to maintaining cervical ROM to obtain good CSA and surgical effects after cervical LMP.

Disc Degeneration and Cervical Spine Intervertebral Motion: A Cross-Sectional Study in Patients with Neck Pain and Matched Healthy Controls.

While neck pain can be defined in clinical terms, in most cases the underlying pathophysiology is largely unknown. Regional cervical spine range of motion is often found to be reduced in patients with neck pain compared to persons without pain although it is not clear if the decreased range is cause or effect. Less is known about the role of intervertebral kinematics and how that might be related to the presence of disc degeneration. In this study, the prevalence of intervertebral disc degeneration and continuous cervical intervertebral motion were both measured utilizing quantitative fluoroscopy (QF) in patients with subacute or chronic neck pain (n = 29) and gender-matched healthy controls (n = 30). A composite disc degeneration (CDD) score was calculated for each participant from the first, neutral, lateral fluoroscopic image. Intervertebral motion sharing parameters of motion-sharing inequality (MSI) and motion-sharing variability (MSV) were derived from the active cervical motion sequences obtained while patients were seated. The objective was to determine if average age, CDD, MSI, and MSV values were correlated and if there were differences in these variables between the neck pain group and the healthy control group. Correlation analysis was conducted for age, CDD, MSI, and MSV in each group. Age was moderately correlated with MSV in cervical spine extension in patients only (r = 0.63, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of disc degeneration (CDD) between patients, who had on average mild pain and related disability, and healthy controls (median CDD 2 both groups, p = 0.94). There were also no significant differences in either flexion or extension intervertebral motion-sharing inequality or variability (MSI or MSV) between groups as measured during active cervical motion.

Laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in the treatment of multisegment cervical spinal canal stenosis: a comparative analysis

BackgroundMultisegment cervical canal stenosis is one of the most common causes of spinal cord dysfunction. Cervical laminectomy affords direct relief from dorsal stenosis, but many concerns were raised regarding its effect on spinal stability and cervical sagittal alignment. Laminectomy in conjunction with lateral mass screws is aiming to prevent recurrence of stenosis and to achieve much improvement of the cervical spine range of motion and curvature.ObjectivesTo compare the clinical and radiological outcome of laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in the treatment of patients with multisegment cervical canal stenosis.Patients and methodsA retrospective study conducted on 46 patients with multisegment cervical canal stenosis who were treated between April 2018 and April 2021. Patients were divided into two groups. The 20 cases in group (A) underwent conventional laminectomies and the 26 cases in group (B) underwent laminectomies with lateral mass screw fixation. Operative complications, visual analogue scale (VAS), neurological functional recovery and cervical curvature changes were compared between the two groups.ResultsOperative times in group A were significantly less than it was in group B (P < 0.001). The postoperative VAS scores in group B were significantly lower than those in group A (P < 0.05). No statistical differences in the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score could be found between the two groups after surgery. Patients in group B in comparison with those in group A had good alignment of the cervical spine with maintenance of curvature index (P < 0.001).ConclusionsIn multilevel cervical canal stenosis, internal fixation using lateral mass screws in conjunction with laminectomy can be of a considerable significance than laminectomy alone in improving the axial symptoms and ceasing further disease progression through stabilization of the cervical spine and maintaining the sagittal alignment.

A Biomechanical Investigation of Cervical Spine Range of Motion for UH-60 Aviators in Real and Simulated Flight Environments.

Military flight surgeons evaluating aviators for flight fitness based on the cervical spine range of motion (CROM) have no operationally relevant reference with which to make a reliable determination. The published physiological limits for the general population do not necessarily apply to military aviators. CROM requirements for rotary-wing aviators would ideally be defined by measurements taken directly within their operational environment. Nine subjects performed the same predetermined 1-hour flight mission in a UH-60 aircraft and then, at least 2 days later, in the U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory (USAARL) NUH-60 flight simulator. Head position was recorded using an optical-based inertial tracker attached to the night vision goggle mount of the subjects' flight helmets. Matched-pair t-tests were implemented to compare the maximum CROM between aircraft and simulated flights and the published general population. The percent of flight time in severe flexion and lateral bending was not statistically different (P > 0.05) between real and simulated flights but was statistically lower in the simulator for severe twist rotation (P < 0.05). The maximum CROM for the advanced maneuvers was significantly lower than the norms for the general population (P < 0.05). The flight simulator could be a useful platform for flight surgeons determining CROM-related flight fitness if methods to increase the frequency of neck twist rotation movements during flight were implemented. The published maximum CROM values for the general population are not an appropriate reference for flight surgeons making flight fitness determinations related to CROM.

EFFECTIVENESS OF KALTENBORN MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL EXERCISE FOR SUBJECTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS

BACKGROUND &amp; AIM: The application of joint mobilization to the upper thoracic spine has been reported to have an positive effect, sometimes immediately, on cervical spine dysfunction, in conjunction with the provision of pain relief. However, previous including joint mobilization, have been ineffective in a busy clinical setting because they involve the direct and passive intervention of therapists. So the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of kaltenborn mobilization technique among cervical spondylosis. OBJECTIVE: • To determine the effectiveness of kaltenborn mobilization technique on reducing pain by using VAS • To evaluate the effectiveness of kaltenborn mobilization technique on improving cervical spine range of motion (ROM) by using goniometer. METHOD: STUDY DESIGN: experimental study SAMPLING TECHNIQUE: Convenient sampling technique SAMPLE SIZE: 30 RESULT: Statistical study revealed that among 30 individuals, The test shows that the subjects received kaltenborn mobilization along with interferential therapy have improved reduction in pain and increased in ROM among cervical spondylosis. CONCLUSION: From this results it has been concluded that there was a definite and positive effect of Kaltenborn mobilization technique along with Interferential therapy for cervical spondylosis patients. KEYWORDS: kaltenborn mobilization, goniometer, cervical spondylosis, isometric exercises.

Cervical Range of Motion Assessment through Inertial Technology: A Validity and Reliability Study

Inertial technology has spread widely for its comfortable use and adaptability to various motor tasks. The main objective of this study was to assess the validity of inertial measurements of the cervical spine range of motion (CROM) when compared to that of the optoelectronic system in a group of healthy individuals. A further aim of this study was to determine the optimal placement of the inertial sensor in terms of reliability of the measure, comparing measurements obtained from the same device placed at the second cervical vertebra (C2), the forehead (F) and the external occipital protuberance (EOP). Twenty healthy subjects were recruited and asked to perform flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation movements of the head. Outcome measurements of interest were CROM and mean angular velocities for each cervical movement. Results showed that inertial measurements have good reliability (0.75 &lt; ICC &lt; 0.9). Excellent reliability (ICC &gt; 0.9) was found in both flexion and right lateral bending angles. All parameters extracted with EOP placement showed ICC &gt; 0.62, while ICC &lt; 0.5 was found in lateral bending mean angular velocities both for F and C2 placements. Therefore, the optimal sensor’s positioning emerged to be EOP. These results suggest that inertial technology could be useful and reliable for the evaluation of the CROM.

The relationship between cervical spine range of motion and postural sway in mechanical neck pain: A cross-sectional study.

Impairments in postural sway have been identified in people with mechanical neck pain. The influence of cervical spine range of motion (ROM) on postural sway is unclear in mechanical neck pain (MNP). This study investigated the relationship between cervical spine range of motion (ROM) and postural sway in MNP. The cervical ROM was measured using the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device. Standing postural sway characterised by mean centre of pressure (COP) measurements in the anterior posterior (AP) and medio-lateral direction with eyes closed and feet together condition was recorded on a posturography platform. Pearson product moment correlation coefficient was used to identify the relationship between cervical ROM and postural sway. Seventy-two MNP individuals (Mean age: ) of either sex (Male: ) were recruited. Overall, no statistically significant correlations were identified between cervical spine ROM in sagittal and frontal plane and postural sway (r values ranging from 0.00 to ; p-values ). However, a weak negative correlation was present between the cervical rotation and AP (r-; p-) and mediolateral (r-; p-) COP excursion. The cervical spine ROM was found to have a weak relationship with postural sway in individuals with MNP. This suggests the investigation of other mechanisms especially muscle tension which might be responsible for altered postural sway in MNP.

Functional range of motion of the cervical spine in cervical fusion patients during activities of daily living

Following cervical spine fusion there is a reduction in maximum range of motion (ROM) but how this impacts activity of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life is unknown. This study’s purpose is to quantify maximum and functional cervical spine ROM in patients with multi-level cervical fusion (>3 levels) compared to controls during ADLs and to correlate functional range of motion with scores from patient reported outcomes measures (PROs) including the Comparative Pain Scale (CPS), Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ), and Neck Disability Index (NDI).An inertial measurement unit (IMU) system quantified ROM during ADLs in the extension/flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation directions of motion. The reliability of this system was compared to standard optical motion tracking. Fourteen participants (8 females, age = 60.0 years (18.7) (median, (interquartile range)) with a history of multi-level cervical fusion (years post-op 0.9 (0.7)) were compared to 16 controls (13 females, age = 52.1 years (15.8)). PROs were collected for each participant.Fusion participants had significantly decreased maximum ROM in all directions of motion. Fusion participants had decreased ROM for some ADLs (backing up a car, using a phone, donning socks, negotiating stairs). CPS, FABQ, and NDI scores were significantly increased in fusion participants. Reductions in two activities (backing up a car, stair negotiation) correlated with a combination of increased PRO scores.Cervical fusion decreases maximum ROM and is correlated with increased PROs in some ADLs, however there is minimal impact on functional ROM. Investigation into velocity and acceleration may yield categorization of pathologic movement.

Preoperative Range of Motion in Extension May Influence Postoperative Cervical Kyphosis After Laminoplasty.

Retrospective observational study. The objective of this study was to investigate factors associated with cervical kyphosis after laminoplasty. Many factors are reportedly associated with the deterioration of cervical curvature after laminoplasty, including cervical lordosis angle, cervical spine range of motion (ROM), T1 slope, and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis. Postlaminoplasty kyphosis or deterioration of cervical curvature is likely caused by multiple factors. There is currently no consensus on these issues. Data of patients treated with laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy at our institution during 2008-2018 were reviewed. The following variables were collected for each patient: age and sex; follow-up time; surgery involving C3 (yes or no); surgery involving C7 (yes or no); distribution of segments operated on; number of laminae operated on; flexion, extension, and total ROM; cervical lordotic angle; longitudinal distance index; curvature index; C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis; and T1 slope. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess possible risk factors for postoperative kyphosis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine the cutoff values of risk factors. The study cohort comprised 151 patients. Logistic regression analysis indicated that sex, number of laminae operated on, and preoperative extension ROM were significantly associated with postoperative cervical kyphosis ( P <0.05). There was significantly greater postoperative kyphosis in women than in men; the more segments operated on, the greater the risk of postoperative kyphosis, and the larger the preoperative extension ROM, the lower the risk of postlaminoplasty kyphosis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value for preoperative extension ROM is 22.1°. Preoperative extension ROM may be associated with the development of postoperative kyphosis. The cutoff value of preoperative extension ROM that suggested the prospect of postoperative kyphosis in our sample was 22.1°.

Outcomes of massage and acupressure therapy in taking care of patients with shoulder-neck strain syndrome at The Military institute of Traditional Medicine in 2022

Objectives: To describe the outcomes of massage and acupressure therapy in taking care of patients with shoulder-neck strain syndrome at the Military Institute of Traditional medicine in 2022. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive design was performed on 170 patients. Treatment results were assessed by the following contents: pain level, cervical spine range of motion, and daily activity level. Results: the rate of patients with muscle spasticity in the neck and back on the first day of treatment was 91.2% and 82.65%, respectively; after 20 days of treatment were 24.12% and 6.77%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant with p&lt;0.05. After 20 days of treatment, most patients had mild pain 0 &lt; VAS ≤ 2 (74.2%). The amplitude of the cervical spine increased, and the range of motion of the cervical spine was improved (the rate of limitation of motion decreased from 15.33% to 0%). Conclusion: The therapy of massage and acupressure significantly affects patients with neck and shoulder pain.

Association between Age, Sex and Cervical Spine Sagittal Plane Motion: A Descriptive and Correlational Study in Healthy Volunteers

Active motion examination of patients with cervical spine-related pathologies is necessary to establish baseline function, set physical therapy goals, and choose interventions. This study investigated the sagittal plane active range of motion (ROM) of the global (GCS) and upper cervical spine (UCS) in relation to age and sex in healthy volunteers. One hundred twenty-two volunteers aged 18 to 75 years participated. Volunteers were excluded if they displayed any characteristic that could affect cervical spine ROM. GCS and UCS flexion and extension were each measured three times using a CROM device. Linear regression models (LRMs) were developed to explore the relationships between age and sex and GCS and UCS ROM. The LRM for age showed a decrease in GCS flexion (-2.01°), GCS extension (-3.33°), and UCS extension (-1.87°) for every decade of increasing age. The LRM for sex showed that men displayed less ROM than women in GCS extension (-6.52°) and UCS extension (-2.43°). These results suggest an age-related loss of sagittal plane GCS ROM and UCS extension ROM, and sex-related differences in GCS and UCS extension with women having greater motion than men.

Improvement of cervical spine mobility and stance stability by wearing a custom-made mandibular splint in male recreational athletes.

The range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine and postural stability are important for an economical and motorically adequate adaptation of the body to any situation. Therefore, this study aims to analyze whether these two components of postural and movement control can be influenced by means of a splint in a centric position compared to habitual occlusion. 38 recreational male athletes volunteered. Cervical spine ROM was recorded using an ultrasound system and the a pressure measuring plate for postural stability (length of center of pressure (CoP) movement, area of CoP). The two dental occlusion conditions employed were the habitual occlusion and wearing a splint in an idealized, condylar position close to the centric position. Level of significance was set at ρ ≤ 0.05. The cervical spine mobility increased significantly by wearing the splint regarding rotation to the left (+3.9%) and right (+2.7%) and lateral flexion to the left (+4.4%) and right (+6.7%). Wearing the splint reduced the area of sway deflections by about 31.5% in the bipedal stance and by about 2.4% (left) and 28.2% (right) in the unipedal stance. The CoP trace was reduced in the sagittal plane by approximately 8.2% in the right single-leg stance. The major findings seem to demonstrate that wearing a splint that keeps the jaw close to the centric relation may increase the cervical ROM and may improve balance stability in male recreational athletes. Changing the jaw relation in athletes can possibly aid the release of performance potentials by improving coordination skills.

Balance Stability and Cervical Spine Range of Motion While Wearing a Custom-Made Mandibular Splint with Special Consideration of the Sex

Introduction: An altered dental occlusion can also affect balance stability or mobility. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine whether wearing a mandibular splint, which retains the occlusion close to the centric occlusion, can increase or decrease balance stability and the range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine as opposed to the habitual occlusion, and if there is a difference between men and women. Material and methods: In this study, 41 male (34.7 ± 11.4 years) and 50 female subjects (29.3 ± 12.7 years) participated. Cervical spine ROM was recorded using the Zebris CMS 70P system. For balance stability, a pressure measuring platform integrated into the treadmill system (FDM-T) of the company Zebris® Medical GmbH was used. Here, the area of the ellipse and the length of the Center of Pressure (CoP) was recorded whilst in the bipedal and unipedal stance. Results: The sex comparison showed significant differences for the area of the ellipse of the right leg and ROM extension in the habitual occlusion: females showed a better balance stability and a larger ROM extension. When wearing the splint, only the CoP of the left leg was significant with a better balance stability in female subjects. Within the male subjects, the ellipse area in the bipedal and unipedal (left/right) stance showed mostly significant reductions, while the rotation left and right as well as the lateral flexion (left/right) improved when wearing the splint. Female subjects, when wearing the splint, showed a significant decrease of the ellipse area and the CoP length when standing on either leg. Flexion, rotation to the right and lateral flexion to the left/right, all increased significantly. Conclusion: Wearing a splint that keeps the jaw close to the centric relation improved balance stability and increased the ROM of the cervical spine for both male and female subjects. Women may have marginally different basic balance stability strategies than men, with regard to bipedal and unipedal standing. Nevertheless, there are scarcely any differences between the two sexes in the adaptation when wearing a splint. Changing the jaw relation in healthy adults can possibly support the release of movement potentials that simplify the performance of everyday activities or sports movements.

Development and testing of a new application for measuring motion at the cervical spine

BackgroundCervical myelopathy is a progressive disease, and early detection and treatment contribute to prognosis. Evaluation of cervical intervertebral instability by simple X-ray is used in clinical setting and the information about instability is important to understand the cause of myelopathy, but evaluation of the intervertebral instability by X-ray is complicated. To reduce the burden of clinicians, a system that automatically measures the range of motion was developed by comparing the flexed and extended positions in the lateral view of a simple X-ray of the cervical spine. The accuracy of the system was verified by comparison with spine surgeons and residents to determine whether the system could withstand actual use.MethodsAn algorithm was created to recognize the four corners of the vertebral bodies in a lateral cervical spine X-ray image, and a system was constructed to automatically measure the range of motion between each vertebra by comparing X-ray images of the cervical spine in extension and flexion. Two experienced spine surgeons and two residents performed the study on the remaining 23 cases. Cervical spine range of motion was measured manually on X-ray images and compared with automatic measurement by this system.ResultsOf a total of 322 cervical vertebrae in 46 images, 313 (97%) were successfully estimated by our learning model. The mean intersection over union value for all the 46-test data was 0.85. The results of measuring the CRoM angle with the proposed cervical spine motion angle measurement system showed that the mean error from the true value was 3.5° and the standard deviation was 2.8°. The average standard deviations for each measurement by specialist and residents are 2.9° and 3.2°.ConclusionsA system for measuring cervical spine range of motion on X-ray images was constructed and showed accuracy comparable to that of spine surgeons. This system will be effective in reducing the burden on and saving time of orthopedic surgeons by avoiding manually measuring X-ray images.Trial registration Retrospectively registered with opt-out agreement.

Comparison of short-term effectiveness of Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement and Zero-P fusion for treatment of single-segment cervical spondylosis

To compare the short-term effectiveness and the impact on cervical segmental range of motion using Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement and Zero-P fusion for the treatment of single-segment cervical spondylosis. The clinical data of 56 patients with single-segment cervical spondylosis who met the selection criteria between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into study group (27 cases, using Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement) and control group (29 cases, using Zero-P fusion) according to different surgical methods. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, type of cervical spondylosis, disease duration, involved segments and preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), surgical segments range of motion, upper and lower adjacent segments range of motion, overall cervical spine range of motion, and cervical curvature (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization stay, time of returning to work, clinical effectiveness indicators (VAS score, JOA score, NDI, and improvement rate of each score), and imaging indicators (surgical segments range of motion, upper and lower adjacent segments range of motion, overall cervical spine range of motion, and cervical curvature, prosthesis position, bone absorption, heterotopic ossification, etc.) were recorded and compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05); the postoperative hospitalization stay and time of returning to work in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). Both groups were followed up 12-64 months, with an average of 26 months. There was no complication such as limb or organ damage, implant failure, and severe degeneration of adjacent segments requiring reoperation. The VAS score, JOA score, and NDI of the two groups at each time point after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the above scores at each time point after operation between the two groups (P>0.05); there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of each score between the two groups at last follow-up (P>0.05). The surgical segments range of motion in the study group maintained to varying degrees after operation, while it in the control group basically disappeared after operation, showing significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the upper and lower adjacent segments range of motion in the study group when compared with preoperative ones (P>0.05), while the upper adjacent segments range of motion in the control group increased significantly (P<0.05). The overall cervical spine range of motion and cervical curvature of the two groups decreased at 3 months after operation, and increased to varying degrees at last follow-up, but there was no significant difference between groups and within groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, X-ray films and CT examinations showed that no prosthesis loosening, subsidence, or displacement was found in all patients; there were 2 cases (7.4%) of periprosthetic bone resorption and 3 cases (11.1%) of heterotopic ossification which did not affect the surgical segments range of motion. Both the Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement and Zero-P fusion have satisfactory short-term effectiveness in treatment of single-segment cervical spondylosis. Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement can also maintain the cervical spine range of motion to a certain extent, while reducing the occurrence of excessive motion of adjacent segments after fusion.

Immediate Effects of Cervical Spine Manipulation Compared With Muscle Energy Technique on Neck Muscle Activity and Range of Motion in Asymptomatic Participants: A Randomized Study

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of cervical spine manipulation (SM) compared with muscle energy technique (MET) on neck muscle activity and range of motion in asymptomatic people. MethodsA randomized parallel-group study was conducted at a chiropractic teaching clinic in Durban, South Africa. Fifty asymptomatic participants between 18 and 35 years of age were randomly assigned into group 1 or group 2. Group 1 received cervical SM, and group 2 received MET. Participants were blinded to group allocation only. Baseline and post-test measurements consisted of resting upper trapezius and posterior cervical muscle activity and cervical spine range of motion (ROM) in lateral flexion and extension. ResultsA significant difference was found in cervical ROM within groups (P < .001), with no significant difference observed between the 2 groups. The right posterior cervical muscles showed a significant difference in group 1 only (P = .012). No significant muscle activity changes occurred in group 2. Resting muscle activity measures showed no statistically significant changes between groups. ConclusionA single application of SM and MET to the cervical spine immediately increased cervical ROM. Neither cervical SM nor MET changed resting posterior cervical and upper trapezius muscle activity.

A Single-Center Study Comparing the Effects of Thoracic Spine Manipulation vs Mobility Exercises in 26 Office Workers with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

BackgroundNeck pain is associated with computer work, poor posture, imbalanced neck muscles, and fatigue, particularly in office workers. This study from a single center aimed to compare the effects of thoracic spine mobility exercise and thoracic spine manipulation to improve cervical spine range of motion in 26 office workers who had chronic neck pain for more than 12 weeks.Material/MethodsThe participants were 26 office workers with neck pain lasting >12 weeks. These participants were randomly assigned to undergo TSME (n=13) or TSM (n=13). Both groups underwent cervical joint mobilization and deep cervical flexor muscle exercises for 25 min a day, twice weekly, for 6 weeks. The TSME group additionally performed TSME 15 min a day, twice a week, for 6 weeks, while the TSM group received TSM 2 times a day, twice a week, for 6 weeks. Cervical and thoracic spine ROM, numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), and neck disability index (NDI) were measured before and after interventions. The ROM of cervical and thoracic spine was measured using a dual inclinometer.ResultsBoth groups showed significant changes in cervical spine ROM, thoracic spine ROM, NPRS, and NDI after intervention compared to before intervention (P<0.05). Cervical spine right lateral flexion and right rotation differed significantly between the groups (P<0.05), while thoracic spine ROM, NPRS, and NDI did not.ConclusionsTSME and TSM have similar effects in improving pain and disability in office workers with non-specific chronic neck pain.

Cervical spine characteristics differ in competitive combat athletes compared with active control participants

BackgroundInjury to the head and neck are common in combat sport athletes. Impairments of the cervical spine have been found in some athletes who participate in sports with high forces and collisions. There is a lack of research on the effects of combat sports on the cervical spine. ObjectiveThe primary study aim was to investigate differences in cervical spine characteristics between combat athletes and a similarly aged active control group. The secondary aim was to investigate the relationship between symptom-based outcome measures and characteristics of the cervical spine. DesignCross-sectional. Method40 male adult combat sport athletes and 40 male adult control participants were recruited from 4 combat sport clubs and a university campus, Australia. Cervical spine assessments were conducted at a private physiotherapy clinic. The Neck Disability Index and the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale were used as symptom-based outcome measures. ResultsCombat sport athletes had a reduced range of cervical motion, but greater isometric strength and endurance compared with a control group (p < 0.05). The Neck Disability Index and Post-Concussion Symptom Scale were negatively correlated with cervical spine range of motion and isometric strength, meaning that higher scores correlated with a reduction in function. ConclusionsDifferences were observed in characteristics of the cervical spine in combat sport athletes compared with a control group. Higher symptom-based outcome scores correlated with reduced range of motion and strength of cervical spine muscles. Further investigation to establish clinical cut-off scores for functional impairment may be warranted.

Design of Personalized Cervical Fixation Orthosis Based on 3D Printing Technology.

The movement of the cervical spine should be restricted throughout the rehabilitation phase after it has been injured. Cervical orthosis is commonly utilized in clinical settings to guarantee cervical spine stability. However, to date, the investigations are limited to patient-specific cervical fixation orthoses. This study provides a new idea for making personalized orthoses. The CT data of the patient's cervical spine were collected, then mimics were used for reconstructing the skin of the cervical spine, the Geomagic Studio was used for surface fitting, the Inspire Studio was used for structural topology optimization, redundant structures were removed, the resulting orthotics were postprocessed, and finally, it was printed with a 3D printer. No signs of pain or discomfort were observed during the wearing. The cervical spine range of motion in flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation is all less than 8° after using the device. Low cost, quick manufacturing time, high precision, attractive appearance, lightweight structure, waterproof design, and practical customized orthotics for patients are all advantages of 3D printing technology in the field of orthopedics. Many possible benefits of using 3D printing to build new orthotics include unique design, stiffness, weight optimization, and improved biomechanical performance, comfort, and fit. Personalized orthotics may be designed and manufactured utilizing 3D printing technology.

Immediate effects of static and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching of hamstring muscles on straight leg raise, craniovertebral angle, and cervical spine range of motion in neck pain patients with hamstring tightness: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

The cranio-cervical flexion exercise and sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique have been used to improve a forward head posture among neck pain patients with straight leg raise (SLR) limitation. However, little is known about the cranio-vertebral angle (CVA) and cervical spine range of motion (CROM) after applying stretching methods to the hamstring muscle. To compare the immediate effects of static stretching and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on SLR, CVA, and CROM in neck pain patients with hamstring tightness. 64 subjects were randomly allocated to the static stretching (n1= 32) or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (n2= 32) stretching group. The SLR test was performed to measure the hamstring muscle's flexibility and tightness between the two groups, with CROM and CVA also being measured. The paired t-test was used to compare all the variables within each group before and after the intervention. The independent t-test was used to compare the two groups before and after the stretching exercise. There were no between-group effects for any outcome variables (P> 0.05). However, all SLR, CVA, and CROM outcome variables were significantly improved within-group (P< 0.05). There were no between-group effects for any outcome variable; however, SLR, CVA, and CROM significantly improved within-group after the one-session intervention in neck pain patients with hamstring tightness.