Indomethacin (10 μM) significantly reduced the contractile responses to electrical field stimulation (EFS) in the non-pregnant myometrium (5–50 Hz by an average of 25.7%) and the pregnant myometrium (30–50 Hz by an average of 16.5%). On the other hand, it significantly increased the contractile responses of the cervix in non-pregnant (2.5-30 Hz by an average of 21.5%) and pregnant (2.5-10 Hz by an average of 12.5%) muscular strips. Prostaglandin (PG) E 2 (0.1-1000 nM) strongly and PGI 2 (0.1-1000 nM) slightly and dose-dependently inhibited the contractile response to EFS of the non-pregnant cervical muscle, but not of the myometrium. In the pregnant uterus, the contractile responses of the cervical muscle were similar to those of the non-pregnant cervix, while the response of the myometrium was increased significantly and dose-dependently by the appliaction of PGE 2 or PGI 2. PGF 2θ (1000 nM) significantly increased the contractile response of the myometrium but not cervical muscle to EFS in the pregnant rabbits. In non-pregnant muscles, the contractile responses of the myometrium and cervical smooth muscle to EFS were not influenced by the treatment with PGF 2α. PGE 2 (0.1-1000 nM) also inhibited the contractile response to direct muscle stimulation, but the inhibition was significantly less than that of the response to indirect stimulation. PGI 2 slightly inhibited the contractile responses to both indirect and direct stimulation. These findings indicate the PGE 2, PGI 2 and PGF 2α increase the contractile response of pregnant myometrium to EFS. PGE 2 has both a pre- and a post-junctional inhibitory effect on excitatory transmission in the cervix, but PGI 2 acts only post-junctionally. It is suggested that the physiological action PGE 2 and of PGI 2 is exerted differently on the myometrium and cervical smooth muscles.