Background: The optimal treatment for stroke patients with tandem cervical carotid occlusion is debated. We analyzed the treatment strategies and outcomes of tandem occlusion patients in the ESCAPE NA1 trial. Methods: ESCAPE NA1 was a multicenter international randomized trial of nerinetide vs. placebo in patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent EVT. We defined tandem occlusions as complete occlusion of the cervical ICA on catheter angiography. The influence of tandem occlusions on outcome was analyzed using regression modeling with adjustment for age, sex, baseline NIHSS and ASPECTS, occlusion location, thrombolysis and treatment allocation. Results: 115 of 1105 patients (10.4%) had tandem occlusions. 73/115 tandem patients (66.0%) received treatment for the cervical occlusion: 21.9% were stented before thrombectomy, 68.5% were stented after thrombectomy, and 8.2% had angioplasty alone. Successful reperfusion was significantly higher in patients who had thrombectomy first followed by carotid treatment (eTICI 2b-3: 40/40 (100.0%)) or carotid angioplasty before and cervical stent after intracranial thrombectomy (9/10 (90.0%)) compared to carotid intervention before intracranial thrombectomy: (19/23 (82.1%), p=0.016). 90-day mRS 0-2 was achieved in 82/115 patients (71.3%) with tandem occlusions (treated occlusions: 74.0%, untreated: 66.7%) compared to 579/981 (59.5%) patients without tandem occlusions. In adjusted analysis, tandem occlusion was not predictive of outcome. In the subgroup of tandem patients, cervical stent-treatment was nominally associated with better outcomes (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.5 - 9.2). Conclusion: Cervical carotid stenting may improve outcomes for EVT patients with tandem occlusions, but these results are limited by the sample size and non-randomized selection of patients for stenting.