Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease Research Articles

Comparison of the long-term efficacy of ROI-C and conventional cage-plate in treatment of spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation: a retrospective study

BackgroundThe self-locking cage (ROI-C, LDR, Troyes, France) has been clinically applied in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). However, only a few long-term clinical and radiographic studies have been conducted on the treatment of spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation (SCIWFD) so far. A comparison between ACDF with either ROI-C or CCP was performed to determine the better treatment for SCIWFD.MethodsA total of 83 patients who underwent ACDF using either ROI-C or CCP were reviewed for radiological and clinical outcomes. The cohort comprised 60 males and 23 females, aged between 32 and 88 years old, with an average age of 58.23 years. All patients exhibited symptoms of nerve injury, including limb numbness, muscle weakness, hypoesthesia or urinary dysfunction. The preoperative ASIA classification of spinal nerve function: 7 cases of grade A, 23 cases of grade B, 34 cases of grade C and 19 cases of grade D were included in the study.ResultsA total of 48 patients underwent ACDF with ROI-C, while 35 patients received a conventional cage-plate. They were studied with a follow-up of 28.63 ± 17.41 months and 29.48 ± 15.43 months respectively. No significant difference was found in blood loss, JOA and ASIA between the two groups. No significant difference was found in cervical lordosis (CL) (P > 0.05). However, statistical difference was found in disc height of fused segment and T1 slope between the two groups (P < 0.05). No statistical difference was in the incidence of cage subsidence (P > 0.05). There was significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia. Both of two groups achieved bony fusion at final follow-up.ConclusionOur study demonstrated that ROI-C has the same efficacy as CCP in improving the cervical stability in treatment of SCIWFD. The migration of cage didn’t occur in ROI-C group at final follow-up, showing steadily fixed in cervical column. Moreover, the ROI-C does have the advantages of good therapeutic effect, mis-invasive, shorter operation time and fewer complications.

A strong association between Modic changes type 2 and endplate defects at non-fused segments after ACDF

To determine the association between Modic changes (MC) with other MRI parameters and clinical symptoms of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD). A retrospective analysis of data on patients with cervical DDD who underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Preoperative demographic data (age, sex, surgical data) were collected, cervical MRI parameters (disc degeneration grade, MC and endplate defects, each determined at each cervical level) and clinical data (Numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) neck and arm, the Neck Disability Index (NDI)) were compared to preoperative data. The study included 121 patients at Visit 1 and 83 patients at Visit 2. The median follow-up duration was 26.5 [18.9; 33.1] months. Patients with MC had more intense NPRS-based neck pain before surgery compared to patients without MC (p=0.001). There were significant changes in MC rate at the C5-C6 levels due to a significant number of new MCs type 1 and MCs type 2 (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). MC type 2 was associated with disc degeneration, endplate defects defects, patients' age and clinical scales (NDI, NPRS) (p<0.05). The endplate defects defect score threshold for predicting MC type 2 at the С3-С7 cervical levels was 5. The factor predicting MC type 2 at the C3-C7 cervical levels is submaximal damage to the endplate. The MC rate is increased due to MC type 1 and MC type 2. MC types at the cervical levels may not represent consecutive stages of the same process.

Combined effect of artificial cervical disc replacement and facet tropism on the index-level facet joints: a finite element study

BackgroundArtificial Cervical Disc Replacement (ACDR) is an effective treatment for cervical degenerative disc diseases. However, clinical information regarding the facet joint alterations after ACDR was limited. Facet tropism is common in the sub-axial cervical spine. Our previous research indicated that facet tropism could lead to increased pressure on the cervical facet joints. This study aimed to assess the impact of facet tropism on the facet contact force and facet capsule stress after ACDR.MethodsA C2–T1 cervical finite element model was constructed from computed tomography (CT) scans of a 28-year-old male volunteer. Symmetrical, moderate asymmetrical (7 degrees tropism), and severe asymmetrical (14 degrees tropism) models were created at the C5/C6 level by altering the facet orientation at the C5-C6 level. The C5/C6 ACDR was simulated in the intact, moderate asymmetrical and severe asymmetrical models. A 75-N follower load with 1.0-Nm moments was applied to the top of C2 vertebra in the models to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation with the T1 vertebra fixed. The range of motions (ROMs) under all moments, facet contact forces (FCFs) and facet capsule strains were tested.ResultsIn the asymmetrical model, the right FCFs considerably increased under flexion, extension, right bending, left rotation, especially under right bending the right sided FCF of the severe asymmetrical model was about 5.44 times of the neutral position, and 3.14 times of the symmetrical model. and concentrated on the cephalad part of the facets. The facet capsule stresses on both sides remarkably increased under extension, lateral bending and right rotation. In the moderate and severe asymmetrical models, the capsule strain was greater on both sides of each position than in the symmetric model.ConclusionsThe face tropism increased facet contact force and facet capsule strain after ACDR, especially under extension, lateral bending, and rotation, and also could result in abnormal stress distribution on the facet joint surface and facet joint capsule. The results suggest that face tropism might be a risk factor for post-operative facet joint degeneration progression after ACDR. Facet tropism may be noteworthy when ACDR is considered as a surgical option.

Overloaded Vertebral Body Following Consecutive Three-Level Hybrid Surgery Comparing with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Based on the varying number and relative positions of cervical disc replacement (CDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures, three-segment hybrid surgery (HS) presents a diverse structural approach. Currently, the potential differential effects of HS with different segment combinations and surgical procedures on overloaded vertebral body (OVB) occurrence remain unexplored. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of HS and ACDF in treating cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD), aiming to provide further insights into OVB. This study included patients with three-level CDDD who underwent ACDF or HS at our institution. Eligible patients were divided into three groups: Type I (one-level CDR and two-level ACDF), Type II (two-level CDR and one-level ACDF), and ACDF (three-level ACDF). For radiographic analysis, patients were further divided into the Replacement Segment Group and the Nonreplacement Segment Group based on the presence of replacement segments above and below the OVB. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and neck disability index (NDI) scores. The cervical radiological parameters assessed included (1) vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA), (2) wedge angle (WA), (3) anterior vertebral height (AH), (4) posterior vertebral height (PH), and (5) Hounsfield unit (HU) values. Statistical methods included paired t-test, ANOVA test, and chi-square test. Independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the differences between two groups according to the results of normal distribution test. A total of 123 patients, evenly distributed among three groups, were included and were well matched in terms of demographic characteristics. The likelihood of vertebral body collapse (VBC) was notably higher in the ACDF group (41.5%) compared with the Type I (17.9%) and Type II (8.9%) groups (p < 0.01). Following surgery, both at 3 and 6 months, the ACDF group demonstrated higher VAS neck scores and NDI scores compared with the Type I and Type II groups (p < 0.01). Additionally, the WA and AH values of the upper and lower adjacent OVB were consistently lower in the ACDF group than in the Type I and Type II groups at 6 and 12 months and at the final follow-up (p < 0.01). Notably, in the Nonreplacement Segment Group, WA significantly decreased at 12 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up compared with the Replacement Segment Group (p < 0.01). Three levels of HS appear to reduce stress concentrations and alleviate morphological changes in OVB. The occurrence of more VBC patients with OVB was associated with the use of Zero-P or Zero-P VA implants.

Risk factors of bone loss after Prestige-LP cervical disc arthroplasty.

Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is widely employed for patients diagnosed with cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). Postoperative bone loss (BL) represents a radiological alteration that is a relatively novel consideration in the realm of CDA. This study endeavors to examine the risk factors associated with BL following CDA, aiming to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and the impact of BL on surgical outcomes. A retrospective study was undertaken, encompassing consecutive patients subjected to one-level CDA, two-level CDA, or two-level hybrid surgery (HS) for the treatment of CDDD at our institution. Patient demographic and perioperative data were systematically recorded. Radiological images obtained preoperatively, at 1-week post-operation, and during the last follow-up were collected and evaluated, following with statistical analyses. A total of 295 patients and 351 arthroplasty segments were involved in this study. Univariate logistic regressions indicated that age ≥ 45years and two-level HS was associated with lower risk of BL; and a greater ΔDA (change of disc angle before and after surgery) was correlated with an increased risk of BL. Multivariate logistic regression determined that two-level HS and greater ΔDA were independent preventative and risk factors for BL, respectively. Further analysis revealed that severe BL significantly elevated the risk of implant subsidence compared to non-BL and mild BL. This study posited bone remodeling and micromotion as potential underlying mechanisms of BL. Subsequent research endeavors should delve into the divergent mechanisms and progression observed between lower- and higher-grade BL, aiming to prevent potential adverse outcomes associated with severe BL.

Clinical Implementation of Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion: Addressing Market Access Challenges.

Background: The traditional open midline posterior cervical spine fusion procedure has several shortcomings. It can cause soft tissue damage, muscle atrophy, compromise of the lateral masses and painful prominent posterior cervical instrumentation or spinous process if there is dehiscence of the fascia. Additionally, patients frequently experience the rapid development of adjacent segment disease, which can result in the reemergence of debilitating pain and functional impairment. Clinical relevance: Tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion is an alternative method for treating patients with symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. However, widespread clinical adoption has been challenged by ambiguity, misunderstandings and misinterpretations regarding appropriate procedural reimbursement coding. Technological advancement: The tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion procedure was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 (CORUS™ Spinal System and CAVUX® Facet Fixation System (CORUS/CAVUX); Providence™ Medical Technology). This technique addresses the concerns with traditional spine fusion methods by achieving the stability and outcomes of posterior cervical fusion without the morbidity associated with significant muscle stripping in the traditional approach. This technology uses specialized implants and instrumentation to perform all of the steps required to facilitate bone fusion and provide stability while minimizing tissue disruption. The technique involves extensive bone preparation for fusion and placement of specialized stabilization implants that span the facet joint, promoting natural bone growth and fusion while reducing the need for extensive exposure. This procedure provides an effective, less invasive solution for patients with cervical degenerative disc disease. Reimbursement and coding clarity: The article provides a comprehensive rationale for appropriate reimbursement coding for tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion. This is a critical aspect for the adoption and accessibility of medical technologies. This information is crucial for practitioners and healthcare administrators, ensuring that innovative procedures are accurately coded and reimbursed. Procedural details and clinical evidence: By detailing the procedural steps, instruments used and the physiological basis for the procedure, this article serves as a valuable educational resource for spine surgeons and payers to appropriately code for this procedure. Conclusions: The description of work for CORUS/CAVUX is equivalent to the current surgical standard of lateral mass screw fixation with decortication and onlay posterior grafting to facilitate posterior fusion. Thus, it is recommended that CPT codes 22600/22840 be used, as they best reflect the surgical approach, instrumentation, decortication, posterior cervical fusion and bone grafting procedures.

Biomechanical Effects on the Prostheses and Vertebrae of Three-Level Hybrid Surgery: A Finite Element Study.

Three-level hybrid surgery (HS) consisting of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been partly used for the treatment of multi-level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). The complications related to the implants and the collapse of the surgical vertebral bodies had been reported in multi-level anterior cervical spine surgery. Thus, this study aimed to explore the biomechanical effects on the prostheses and vertebrae in three-level HS. A FE model of cervical spine (C0-T1) was constructed. Five surgical models were developed. They were FAF model (ACDF-CDA-ACDF), AFA model (CDA-ACDF-CDA), FFF model (three-level ACDF), SF model (single-level ACDF), and SA model (single-level CDA). A 75-N follower load and 1.0-N·m moment was applied to produce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Compared with the intact model, the range of motion (ROM) of total cervical spine in FAF model decreased by 34.54%, 54.48%, 31.76%, and 27.14%, respectively, in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, which were lower than those in FFF model and higher than those in AFA model. The ROMs of CDA segments in FAF and AFA models were similar to the intact model and SA model. Compared with the intact model, the ROMs at C3/4 segment in FFF model increased from 5.71% to 7.85%, and increased from 5.31% to 6.81% at C7/T1 segment, following by FAF model, then the FAF model. The maximum interface pressures of the Prestige-LP in FAF model were similar to SA model, however the corresponding values were increased in AFA model. The maximum interface pressures of the Zero-P were increased in FAF and AFA model compared with those in SF and FFF models. The stress was mainly distributed on the screws. In AFA model, the maximum pressures of the ball and trough articulation in superior and inferior Prestige-LP were all increased compared with those in SA and FAF model. In FFF model, the maximum pressures of the vertebrae were higher than those in other models. The stress was mainly distributed on the anterior area of the vertebral bodies. HS seemed to be more suitable than ACDF for the surgical treatment of three-level CDDD in consideration of the biomechanical effects, especially for the two-level CDA and one-level ACDF construct. But a more appropriate CDA prosthesis should be explored in the future.

Postoperative Horner Syndrome: A Case Report Describing a Rare Complication After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

The gold standard for correcting cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), which is a safe, effective procedure. Horner syndrome (HS) is an extremely rare complication immediately post-ACDF due to impairment of the sympathetic trunk. Herein, we present the case of a 48-year-old woman with CDDD-related pain and radiculopathy who was counselled and consented for C5–6 and C6–7 ACDF. ACDF was performed with standard anterior left-sided incisions at appropriate levels. Unlike our usual practice, deeper-toothed retractors were employed for better exposure. Two cages were inserted at C5–6 and C6–7. The procedural time was standard (180 minutes), without intraoperative complications. The patient experienced significant symptom relief immediately post-ACDF, but developed sudden onset left-sided HS, with ptosis, miosis, and anhidrosis, approximately 48 hours post-ACDF. At a 2-week postoperative follow-up, she exhibited clinical improvement, and by 12 weeks, her HS had completely resolved. To our knowledge, this case is the first documented instance of delayed-onset HS post-ACDF. It may be associated with the type of retractors used, resulting in neuropraxia or strain on the sympathetic chain ganglia. We recommend adequate exposure while minimizing excessive retraction of the longus colli muscle to reduce irritation to the sympathetic trunk.

A Systematic Review Comparing Fusion Rates and Cage Subsidence in ACDF by Cage Alone vs Cage and Plate in Multilevel Cervical Disc Prolapse

Abstract Background Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion (ACDF) has become the standard procedure for treating degenerative cervical disc disease. Multiple techniques and modalities of fixation are used in ACDF, each with its merits and demerits. Aim of the Work The objective of this study is to compare the outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion by cage alone versus surgical fusion by cage and plate in terms of morbidity, mortality, fusion rates, cage subsidence and quality of life estimates in treatment of multilevel cervical disc prolapse. Patients and Methods Our search strategy identified a total of 235 citations. Search was done for studies conducted or published within 2010 – 2022. After removal of 58 duplicate studies, eligibility criteria was applied to the titles of 177 articles with the exclusion of non-appropriate study design. This yielded 21 studies that underwent full text analysis of which 13 did not meet the inclusion criteria for having only single level ACDF or short follow up period. Results Our study included 8 observational studies (6 retroscpective and 2 prospective) comparing multilevel ACDF with cage alone vs cage and plate regarding fusion rate and cage subsidence, the results showed that while the cage plate group had lower rate of cage subsidence, there was no significant difference in the rate of fusion. Conclusion Our study included 8 observational studies (6 retroscpective and 2 prospective) comparing multilevel ACDF with cage alone vs cage and plate regarding fusion rate and cage subsidence, the results showed that while the cage plate group had lower rate of cage subsidence, there was no significant difference in the rate of fusion.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery: Results with Zero - Profile Spacer/Cage

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) treatments for cervical disc degenerative disease (CDDD) using a Zero Profile cage. METHODOLOGY A retrospective study of 26 patients with cervical disc disease treated with a zero-profile cage was designed and followed up for an average of 12 months in descriptive research. For arm and neck pain, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were used to assess function. Nurick’s myelopathy classification scheme based on gait impairments was also documented. RESULTSThe average age of the 26 patients was 48.96 13.13 years (mean SD), with 44 percent falling into the 40-60-year age bracket. The male/female gender distribution was 21 (84%) and 04 (16%) male/female. Radiculomyelopathic symptoms were detected in 11 (28%) of the patients, with radicular pain occurring bilaterally in seven (28%) of the patients and on the left side in four (16%). A radiological examination of fusion was performed at six months and one year. The fusion had a success rate of 95 percent at six months (19 patients) and 100 percent at one year. CONCLUSION A zero-profile device provides biomechanical stability and fusion rates with excellent outcomes for one- and two-level ACDFs. Advantages include low rates of dysphagia, decreased operative time, restoration of cervical lordosis and disc height, and lack of cage subsidence or screw back out.

Comparison of the efficacy of ROI-C cage with Zero-P device in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of cervical degenerative disc disease: a two-year follow-up study.

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of Zero-P and ROI-C devices applied to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). From January 2020 and December 2020, 56 patients with CDDD who underwent ACDF using Zero-P or ROI-C were included in this retrospective study. The outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI) score, Cobb angle, dysphagia, and bone fusion rate. Dysphagia was assessed using the Bazaz grading system. The comparison of outcomes between the two groups was based on the 2-year follow-up time point, which was defined as the last follow-up visit. The Zero-P group included 16 males and 14 females, with a mean age of 56.2 (range, 35-65) years. The ROI-C group included 11 males and 15 females, with a mean age of 57.4 (range, 36-67) years. There was no significant difference in gender and mean age between the two groups. There were no significant differences in VAS score, JOA score, NDI score, Cobb angle, dysphagia, and bone fusion rate between two groups at the last follow up visit. In the Zero-P group, the duration of surgeries involving C3-4 or C6-7 segments was significantly longer than those including C4-5 or C5-6 segments (135.0 ± 19.0 vs. 105.6 ± 17.5 min, P < 0.05). In surgeries involving C3-4 or C6-7 segments, the operation time of ROI-C was significantly shorter than that of Zero-P (106.5 ± 19.5 vs.112.2 ± 20.5 min, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the dysphagia or cage subsidence rates between the Zero-P and ROI-C groups (P > 0.05). The Cobb angle in the last follow-up visit in the Zero-P group (24.4 ± 4.5°) was significantly higher than that in the ROI-C group (18.1 ± 2.3°) (P < 0.05). ACDF using ROI-C device showed an efficacy similar to the Zero-P device, as well as a shorter operation time for surgeries involving C3-4 or C6-7 segments. However, ROI-C could cause more loss of Cobb angle over time, which could lead to uncomfortable symptoms.

Comparative analysis of risk factors associated with degeneration of adjacent segments: zero-profile anchored spacer vs. anterior cervical plate and cage construct.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established treatment for cervical degenerative disc disease, but cervical spine surgery may affect sagittal alignment parameters and induce adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). This study aimed to determine the risk factors for developing ASD following anterior cervical plate and cage (ACPC) compared with the use of zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C). A retrospective contrastive study included 105 patients who underwent ACPC or ROI-C between January 2014 and October 2019 at our treatment centre. There were 50 cases in the ROI-C group and 55 patients in the ACPC group. Clinical and radiological results and the incidence of ASD were assessed after surgery. All patients were further divided into the ASD and non-ASD groups for subgroup analysis. At each follow-up time, there was no statistically significant in radiographic parameters between the two groups. The overall ASD rate was higher in the ACPC group than in the ROI-C group (65.5% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.027). The low preoperative Cobb angle, low preoperative segment angle (SA), and loss of Cobb (ΔCobb) were significantly correlated with ASD. However, clinical outcomes were not associated with ASD at any postoperative follow-up visit. Equally good therapeutic effects were achieved with both the ROI-C and ACPC. The occurrence of ASD was considerably higher in the ACPC group than in the ROI-C group. The preoperative Cobb angle, preoperative SA, and ΔCobb were the most associated with an increase in the risk of ASD.

Biomechanical analysis of single and multi-level artificial disc replacement (ADR) in cervical spine using multi-scale loadings: A finite element study.

Artificial disc replacement (ADR) is a clinical procedure used to diagnose cervical degenerative disc disease, preserving range of motion (ROM) at the fixation level and preventing adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). This study analyzed the biomechanics of ADR by examining range of motion (ROM), stress levels in bone and implants, and strain in the bone-implant interface using multi-scale loadings. The study focused on single- and double-level patients across various loading scales during physiological motions within the cervical spine. Results showed increased ROM in single-level and double-level fixations during physiological loadings, while ROM decreased at the adjacent level of fixation with the intact cervical spine model. The Prodisc-Implant metal endplate experienced a maximum von Mises stress of 432 MPa during axial rotation, confirming the long durability and biomechanical performance of the bone-implant interface.

Anterior cervical hybrid constructs reduce superior adjacent segment burden compared to multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Traditional surgical treatment for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), yet the increased risk of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) requiring additional surgery exists and may result in limiting long-term surgical success when it occurs. Disc arthroplasty can preserve or restore physiologic range of motion (ROM), decreasing adjacent level stress and subsequent surgery. For patients with multilevel pathology requiring at least a 1-level fusion, interest is growing in anterior cervical hybrid (ACH) surgery as a partial motion-preserving procedure to decrease the adjacent level burden. This radiographic study compares postoperative superior adjacent segment motion between ACH and ACDF. Secondarily, total global motion, construct motion, inferior adjacent segment motion, and sagittal alignment parameters were compared. This is a single-center, multi-surgeon, retrospective cohort study of 2- and 3-level ACH and ACDF cases between 2013 and 2021. Degrees of motion were analyzed on flexion/extension views using Cobb angles to measure global (C2-C7) construct and adjacent segment lordosis. Neutral lateral X-rays were analyzed for alignment parameters, including global lordosis, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), and T1 slope (T1S). Differences were determined by independent t-test and Fisher's exact test. Of 100 patients, 38% were 2-level cases (47% ACH, 53% ACDF) and 62% were 3-level cases: (52% ACH, 48% ACDF). Postoperatively, superior adjacent segment motion increased with ACDF and decreased with ACH (-1.3°±5.3° ACH, 1.6°±4.6° ACDF, P=0.005). Postoperatively, the ACH group had greater ROM across the construct (16.3°±8.7° ACH, 4.7°±3.3° ACDF, P<0.001) and total global ROM (38.0°±12.8° ACH, 28.0°±11.1° ACDF, P<0.001). ACH resulted in a significant reduction of motion loss across the construct (-10.0°±11.7° ACH, -18.1°±10.8° ACDF, P<0.001). Postoperative alignment restoration was similar between both cohorts (-2.61°±8.36° ACH, 0.04°±12.24° ACDF, P=0.21). Compared to ACDF, hybrid constructs partially preserved motion across operative levels and had greater postoperative global ROM without increasing superior adjacent segment mobility or sacrificing alignment restoration. This supports the consideration of ACH in patients with multilevel degenerative cervical pathology requiring at least a 1-level fusion and suggests a propensity for long-term success by reducing the superior adjacent segment burden.

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for Two-Level Cervical Disc Degenerative Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are both considered to be efficacious surgical procedures for treating cervical spondylosis in patients with or without compression myelopathy. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of these procedures for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) at two contiguous levels. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched up to 1 May 2023. Studies comparing the outcomes between CDA and ACDF in patients with two-level cervical DDD were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes were surgical success rates and secondary surgery rates. Secondary outcomes were scores on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, as well as the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for the severity of cervical compression myelopathy and complication rates. Results: In total, eight studies (two RCTs, four retrospective studies, and two prospective studies) with a total of 1155 patients (CDA: 598; ACDF: 557) were included. Pooled results revealed that CDA was associated with a significantly higher overall success rate (OR, 2.710, 95% CI: 1.949-3.770) and lower secondary surgery rate (OR, 0.254, 95% CI: 0.169-0.382) compared to ACDF. In addition, complication rates were significantly lower in the CDA group than in the ACDF group (OR, 0.548, 95% CI: 0.326 to 0.919). CDA was also associated with significantly greater improvements in neck pain VAS than ACDF. No significant differences were found in improvements in the arm VAS, NDI, and JOA scores between the two procedures. Conclusions: CDA may provide better postoperative outcomes for surgical success, secondary surgery, pain reduction, and postoperative complications than ACDF for treating patients with two-level cervical DDD.

Biomechanical Comparison of Different Surgical Strategies for Skip-level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Finite Element Study.

We constructed finite element (FE) models of the cervical spine consisting of C2-C7 and predicted the biomechanical effects of different surgical procedures and instruments on adjacent segments, internal fixation systems, and the overall cervical spine through FE analysis. To compare the biomechanical effects between the zero-profile device and cage-plate device in skip-level multistage anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). ACDF is often considered the standard treatment for degenerative cervical spondylosis. However, the selection of surgical methods and instruments in cases of skip-level cervical degenerative disk disease is still controversial. Three FE models were constructed, which used noncontiguous 2-level Zero-P (NCZP) devices for C3/4 and C5/6, a noncontiguous 2-level cage-plate (NCCP) for C3/4 and C5/6, and a contiguous 3-level cage-plate (CCP) for C3/6. Simulate daily activities in ABAQUS. The range of motion (ROM), von Mises stress distribution of the endplate and internal fixation system, and intervertebral disk pressure (IDP) of each model were recorded and compared. Similar to the stress of the cortical bone, the maximum stress of the Zero-P device was higher than that of the CP device for most activities. The ROM increments of the superior, inferior, and intermediate segments of the NCZP model were lower than those of the NCCP and CCP models in many actions. In terms of the IDP, the increment value of stress for the NCZP model was the smallest, whereas those of the NCCP and CCP models were larger. Similarly, the increment value of stress on the endplate also shows the minimum in the NCZP model. Noncontiguous ACDF with zero profile can reduce the stress on adjacent intervertebral disks and endplates, resulting in a reduced risk of adjacent segment disease development. However, the high cortical bone stress caused by the Zero-P device may influence the risk of fractures.

Management Considerations for Cervical Corpectomy: Updated Indications and Future Directions.

Together, lower back and neck pain are among the leading causes of acquired disability worldwide and have experienced a marked increase over the past 25 years. Paralleled with the increasing aging population and the rise in chronic disease, this trend is only predicted to contribute to the growing global burden. In the context of cervical neck pain, this symptom is most often a manifestation of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD). Traditionally, multilevel neck pain related to DDD that is recalcitrant to both physical and medical therapy can be treated with a procedure known as cervical corpectomy. Presently, there are many flavors of cervical corpectomy; however, the overarching goal is the removal of the pain-generating disc via the employment of the modern anterior approach. In this review, we will briefly detail the pathophysiological mechanism behind DDD, overview the development of the anterior approach, and discuss the current state of treatment options for said pathology. Furthermore, this review will also add to the current body of literature surrounding updated indications, surgical techniques, and patient outcomes related to cervical corpectomy. Finally, our discussion ends with highlighting the future direction of cervical corpectomy through the introduction of the "skip corpectomy" and distractable mesh cages.

The Top 100 Cited Articles on Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Bibliometric analysis. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has emerged as an effective surgical intervention for degenerative cervical disc disease with potential advantages over traditional cervical fusion. This bibliometric analysis aimed to assess the current state of research on CDA by analyzing the relevant literature using bibliometric indicators. Web of Science Core Collection. A comprehensive search was conducted using the Web of Science database, for articles related to CDA published in the last 19 years. The top 100 articles were reviewed using bibliometric analysis. Publication trends, citation patterns, authorship, and collaboration networks were analyzed using VOSviewer and the Bibliometrix package in RStudio. The results revealed a significant increase in the number of publications related to CDA over the past 2 decades, with most of the articles being published in orthopedic and spine surgery journals. The most frequently cited articles were related to clinical outcomes, complications, and biomechanical studies of CDA. Co-authorship analysis identified influential authors and collaborative networks, highlighting the multidisciplinary nature of CDA research involving neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and engineers. Overall, this bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on CDA, highlighting the key research themes, influential authors, and collaborative networks in the field. These findings can serve as a guide for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers to identify knowledge gaps, research trends, and future directions in the field of CDA.

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Rationale, Designs, and Results of Randomized Controlled Trials.

This review outlines clinical data and characteristics of current Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved implants in cervical disc replacement/cervical disc arthroplasty (CDR/CDA) to provide a centralized resource for spine surgeons. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CDR/CDA were identified using a search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. The initial search identified 69 studies. Duplicates were removed, and the following inclusion criteria were applied when determining eligibility of RCTs for the current review: (1) discussing CDR/CDA prosthesis and (2) published within between 2010 and 2020. Studies without clinical data or that were not RCTs were excluded. All articles were reviewed independently by 2 authors, with the involvement of an arbitrator to facilitate consensus on any discrepancies. A total of 34 studies were included in the final review. Findings were synthesized into a comprehensive table describing key features and clinical results for each FDA-approved CDR/CDA implant and are overall suggestive of expanding indications and increasing utilization. RCTs have provided substantial evidence to support CDR/CDA for treating single- and 2-level cervical degenerative disc disease in place of conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. This review provides a resource that consolidates relevant clinical data for current FDA-approved implants to help spine surgeons make an informed decision during preoperative planning.

The Role of Osteobiologics in Augmenting Spine Fusion in Unplated Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Compared to Plated Constructs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis. To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as complications of unplated vs plated anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery considering the role of osteobiologics in single- and multi-level procedures. A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed. Briefly, we sought to identify studies comparing unplated vs. plated ACDF for cervical degenerative disc disease reporting the use of osteobiologics in terms of clinical outcomes, radiographic fusion, and complications. Data on study population, follow-up time, type of cage and plate used, type of osteobiologic employed, number of levels treated, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), radiographic outcomes and complications were collected and compared. Relevant information was pooled for meta-analyses. Thirty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was found in terms of clinical outcomes between groups. Unplated ACDF was characterized by reduced blood loss, operation time and length of hospital stay. Fusion was achieved by the majority of patients in both groups, with no evidence of any specific contribution depending on the osteobiologics used. Dysphagia was more commonly associated with anterior plating, while cage subsidence prevailed in the unplated group. Unplated and plated ACDF seem to provide similar outcomes irrespective of the osteobiologic used, with minor differences with doubtful clinical significance. However, the heterogeneity and high risk of bias affecting included studies markedly prevent significant conclusions.