Certain Types Of Medications Research Articles

Overview of Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit: Potential implications for patients with psychotic disorders

Medicare Part D prescription drug benefits are reviewed. Potential implications for patients with psychotic disorders in relation to Medicare Part D are discussed. The newly created Medicare Part D provides prescription drug benefits to many individuals formerly without prescription benefits and, possibly, lower-cost benefits to those who previously relied on other benefits. Participating prescription plans use a variety of pharmacy management tools to minimize costs while providing benefit plans that meet Part D requirements for composition and coverage. Patients then have the challenge of choosing a prescription drug plan that will best satisfy their prescriptions needs. The rollout of Part D has not been without problems, and although more Medicare participants are receiving prescription drug benefits at a greater savings, there are concerns that Part D may not provide adequate coverage for all patients or for patients requiring certain types of medications, especially some psychotropic medications. Pharmacists have voiced concerns about the Medicare Part D drug plan in regard to both the degree of coverage it provides to enrollees and the difficulty in administering the benefit.

Pharmacies, Pharmacists, and Conscientious Objection

This paper examines the obligations of pharmacy licensees and pharmacists in the context of conscience-based objections to filling lawful prescriptions for certain types of medications--e.g., standard and emergency contraceptives. Claims of conscience are analyzed as means to preserve or maintain an individual's moral integrity. It is argued that pharmacy licensees have an obligation to dispense prescription medications that satisfy the health needs of the populations they serve, and this obligation can override claims of conscience. Although efforts should be made to respect the moral integrity of pharmacists and accommodate their claims of conscience, it is argued that the health needs of patients and the professional obligations of pharmacists limit the extent to which pharmacists may refuse to assist patients who have lawful prescriptions for medically indicated drugs.

Medications as risk factors for farm injury

A case-control study was used to determine whether cases of farm injury were more likely than controls to have been regularly exposed to certain types of medication including those that cause side effects which may predispose to injury. Persons reporting an injury ( n = 176) were identified in a population-based mail survey of people on 1364 Ontario farms, and compared to people without injuries using a 4:1 control: case ratio. Bivariate, stratified, and multivariable analyses were used to quantify the strength of associations between exposures to certain medications and the occurrence of farm injury. Those who regularly used certain types of medication were separated into two groups: people who used the medications in isolation, and those who used the medications in combination with other medications. Response to the survey was 77.3% among cases and 82.6% among controls. Strong and statistically significant increases in risk for injury were observed in association with the regular use of stomach remedies or laxatives by males (OR 2.8; 95% CI: 1.0,7.7), and regular use of heart or circulatory medications by men over the age of 45 (OR 4.2; 95% CI: 1.2,14.7). The identified associations remained after adjustment for age, co-morbidity, tillable farm acreage, education, income, alcohol consumption and tobacco use. Several possible explanations for the occurrence of the identified associations, other than the etiological hypothesis originally advanced, are discussed.