We would like to congratulate Veves et al. for their excellent review that stressed the importance of painful diabetic neuropathy diagnosis [1]. However, apart from neuropathic pain scales and skin biopsy, we believe that neurophysiological tools are also useful in the diagnostic work-up of diabetic patients with neuropathic pain complaints due to small fiber involvement. Small fiber function can be noninvasively assessed by quantitative sensory testing for thermal sensation [2], in which warm and heat pain thresholds reflect the function of C- and Ad-fibers, respectively. This method has been proposed in the assessment of patients with diabetic neuropathy [3], but is limited by the subjectiveness of the individual’s responses [4]. In the last few years, more objective techniques have been developed for small fiber assessment. Lasergenerated radiant heat pulses selectively activate Ad and C nociceptors [5] and have been used for the early diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy [6,7]. Unfortunately, because of the imminent risk for skin lesions—especially in diabetic subjects—its use is not recommended in routinary basis. More recently, contact heat-evoked potentials have been introduced for small fiber evaluation without the risk of cutaneous lesions [8]. The system delivers rapidly raising heat stimuli through a thermode placed in the skin, able to evoke cerebral potentials reliably [9,10], and has been used for the study of many small fiber syndromes [9–11] with a good correlation with the density of C fibers in the superficial skin [10].