1. 1. In the present study we have selected the records of 102 children and nine adults from the files of the Philadelphia Center for Research in Child Growth. The children were all of dental stage III C to IV A, with a chronological age range of 11:3 to 13:7. The study is essentially cross sectional. 2. 2. Sample breakdown is as follows: normal occlusion, twenty-four boys and twenty-nine girls; Class II, Division 1 malocclusion, twenty-nine boys and girls, grouped; Class III malocclusion, eleven boys and girls, grouped; nine Negro boys and girls, grouped, with normal occlusion; the nine adults, male and female, grouped, had mixed occlusion. 3. 3. For each case lateral and anteroposterior roentgenographic cephalometric films, taken in the Broadbent-Bolton apparatus, were analyzed, together with dental models. The main comparative analysis, in the present study, is between the groups with normal occlusion and those with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. 4. 4. In this study we have employed previously defined landmarks and/or end points in the lateral film, but we have presented an entirely new series of such landmarks and/or end points in the P-A film. The aim is to permit a technical and visual correlation between the two views so that any specific structure, such as 6 may be oriented and understood in three planes of space. 5. 5. In the P-A film we have established three main zones (Fig. 4): horizontal (H), unpaired; central (C), vertical in position, unpaired; lateral (L), paired. The major contents of each zone or structure, as seen in the x-ray film, are carefully defined and described. 6. 6. In the lateral film, three zones, in an anteroposterior orientation, are given (Fig. 5): anterior (A), medial (M), and posterior (P). 7. 7. A technique employing millimeter paper is given which permits the orientation of comparable lateral and P-A tracings, in the same child, at the same age. Also, a technique is presented to permit direct comparison of x-ray films (lateral and P-A) with dental models. 8. 8. The position of 6 anteroposteriorly, as seen in the lateral x-ray film, is as follows: 8.1. (a) The distance Te-Na = ANS 6 8.2. (b) Position of 6 to the temporal arc (Te) varies directly as does ANS to the anterior arc. 8.3. (c) This suggests that 6 position in the arch varies as does position of 1 . 8.4. (d) The anteroposterior position of 6 is influenced by size of teeth, position of incisors, muscle balance, and the position of the palate in the cephalofacial complex. 8.5. (e) The anteroposterior position of 6 is not, as Angle claimed, fixed; hence, it cannot be absolutely basic to an occlusal classification which assumes 6 to be stable and fixed. 9. 9. The position of 6 transversely, as seen in the P-A x-ray films, is as follows: 9.1. (a) In normal occlusion its variability is of the order of 1 to 2 mm. 9.2. (b) Class II, Division 1 malocclusions tend to have a smaller bimolar dimension, while in Class III the reverse is true. 9.3. (c) The bicanine diameter approximates three-fifths of the bimolar diameter, regardless of occlusal category; the Class II, Division 1 is in the lower end of the distribution of total range. 9.4. (d) The position of 6 transversely is influenced by both muscular and mandibular function. 10. 10. The position of 6 vertically, as seen in the lateral x-ray film, is as follows: 10.1. (a) The vertical variation of 6 is small, of the order of ±1 mm. 10.2. (b) Hence, the position of 6 is relatively very stable in this plane. 11. 11. This study, cross sectional in nature and based upon small samples in some of the occlusal groups, must be tested at least by longitudinal studies and possibly by experimentation.