Background & Objectives: The MRI environment requires a cool ambient temperature between 20-22°C for proper magnet function which predisposes children to heat loss (1). However absorption of radiofrequency generated by the MRI scanner may also alter normal thermoregulation and partially offset heat loss. Most general anesthetics also impair central thermoregulatory control by inhibiting normal tonic thermoregulatory vasoconstriction. Ketamine, unique among anesthetics, increases plasma concentration of norepinephrine and peripheral arteriolar resistance (2). In contrast, propofol causes profound venodilatation than other anesthetics. However, insufficient data exist for temperature changes for both sedated and non-sedated children during MRI examinations in 3 Tesla (T) MRI systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate temperature variance for non-sedated and propofol- or ketamine-sedated pediatric patients during MRI. Materials & Methods: ASA I-II, 103 children, undergoing brain MRI were randomly allocated into three groups. Group I (n=34) received no sedation, Group II (n=35) sedated with 0,1 mg/kg midazolam+2 mg/kg propofol and Group III (n=34) sedated with 0,1 mg/kg midazolam+1,5 mg/kg ketamine. Additional 1 mg/kg propofol in Group II and 0.5 mg/kg ketamine in Group III was provided and repeated to maintain sedation. Pre-scanning, post-scanning and 1 hour after MRI-scanning temperature were measured at the right tympanic site. Temperature changes, specific absorption rate (SAR), consumption of sedatives, total number of scans and duration of scans were also recorded. Results: Demographic data were comparable among three groups. Pre-scanning and post-scanning temperatures were similar between groups whereas measured temperatures 1 hour after MRI were significantly different between Group I and Group II (p=0.005). In Group I and III, post-scanning temperatures were significantly increased in comparison to pre-scanning values (p=0,001, p=0,002, respectively). The temperatures measured 1 hour after MRI were returned to pre-scanning values in Group I but significant temperature difference was continued in Group III (p=0.008). Specific absorption rate (SAR), consumption of sedatives, total number of scans and duration of scans were similar among groups. Conclusion: While confirming temperature rising effect of MRI in children, this study also report that propofol or ketamine has no clinically significant effect on body temperature during sedation for MRI scanning.