Central Sensitization Inventory Scores Research Articles

Correlations of The Central Sensitization Inventory, conditioned pain modulation, cognitions and psychological factors in individuals with chronic neck pain: A cross-sectional study.

Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a global public health problem, with high prevalence and absenteeism rates. Central sensitization (CS) as a basis for chronic pain may play an essential role in its development and progression. It is often comorbid with low conditioned pain modulation (CPM) effects, cognitions, and psychological problems. The purposes of this study were to (1) explore the relationship between pain-related cognitions and psychological factors, CPM effects, and the central sensitization inventory (CSI) scores; and (2) determine whether cognitions and psychological factors can predict CSI scores and CPM effects in individuals with CNP. Fifty-four individuals with CNP were recruited for this cross-sectional study. The following outcome measures were evaluated: The CSI (screening tool) was compared with the cold pressor test (CPT), which was the psychophysical test used to assess the CPM; neck pain intensity using the visual analogue scale (VAS), as well as pain-related cognitions (including kinesiophobia and pain catastrophization) and psychological states (including anxiety and depression) using self-report questionnaires. CSI score was not associated with the CPM effect (r = 0.257, p > 0.05), and no cognitions or psychological factors were associated with CPM (p > 0.05), but CSI score was moderately positively correlated with kinesiophobia (r = 0.554, p < 0.01), lowly positively correlated with pain catastrophization (r = 0.332, p = 0.017) and anxiety (r = 0.492, p < 0.01), but not depression (r = 0.207, p = 0.132). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that kinesiophobia (B = 1.308, p < 0.01) and anxiety (B = 1.806, p = 0.02) were significant positive predictors of CSI score. The findings confirm some of our hypotheses. Accordingly, the findings inferred that the CSI does not seem to respond to CPM effect in patients with CNP effectively. In addition, CSI score was associated with cognitions and psychological factors, of which kinesiophobia and anxiety were effective predictors. In clinical practice, pain-related cognitions and psychological factors should be fully considered to manage neck pain efficiently.

Effect of dry needling on pain and central sensitization in women with chronic pelvic pain: A randomized parallel-group controlled clinical trial

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a debilitating problem in women with clear evidence of myofascial dysfunction. It seems that Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) contribute to the development of central sensitization (CS). This study aimed to investigate the effect of dry needling on pain and CS in women with CPP. Thirty-six women with CPP participated in this randomized controlled clinical trial and randomly assigned into three groups: dry needling group (DNG), placebo needling group (PNG) and control group (CG). The DNG received five sessions of DN using the “static needling”, the PNG received non-penetrating method, and the CG did not receive any intervention. Assessment of outcomes including central sensitization inventory (CSI), short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), electroencephalography (EEG), conditioned pain modulation (CPM), salivary cortisol concentration, 7-item general anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7), pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), and SF-36 questionnaire was performed pre-intervention, post-intervention, and three months post-intervention by a blind examiner. The result showed a significant group-by-time interaction for CSI, SF-MPQ, and PCS. There was a significant decrease in CSI score in post-intervention and three-months post-intervention compare to pre-intervention in the DNG and PNG. SF-MPQ-PPI score in DNG significantly decreased post-intervention. PCS-Total score decreased significantly post-intervention in DNG and PNG. No significant group-by-time interactions were observed for other variables. EEG results showed regional changes in the activity of frequency bands in both eye closed and eye open conditions. It seems that DN can affect central pain processing by removing the source of peripheral nociception.Trial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20211114053057N1, registered on: December 03, 2021. https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/search/result?query=IRCT20211114053057N1).

Cross-cultural adaption, validity, and reliability of the Japanese version of the Central Aspects of Pain in the Knee (CAP-Knee-J) questionnaire in patients with knee pain: a validation study

BackgroundKnee pain is a prominent concern among older individuals, influenced by the central nervous system. This study aimed to translate the Central Aspects of Pain in the Knee (CAP-Knee) questionnaire into Japanese and investigate its reliability and validity in older Japanese individuals with knee pain.MethodsUsing a forward–backward method, CAP-Knee was translated into Japanese, and data from 110 patients at an orthopedic clinic were analyzed. The Japanese version (CAP-Knee-J) was evaluated regarding pain intensity during walking, central sensitization inventory, and pain catastrophizing scale. Statistical analyses confirmed internal validity and test–retest reliability. Concurrent validity was assessed through a single correlation analysis between CAP-Knee-J and the aforementioned measures. Exploratory factor analysis was employed on each CAP-Knee-J item to examine structural validity.ResultsCAP-Knee-J showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.86) and excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.77). It correlated significantly with pain intensity while walking, central sensitization inventory scores, and pain catastrophizing scale scores. Exploratory factor analysis produced a three-factor model.ConclusionsCAP-Knee-J is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing central pain mechanisms specific to knee pain in older Japanese individuals, with moderate correlations with the CSI and weak with the PCS, thus indicating construct validity. This study supports the development of effective knee pain treatments and prognosis predictions.

Central sensitivity syndrome affects the disease activity index and treatment satisfaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Many rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients prioritize pain improvement in treatment. As pain can result from various causes, including noninflammatory factors such as central sensitivity syndrome (CSS), we hypothesized that CSS might impact treatment satisfaction. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the CSS effects on clinical disease activity and treatment satisfaction in RA patients. In total, 220 consecutive RA patients receiving long-term follow-up were evaluated for clinical disease activity and treatment satisfaction. CSS was evaluated using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). An overall score of ≥40 indicates the presence of CSS. We queried "How satisfied are you with your treatment?"; answers included (a) very satisfied, (b) satisfied, (c) not satisfied, or (d) very dissatisfied. For univariate analysis, we condensed these answers into "dissatisfied" or "satisfied." We also evaluated treatment satisfaction using the visual analog scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0 mm (very dissatisfied) to 100 mm (very satisfied). Of the 220 patients, 17 (7.7%) were classified as having CSS. CSI score was significantly correlated with the clinical disease activity index (CDAI; r = .322, p < .01) and treatment satisfaction (r = -.336, p < .01). Regarding treatment satisfaction, univariate analysis revealed that patient global assessment (PtGA), pain VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein, CDAI, and CSI scores of patients who were satisfied with treatment differed significantly from those of dissatisfied patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that CSI, PtGA, and HAQ-DI scores were associated with treatment satisfaction. In RA patients, CSS may affect the disease activity index and reduce treatment satisfaction.

The effects of upper cervical spine manual therapy on central sensitization and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in subjects with migraine and neck pain

BackgroundMigraine is an important disease due to its impact on global health. Due to association of neck pain with migraine, manual therapy (MT) often used in management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of upper cervical spine MT on specific mechanisms including central sensitization (CS) and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in subjects with migraine and neck pain. Methods30 subjects with migraine and neck pain (30 female, mean age 43.10 ± 8.13) were randomly assigned to a medication plus MT (MedMT) group, a medication plus sham manual therapy (sham MT) group, and a medication alone (Med) group. CS was evaluated using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and BAEP determined electrophysiologically in all subjects pre and post intervention. Subjects in MedMT and sham MT groups received either 4 sessions of MT or sham MT. All subjects received medication. ResultsSubjects in MedMT group had a significant reduction in CSI score (P < 0.05) compare to the other 2 groups. For BAEPs, MedMT and sham MT groups had significantly decreased wave V latency on the right side (P < 0.05) compared to Med group. DiscussionManual therapy plus medication may have beneficial effects in people with migraine and neck pain by normalizing central sensitization levels. Additionally, upper cervical manual therapy or sham manual therapy have demonstrable neurophysiological effects reflected by changes in the auditory transmission pathways in the brainstem. Further research is required to investigate the mechanisms of action of MT in migraine.

The effect of balance exercises on central sensitization in patients with knee osteoarthritis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of balance exercises on functional status, pain, balance, and central sensitization in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients diagnosed with bilateral Kellgren–Lawrence grade ≥ 2 primary knee OA and associated central sensitization were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups. Both groups were provided with verbal and written information on knee OA. In addition, the intervention group received a supervised balance exercise program for 6 weeks, 3 days a week on alternating days. The outcome measures were the changes in the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Berg Balance Scale, and Y Balance Test. Evaluations were performed at baseline, immediately after treatment (6th week) and at 12th week. The study included 40 patients, 20 patients in each group. At the end of the treatment period (6th week), the improvement in CSI score, WOMAC pain, WOMAC physical function, WOMAC total score, Y Balance Test scores, and VAS pain during activity was significantly greater in the intervention group than that in the control group (p < 0.001). Regarding the changes from baseline to the 12th week, the intervention group experienced greater improvement in most of the outcome measures. Yet, the change in WOMAC pain score, Berg Balance Scale score, and VAS pain at rest was similar between the study groups (p = 0.05, p = 0.257, and p = 0.385, respectively). A two-model multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the changes in VAS pain (during activity) after the treatment and at follow-up [(p = 0.004, adjusted R2: 0.346) and (p = 0.002, adjusted R2: 0.391), respectively], as well as changes in WOMAC pain from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.020, ΔR2 = 0.245) significantly affected central sensitization. However, changes in Y Balance Test and WOMAC total scores did not appear to have a significant impact on the improvement in central sensitization (p > 0.05). Balance exercises may provide improvement in central sensitization, functional status, and dynamic balance among patients with knee OA. The improvement in central sensitization depends mostly on the pain relief effect of balance exercises.

Evaluation of the segmental distribution of pain sensitivity among patients with central sensitization associated with chronic subacromial pain syndrome: A cross-sectional study

IntroductionPain sensitivity is the main finding of central sensitization (CS) and can occur in patients with chronic shoulder pain. However, there is limited evidence concerning the distribution of pain sensitivity in shoulders, forearms, and legs in patients with CS associated with chronic shoulder pain. The present study aimed to determine the distribution of pain sensitivity in patients with CS associated with chronic subacromial pain syndrome (SPS). MethodThis cross-sectional study included 58 patients with chronic SPS and CS (patient group) and 58 healthy participants (control group). The presence of CS was determined using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). To determine the distribution of pain sensitivity, pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurements were performed from the shoulders, forearms, and legs. ResultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sociodemographic data (p > 0.05). The patient group had a significantly higher CSI score (p < 0.001) and lower PPTs in all regions (p < 0.05) than the control group. Unlike the control group, the patient group had lower PPTs on the affected side for the shoulder [mean difference (MD) 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2 (−1.7 to −0.6)], forearm [MD 95% CI: 1.1 (−1.7 to −0.6)], and leg [MD 95% CI: 0.9 (−1.4 to −0.3)] compared with the contralateral side (p < 0.001). ConclusionPain sensitivity is more pronounced in the affected shoulder and the forearm and leg located on this side than in those on the contralateral side in patients with CS associated with chronic SPS.

Pain types and risk factors in post-COVID-19.

This study aims to accurately evaluate pain lasting longer than three months and falls under the category of chronic pain and to determine the risk factors to follow up and treat properly and to develop appropriate diagnostic and treatment algorithms. Between March 2021 and December 2021, a total of 437 patients (162 males, 275 females; mean age: 44±14.6 years; range, 12 to 82 years) who were referred to the participating centers due to pain complaints and were diagnosed with post-COVID-19 condition according to the criteria defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) were included in the study. The patients were divided into three groups as nociceptive pain, neuropathic pain, and central sensitization, based on the physician's clinical evaluation and the Self-Report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) and Central Sensitization Inventory scores. The most common diagnosis was nociceptive pain followed by central sensitization. Patients with nociceptive pain had less pain. It was found that not exercising regularly, having a chronic disease and being a woman were risk factors for central sensitization, having thyroid disease before COVID-19, and defining the current pain as very severe were risk factors for neuropathic pain. In the evaluation of post-COVID-19 pain, neuropathic pain and central sensitization should be also considered in addition to nociceptive pain and the severity of pain, systemic diseases and physical activity should be questioned.

Associations between the burdens of comorbid sleep problems, central sensitization, and headache-related disability in patients with migraine.

Sleep disturbances are common in migraine patients and affect quality of life. Central sensitization (CS) is likely to play a role in the increased severity and chronicity of migraine. We hypothesized that the number of comorbid sleep problems would affect headache-related disability through the effects of central sensitization (CS). We performed a cross-sectional study including 215 consecutive patients with migraine. Insomnia was defined as a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score greater than 5. Probable REM sleep behavior disorder (pRBD) was defined as an RBD screening score of 5 or greater. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) was defined as an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 10 or higher. Suspected sleep apnea (SA) was defined as patients with snoring or sleep apnea witnessed 3 or more nights a week. CS was assessed by the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). Restless legs syndrome, insomnia, EDS, SA and pRBD were observed in 25.6%, 71.6%, 34.4%, 10.2%, and 21.4%, respectively, of the patients. At least one sleep problem was present in 87.0% of the patients. According to the results of the multinomial logistic regression analysis with no sleep problems as a reference, after we corrected for adjustment factors, the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score significantly increased when three or more comorbid sleep problems were present. According to our mediation analysis, an increased number of sleep problems had a direct effect on the MIDAS score after we adjusted for other variables, and the CSI score was indirectly involved in this association. The present study showed an association between migraine-related disability and the burden of multiple sleep problems, which was partially mediated by CS.

Black box in overactive bladder: Central sensitization and its relationship with urinary symptom severity and quality of life.

To examine central sensitization (CS), and to investigate the relationship between CS, and urinary symptom severity, and quality of life (QoL) in women with overactive bladder (OAB). A total of 144 women with OAB included the study. CS with the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), urinary symptom with the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Version 8 (OAB-V8), bladder diary and Patients' Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) and QoL with the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) were assessed. It was found that 47.9% (n = 69) of women with OAB had CS. It was observed that the CSI score was related to the OAB-V8 score (ρ = 0.327; p < 0.001) and the average number of voids/day (ρ = 0.291; p < 0.001). Additionally, urgency severity was higher in women with OAB with CS than in women with OAB without CS (p = 0.006). There was a relationship between the CSI score and KHQ-incontinence impact (ρ = 0.250; p = 0.012), KHQ-personal relationship (ρ = 0.253; p = 0.002), KHQ-sleep/energy (ρ = 0.180; p = 0.031), KHQ-emotional state (ρ = 0.310; p < 0.001) and KHQ-severity measurement scores (ρ = 0.391; p < 0.001). In this study, it was observed that the majority of women with OAB had CS. It was found that more severe symptoms of CS were associated with worse urinary symptom severity and QoL in these patients. It may be beneficial to evaluate CS in the management of OAB and to consider CS when determining treatment strategies.

Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia in Patients with Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Differences between Subgroups Based on the Central Sensitization Inventory.

Physical exercise is an important element in the rehabilitation of chronic whiplash-associated disorders, with the physiological process underlying pain reduction called exercise-induced hypoalgesia. In chronic whiplash-associated disorders, exercise-induced hypoalgesia appears impaired, and the research suggests a relationship with symptoms of dysfunctional nociceptive processing, such as central sensitization. This study improves our understanding of exercise-induced hypoalgesia in chronic whiplash-associated disorders by examining the differences between the extent of exercise-induced hypoalgesia in subgroups based on scores on the central sensitization inventory (CSI). Data were collected from 135 participants with chronic whiplash-associated disorders who completed a set of questionnaires. Pain pressure thresholds and temporal summations were assessed before and after a submaximal aerobic bicycle exercise test. We observed no interaction effect between exercise-induced hypoalgesia and the CSI scores for both pain pressure threshold and temporal summation. No overall statistical effect was measured in the analysis of the effect of time. The pain pressure threshold significantly related to the CSI. The temporal summation showed no correlation. During this study, we did not find evidence for a difference in the presence of exercise-induced hypoalgesia when the subgroups were created based on the central sensitization cluster calculator. Limited evidence was found for the influence of CSI scores on the delta pain pressure threshold.

Central sensitization: its prevalence and impact on quality of life among hemodialyzed patients.

Data on the role of central sensitization in hemodialyzed patients are scarce. The aim was to identify the impact of central sensitization on quality of life and elucidate the risk factors for the development of central sensitization in patients receiving hemodialysis. Central sensitization, quality of life, psychological well-being, and sleep were assessed by the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale (JSS), respectively. The effect of central sensitization on quality of life and the predictors of the development of central sensitization were assessed by regression analyses. The frequency of central sensitization was 48% in the study population (n = 100). Patients with central sensitization had significantly higher pain intensity, worse sleep quality, and more impaired psychological status (p < 0.05 for all). The CSI score negatively affected all quality of life domains on its own (p < 0.001 for all, adjusted R2 ranged from 0.17 to 0.47). Dialysis vintage (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.0), pain (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.0), JSS (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5), and HADS-total (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.2) were determined as the independent risk factors for central sensitization (p < 0.05 for all). This study confirms that given the high frequency of central sensitization and its significant negative impact on quality of life, the presence of central sensitization should be investigated in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Mental Health Outcomes of Endometriosis Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact of Pre-pandemic Central Nervous System Sensitization

To correlate pain-related phenotyping for central nervous system sensitization in endometriosis-associated pain with mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic, the prospective Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02911090) was linked to the COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Study of a Provincial Population-Based Cohort for Gender and Sex (RESPPONSE) dataset. The primary outcomes were depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) scores during the pandemic. The explanatory variables of interest were the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) score (0–100) and endometriosis-associated chronic pain comorbidities/psychological variables before the pandemic. The explanatory and response variables were assessed for correlation, followed by multivariable regression analyses adjusting for PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores pre-pandemic as well as age, body mass index, and parity. A higher CSI score and a greater number of chronic pain comorbidities before the pandemic were both positively correlated with PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores during the pandemic. These associations remained significant in adjusted analyses. Increasing the CSI score by 10 was associated with an increase in pandemic PHQ-9 by .74 points (P < .0001) and GAD-7 by .73 points (P < .0001) on average. Each additional chronic pain comorbidity/psychological variable was associated with an increase in pandemic PHQ-9 by an average of .63 points (P = .0004) and GAD-7 by .53 points (P = .0002). Endometriosis patients with a history of central sensitization before the pandemic had worse mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a risk factor for mental health symptoms in the face of major stressors, clinical proxies for central sensitization can be used to identify endometriosis patients who may need additional support. PerspectiveThis article adds to the growing literature of the clinical importance of central sensitization in endometriosis patients, who had more symptoms of depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical features of central sensitization may help clinicians identify endometriosis patients needing additional support when facing major stressors.

Association between central sensitization, pain sensitivity and balance control in patients with migraine.

Balance alterations are prevalent among pain conditions, including migraine. The mechanisms explaining the association between pain and balance are unclear, as well as whether levels of pain sensitivity correlate with impaired balance. Our aim was therefore to investigate the association between balance, central sensitization symptoms and pain sensitivity in patients with migraine. This cross-sectional study included 50 patients and demographic, clinical information, central sensitization inventory (CSI) and pain catastrophizing (PCS) scores were obtained. Patients underwent a standardized protocol evaluating balance and pain thresholds for cold (CPT), heat (HPT), mechanical (MPT) and pressure (PPT) in trigeminal (V1) and extra-trigeminal (C6) dermatomes. Data were analysed using Person's correlation, linear regression models and contrasting the presence and absence of central sensitization symptoms through T-tests. Mild-to-moderate correlations were observed between balance and MPT in V1 (r = -0.24, p = 0.046) and C6 (r = -0.41, p = 0.002), CPT in V1 (r = 0.31, p = 0.026), CSI scores (r = 0.27, p = 0.029) and migraine frequency (r = 0.25, p = 0.040). Balance was explained by CPT and MPT (R2 = 0.32, p = 0.001). The variance of CSI was explained by PCS scores and balance (R2 = 0.28, p = 0.001). Patients with symptoms of central sensitization presented an increased balance impairment (p = 0.044) and higher catastrophizing levels (p = 0.001) in contrast to patients without symptoms. Balance impairment is associated with reduced pain thresholds and higher CSI scores. These results may help to elucidate the aetiology of balance alterations among chronic pain conditions. For the first time, it has been shown that balance alterations can reflect greater pain sensitivity and signs of central sensitization in patients with migraine. This opens up perspectives for future studies to understand the mechanisms and further factors associated with balance and pain sensitivity in migraine.

Central Sensitization in Psoriatic Arthritis: Relationship With Composite Measures of Disease Activity, Functional Disability, and Health-Related Quality of Life.

To investigate the prevalence of central sensitization (CS) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and its association with disease activity and patient-reported outcome measures. This cross-sectional study included adults with PsA without coexisting fibromyalgia (FM). Patients underwent a clinimetric assessment to collect variables regarding disease activity, quality of life (QOL), functional ability, impact of disease, and CS. Spearman ρ was used to examine the relationship between CS Inventory (CSI) scores and other variables. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent contribution of each variable to the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) score. One hundred fifty-seven patients were enrolled. Of them, 45.2% scored a CSI ≥ 40, indicating a high probability of CS. Significant correlations were found between CSI and disease activity, as evaluated by Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis score and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (ρ 0.587 and ρ 0.573, respectively), between CSI and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (ρ 0.607), and between CSI and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey physical component summary and mental component summary scores (ρ -0.405 and ρ -0.483, respectively). In multivariate analysis, CSI score was the principal independent variable (P < 0.001) contributing to PsAID-12 score. Patients with PsA with symptoms of CS had higher disease activity, worse functional ability, and worse QOL. The presence of CS is the major contributor in the impact of disease.

The relation of psychological status and type D personality with central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis: everything is in your mind!

To evaluate the relation of psychosocial parameters and type D personality with central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis (OA). The study included 126 patients with knee OA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Sociodemographic variables (age, gender, education, marital status, annual income), alcohol consumption/smoking, body mass index, comorbidities, and duration of symptoms were noted. Radiographic evaluation was performed according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index was used for clinical evaluation. Type D personality, negative affectivity, and social inhibition were evaluated using the type D Scale-14 (DS14). Central sensitization was assessed by the central sensitization inventory (CSI), while psychological status, quality of life, and sleep were assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), an abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale (JSS), respectively. The effect of type D personality on study parameters including central sensitization, as well as the risk factors for the development of central sensitization were assessed by regression analyses. Patients with type D personality had higher CSI, HADS scores and lower WHOQOL-BREF scores for psychological health, social relationship, environment and general quality of life. Linear regression analysis showed that the DS14 total score has a significant positive relation with CSI (β = 0.4, p < 0.05), HADS-depression (β = 0.4, p < 0.05), HADS-anxiety (β = 0.5, p < 0.05), and HADS-total scores (β = 0.5, p < 0.05). It also had a significant negative effect on all domains of WHOQOL-BREF (p < 0.05 for all). Logistic regression analysis revealed that JSS [Odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94; p = 0.003] and negative affectivity (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.94; p = 0.008) were independent risk factors for the development of central sensitization in knee OA. Type D personality has an impact on quality of life, central sensitization, and psychological health, with negative affectivity and sleep impairment serving as independent risk factors for central sensitization. While managing patients with knee OA, these intimate relationships should be taken into consideration.

Central sensitization negatively influences the level of disability in female patients with anterior knee pain.

To define the prevalence of Central Sensitization (CS) in patients with Anterior Knee Pain (AKP) and determine whether there is an association between CS and the magnitude of pain, disability, quality-of-life and psychological impairment. The data of a total of 44 AKP female patients with a mean age of 27.7years (15-50) recruited consecutively from hospital outpatient knee clinics were prospectively included in this study. The patients had no antecedents of knee trauma or surgery and no history of injury or disease of the nervous system. There were also 50 healthy female controls with a mean age of 26.1years (16-46). CS was evaluated using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). Quality-of-life was evaluated using the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire. Self-reporting of clinical pain intensity was obtained using the Visual Analogue Scale. The Kujala Knee Scale and IKDC form were used to evaluate disability. Anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Subscale (HAD). Kinesiophobia was measured with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) and catastrophizing by means of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Sixteen AKP patients (36%), and 2 (4%) of the healthy controls presented with central sensitization (p < 0.01). AKP patients with CS have a greater degree of disability based on the Kujala Scale and higher levels of anxiety and depression than AKP patients without CS. The score of AKP patients in the CSI correlated weakly with disability and quality of life and moderately with anxiety and depression. However, no association was seen between CSI score and pain intensity, nor with catastrophizing and kinesiophobia. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only depression was statistically significant in the prediction of the presence of CS (odds ratio 1.45; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.96). AKP patients have a significantly higher prevalence of CS in comparison with what has been reported for the general population. This finding suggests the presence of altered pain modulation in a subgroup of AKP patients. Level III.

Negative correlation between central sensitization and forgotten joint score-12 after total hip arthroplasty

BackgroundCentral sensitization is a condition in which even mild stimuli cause pain due to increased neuronal reactivity in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. It is one of factors of chronic pain in patients with osteoarthritis. However, it is unknown whether central sensitization relates to clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to clarify whether preoperative central sensitization relates to the forgotten joint score-12 (FJS) after THA. Moreover, the secondary outcome was to identify which items in the FJS were most related by central sensitization.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 263 hips (263 patients; 51 males and 212 females) that underwent primary THA in our institute and were available for evaluation one year postoperatively. The average patient age was 64.8 ± 11.9 years. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) part A, which is a patient-reported outcome, was used to measure preoperative central sensitization. The correlation between preoperative CSI and postoperative FJS and the association between postoperative FJS and preoperative CSI severity were determined. Moreover, difference in each FJS item was evaluated by CSI severity.ResultsTwenty-six patients (9.9%) had central sensitization preoperatively. Preoperative CSI scores and postoperative FJS were negatively correlated (r = − 0.331, p < 0.0001). The postoperative FJS was significantly lower in patients with moderate or higher preoperative CSI severity than that in patients with subclinical or mild preoperative CSI severity (p < 0.05). FJS items with movement of daily life were significantly worse in the moderate or higher CSI severity compared with subclinical group (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01).ConclusionCentral sensitization prior to THA negatively related to postoperative FJS. In particular, the relationship of central sensitization was found to be significant in FJS items with movement, which would lead to lower patient satisfaction after THA. To get better postoperative outcomes in patients with preoperative central sensitization, improving central sensitization would be important.

Assessment of Prevalence and Risk Factors for Central Sensitization Related to Shoulder Osteoarthritis and Rotator Cuff Tears Using the Central Sensitization Inventory: A Cross-Sectional Study in Shoulder Surgery Patients.

Shoulder disorders occasionally cause intractable pain. Central sensitization (CS) may be involved in such pain. Identifying risk factors associated with CS is crucial for effective pain control. This study aimed to determine the effects of shoulder osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tears (RCT) on CS and associated factors. This study included patients evaluated for CS using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) before surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis, RCT, or cuff tear arthropathy. Patients with a CSI score of 40 or higher were defined as having CS. The relationships between glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA), RCT size, and CS were statistically analyzed. Multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the factors affecting CSI scores. Subjects included 167 patients: 131 patients had RCT without GHOA, 23 had GHOA with RCT, and 13 had GHOA without RCT. The GHOA group had a significantly higher CSI score (27.5 [10.8-40.5] vs. 18.0 [10.0-27.5]) and CS prevalence (27.8% vs. 8.4%) than the RCT without GHOA group. There was no significant correlation between RCT size and CSI scores. Multiple regression analysis showed that female sex, severe pain, and long pain duration were associated with higher CSI scores. Considering the risk factors for CS might be helpful in shoulder treatment.

The relationship between inadequate response to physical therapy and central sensitization in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A prospective cohort study.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the relationship between physical therapy response and the presence of central sensitization (CS) in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients and methods: Between May 2019 and March 2020, a total of 84 patients with knee OA (12 males, 72 females; mean age: 60.7±7.7 years; range 50 to 74 years) and 30 age and sex-matched controls (6 males, 24 females; mean age: 59.2±8.9 years; range 50 to 75 years) were included in this study. Knee pain and functional status were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Structural damage was assessed by knee radiography. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and PainDETECT Questionnaire (PDQ) were applied at baseline. Pain pressure thresholds (PPTs) of the patients were measured and compared with the control group. All patients underwent a total of 15 sessions of physical therapy program for five sessions/weekly. After treatment, the patients were divided into two groups as responders and non-responders according to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) criteria. Results: The CSI score of the patients in non-responder group was significantly higher compared to the responder group (p=0.004). Using a cut-off value of ≥40, the proportion of patients with CSI scores of ≥40 was significantly lower in the responder group compared to non-responder group (p=0.021). The PPT measurement values were significantly lower in the non-responder group compared to the responder and control groups (p <0.01). There was a significant difference in the frequency of hyperalgesia between the groups (p=0.021). Central sensitization and depression were the most significant predictors of non-response to physical therapy (p=0.045 and p=0.024, respectively). Conclusion: Our study results suggest the presence of CS and depression may result in an inadequate response to physical therapy in patients with knee OA. Clinicians should consider the findings of CS and depression in treatment planning.