Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections Research Articles

Health Equity Factors and Healthcare-Associated Infections in Louisiana Facilities, 2022

Background: Health equity is a critical consideration in public health research, emphasizing the importance of fair and just access to healthcare resources. This study explores the impact of health equity factors on the incidence rates of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) across diverse healthcare facilities in Louisiana. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive analysis utilizing 2022 data from the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Fourteen healthcare facilities were randomly selected from nine regions in Louisiana, with guidance from the 2022 NHSN external validation toolkit. Key health equity factors from Health Resources and Service Administration (HRSA) were assessed, including urbanicity, MUA/P, and HPSA_Primary Care. Risk ratios were calculated to quantify the association between these health equity factors and the incidence rates of CLABSI and MRSA. Results: The findings reveal intriguing insights into the relationship between health equity factors and infection rates. In urban settings, the risk of CLABSI was lower (Risk Ratio: 0.634, 95% CI: 0.2442–1.646), contrasting with a significantly higher risk of MRSA (Risk Ratio: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.119–2.582). This suggests a complex interplay between urbanicity and the specific infection types. For MUA/P, no significant impact on CLABSI rates was observed (Risk Ratio: 0.963, 95% CI: 0.4225–2.195), but an increased risk of MRSA emerged (Risk Ratio: 1.652, 95% CI: 1.029–2.652). In healthcare professional shortage areas for primary care (HPSA_Primary Care), both CLABSI (Risk Ratio: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.5854–3.204) and MRSA (Risk Ratio: 2.098, 95% CI: 1.305–3.372) exhibited elevated risks, though only MRSA risk was statistically significant. Conclusions: This research underscores the nuanced relationship between health equity factors and infection rates in healthcare facilities. Urban settings may contribute to a lower risk of CLABSI but a higher risk of MRSA, emphasizing the need for tailored preventive strategies. Living in medically underserved areas appears to heighten the risk of MRSA, warranting targeted interventions. Additionally, healthcare professional shortage areas for primary care demonstrate potential associations with increased risks for both CLABSI and MRSA. These findings provide valuable insights for public health practitioners, policymakers, and healthcare administrators aiming to address health disparities and enhance infection control measures in diverse healthcare settings. Further research is encouraged to unravel the multifaceted dynamics influencing infection rates and to inform targeted interventions for improved health outcomes.

Antimicrobial bathing of the critically ill for the prevention of healthcare-associated infection at a hospital in California

Background: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) have invasive lines increasing their risk for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Our objective was to determine if antimicrobial bathing with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) compared to the colloidal silver-based antimicrobial product would reduce the incidents of central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). Methods: We performed a before-and-after study in four adult ICUs at a two-hospital facility in California. Prospective surveillance of CLABSI and CAUTI prevention bundles monitoring was established. The intervention consisted of daily bathing with CHG for all patients in the ICUs. A baseline period of one year was followed by an intervention period of one year. The incidence rates of CLABSIs and CAUTIs were compared between the baseline and intervention periods utilizing a t-test analysis. Results: A total of 10103 patients were included. At Facility A, a mean CLABSI rate of 2.43/1000 central line catheter days (CL) with 2149 patients days (Mean differences 95% CI -0.5–3.1; P>0.0975), during the baseline period followed by 1.11/1000 CL days with 2193 patient days in the intervention period. At Facility B, the mean CLABSI rate of 1.82/1000 CL days with 2976 patient days (Mean differences 95% CI -0.6–2.31; P>0.161) during the baseline period was followed by 1.01/1000 CL days with 2785 patient days in the intervention period. At Facility A, the mean CAUTI rate of 1.37/1000 indwelling catheter days (IUC) with 2149 ICU patient days (Mean difference 95% CI is 0.28–1.97; P 0.2160) was noted in the baseline period, followed by 0.45/1000 IUC days with 2785 in the intervention period. Conclusion: Daily bathing with CHG significantly reduced the incidence of CAUTI at Facility A. It is unclear why Facility A saw a statistically significant reduction in CAUTI, but Facility B did not. The difference in outcomes may be related to hospital size, service lines, supply constraints, and discrepancies in staffing. CHG bathing was not directly associated with a reduced risk of CLABSI at Facility A and B during our limited study, but it was encouraging enough that our organization will continue this intervention to obtain additional data to determine if bathing with CHG will reduce CLABSI and CAUTI.

Infection prevention making a difference on statewide standardized infection ratios for device-associated HAIs from 2015-2022

Background: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. Over the last 10 to 20 years, hospital accountability for the prevention of device-associated infections increased at the state and national levels. For example, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services implemented the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program in 2015. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of increased federal attention on infection prevention using longitudinal data from the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). We hypothesize that there was a significant decrease in statewide standardized infection ratios (SIRs) for CLABSI and CAUTI over the last 8 years. Methods: We collected SIRs for CLABSI and CAUTI in acute care hospitals for all 50 states and Washington D.C. from the NHSN database from 2015 to 2022. For CLABSI, we performed unique analyses for critical care units, wards, and neonatal intensive care (NICU) locations. For CAUTI, we stratified by critical care units and wards. We included all states with more than 5 hospitals reporting data. Those with fewer than 5 were excluded by listwise deletion in the corresponding analysis. We tested trends over time using linear mixed effect models with year as fixed effect and state as random effect. We also included an indicator variable representing the influence of SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). We elected an alpha of 0.05 as the threshold for statistical significance. Results: Overall, CLABSI and CAUTI SIRs exhibited significant negative slopes (Figures 1-5) after controlling for the influence of Covid-19. Each analysis revealed progressively lower SIRs compared to the previous year except for the 2019-2020 interval. Interestingly, the linear trend resumed after 2020 with subsequently lower SIRs in 2021 and 2022. Covid-19 had a greater influence on CLABSI SIRs in critical care settings compared to ward or NICU locations. The slope of CAUTI SIRs were impacted less by Covid-19 in wards compared to critical care settings. Conclusion: The results of the analysis demonstrate that CLABSI and CAUTI are trending in the desired direction despite the HAI spike during Covid-19. Government and hospital stakeholders in the United States should be encouraged by the reported trends and continue to prioritize the funding and use of resources for evidence-based device-associated infection prevention.

The Mechanics, Art, and Value of Central Line Stewardship

Background: Central venous catheter (CVC) utilization and central-line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) have increased nationwide. Busy providers can easily overlook the recommended practice of daily assessment of the ongoing indication for CVC. Prospective audit and feedback (PAF) is widely used and the gold standard for antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP), but reports involving PAF for device use are scarce. Therefore, we decided to evaluate the usefulness and feasibility of PAF for reducing device utilization and ultimately CLABSI rates at our 528-bed tertiary care hospital. Methods: A PAF-based Central Line Stewardship (CLS) initiative was launched in February 2023, with a team of hospitalists, infectious diseases physicians, health informatics, vascular access nurses, and infection preventionists. On business days, CVC line-lists were exported from the electronic medical record (EMR), into a REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) database for team members to evaluate, in real-time, all non-ICU CVCs in place for more >72 hours (Figures 1 and 2). For CVCs eligible for stewardship, CLS members placed Legal-approved note into the patient’s EMR, advising CVC removal or alternative IV access (Figure 3). CVCs continued to be audited until removal or patient discharge. Recommendation outcomes were tracked over the subsequent 72 hours for acceptance. Standardized Utilization Rates (SUR) and Infection Rates (SIR) were calculated and compared using the National Healthcare Safety Network. Results: Between February and August 2023, the CLS team reviewed 861 CVCs, representing 581 unique patient encounters, and made 622 recommendations. Recommendations to remove or replace the CVC represented 23.5% (146) of reviews, and 57% of these CVCs were removed within 3 days. 95% of removed lines had no adverse outcomes and did not require reinsertion. Hospital-wide CVC utilization decreased 18.7% from a SUR of 1.006 in the previous year, to 0.818 during the 7-month pilot period (p < 0 .001). In the 4 months following the pilot period, decreased CVC utilization was sustained with an SUR of 0.797. Non-ICU CLABSI SIR decreased from 1.282 in 2022 to 1.024 in 2023 (p=0.36). Average time physician required for CLS review approximated a 0.4 full-time equivalent a week. The intervention was well received, with requests for expansion to urinary catheters. Conclusion: CLS safely and significantly reduced device-utilization; directly via documentation and recommendation, and indirectly through increased awareness and the Hawthorne Effect. Examples of the “art” of CLS include when to leave a discoverable note and how to determine ongoing need for CVC in a fragile patient.

Impacts of Hospital Acquired Bloodstream Infections in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis Through a Central Venous Catheter

Background: Hospital acquired infections (HAI) are of interest given their resultant morbidity, mortality, and hospital utilization. Among HAIs, central line associated bloodstream infections result in the highest rates of mortality and additional costs. While all central venous catheters (CVC) carry risk for BSI, long-term catheter use is at increased risk. One population that utilize CVCs for extended durations are those undergoing hemodialysis. While data are available characterizing BSI impacts on outpatient hemodialysis patients, little data exist describing inpatients. The purpose of this study was to characterize the demographics, outcomes, and economics associated with the development of hospital acquired BSI (HA-BSI) in patients undergoing hemodialysis through a CVC (HD-CVC). Methods: All admissions of adult patients in the Premier Healthcare Database with hospital stays including HD-CVC with discharge dates during 2020-2022 were retrospectively evaluated. BSIs were identified by ICD-10 codes and blood culture collection dates. A BSI was deemed hospital acquired if the blood culture date was ≥3 calendar days after admission. Descriptive analyses were undertaken for HA-BSI patients including: baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Length of stay (LOS), ICU utilization, and estimated costs were evaluated for HAI-BSI and non-BSI populations. Results: 166,394 admissions from 91,448 patients were identified. Of these, 5,722 patients (6.3%) had 5,842 admissions with a HA-BSI. These patients were 58.9% white, 28.3% black, 56.8% male, and 62.9% were aged ≥60years. Patients had considerable comorbidities at baseline with 88.9% having ≥2 Charlson comorbid conditions and 46.9% with ≥6. During the study period, all-cause mortality was 27.8% for HA-BSI patients with 85.5% of deaths occurring while inpatient. Median LOS for patients with HA-BSI was 25 days compared with 6 days for HD-CVC without BSI; patients with HA-BSI were also more likely to require the ICU (65.6% vs. 27.6%). The median ICU LOS was 12 days for HA-BSI versus 34 days for HD-CVC without BSI. Greater intensity of healthcare utilization was reflected in median costs of $402K for HA-BSI, compared with $43K for HD-CVC without BSI. Discussion: We described the characteristics of HD-CVC patients that developed HA-BSI. These patients had many comorbidities and relatively high rates of all-cause in-hospital mortality. Patients were likely to have long LOS, both in-hospital and within the ICU. Collectively, care of these patients was associated with considerable healthcare costs, particularly as compared with HD-CVC patients not developing a HA-BSI. Future studies should characterize risk factors and evaluate potential prevention strategies for this high-risk population.

Impact of Vascular Access Teams on Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, rates of central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI) increased nationally. Studies pre-pandemic showed improved CLABSI rates with implementation of a standardized vascular access team (VAT).[PL1] [PL2] [mi3] Varying VAT resources and coverage existed in our 10 acute care facilities (ACF) prior to and during the pandemic. VAT scope also varied in 1) process for line selection during initial placement, 2) ability to place a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), midline or ultrasound-guided peripheral IV in patients with difficult vascular access, 3) ownership of daily assessment of central line (CL) necessity, and 4) routine CL dressing changes. We aimed to define and implement the ideal VAT structure and evaluate the impact on CLABSI standardized infection ratios (SIR) and rates prior to and during the pandemic. Methods: A multidisciplinary workgroup including representatives from nursing, infection prevention, and vascular access was formed to understand the current state of VAT responsibilities across all ACFs. The group identified key responsibilities a VAT should conduct to aid in CLABSI prevention. Complete VAT coverage[mi4] was defined as the ability to conduct the identified responsibilities daily. We compared the SIR and CLABSI rates between hospitals who had complete VAT (CVAT) coverage to hospitals with incomplete VAT (IVAT) coverage. Given this work occurred during the pandemic, we further stratified our analysis based on a time frame prior to the pandemic (1/2015 – 12/2019) and intra-pandemic (1/2020 - 12/2022). Results: The multidisciplinary team identified 6 key components of complete VAT coverage: Assessment for appropriate line selection prior to insertion, ability to insert PICC and midlines, daily CL and midline care and maintenance assessments, daily assessment of necessity for CL, and weekly dressing changes for CL and midlines[NA5] . A cross walk of VAT scope (Figure 1) was performed in October 2022 which revealed two facilities (A and E) which met CVAT criteria. Pre-pandemic, while IVAT CLABSI rates and SIR were higher than in CVAT units, the difference was not statistically significant. During the pandemic, however, CLABSI rates and SIR were 40-50% higher in IVAT compared to CVAT facilities (Incident Rate Ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0 and SIR Relative Ratio 1.4, 95% CI1.1-1.9 respectively) (Table 1). Conclusions: CLABSI rates were lower in facilities with complete VAT coverage prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic suggesting a highly functioning VAT can aid in preventing CLABSIs, especially when a healthcare system is stressed and resources are limited.

Comparative Analysis of Healthcare-associated Bloodstream Infections & CLABSI Surveillance in A Singaporean tertiary Hospital

Background: Healthcare-associated central line associated bloodstream infection (HA-CLABSI) surveillance is important for monitoring healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and evaluating effectiveness of infection prevention (IP) measures. However, implementing it is a laborious and time-consuming approach. Exclusive focus on central lines neglects HAI risk due to peripheral vascular catheters. This study aimed to assess whether HA-CLABSI incidence could be inferred from HA-bloodstream infection (BSI) trends and explore shift to HA-BSI surveillance. Methods: The study was performed in a Singaporean tertiary care hospital. Electronic medical records review was performed to determine whether positive blood cultures met Centers for Disease Control/National Health Safety Network (CDC/NHSN) definitions for HA-CLABSI and HA-BSI. Incident episodes of HA-BSI were included (excluding positive cultures repeated within 14 days). Incident organisms were explored to identify common causative pathogens (excluding same organisms isolated from cultures repeated within 14 days). CLABSI and BSI occurring ≥72hrs after admission were considered healthcare-associated. Patients under oncology or hematology service were considered immunocompromised. Incidence rates (IR) per 10,000 patient-days, patient characteristics and causative pathogens were compared between both indicators. Results: From January 2022 to October 2023, mean IR for HA-CLABSI was 0.63 (n=68) and for HA-BSI was 10.06 (n=1094). Median age of patients with HA-CLABSI was 66 years and HA-BSI was 68 years. HA-CLABSI and HA-BSI were more common in males (60.86% & 58.68%). Median duration between admission to HA-CLABSI was 20 days and to HA-BSI was 12 days. Median duration between central line insertion to HA-CLABSI was 16 days. Of 1094, 631 (57.7%) patients had vascular catheter(s) (i.e., IV cannula, port-a-cath, peripherally-inserted central catheter or central line) inserted at time of HA-BSI diagnosis, of whom 46 (7.3%) patients had CLABSI ±2days from positive blood culture. There was no significant correlation between monthly aggregate data from these indicators (Spearman’s correlation coefficient= 0.36, p-value=0.1). Predominant organisms causing HA-CLABSI and HA-BSI were gram negative bacteria (GNB, 40% & 57.21%), gram positive bacteria (24.71% & 22.23%), and fungi. Common GNB in CLABSI patients were Pseudomonas spp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (8.24%), followed by Serratia marcescens and Klebsiella pneumoniae (5.88%). The frequent GNB in HA-BSI patients were Escherichia coli (15.4%), Klebsiella pneumonia (12.68%), and Pseudomonas spp. (6.69%). Common multi-drug resistant organisms were vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (10.59% & 3.69%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (10.59% & 3.07%). Conclusion: HA-BSI did not correlate with HA-CLABSI. HA-BSI reflects heterogenous population outcomes. For utilization as surveillance indicator, further assessment on exclusion criteria is required to improve specificity.

To assess the effectiveness of intervention program on knowledge regarding central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSI) bundle care among staff nurses at selected hospitals of Kalaburagi

To assess the effectiveness of intervention program on knowledge regarding central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSI) bundle care among staff nurses at selected hospitals of Kalaburagi

The Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Survey of Acute Care Hospitals

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed an enormous strain on the healthcare system, including infection prevention and control. The response to the COVID-19 pandemic required extraordinary resources, which were often diverted from routine infection prevention and control activities and may have contributed to increased rates of HAI in the acute care setting. However, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infection prevention and control departments, including staffing and resources, and on routine infection prevention and control activities is not well-described. The objective of this study was to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on IPC departments and department response to the pandemic. Methods: Between August and December of 2023, we conducted an electronic survey of all acute care facilities participating in the National Healthcare Safety Network. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Over 594 infection control departments participated in the survey, representing 1,400 NHSN facilities (20% response rate based on number of eligible NHSN facilities). Half of the respondents reported that their hospital experienced increases in the following HAI rates during the first two years of the pandemic: central-line associated bloodstream infections (54%), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (46%) and ventilator associated pneumonia (45%). When asked to identify the top three contributors to increased HAI rates in their facility, respondents cited the following factors: staffing shortages (70%), patient acuity (69%), use of travel nurses (48%), increased device utilization (37%), and reduced bedside acuity (31%). Respondents reported that their department utilized the following actions to decrease these HAI rates: increased rounding and monitoring of IPC procedures (81%), reeducation of frontline staff on IPC policies and procedures (77%), environmental care rounds (69%), monitoring of isolation compliance (66%), HAI Task Force/Committee (57%), nurse-driven catheter removal protocols (53%), and insertion prevention protocols (53%). When asked if the department experienced applied pressure or attempts to influence HAI reporting due to the increase in HAI rates in the facility experienced in the wake of the pandemic, 19% of respondents reported increased pressure from management/C-suite and 7% reported increased pressure from providers. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on IPC departments in acute care hospitals and had a profound effect on IPC staffing, resources and routine IPC activities. Future work needs to identify best practices and lessons learned from the pandemic to inform future pandemic preparedness.

Changes in Interprofessional Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Effect on Patient Outcomes: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Changes in healthcare delivery were required during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the approach to care of the COVID-19 patient on nursing sensitive indicators and nutrition therapy and the utilization of rehabilitation services during the first year of the pandemic in the acute care setting. A retrospective study of 894 patients admitted with a COVID-19 diagnosis was conducted between March 2020 and February 2021 in 3-month cohorts. All charts were reviewed for general demographics and hospital data, nursing quality indicators, and nutritional and rehabilitation services for the first 30 days of admission. Differences in patient characteristics were noted among the cohorts. Variations were observed between time points in hospital-acquired pressure injury occurrence, with mechanical ventilation and proning being independent predictors of hospital-acquired pressure injuries. There were differences noted in the percentage of patients with a central line-associated bloodstream infection among the time points (P < .001), but there were no differences noted in catheter-associated urinary tract infections (P = .20). Overall, 15.5% had a malnutrition diagnosis, with most patients receiving 50% of prescribed calorie and protein needs. Rehabilitation services increased over time with these services being initiated earlier in the later cohorts (P < .001). The results of this study demonstrated the impact of the pandemic on outcomes in the areas of nursing, nutrition, and rehabilitation, which varied across quarterly cohorts as we learned and developed new practices and adapted to a novel pandemic.

Nurse-Sensitive Indicators as Predictors of Trauma Patient Discharge Disposition.

About 3.5 million trauma patients are hospitalized every year, but 35%-40% require further care after discharge. Nurses' ability to affect discharge disposition by minimizing the occurrence of nurse-sensitive indicators (catheter-associated urinary tract infection [CAUTI], central line-associated bloodstream infection [CLABSI], and hospital-acquired pressure injury [HAPI]) is unknown. These indicators may serve as surrogate measures of quality nursing care. The purpose of this study was to determine whether nursing care, as represented by three nurse-sensitive indicators (CAUTI, CLABSI, and HAPI), predicts discharge disposition in trauma patients. This study was a secondary analysis of the 2021 National Trauma Data Bank. We performed logistic regression analyses to determine the predictive effects of CAUTI, CLABSI, and HAPI on discharge disposition, controlling for participant characteristics. A total of n =29,642 patients were included, of which n =21,469 (72%) were male, n =16,404 (64%) were White, with a mean (SD) age of 44 (14.5) and mean (SD) Injury Severity Score of 23.2 (12.5). We created four models to test nurse-sensitive indicators, both individually and compositely, as predictors. While CAUTI and HAPI increased the odds of discharge to further care by 1.4-1.5 and 2.1 times, respectively, CLABSI was not a statistically significant predictor. Both CAUTI and HAPI are statistically significant predictors of discharge to further care for patients after traumatic injury. High-quality nursing care to prevent iatrogenic complications can improve trauma patients' long-term outcomes.

Inpatient Hospice Impact on Blood Culture Practices Near the Time of Death, Tertiary Center, Northern California, 2019–2023

Introduction: Many central line-associated bloodstream infections are identified in patients nearing the end of life. Stanford Health Care recently introduced the General Inpatient Hospice program. This program offers inpatient hospice care for patients who, due to uncontrolled symptoms, cannot be discharged to a hospice facility or receive home hospice care. We investigated whether this program would impact blood cultures practices near the time of death. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at Stanford Health Care using records of blood culture events from May 2019 to October 2023. We defined a blood culture near-death as those collected within 2 days before the date of death. We performed an interrupted time series linear regression before and after the implementation of the General Inpatient Hospice program on July 1, 2022 to assess blood culture intensity near-death. Blood culture intensity was defined as the proportion of cultures collected near-death in relation to the total number of blood cultures. Additionally, we calculated blood culture positivity rate, which was defined as the proportion of positive blood cultures among all those collected during our study period. Results: Out of 220,269 blood cultures from 24,955 unique patients, a total of 6,147 cultures (9%) were obtained near the time of death. Among these subjects, the median age was 65 years (range 20–102), with 43% identifying as being of White race-ethnicity and 57% as male. Of these cultures, 3044 were positive (49.5%), with Escherichia coli (618, 24%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (341, 13%), and Staphylococcus aureus (166, 10%) being the most common organisms. After the implementation of the General Inpatient Hospice program, the median enrollment was 12 patients (range 3–18) and the median mortality rate was 2.3% (range 2–3%). The blood culture intensity near death decreased by 0.81%, a change that was not statistically significant (95% CI -2.4% to 0.8%, p=.32; Figure 1). Subsequently, the blood culture intensity showed a non-significant increasing trend of 0.05% (95% CI -0.1% to 0.2%, p=0.53). The blood culture positivity rate near the time of death increased by 16% following the intervention, but this increase was not statistically significant (95% CI – 11.8% to 43.3%, p=.26; Figure 2), and it was followed by a non-significant downtrend of 1.9% (95% CI -3.9% to 1.4%, p=.36). Conclusion: We found no significant association between the implementation of an inpatient hospice program and blood culture practices near the time of death, likely due to low patient enrollment.

Blood Culture Contamination Mitigation: Sustaining Success and Stewardship Systemwide

Background: False-positive blood cultures compromise care; extended stays, Clostridioides difficile risk increases and renal woes tagged to antibiotic alms contribute to the doubling of patient in-hospital mortality that is observed relative to true negative diagnostic results. False-positive affiliated central line-associated bloodstream infection reports can further obfuscate the quality of care provided. Between personnel performance pressures, laboratory resource losses and the risk for financial penalty under Value-Based Purchasing and Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Programs (Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services), it becomes difficult to brush aside the burden of a non-zero blood culture contamination rate. Following unsuccessful and unsustainable endeavors that included educational exercise and waste tube employment, initial-specimen diversion devices designed to shift performance burdens from technicians to technology were co-opted in an effort to secure reliable blood culture contamination rate reductions. Methods: A 3.6% blood culture contamination rate was observed systemwide prior to intervention, which began in 2020. Among seventeen facilities that share a data system, twelve co-opted initial-specimen diversion device technology as the evidence-based anchor to a trifurcate intervention strategy that included value analysis and cultural curation. Results: The 2023 systemwide blood culture contamination rate was 1.95%; down from 2.8% in 2022 and 3.2% in 2021. The average cost per false-positive event was $2,111, with intervention amounting to systemwide savings of $4.1 million in 2023 as approximately 1,920 patients avoided false-positive incidents. Critical to year-over-year systemwide uptick in adoption of interventive technology was consistent and near real-time communication to caretakers regarding outcomes. Conclusion: The sustained success of the multifactorial solution showcased herein stems from the coupling of an evidence-based action with an ongoing assessment of value and communication channels carefully constructed to celebrate and perpetuate value observed. Layered uncertainties often cloud the crux of a multifactorial solution to a complex conundrum; for many decades the literature-supported solution to high blood culture contamination rates was to educate every person involved in every possible way. Only recently, following recommended practice revisions endorsed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, did it become apparent nationwide that education alone was insufficient; some contaminant pathways persist without meticulously mechanical closure. Antimicrobial stewardship requires the respectful removal of adaptable pressures from microorganisms, but the inverse is equally important; by setting an ambitious systemwide blood culture contamination rate target of 1% or less, it is hoped that all facilities involved herein respond to this pressure with optimism, introspection and innovation.

Investigating the implementation of a complex intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, using Normalisation Process Theory

BackgroundCare bundles may reduce neonatal CLABSIs by 60% though it is often unclear if it is the intervention, the implementation, or both, that results in CLABSI reductions. This study aimed to investigate the implementation of a CLABSI care bundle in a UK neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). MethodsA focused ethnographic design was used underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. Data collection included Normalisation MeAsure Development (NoMAD) surveys, observations of practice with dyadic think aloud interviews, and semi-structured interviews. Outcome and processes measures were collected. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. ResultsThere was only partial bundle implementation, with minimal changes in survey scores and influences across individual, team and organisational levels moderating bundle adoption. Organisational culture sometimes undermined implementation and there were challenges relating to reinforcement and endorsement. ConclusionsThe introduction of a care bundle into a tertiary UK NICU did not result in sustained reductions in CLABSIs, which is one of few negative studies. Understanding the mechanisms by which an intervention works (or not) in specific contexts is important to optimise the delivery of evidence-based care.

Implementing an Oral Health Educator Contributes to Reduced MBI-CLABSI Rates for Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

Mucosal barrier injury central line-associated bloodstream infections (MBI-CLABSIs) remain a challenge among the pediatric cancer population. These infections commonly occur by oral or gastrointestinal (GI) bacteria translocating through impaired gut or oral mucosa. Although strategies to prevent gut MBI-CLABSIs are well characterized, oral pathogen prevention strategies are lacking. The authors' oncodental collaboration quality improvement project, which included two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, aimed to improve MBI-CLABSI rates and oral care adherence on a pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) unit. PDSA cycle 1 integrated dental residents into existing rounds every third week to screen for dental, gum, and mucosal disease and provide targeted education to patients and families. PDSA cycle 2 implemented a novel oral health educator (OHE) role in which a trained dental hygienist rounded four days per week. Monthly MBI-CLABSI rates and oral care adherence were followed from December 2020 to May 2021 (baseline), June 2021 to March 2022 (PDSA cycle 1), and April 2022 to December 2022 (PDSA cycle 2). Qualitative surveys captured patient and family perception, and a cost savings analysis was completed. A 58.8% reduction in MBI-CLABSI rate (events per 1,000 central venous line days) was detected (baseline: 5.1; PDSA cycle 2: 2.1), oral care adherence improved 41.7% (baseline: 60.9%; PDSA cycle 2: 86.3%), 100% of patients found it beneficial to receive oral care demonstrations, and an annual cost savings of $541,000 was estimated. Direct patient outcomes have measurably improved. This project suggests the implementation of an OHE in pediatric HSCT inpatient units may be valuable to patients and families and may be a cost-effective way to reduce MBI-CLABSIs resulting from oral pathogens.

An Exploratory Analysis of the Association between Healthcare Associated Infections & Hospital Financial Performance.

Purpose: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) place a significant financial burden on United States hospitals. HAI treatments extend hospital lengths of stay and increase hospital operational costs while significantly reducing hospital profit margins. Given these challenges, the research aim of this study was to explore the association between HAIs and hospital financial performance. A better understanding of this relationship can assist hospital leaders in optimizing the use of scarce financial resources to reduce HAI prevalence. Methods: Data for calendar year 2022 for active short-term acute care hospitals (n = 1454) in the US were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. We explored two derived dependent variables, operating expense per staffed bed and operating expense per discharge. The independent variables included four healthcare-associated infection rates: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection rate, Clostridium difficile (C. diff) infection rate, Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) rate, and Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections (CLABSI). Appropriate organizational and market-level variables that may independently influence hospital financial performance were included as control variables. Results: The results revealed that C. diff (β: 0.037, p < 0.05) and CAUTI (β: 0.031, p < 0.05) rates were positively associated with an increase in operating expense per staffed bed, while increases in MRSA (β: 0.042, p < 0.001), C. diff (β: 0.062, p < 0.001), and CAUTI rates (β: 0.039, p < 0.001) were correlated with increased operating expenses per discharge. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that specific HAIs may be associated with increased hospital expenses. Proactively targeting these infections through tailored interventions may lead to reduced hospital costs, improved financial performance, and economic stability.

Prevention of central venous line associated bloodstream infections- A literature review

Hospital-acquired infections, particularly Central Venous Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs), are a noteworthy concern in intensive care units (ICUs). CLABSIs not only extend hospital stays but also increase healthcare costs and pose serious threats to patients' well-being. This narrative literature review explores the evidence-based strategies for the prevention of CLABSIs in critical care settings. It emphasizes the importance of proper infection control measures, such as hand hygiene, maximal barrier precautions, and chlorhexidine skin preparation, to reduce the risk of infection. The choice of catheter insertion site, duration of catheter use, and nurse-patient ratios are also discussed as crucial factors in CLABSI prevention. Additionally, post-insertion care, including daily bathing with chlorhexidine, catheter patency maintenance, and dressing changes, is highlighted. The review underscores the need for healthcare workers to adhere to best practices and guidelines to minimize CLABSI rates, ultimately enhancing patient safety and reducing healthcare burdens. The findings emphasize the significance of informed practices in preventing CLABSIs and the potential for improved patient outcomes with their implementation.

Impact of intermittent versus continuous infusions on central line-associated bloodstream infection risk in haemato-oncology patients: a quasi-experimental study

Continuous fluid infusions delivered between therapies by piggy-back systems avoid disconnection and reconnection of central venous catheters (CVCs), thereby reducing opportunities for line contamination. However, the impact of continuous versus intermittent infusions on central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) is unknown. To investigate the effect of temporary infusion interruption and line disconnection, with or without use of a 70% isopropyl alcohol cap (IPA-C) on CLABSI rates in haematology patients. Quasi-experimental study in two haemato-oncology units. At baseline (P1, September 2020 to August 2021), continuous intravenous piggy-back infusions were mandatory. In a first intervention phase (P2, September 2021 to August 2022), infusion disconnections were implemented with use of a 70% isopropyl alcohol cap (IPA-C) for passive decontamination. In a second intervention phase (P3, September 2022 to August 2023), infusion disconnections continued without the use of IPA-C. Rates of CLABSI were compared across the three intervention periods using segmented Poisson regression. A total of 11,039 catheter-days across 764 CVCs and 16,226 patient-days were included. Twenty-one CLABSIs were recorded across all intervention periods. Compared with P1, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for CLABSI did not significantly change in P2 (IRR 0.76 (95% CI 0.27-2.15)) and P3 (IRR 0.79 (95% CI 0.28-2.22)). No CVCs were removed due to occlusion during the study period. Five of 21 CLABSIs were polymicrobial, and coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in 19/21 cases (90%). Interruption of continuous infusions in haemato-oncology patients with a CVC was not associated with a substantial change in CLABSI rates, whether or not an IPA-C was used.

Device and surgical procedure-related infections in Canadian acute care hospitals, 2018-2022.

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a significant healthcare burden in Canada. National surveillance of HAIs at sentinel acute care hospitals is conducted by the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program. This article describes device and surgical procedure-related HAI epidemiology in Canada from 2018 to 2022. Data were collected from over 60 Canadian sentinel acute care hospitals between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), hip and knee surgical site infections (SSIs), cerebrospinal fluid shunt (CSF) SSIs and paediatric cardiac SSIs. Case counts, rates, patient and hospital characteristics, pathogen distributions and antimicrobial resistance data are presented. Between 2018 and 2022, 2,258 device-related infections and 987 surgical procedure-related infections were reported. A significant rate increase was observed in adult mixed intensive care unit CLABSIs (1.07-1.93 infections per 1,000 line days, p=0.05) and a non-significant rate increase was observed in SSIs following knee arthroplasty (0.31-0.42 infections per 100 surgeries, p=0.45). A fluctuating rate trend was observed in CSF shunt SSIs over the time period and a significant rate decrease in paediatric cardiac SSIs was observed (68%, from 7.5-2.4 infections per 100 surgeries, p=0.01). The most commonly identified pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (22.8%) among CLABSIs and Staphylococcus aureus (42%) among SSIs. Epidemiological and microbiological trends among selected device and surgical procedure-related HAIs are essential for benchmarking infection rates nationally and internationally, identifying any changes in infection rates or antimicrobial resistance patterns and helping inform hospital infection prevention and control and antimicrobial stewardship policies and programs.

Candida auris central line-associated blood stream infection in critically ill patients: the worst end of a bad scenario

Candida auris central line-associated blood stream infection in critically ill patients: the worst end of a bad scenario