Volume Centers Research Articles

Center-level outcomes following elective fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative database

ObjectiveHospital volume is associated with mortality after open aortic aneurysm repair. Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (B-FEVAR) has been increasingly used for repair of complex thoracoabdominal and juxtarenal aneurysms, but evidence of a center-volume relationship is limited. We aimed to measure the association of center volume with in-hospital mortality, postoperative outcomes, and 1-year survival following B-FEVAR. MethodsPatients undergoing elective endovascular thoracoabdominal and complex abdominal aneurysm repair with branch intervention (2014-2021) listed within the national Vascular Quality Initiative Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair/Complex EVAR database were analyzed. Centers were grouped into quartiles by mean annual procedure volume. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the effect of center volume on in-hospital mortality adjusting for baseline and procedural characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimation, log rank test, and mixed effects Cox regression were used to evaluate 1-year survival. ResultsA total of 4302 adult elective F-BEVAR procedures were identified at a total of 163 centers. In-hospital mortality did not differ by hospital volume (quartile [Q]1 = 35/1059 [3.3%]; Q2 = 30/1063 [2.8%]; Q3 = 33/1120 [2.9%]; and Q4 = 44/1060 [4.2%]; P = .308). The high volume group had a higher rate of major complication (Q1 = 14.9%; Q2 = 12.8%; Q3 = 13.3%; and Q4 = 20.1%; adjusted P < .001). Physician-modified grafts were more frequently employed in high-volume centers (Q1 = 4.5%; Q2 = 18.7%; Q3 = 11.3%; and Q4 = 19.2%; P < .001), with a decreased incidence of any endoleak noted at the end of the procedure (Q1 = 34.9%; Q2 = 32.8%; Q3 = 30.0%; and Q4 = 29.0%; P = .003). In the multivariable analysis, in-hospital mortality was not associated with center volume, comparing very low volume to medium- and high-volume centers (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] vs Q4: Q1 = 1.1 [0.6-1.9], Q2 = 0.6 [0.4-1.1], and Q3 = 0.9 [0.5-1.5]; all P > .05). No significant difference was found in 1-year survival between center volume groups. ConclusionsIn-hospital mortality is not associated with procedure volume within centers performing complex endovascular aortic repair. However, complication rates and endoleak may be associated with procedure volume. Long-term outcomes by annualized procedure volume, specifically graft durability and sac expansion, should be investigated.

Impact of center volume on in-hospital mortality in adult patients with out‑of‑hospital cardiac arrest resuscitated using extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study

Recently, patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) refractory to conventional resuscitation have started undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). However, the mortality rate of these patients remains high. This study aimed to clarify whether a center ECPR volume was associated with the survival rates of adult patients with OHCA resuscitated using ECPR. This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective multicenter registry study, the SAVE-J II study, involving 36 participating institutions in Japan. Centers were divided into three groups according to the tertiles of the annual average number of patients undergoing ECPR: high-volume (≥ 21 sessions per year), medium-volume (11–20 sessions per year), or low-volume (< 11 sessions per year). The primary outcome was survival rate at the time of discharge. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared among the three groups. Moreover, a multivariable-adjusted logistic regression model was applied to study the impact of center ECPR volume. A total of 1740 patients were included in this study. The center ECPR volume was strongly associated with survival rate at the time of discharge; furthermore, survival rate was best in high-volume compared with medium- and low-volume centers (33.4%, 24.1%, and 26.8%, respectively; P = 0.001). After adjusting for patient characteristics, undergoing ECPR at high-volume centers was associated with an increased likelihood of survival compared to middle- (adjusted odds ratio 0.657; P = 0.003) and low-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio 0.983; P = 0.006). The annual number of ECPR sessions was associated with favorable survival rates and lower complication rates of the ECPR procedure.Clinical trial registration: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041577 (unique identifier: UMIN000036490).

Root cause analysis of mortality after esophagectomy for cancer: a multicenter cohort study from the FREGAT database

BackgroundEsophagectomy is associated with significant mortality. A better understanding of the causes leading to death may help to reduce mortality. A root cause analysis of mortality after esophagectomy was performed. MethodsRoot cause analysis was retrospectively applied by an independent expert panel of 4 upper gastrointestinal surgeons and 1 anesthesiologist-intensivist to patients included in the French national multicenter prospective cohort FREGAT between August 2014 and September 2019 who underwent an esophagectomy for cancer and died within 90 days of surgery. A cause-and-effect diagram was used to determine the root causes related to death. Death was classified as potentially preventable or non-preventable. ResultsAmong the 1,040 patients included in the FREGAT cohort, 70 (6.7%) patients (male: 81%, median age 68 [62–72] years) from 17 centers were included. Death was potentially preventable in 37 patients (53%). Root causes independently associated with preventable death were inappropriate indication (odds ratio 35.16 [2.50–494.39]; P = .008), patient characteristics (odds ratio 5.15 [1.19–22.35]; P = .029), unexpected intraoperative findings (odds ratio 18.99 [1.07–335.55]; P = .045), and delay in diagnosis of a complication (odds ratio 98.10 [6.24–1,541.04]; P = .001). Delay in treatment of a complication was found only in preventable deaths (28 [76%] vs 0; P < .001). National guidelines were less frequently followed (16 [43%] vs 22 [67%]; P = .050) in preventable deaths. The only independent risk factor of preventable death was center volume <26 esophagectomies per year (odds ratio 4.71 [1.55–14.33]; P = .006). ConclusionsMore than one-half of deaths after esophagectomy were potentially preventable. Better patient selection, early diagnosis, and adequate management of complications through centralization could reduce mortality.

Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: Influence of centre volume on TAVR adoption rates and outcomes in France

BackgroundTranscatheter (TAVR) has supplanted surgical (SAVR) aortic valve replacement (AVR). AimTo evaluate whether adoption of this technology has varied according to centre volume at the nationwide level. MethodsFrom an administrative hospital-discharge database, we collected data on all AVRs performed in France between 2007 and 2019. Centres were divided into terciles based on the annual number of SAVRs performed in 2007–2009 (“before TAVR era”). ResultsA total of 192,773 AVRs (134,662 SAVRs and 58,111 TAVRs) were performed in 47 centres. The annual number of AVRs and TAVRs increased significantly and linearly in low-volume (<152 SAVRs/year; median 106, interquartile range [IQR] 75–129), middle-volume (152–219 SAVRs/year; median 197, IQR 172–212) and high-volume (>219 SAVRs/year; median 303, IQR 268–513) terciles, but to a greater degree in the latter (+14, +16 and +24 AVRs/centre/year and +16, +19 and +31 TAVRs/centre/year, respectively; PANCOVA<0.001). Charlson Comorbidity Index and in-hospital death rates declined from 2010 to 2019 in all terciles (all Ptrend<0.05). In 2017–2019, after adjusting for age, sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index, there was a trend toward lower death rates in the high-volume tercile (P=0.06) for SAVR, whereas death rates were similar for TAVR irrespective of tercile (P=0.27). Similar results were obtained when terciles were defined based on number of interventions performed in the last instead of the first 3years. Importantly, even centres in the lowest-volume tercile performed a relatively high number of interventions (150 TAVRs/year/centre). ConclusionsIn a centralized public healthcare system, the total number of AVRs increased linearly between 2007 and 2019, mostly due to an increase in TAVR, irrespective of centre volume. Progressive declines in patient risk profiles and death rates were observed in all terciles; in 2017−2019 death rates were similar in all terciles, although lower in high-volume centres for SAVR.

(324) - Association of Center Volume with Post-Transplant Survival After the 2018 US Heart Allocation Policy Change

(324) - Association of Center Volume with Post-Transplant Survival After the 2018 US Heart Allocation Policy Change

(1219) - Impact of Donor Center Volume on Heart Transplant Outcomes

(1219) - Impact of Donor Center Volume on Heart Transplant Outcomes

(518) - Donation After Circulatory Death Donors for Heart Transplantation: Does Center Volume Matter?

(518) - Donation After Circulatory Death Donors for Heart Transplantation: Does Center Volume Matter?

Prophylactic abdominal drainage after distal pancreatectomy (PANDORINA): an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial

Prophylactic passive abdominal drainage is standard practice after distal pancreatectomy. This approach aims to mitigate the consequences of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) but its added value, especially in patients at low risk of POPF, is currently being debated. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of a no-drain policy in patients after distal pancreatectomy. In this international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older undergoing open or minimally invasive elective distal pancreatectomy for all indications in 12 centres in the Netherlands and Italy. We excluded patients with an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status of 4-5 or WHO performance status of 3-4, added by amendment following the death of a patient with ASA 4 due to a pre-existing cardiac condition. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) intraoperatively by permuted blocks (size four to eight) to either no drain or prophylactic passive drain placement, stratified by annual centre volume (<40 or ≥40 distal pancreatectomies) and low risk or high risk of grade B or C POPF. High-risk was defined as a pancreatic duct of more than 3 mm in diameter, a pancreatic thickness at the neck of more than 19 mm, or both, based on the Distal Pancreatectomy Fistula Risk Score. Other patients were considered low-risk. The primary outcome was the rate of major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score ≥III), and the most relevant secondary outcome was grade B or C POPF, grading per the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. Outcomes were assessed up to 90 days postoperatively and analysed in the intention-to-treat population and per-protocol population, which only included patients who received the allocated treatment. A prespecified non-inferiority margin of 8% was compared with the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI (Wald) of unadjusted risk difference to assess non-inferiority. This trial is closed and registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry, NL9116. Between Oct 3, 2020, and April 28, 2023, 376 patients were screened for eligibility and 282 patients were randomly assigned to the no-drain group (n=138; 75 [54%] women and 63 [46%] men) or the drain group (n=144; 73 [51%] women and 71 [49%] men). Seven patients in the no-drain group received a drain intraoperatively; consequently, the per-protocol population included 131 patients in the no-drain group and 144 patients in the drain group. The rate of major morbidity was non-inferior in the no-drain group compared with the drain group in the intention-to-treat analysis (21 [15%] vs 29 [20%]; risk difference -4·9 percentage points [95% CI -13·8 to 4·0]; pnon-inferiority=0·0022) and the per-protocol analysis (21 [16%] vs 29 [20%]; risk difference -4·1 percentage points [-13·2 to 5·0]; pnon-inferiority=0·0045). Grade B or C POPF was observed in 16 (12%) patients in the no-drain group and in 39 (27%) patients in the drain group (risk difference -15·5 percentage points [95% CI -24·5 to -6·5]; pnon-inferiority<0·0001) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Three patients in the no-drain group died within 90 days; the cause of death in two was not considered related to the trial. The third death was a patient with an ASA score of 4 who died after sepsis and a watershed cerebral infarction at second admission, leading to multiple organ failure. No patients in the drain group died within 90 days. A no-drain policy is safe in terms of major morbidity and reduced the detection of grade B or C POPF, and should be the new standard approach in eligible patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. Ethicon UK (Johnson & Johnson Medical, Edinburgh, UK).

A multidimensional approach to identifying high-performing trauma centers across the United States.

The differentiators of centers performing at the highest level of quality and patient safety are likely both structural and cultural. We aimed to combine five indicators representing established domains of trauma quality and to identify and describe the structural characteristics of consistently performing centers. Using American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program data from 2017 to 2020, we evaluated five quality measures across several care domains for adult patients in levels I and II trauma centers: (1) time to operating room for patients with abdominal gunshot wounds and shock, (2) proportion of patients receiving timely venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, (3) failure to rescue (death following a complication), (4) major hospital complications, and (5) mortality. Overall performance was summarized as a composite score incorporating all measures. Centers were ranked from highest to lowest performer. Principal component analysis showed the influence of each indicator on overall performance and supported the composite score approach. We identified 272 levels I and II centers, with 28 and 27 centers in the top and bottom 10%, respectively. Patients treated in high-performing centers had significant lower rates of death major complications and failure to rescue, compared with low-performing centers ( p < 0.001). The median time to operating room for gunshot wound was almost half that in high compared with low-performing centers, and rates of timely venous thromboembolism prophylaxis were over twofold greater ( p < 0.001). Top performing centers were more likely to be level I centers and cared for a higher number of severely injured patients per annum. Each indicator contributed meaningfully to the variation in scores and centers tended to perform consistently across most indicators. The combination of multiple indicators across dimensions of quality sets a higher standard for performance evaluation and allows the discrimination of centers based on structural elements, specifically level 1 status, and trauma center volume. Therapeutic /Care Management; Level IV.

Impact of Center Volume on Cardiopulmonary and Mortality Outcomes after Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were proven effective in inducing tumor regression. However, its toxicity tends to be fatal. We sought to investigate the hospital volume/outcomes relationship. Databases were searched for studies reporting immune-checkpoint inhibitors adverse events (AEs) in patients with solid-organ malignancies. The outcomes were A) the pooled events rate (PER) of grade 5, grade 3-4, cardiac-related, and pulmonary-related AEs, and B) the assessment of the volume/outcomes relationship. One hundred and forty-seven studies met our inclusion criteria. The PER of grade 5, grade 3-4, and any-grade AEs was 2.75% (95%CI: 2.18-3.47), 26.69% (95%CI: 21.60-32.48), and 77.80% (95%CI: 70.91-83.44), respectively. The PER of pulmonary-related AEs was 4.56% (95%CI: 3.76-5.53). A higher number of annual cases per center was significantly associated with reduced grade 5 (p = 0.019), grade 3-4 (p = 0.004), and cardiac-related AEs (p = 0.035) in the meta-regression. In the current era of cancer immunotherapy, knowledge regarding the early diagnosis and management of immunotherapy-related AEs is essential. Our meta-analysis demonstrates the importance of center volume in improving outcomes and reducing the incidence of severe AEs.

Respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation : From rescue therapy to standard tool for treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome?

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has increased substantially. With modern trials supporting its efficacy, ECMO has become an important tool in the management of severe ARDS. The objectives of this paper are to discuss ECMO physiology and configurations used for patients with ARDS, review evidence supporting the use of ECMO for ARDS, and discuss aspects of management during ECMO. Current evidence supports the use of ECMO, combined with an ultra-lung-protective approach to mechanical ventilation, in patients with ARDS who have refractory hypoxemia or hypercapnia with severe respiratory acidosis. Furthermore, data suggest that center volume and experience are important factors in the care of patients receiving ECMO. The use of extracorporeal technologies in expanded patient populations and the optimal management of patients during ECMO remain areas of investigation. This article is freely available.

Survival does not differ by annual center transplant volume-A Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Registry study.

There are conflicting data regarding the relationship between center volume and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation. Previous studies have not fully accounted for differences in case mix, particularly in high-risk congenital heart disease (CHD) groups. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between center volume and outcomes using the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS) Registry and explore how case mix may affect outcomes. A retrospective cohort study of all pediatric patients in the PHTS Registry who received a heart transplant from 2009 to 2018 was performed. Centers were divided into 5 groups based on average yearly transplant volume. The primary outcome was time to death or graft loss and outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. There were 4583 cases among 55 centers included. There was no difference in time to death or graft loss by center volume in the entire cohort (p = .75), in patients with CHD (p = .79) or in patients with cardiomyopathy (p = .23). There was also no difference in time to death or graft loss by center size in patients undergoing transplant after Norwood, Glenn or Fontan (log rank p = .17, p = .31, and p = .10 respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in outcomes by center size in the positive crossmatch group (p < .0001), though no discernible pattern related to high or low center volume. Outcomes are similar among transplant centers of all sizes, including for high-risk patient groups with CHD. Future work is needed to understand how patient-specific risk factors may vary among centers of various sizes and whether this influences patient outcomes.

Los últimos avances en prostatectomía robótica: ¿cómo lo hacemos en Cataluña, España?

Introduction and objectiveRobotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) seems to improve functional outcomes, however there is not a consensus of a standard procedure. The aim of this study was to identify the RALP “state of art” in Catalonia, Spain. Material and methodsThis was a cross-sectional survey-based study conducted among urologists across Catalonia. The survey was distributed through online platforms and the professional urology society. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata software, v. 20. ResultsFifty-nine urologists completed the survey, revealing RALP as the most commonly used technique (79.7%). Most urologist (70%) create the pneumoperitoneum using a controlled incision with direct access and 78.3% use the AirSeal® technology. The intraperitoneal approach is performed in more than 90% of cases. Endopelvic fascia preservation is not routinely performed. A percentage of 34.5 of the survey not perform the dorsal vein complex suture. All preserves the bladder neck when oncologically safe. Nerve-vascular bundles bleeding control is performed using standard coagulation or suturing. Thirty-four percent performed posterior reconstruction. Only use hemostatic devices when evident bleeding and 70% does not routinely left a drainage. Multivariable analysis showed that center volume had a significant independent association with dorsal venous complex suturing (OR 0.073, 95% CI 0.07-0.826), nerve-vascular bundles suturing hemostasis (OR 11.67, 95% CI 1.07-127.60) and endopelvic fascia preservation (OR 13.64, 95% CI 1.087-201.27), but there was no correlation with time the bladder catheter or days hospitalized. ConclusionsThe study provides an overview of the state of RALP in Catalonia, Spain, showing significant variability and reflecting a commitment to advancing surgical technology and patient care.

Surgeon volume and outcomes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury

ObjectiveThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) at high-volume hospitals has previously been associated with lower perioperative mortality, but the impact of annual surgeon volume on outcomes following TEVAR for BTAI remains unknown. MethodsWe analyzed Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) data from patients with BTAI that underwent TEVAR between 2013 and 2023. Annual surgeon volumes were computed as the number of TEVARs (for any pathology) performed over a 1-year period preceding each procedure and were further categorized into quintiles. Surgeons in the first volume quintile were categorized as low volume (LV), the highest quintile as high volume (HV), and the middle three quintiles as medium volume (MV). TEVAR procedures performed by surgeons with less than 1-year enrollment in the VQI were excluded. Using multilevel logistic regression models, we evaluated associations between surgeon volume and perioperative outcomes, accounting for annual center volumes and adjusting for potential confounders, including aortic injury grade and severity of coexisting injuries. Multilevel models accounted for the nested clustering of patients and surgeons within the same center. Sensitivity analysis excluding patients with grade IV BTAI was performed. ResultsWe studied 1321 patients who underwent TEVAR for BTAI (28% by LV surgeons [0-1 procedures per year], 52% by MV surgeons [2-8 procedures per year], 20% by HV surgeons [≥9 procedures per year]). With higher surgeon volume, TEVAR was delayed more (in <4 hours: LV: 68%, MV: 54%, HV: 46%; P < .001; elective (>24 hours): LV: 5.1%; MV: 8.9%: HV: 14%), heparin administered more (LV: 80%, MV: 81%, HV: 87%; P = .007), perioperative mortality appears lower (LV: 11%, MV: 7.3%, HV: 6.5%; P = .095), and ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke was lower (LV: 6.5%, MV: 3.6%, HV: 1.5%; P = .006). After adjustment, compared with LV surgeons, higher volume surgeons had lower odds of perioperative mortality (MV: 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.97; P = .039; HV: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.16–1.22; P = .12; MV/HV: 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.96; P = .038) and ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke (MV: 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.81; P = .011; HV: 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.61; P = .008). Sensitivity analysis found lower adjusted odds for perioperative mortality (although not significant) and ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke for higher volume surgeons. ConclusionsIn patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI, higher surgeon volume is independently associated with lower perioperative mortality and postoperative stroke, regardless of hospital volume. Future studies could elucidate if TEVAR for non-ruptured BTAI might be delayed and allow stabilization, heparinization, and involvement of a higher TEVAR volume surgeon.

Risk factors for failure to rescue after hepatectomy in a high-volume UK tertiary referral center

BackgroundMortality after severe complications after hepatectomy (failure to rescue) is strongly linked to center volume. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for failure to rescue after hepatectomy in a high-volume center. MethodsRetrospective study of 1,826 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy from 2011 to 2018. The primary outcome was a 90-day failure to rescue, defined as death within 90 days posthepatectomy after a severe (Clavien-Dindo grade 3+) complication. Risk factors for 90-day failure to rescue were evaluated using a multivariable binary logistic regression model. ResultsThe cohort had a median age of 65.3 years, and 56.6% of patients were male. The commonest indication for hepatectomy was colorectal metastasis (58.9%), and 46.9% of patients underwent major or extra-major hepatectomy. Severe complications developed in 209 patients (11.4%), for whom the 30- and 90-day failure to rescue rates were 17.0% and 35.4%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, increasing age (P = .006) and modified Frailty Index (P = .044), complication type (medical or combined medical/surgical versus surgical; P < .001), and body mass index (P = .018) were found to be significant independent predictors of 90-day failure to rescue. ConclusionOlder and frail patients who experience medical complications are particularly at risk of failure to rescue after hepatectomy. These results may inform preoperative counseling and may help to identify candidates for prehabilitation. Further study is needed to assess whether failure to rescue rates could be reduced by perioperative interventions.

Analysis of 516 cases of revision total elbow arthroplasty from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry: centralization of care is the future

BackgroundThe number of revision total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) remains relatively low. As a result, there are relatively few orthopedic surgeons and a limited number of centers with substantial expertise in revising TEA. This study provides a comprehensive description of the current practice concerning revision TEA in a northern European Country based on the data of the Dutch National Implant Registry. MethodsData of all revision TEA procedures performed between 2014 and 2022 were extracted from the national registry, including cases where the primary procedure was either not recorded in the registry or was not a TEA. Descriptive statistics were used to report the current practice of revision TEA in the Netherlands. ResultsFive hundred sixteen revision TEAs were performed in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2022. Eighty-four elbows required more than one revision during that period. The primary cause for revision was aseptic loosening 51%. The procedures were performed in 35 centers, and 21/35 centers performed 5 or less revision procedures per year. No center performed 20 or more revision procedures per year. DiscussionAll types of elbow arthroplasty are associated with a considerable rate of complications, and a direct volume-outcome relationship exists in these surgical procedures. Despite the considerable complication rate, the volume of revision TEA remains low, primarily due to the infrequent occurrence of primary procedures. ConclusionThe study reported that aseptic loosening was the primary reason for revision TEA. We recommend centralizing infrequent surgical procedures such as revision TEA in selected highly specialized centers to increase surgeon and center volumes, aiming to yield more favorable outcomes.

Outcomes After Pectus Excavatum Repair: Center Volume Matters

PurposePectus excavatum (Pectus) repair may be offered for those with significant cardiopulmonary compromise or severe cosmetic defects. The influence of hospital center volume on postoperative outcomes in children is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of children undergoing Pectus repair, stratified by hospital surgical volume. MethodsThe Nationwide Readmission Database was queried (2016–2020) for patients with Pectus (Q67.6). Patients were stratified into those who received repair at high-volume centers (HVCs; ≥20 repairs annually) versus low-volume centers (LVCs; <20 repairs annually). Demographics and outcomes were analyzed using standard statistical tests. ResultsA total of 9414 patients with Pectus underwent repair during the study period, with 69% treated at HVCs and 31% at LVCs. Patients at LVCs experienced higher rates of complications during index admission, including pneumothorax (23% vs. 15%), chest tube placement (5% vs. 2%), and overall perioperative complications (28% vs. 24%) compared to those treated at HVCs, all p < 0.001.Patients treated at LVCs had higher readmission rates within 30 days (3.8% vs. 2.8% HVCs) and overall readmission (6.8% vs. 4.7% HVCs), both p < 0.010. Among readmitted patients (n = 547), the most frequent complications during readmission for those initially treated at LVCs included pneumothorax/hemothorax (21% vs. 8%), bar dislodgment (21% vs. 12%), and electrolyte disorders (15% vs. 9%) compared to those treated at HVCs. ConclusionPediatric Pectus repair performed at high-volume centers was associated with fewer index complications and readmissions compared to lower-volume centers. Patients and surgeons should consider this hospital volume-outcome relationship. Type of StudyRetrospective Comparative. Level of EvidenceIII.

Multiarterial vs Single-Arterial Coronary Surgery: 10-Year Follow-up of 1 Million Patients

BackgroundAlthough many options exist for multivessel coronary revascularization, controversy persists over whether multiarterial grafting (MAG) confers a survival advantage over single-arterial grafting (SAG) with saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study sought to compare longitudinal survival between patients undergoing MAG and those undergoing SAG. MethodsAll patients undergoing isolated CABG with ≥2 bypass grafts in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (2008-2019) were linked to the National Death Index. Risk adjustment was performed using inverse probability weighting and multivariable modeling. The primary end point was longitudinal survival. Subpopulation analyses were performed and volume thresholds were analyzed to determine optimal benefit. ResultsA total of 1,021,632 patients underwent isolated CABG at 1108 programs (100,419 MAG [9.83%]; 920,943 SAG [90.17%]). Median follow-up was 5.30 years (range, 0-12 years). After risk adjustment, all characteristics were well balanced. At 10 years, MAG was associated with improved unadjusted (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI 0.58-0.61) and adjusted (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.85-0.88) 10-year survival. Center volume of ≥10 MAG cases/year was associated with benefit. MAG was associated with an overall survival advantage over SAG in all subgroups, including stable coronary disease, acute coronary syndrome, and acute infarction. Survival was equivalent to that with SAG for patients age ≥80 years and those with severe heart failure, renal failure, peripheral vascular disease, or obesity. Only patients with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 had superior survival with SAG. ConclusionsMultiarterial CABG is associated with superior long-term survival and should be the surgical multivessel revascularization strategy of choice for patients with a body mass index of less than 40 kg/m2.

P1039 RECtal OUtcomes in Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis (RECOUP-UC): An International Clinical Practice Survey of Paediatric Gastroenterologists

Abstract Background Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in childhood is associated with a higher risk of developing acute severe colitis and colectomy compared to adult populations. Following subtotal colectomy, the rectal remnant is typically oversewn and remains in-situ until ileal continuity surgery is undertaken. Access to such surgical expertise determines the timing of restorative surgery, which may range from months to years. There is a paucity of data regarding residual rectal activity during this interval, its medical management and clinical outcomes. Methods An electronic survey (SurveyMonkey) of clinical practice was disseminated to the paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) community internationally. Data collected included treating centre demographics, local colectomy practices, expert opinion on rectal cuff assessment and management. Clinicians were asked to rank order the symptoms and signs considered most relevant to determining disease activity. They also ranked the clinical features they believed most important to patients. Descriptive statistics were used to present findings. Results Responses were collated from over 10 countries, including Ireland, Sweden, UK, Australia, Israel, Canada, Iran, Finland, UAE and Austria. Centre sizes were categorised based on total PIBD population. There was heterogeneity across centres - 16% of respondents were from small volume centres in the range of 0-100 patients, 45% were from medium sized centres (101-300), 25% were from large volume centres (301-500) and 12% treat &amp;gt;500 patients which we categorised as very large volume. Despite variation in centre volume majority of respondents (75%) diagnose &amp;gt;20 new cases of UC annually. Over 90% of respondents reported having no formal guideline for managing rectal disease. Most centres’ patients (60%) waited at least 3 months post-colectomy for restoration surgery. Mild intermittent symptoms were expected to continue by 60% of respondents. Of these symptoms, 45% ranked haematochezia as the most important in determining severity. There was no consensus on the best assessment tool to use; 30% use the PUCAI. Most (80%) use blood markers and endoscopy routinely to assess rectal activity. Favoured treatments include rectal therapy (80%) followed by oral steroids and surgical referral. All respondents agreed that additional research was needed. Conclusion International management of the rectum following subtotal colectomy in children is characterised by variable clinical practises, and a lack of guidelines or validated assessment tools. Additional research in the field is needed to address current literature deficits and improve care for children.

Very high-power and short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in a Latin American low-volume private center.

Center volume and operator experience/training are important factors impacting outcomes in AFib CA. Setting for RF delivery (power, duration, and contact force) associated with better outcomes remains to be determined. This is an observational, longitudinal, and retrospective study. All consecutive procedures performed between December 12, 2013, and March 9, 2023, in a low-volume private center in Latin America were analyzed. Procedure characteristics and outcomes were compared between STD and vHPSD. Two hundred ten procedures were performed on 194 patients. Median annual number of procedures was 19 (7-29). Median age was 62 (52-68), and majority were male (71%). Median procedure duration was 155 (125-195) min, mean fluoroscopy time 32.8 ± 15min and mean fluoroscopy dose 373.5 ± 208.9 mGray. Median follow-up was 27months, significantly longer in STD compared with vHPSD group (43 [31-68] vs. 13 [8-19], respectively; P ≤ 0.001). The recurrence rate was 33.2% and major complications 8.6%. Compared with STD, vHPSD resulted in a significantly shorter procedure duration (125 vs. 180min, P ≤ 0.001), shorter fluoroscopy time (22.7 ± 9.5 vs. 39.2 ± 14.3min, P ≤ 0.001), and lower fluoroscopy dose (283.8 ± 161.1 vs. 438.3 ± 216.1 mGray, P ≤ 0.001). No long-term recurrence difference was observed when the follow-up periods were comparable. No difference in complication rate was observed (8.5% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.988). Outcomes in AFib CA in a Latin American low-volume private center can be considered acceptable, with efficacy and safety similar to those reported in the literature. Compared with STD ablation, vHPSD showed higher efficiency with similar efficacy and safety.