THE JOURNAL OF ASIAN STUDIES language(s) of the people one is studying, and Chapter 11 questions how factual the faces economists collect are. Chapters 1 and 2, written by the editors, present an overview of fieldwork from stare co finish: from how co finance fieldwork, co relations with bureaucrats, co post-fieldwork obligations and adjustments. The fundamental nature of these topics suggests how basic is much of the subject matter covered by this book. Chapter 3, by Stephen Devereux, considers two of his early fieldwork worries: the pragmatics of learning the local language (he worked among a polygamous polyglot (p . 47] population), and how to count households. He found it was often unclear what constituted a household . Chapter 4, by Wendy Olsen, discusses random sampling and the value of using native categories co construct stratified samples. She also considers the advantages and problems of repeated surveys, in her case, monthly household surveys. Chapter 5, by John Hoddinott, addresses problems of doing fieldwork under time constraints. Chapter 6, by Elizabeth Francis, imagines problems arising from how informants perceive fieldworkers and describes how and for what purposes she collected life histories-co reconstruct from personal stories a local history of economic change. Chapter 7, by Lucia da Corea and Davuluri Venkareshwarlu, focuses on methods for gathering data on economic mobility. Chapters 8 and 9, by Garry Christensen and Barbara Harriss, respectively, deal with problems of collecting sensitive material from informants about livestock and informal credit in the first instance, and about trade from traders in the second- good chapters, these. Chapter 10, by Shahrashoub Razavi, is concerned with the advantages and disadvantages of being an Iranian woman doing fieldwork in Iran-lots of advantages. As noted, in Chapter 11, Matthew Lockwood warns against thinking data represent facts. Data are the product of the interaction between informants and fieldworker and reflect their interpretations. Chapter 12, by Ken Wilson, focuses on ethical issues of fieldwork, and chapter 13, by Judith Heyer, concludes the book by comparing village-level fieldwork in Kenya and India. Taken together, this well-presented and integrated collection of articles offers the novice fieldworker a rich bagful of experience. That Asia, especially India, is the setting for many of the chapters is an added dimension . MATTISON MINES University of California, Santa Barbara Asian American Panethnicity: Bridging Institutions and Identities. By YEN LE ESPIRITU. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992. 222 pp. Yen Le Espiritu views panethnicicy-shifrs in levels of ethnic group identification from smaller and hitherto distinct groups co larger-level affiliations-as an emergent phenomenon among Asian Americans. Likening Asian American panethnic groups to those being forged by Native Americans and Latino Americans, she emphasizes the imposition of ethnicity (or in this case panethnicity) from the outside. She argues, however, that the panechnic concept may have originated in the minds of outsiders but ic has now become a resource for insiders. To make her case, she considers the Asian American movement, electoral politics, social service funding, conflicts over census classification, and organizational responses to anti-Asian violence. The author brings a good deal of personal enthusiasm and idealism to her inquiry, as the dedication and thanks in the preface indicate. A brief survey of che early history of Asians in the United States includes discussions of disidentificacion (the